Author Topic: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles  (Read 6676 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #50 on: March 06, 2009, 01:46:15 AM »
Muman, the fact is that Christianity denounces assimilation and intermarriage just as much as Judaism. Shlomo put it perfectly when he mentioned that we oppose being "unequally yoked" in the Torah forum. Countless thousands, if not millions, of Christians have been lost forever to hedonistic Western secularism just as many Jews have been. There is a spiritual holocaust attacking us, too.

Here are New Testament verses denouncing Christian intermarriage:

Quote from: 1 Corinthians 7:39
A woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is free to marry anyone she wishes, but he must belong to Christ.

Quote from: 1 Corinthians 9:5
We have the right to take a believing wife with us like the other apostles...

Christianity does not support its believers intermarrying with Jews or people of any other faith. The "Christian" culture that you fear is made up of self-hating, nominal, secular "Christians". I know that Judaism's collective experience with so-called Christian society has been a nightmare beyond anything words can describe, but it needs to be known that medieval pogromist regimes and postmodern secular Western civilization are both about as Christian as an ADL meeting about showing tolerance for Islam at a Deformed synagogue that serves shrimp appetizers is Jewish.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2009, 02:01:27 AM by C.F. »

Offline Vito

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2114
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #51 on: March 06, 2009, 02:04:46 AM »
Muman, you seem like a good guy. But you cannot go around taking passive/aggressive jabs at Christianity, especially being that you're a moderator here. 

You wrote the following:

I will not tell you what I think about the Christian doctrine because you would be offended.

This is a passive/agressive jab if I ever saw one. Don't think it goes unnoticed.  How would you like it if someone were to say to you, "I won't tell you what I think of the Jewish religion because you would be offended?"  You would correctly take that as an insult.  Now I'm sure you'll say to me "Lisa, this is a Jewish forum."  That is true.  But we have many wonderful non-Jewish members.  So why do you make passing derogatory comments about their religion when they sincerely believe in what JTF is trying to accomplish?  How many mainstream Jews do you think would be as supportive of JTF, as good Christians like Chaimfan and others here?  So what were you thinking by telling Chaimfan that he's going to burn in hell? 

Now if you personally don't want to work with Christians, that's your business.  But on this forum, I will thank you to politely agree to disagree on matters of theology. 

I will speak on Nadav's behalf... stop defending the goyim!

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #52 on: March 06, 2009, 02:07:54 AM »
Muman, you seem like a good guy. But you cannot go around taking passive/aggressive jabs at Christianity, especially being that you're a moderator here. 

You wrote the following:

I will not tell you what I think about the Christian doctrine because you would be offended.

This is a passive/agressive jab if I ever saw one. Don't think it goes unnoticed.  How would you like it if someone were to say to you, "I won't tell you what I think of the Jewish religion because you would be offended?"  You would correctly take that as an insult.  Now I'm sure you'll say to me "Lisa, this is a Jewish forum."  That is true.  But we have many wonderful non-Jewish members.  So why do you make passing derogatory comments about their religion when they sincerely believe in what JTF is trying to accomplish?  How many mainstream Jews do you think would be as supportive of JTF, as good Christians like Chaimfan and others here?  So what were you thinking by telling Chaimfan that he's going to burn in hell? 

Now if you personally don't want to work with Christians, that's your business.  But on this forum, I will thank you to politely agree to disagree on matters of theology. 

I will speak on Nadav's behalf... stop defending the goyim!

Are you being funny Vito?
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #53 on: March 06, 2009, 02:14:49 AM »
Umm, unless Catholic Italians are now included under the definition of Jewry, I would venture a yes.  :laugh:

Offline Shlomo

  • Administrator
  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5212
  • SAVE ISRAEL!
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #54 on: March 06, 2009, 10:21:02 AM »
I can't stand homosexual perverts and I have nothing to do with them at all. I stay as far away from them as possible. The people you hang around are the people you become like and I choose not to associate with them. I'm not really sure why you feel a need to defend them.

Muman, you always sound like you talk down to gentiles or Christians and this is very wrong behavior. We are supposed to be a light to the nations - not a bunch of elitists that hurt righteous gentiles that Hashem loves. G-d forbid, we could hurt them so they turn against the Jewish people or give up hope on being righteous. I'm not pleased with this type of destructive attitude that always has to make slams on the Christian members of the forum. They love G-d and are here to help.

Lastly, let's drop the hollywood obsession here. Who cares about this crap? I don't even have a TV and haven't seen a movie in almost a year. My life is better without such wasted time. People love to entertain themselves to death rather than fight for the causes that matter. I wish most people would watch less TV and spend more time reading the Bible or doing things that matter.
"In the final analysis, for the believer there are no questions, and for the non-believer there are no answers." -Chofetz Chaim

Offline briann

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8038
  • Mmmm HMMMMM
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #55 on: March 06, 2009, 10:24:07 AM »
I can't stand homosexual perverts and I have nothing to do with them at all. I stay as far away from them as possible. The people you hang around are the people you become like and I choose not to associate with them. I'm not really sure why you feel a need to defend them.

Muman, you always sound like you talk down to gentiles or Christians and this is very wrong behavior. We are supposed to be a light to the nations - not a bunch of elitists that hurt righteous gentiles that Hashem loves. G-d forbid, we could hurt them so they turn against the Jewish people or give up hope on being righteous. I'm not pleased with this type of destructive attitude that always has to make slams on the Christian members of the forum. They love G-d and are here to help.

Lastly, let's drop the hollywood obsession here. Who cares about this crap? I don't even have a TV and haven't seen a movie in almost a year. My life is better without such wasted time. People love to entertain themselves to death rather than fight for the causes that matter. I wish most people would watch less TV and spend more time reading the Bible or doing things that matter.

C.F. you should have a Hollywood Gossip Column.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2009, 11:23:08 AM by briann »

Offline Lisa

  • Forum Administrator
  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9373
    • The Urban Grind
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #56 on: March 06, 2009, 10:48:03 AM »
C.F., like I said before, you're giving this young woman too much power by repeatedly writing about her.  I agree with you that she's an immoral floozie.  But immoral floozies are nothing new.  They've always existed, and they (unfortunately) always will.  Prostitution is world's oldest profession.  If Fox wasn't posing in nudie mens magazines, I assure you, some other woman would be doing the same thing. 

But people have free will.  The entertainment industry is not responsible for raising our kids.  Parents need to be proactive in setting a good moral example for their children by either home schooling them and/or limiting their television exposure. 

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #57 on: March 06, 2009, 12:25:20 PM »
Lastly, let's drop the hollywood obsession here. Who cares about this crap? I don't even have a TV and haven't seen a movie in almost a year. My life is better without such wasted time. People love to entertain themselves to death rather than fight for the causes that matter. I wish most people would watch less TV and spend more time reading the Bible or doing things that matter.
Shlomo, I understand where you are coming from but this is news, and I thought that JTF has a moral calling to comment on all the news. I only make threads like this about once a week. I realize that you dislike the word "whore" and so lately have tried to find classier words with the same meaning (harlot, trollop, etc.). Are these threads actually in violation of a forum rule? I could see if I was putting up dozens of threads like this but on average I only do about once a week. I would reckon that they are only about 10% of my threads.

Offline nessuno

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 5533
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #58 on: March 06, 2009, 12:32:36 PM »
C.F., like I said before, you're giving this young woman too much power by repeatedly writing about her.  I agree with you that she's an immoral floozie.  But immoral floozies are nothing new.  They've always existed, and they (unfortunately) always will.  Prostitution is world's oldest profession.  If Fox wasn't posing in nudie mens magazines, I assure you, some other woman would be doing the same thing. 

But people have free will.  The entertainment industry is not responsible for raising our kids.  Parents need to be proactive in setting a good moral example for their children by either home schooling them and/or limiting their television exposure. 
I don't think the only way to raise a good and moral child is homeschooling(an excellent alternative to public education I'm sure) or keeping them unaware of what is currently happening in their world. 
Parents must be good role models.  They must talk to their children about right and wrong.   They must set limits and expectations.  You can't hide your children under a rock.
Be very CAREFUL of people whose WORDS don't match their ACTIONS.

Offline Americanhero1

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7617
  • I ain't going anywhere
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #59 on: March 06, 2009, 12:34:22 PM »
C.F., like I said before, you're giving this young woman too much power by repeatedly writing about her.  I agree with you that she's an immoral floozie.  But immoral floozies are nothing new.  They've always existed, and they (unfortunately) always will.  Prostitution is world's oldest profession.  If Fox wasn't posing in nudie mens magazines, I assure you, some other woman would be doing the same thing. 

But people have free will.  The entertainment industry is not responsible for raising our kids.  Parents need to be proactive in setting a good moral example for their children by either home schooling them and/or limiting their television exposure. 
I don't think the only way to raise a good and moral child is homeschooling(an excellent alternative to public education I'm sure) or keeping them unaware of what is currently happening in their world. 
Parents must be good role models.  They must talk to their children about right and wrong.   They must set limits and expectations.  You can't hide your children under a rock.

Don't forget when kids do something wrong they need a good butt whooping

Offline nessuno

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 5533
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #60 on: March 06, 2009, 12:37:32 PM »
C.F., like I said before, you're giving this young woman too much power by repeatedly writing about her.  I agree with you that she's an immoral floozie.  But immoral floozies are nothing new.  They've always existed, and they (unfortunately) always will.  Prostitution is world's oldest profession.  If Fox wasn't posing in nudie mens magazines, I assure you, some other woman would be doing the same thing. 

But people have free will.  The entertainment industry is not responsible for raising our kids.  Parents need to be proactive in setting a good moral example for their children by either home schooling them and/or limiting their television exposure. 
I don't think the only way to raise a good and moral child is homeschooling(an excellent alternative to public education I'm sure) or keeping them unaware of what is currently happening in their world. 
Parents must be good role models.  They must talk to their children about right and wrong.   They must set limits and expectations.  You can't hide your children under a rock.

Don't forget when kids do something wrong they need a good butt whooping
At least they should have a healthy fear that they might get an arse whooping. 8;)
Be very CAREFUL of people whose WORDS don't match their ACTIONS.

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #61 on: March 06, 2009, 12:38:40 PM »
Lisa and Bullcat, you can't raise your kids in a hermetic vacuum. Sooner or later, even the most devoutly raised Christian or Jewish children will learn who the vile prostitute Megan Fox (yimach schma vezichra--may the name of the wicked rot in hell) is and will wonder what to do with her mentally speaking. It is true that kids that are raised correctly are far more likely to reject these human abominations than mindless secular youth, but the fact of the matter is that there will always be people who, despite the best efforts of their parents, are too stupid and rebellious for these values to sink in. What then? Megan Fox is urging young women to all be bisexuals, and is deliberately feeding a perverse sexual fantasy that unfortunately many males have in our culture today (thanks to constant bombardment by movies, music, magazines, and porn). If G-d took Fox tomorrow via a rapidly-spreading ovarian abscess, it wouldn't be soon enough.

Offline nessuno

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 5533
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #62 on: March 06, 2009, 01:10:32 PM »
Lisa and Bullcat, you can't raise your kids in a hermetic vacuum. Sooner or later, even the most devoutly raised Christian or Jewish children will learn who the vile prostitute Megan Fox (yimach schma vezichra--may the name of the wicked rot in hell) is and will wonder what to do with her mentally speaking. It is true that kids that are raised correctly are far more likely to reject these human abominations than mindless secular youth, but the fact of the matter is that there will always be people who, despite the best efforts of their parents, are too stupid and rebellious for these values to sink in. What then? Megan Fox is urging young women to all be bisexuals, and is deliberately feeding a perverse sexual fantasy that unfortunately many males have in our culture today (thanks to constant bombardment by movies, music, magazines, and porn). If G-d took Fox tomorrow via a rapidly-spreading ovarian abscess, it wouldn't be soon enough.
Your right, C.F..
There are many evil influences in today's society. 
Yet, I can't shield my child from all of them.
That is not realistic.
Therefore, I try to be the best role model I can.
I teach her religion instruction class, attend the PTA and volunteer often.
We are very involved with the local senior and veteran groups.
What better role models can there be?
She helps deliver meals on wheels.  Has done so from birth(in a car seat). She loves the homebound people we deliver to.
Hopefully - the moral people that she is growing up around will be the people she will emmulate.
When I see things that are evil or immoral, I point that out to her.  I also explain the consequences that come with following that path.
As for Megan Fox.  I don't wish any evil to befall her.  If she lives her life in an evil way...she will have to live with the consequences.
Be very CAREFUL of people whose WORDS don't match their ACTIONS.

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Megan Fox (yimach schma) Gets Two New Lead Roles
« Reply #63 on: March 06, 2009, 01:28:41 PM »
Evil probably already has befallen this beast in the form of methicillin-resistant syphilis and HPV.