Every day I read stories on Arutz Sheva which make me happy, and there are days I read stories which really upset me. This is one of those stories which really upsets me.
When a government acts hypocritically against one part of the population it usually means that there is bias and prejudice against that population. Israels government has once again acted blatantly biased against the Jewish people. It is insulting and degrading enough that Jews are not allowed to pray on the Temple mount, the most holy place for the Jewish religion. It is also insulting that the police always are biased against Jews when the Arabs throw rocks to interrupt the prayers of Jews on the mount as another story from A7 related. The police officer virtually said "This is all because of you dirty Jews!".
The Israeli government recently allowed the school systems IN ISRAEL to teach the fakestinians that an event called NAKBA occured. NAKBA is a false claim that the Jews massacred the Arabs when the state was created. There was no NAKBA but the arabs have petitioned the state to allow them to teach it at the exclusion of teaching about the Holocaust. Arabs the world over are trying to remove teaching about the Holocaust and replacing it with stories of Nakba. Once again... NAKBA NEVER HAPPENED!
Now the Israeli government is going to decide if a Jewish museum which documents the atrocities carried out by the Israeli government during the EXPULSION of Jews from the Gush Katif can use the word EXPULSION. They claim the word is 'inciteful' and 'politically motivated'.
I believe that allowing ARABS to say that a NAKBA [CATASTROPHE] and not allowing Jews to say that EXPULSION occured is completely biased, hypocritical, and worthy of STRONG REBUKE!
Israel must act in the best interest of Jews and remove the Arabs from the land. They must be removed like weeds from the garden.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133653Gov’t Radio Bans the Word "Expulsion" in Ad
Tishrei 13, 5770, 01 October 09 11:12
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu(Israelnationalnews.com) The High Court is to decide next week on an appeal against government broadcast authorities who banned the word “expulsion” from commercials promoting the Gush Katif museum. The museum, located in Jerusalem, depicts life in the Jewish communities before the government destroyed them and expelled the residents in 2005. The expulsion itself is also documented there. %ad%
The Israel Broadcast Authority has banned the term "expulsion" from the ads on the grounds that it is “political and not informative.” The Committee for Saving the Land of Israel (SOS) appealed to the High Court to overturn the decision.
A three-judge panel on Wednesday suggested the use of the alternative term “forced evacuation,” but the plaintiffs rejected it, arguing that the freedom of speech allows the museum’s use of the word "expulsion.”
Aviad Visuli, attorney for the petitioners, told the judges that “forced evacuation" does not convey the suffering of the approximately 9,000 Jewish residents, including the elderly and little children, whose possessions were taken away and whose homes were destroyed. Many of them remain even today without permanent housing and employment.
“We cannot agree to the laundering of words in order to justify the horrible expulsion,” the lawyer told the court. He charged that the broadcasting authorities have political motives in trying to “to impose on us the use of leftist words like ‘evacuation’ and ‘disengagement.’’’ The latter phrase was coined by aides to former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who engineered the policy to end a Jewish presence in Gaza.
High Court Justice Elyakim Rubenstein said at Wednesday’s hearing that the use of the word “expulsion” may be problematic for commercial advertising, Visuli argued that the government used political terms in commercial advertising following the expulsion. The commercials’ statements that the government has “a solution for every resident” amounted to “throwing sand in the eyes of the public,” he asserted.
The Israel Broadcasting Authority claimed support for its position by relying on speeches by then-Meretz Knesset Members Avshalom Vilan and Ran Cohen, who objected to the term “expulsion.”