I said I wouldn't post here anymore, but I guess I broke my promise.
I wanted to say that this passage from JewFaq makes no sense, in particular this part:
It is a violation of this mitzvah to say anything about another person, even if it is true, even if it is not negative, even if it is not secret, even if it hurts no one, even if the person himself would tell the same thing if asked!
Does that mean any stories and anecdotes you tell about other people are bad? That would mean all journalism, all non-fiction, including the Bible, is a violation of this mitzvah!
I guess it's possible that the Bible stories are fictional, and then it wouldn't be a violation of this mitzvah to talk about the various people and their lives in the Bible, since they aren't real.
I'll try not to post here anymore after this.
Also regarding "lashon hara," disparaging speech, I think that includes most of this website and forum posts, which have speech disparaging Muslims, criminal blacks, liberals, and other people. Then again it also includes this paragraph, because I've now disparaged the people here by saying they've committed lashon hara.
As a gentile I'm allowed to break promises and use lashon ha-ra all I want because it's not against any of the Noahide Laws.
It feels like it is, though, like there could be something wrong with it, even though I don't see it listed in the Noahide Laws.
Also that website says that someone who listens to lashon hara is worse than the person who says it or repeats it. I think it said that at that website (maybe it was a different one). Whatever the case, that makes anyone reading my post here, which engages in a bit of lashon hara (criticism, disparaging speech), worse than me! So you better stop reading this!!!!
--
I think it's intriguing to consider that the Bible is actually fictional. That way it can not be considered a work that itself is engaging in tale-bearing and lashon hara. It does tell stories that are either positive or negative about individuals. Again, I'm just going by what's said in Jewfaq, specifically that one paragraph which reads, again:
"It is a violation of this mitzvah to say anything about another person, even if it is true, even if it is not negative, even if it is not secret, even if it hurts no one, even if the person himself would tell the same thing if asked! "
Now it's probably the case that whoever wrote that didn't realize the absurdity of what they're saying, because if it's interpreted strictly, it would mean that any time you're talking about another person, like saying "oh I heard so-and-so say this the other day," that it's bad. But is it really? Because that would seriously make ALL journalism, all news reporting, and all non-fiction writing (books, or also movies that are "based on true stories") to be breaking this mitzvot. It seems to imply that Jews are supposed to be a much tighter-lipped people than they are!
And it would imply that the Bible itself is tale-bearing or something like that. Think about it. because the Bible tells tales about people (Moses, Abraham, etc) that are both positive and negative. It's history. All historical writings are considered a violation of this mitzvot!?
Lashon hara. It's something I'm skeptical about. It seems like calling people out for their sins is a good thing? Maybe I'm wrong.
It's confusing to me. I guess it shouldn't concern me that much since I'm a gentile though.
Probably it's just Jewfaq that's stupid. Whoa, this post got a lot longer than i wanted. I kept editing it. Sorry.