I don't think there's anything wrong with asking the challenging questions on the forum. In fact, I think it's beneficial and even necessary to look at the other side of the coin. We can't fully understand our own perspectives unless we understand the opposing viewpoint's perspective. But then again, that was the major premise I learned in an argumentation course I took at a liberal college. But whether someone is liberal or conservative on any given issue, I believe strongly in this concept.
Anyway, I was a little taken aback when Chaim stated to Hidden Author a couple of weeks ago that Hidden Author was asking a "self-hating question" and then proceeded to be in complete shock about the term "dispossessed." I don't see what since that is an expression that the Arabs in Israel use all the time to describe what happened to them. I always leanred that there are no stupid questions, just stupid answers. I think that's it's important to look at both sides of an issue. Even if you don't agree with the other side, it's still good to look at it and to at least "understand" it. I'm a very strong Zionist and believe in Israel's right to exist. At the same time, I also think it's important to look at the Arab point of view and their issues they bring up. But I wonder if I ask about house demolitions, uprooting of olive trees, settler violence, Rachel Corrie, or any other issues raised by the Arabs, would Chaim and the rest of you consider this asking self-hating questions? Or are Chaim and the rest of you open to at least take a look and have an understanding of the other side and have a conversation about it? Just something that has been on my mind for a while now.