You've got a brilliant gift for self-deception, Imerica. Which is why you keep on defending the indefensible, and why you keep on confirming everything that most whites believe about blacks.
Okay, that one situation is where those blacks rioted over govt. cheese...but blacks don't ONLY riot over govt cheese was my point.
You first categorically stated that blacks don't riot for government cheese. Now you're changing your story. Just like you're now trying to change what the world saw with its own eyes in New Orleans.
You didn't see all of the blacks who weren't forraging for liquor and tv sets? You probably only saw a snippet of a group of black people doing those ignorant things. Its not fair to take that picture in your mind and apply it to those who actually WERE looking for food.
I saw tens of thousands of blacks trashing every business in the city, and I only saw handfuls of people taking food. And even those handfuls were also grabbing liquor and blue jeans and everything else that they could get their hands on, just like blacks do in every riot.
Exactly how would your neck of the woods look if it were overcome by floods? Of course, every place affected by devastation like that WOULD look like a 3rd world country...
BALONEY!!! I have NEVER seen whites rioting after a natural disaster, even after something as bad as Hurricane Andrew or the San Francisco earthquake. In fact, I've never seen whites rioting about anything, except drunken kids celebrating the exploits of black rapists in basketball and football jerseys.
however I think what the European television reporter meant was that everyone in that state was black...and it looked like Africa to them.
The reporter was referring to the chaos and violence, as did every other reporter who went there. (Like I say, Imerica, you make it up as you go along, and you always try to whitewash it.)
And the whites who suffered during the hurricane, in Mississippi, for example didn't have as much water to deal with. It was devastating to businesses but New Orleans was almost completely covered by water...Mississippi wasn't.
Now you're trying to tell us that whites would have behaved in the same way as blacks, if New Orleans was white instead of black. Once again, Imerica, BALONEY!!!
(Which is why DUHBUYA, touched down THERE instead of in New Orleans.)
DUHBUYA, as you call him, or "that motherf***er George Bush!", as your friend Ray Nagin called him, didn't go to New Orleans because young black gentlemen were shooting at the medical rescue helicopters and every other whitey who came within firing range.
OK, Imerica. Now tell us what you really meant when you said this:
But they do make the decision in some places to riot over stupid things like Rodney King, but the only thing about the riots I don't understand is why they must destroy their own stores and neighborhood.
I repeat my previous question: If you understand everything about black riots except why they take place in black neighborhoods, do you want them to take place in
white neighborhoods?