Which Bush was the worse President?

[The One and Only Mo]

simple question. Please explain.

[IsraeliGovtAreKapos]

                                                                 בס"ד

The father, for those reasons:
1.) He started the second half of the path to the Oslo Accords in the Madrid Conference.
2.) He slammed Sa'adam who was the only counter to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Syria, and other Islamic factors.
3.) He was the Muslims' petboy.

[pennyjangle]

I say they're equal.......the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

I voted for both of them, while they did some good on the flip side both were for the "new world order", they were members of skull & bones, the exclusive Bohemian Grove men's club and they supported the teen boot camps, were teens were tortured & some died. Before the son left office he created the "North American Union" effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. Way to go Bush, I always said he was a wolf in sheep's clothing, the way he carried that bible around, who knows what was under that cover. 

[TruthSpreader]

So hard to choose. But Obama makes them both look like saints in comparison.

[muman613]

I voted for the Father, George HW Bush after I voted for Reagan in 84.... I didnt vote for GW Bush because by that time I was a loony Democrat and voted for Clinton, Gore, Kerry, and I didnt vote Republican again till I voted for McPain last year.

[pennyjangle]

I voted for the Father, George HW Bush after I voted for Reagan in 84.... I didnt vote for GW Bush because by that time I was a loony Democrat and voted for Clinton, Gore, Kerry, and I didnt vote Republican again till I voted for McPain last year.

I'm a registered Democrat, I always split my ticket but vote Republican for president's ( no one is in that booth with you.)

[pennyjangle]

How comes no one answers after me.............do I have cooties??   

[Dr. Dan]

father far worse

[Zelhar]

                                                                 בס"ד

The father, for those reasons:
1.) He started the second half of the path to the Oslo Accords in the Madrid Conference.
2.) He slammed Sa'adam who was the only counter to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Syria, and other Islamic factors.
3.) He was the Muslims' petboy.

2 was actually a good thing. At that time (1990), Iraq had a serious and dangerous program for mass destruction weapons, including uranium enrichment using centrifuges.

[The One and Only Mo]

How comes no one answers after me.............do I have cooties??   

Yes.

[Confederate Kahanist]

The son was the worst because he made a mess in the middle east and he wanted to legalize the illegal aliens. 

[IsraeliGovtAreKapos]

                                                            בס"ד

                                                                 בס"ד

The father, for those reasons:
1.) He started the second half of the path to the Oslo Accords in the Madrid Conference.
2.) He slammed Sa'adam who was the only counter to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Syria, and other Islamic factors.
3.) He was the Muslims' petboy.

2 was actually a good thing. At that time (1990), Iraq had a serious and dangerous program for mass destruction weapons, including uranium enrichment using centrifuges.

Not really, history has proven it to be a half-right move. Without this, the non Pan-Arabist Muslims would had much harder time to fight Israel and the West.
About the nukes, I don't think Sa'adam would have used it. After all, Sa'adam was not as suicidal as Ahmedinejad.
Anyway I think if already taking on Iraq he should have had attacked Iran, Egypt and Saudi Arabia also.
Btw, Syria then and now is much more dangerous to Israel than Iran or Iraq.

[pennyjangle]

How comes no one answers after me.............do I have cooties??   

Yes.

Frailech

[The One and Only Mo]

How comes no one answers after me.............do I have cooties??   

Yes.

Frailech

Your yiddish is mamish improving.

[pennyjangle]

ish dank aysh ztyer 

[The One and Only Mo]

ish dank aysh ztyer