It is most plausible a scenario that this miscreant and his mullahs staged the attack on themselves, in order to claim on the "world stage" that they are being targeted by "the Zionists".
It has long been established that bombing their own people, and causing death and injury to women and children bystanders, means nothing to these scum.
Furthermore, the publicity and propaganda opportunity they stand to gain by instigating such an incident proves invaluable to them.
Evening news coverage all over the world will devote at least ten minutes to the "story", sympathetically portraying the little greasy bastard as being victimized by those wanting to 'silence' him [the unspoken implication being that Mossad is the villain].
Hundreds of thousands of muzzies will be shown rioting in the streets in Teheran, Paris, London, Istanbul, holding signs calling for the death of Jews and burning effigies of America and Israel.
And in Iran, the precisely staged event - the "failed assassination attempt", will be used as the pretext to round up, torture, and execute all known dissidents who criticize the rule of the mullahs.
Checkmate!
Everyone in JTF needs to learn how to "read through news headlines" to analyze for themselves what is really taking place in the world.
I proffer above a plausible scenario which I am unable to prove.
But that being a given, is there anyone here who after reading it and considering the possible truth of my scenario, still continues to accept the original news headline at "face value"?
Remember: The
CONTROLLED MEDIA is
STATING AS FACT that what took place
WAS AN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT, and that
THE INTENDED VICTIM SURVIVED.
Of course, we already know that the media would never engage in collusion with Islam in order to further an agenda, don't we?