Turner: One-child policy good for planet

[Confederate Kahanist]

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1249938

CNN founder and billionaire Ted Turner wants China's one-child policy to be imposed on the entire world because he believes it will help reduce global warming -- a theory disputed by many scientists.

 

While in Cancun this week to attend an international conference on climate change, the controversial Turner endorsed the communist regime's policy that penalizes -- typically via arrests or forced abortions -- families that exceed the one-child limit, saying: "If we're going to be here [as a species] 5,000 years from now, we're not going to do it with seven billion people." He also suggested that if such a plan was adopted, poor people could profit from their decision not to reproduce by selling fertility rights.

 

Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, (PRI) tells OneNewsNow that what Turner fails to understand is that the only way China has been able to enforce the policy is through force.

"Women arrested for the crime of being pregnant, women taken in by force to abortion clinics, women forcibly aborted at nine months pregnancy, babies killed at birth -- I don't know where Ted Turner has been for the last 30 years to have missed all this," Mosher laments.

Steve Mosher PRIHe contends the billionaire is ignorant of all of those realities. And as Turner believes China enforces the law through fines, he wants to follow that method and encourage women to refrain from having more children through financial rewards.

But the PRI president adds that he does not buy the global warming myth either.

"I say 'myth' because the science is still unsettled," he explains. "We don't know whether the planet is warming or not. If it is warming, we don't know whether that's caused by human beings. If it's caused by human beings, we don't know [whether] that's a bad thing. I mean, it would make large parts of Russia and Canada fertile country, able to plant and grow crops."


Mosher insists the one-child policy is a recipe for tyranny -- not environmental protection. Meanwhile, Turner continues to donate millions of dollars to promote abortion and contraception worldwide.

[Raulmarrio2000]

Zero child policy for Fakestinians!!! I wish Israel had the nerve to enforce that even on Fakestinians who live abroad.

[Rubystars]

This is part of the NWO agenda. This isn't just a bunch of talk, this could really happen. However I think that it will mostly be enforced in first world/white countries.

I've read horrible stories of Chinese women who wanted and loved their babies being forced to abort them. China has one of the most evil governments on earth.

[Irish Zionist]

It would be good for the planet if there was no more muslims.

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Like Rubystars said, this would never be applied to Third World slime or Muzzies. They should of course have a zero-child policy.

[Ulli]

For bolschewiks like Turner who believe in this insane global warming cult, this China one child policy is the right thing. But me and my wife want and will have a big family.

It is really interesting what bolschewik cults ask for sacrifices from their insane members. And then their members claim that the real god is strict and evil. 

 

[muman613]

For bolschewiks like Turner who believe in this insane global warming cult, this China one child policy is the right thing. But me and my wife want and will have a big family.

It is really interesting what bolschewik cults ask for sacrifices from their insane members. And then their members claim that the real G-d is strict and evil. 

 

So TRUE!

It is also very amazing that this should come up so close to Chanukah. The evil Greco-Syrians routinely disposed of babies which were deemed too weak, blemished, or the wrong sex. The dark side seems to always work for the same goals, destruction of humanity.

http://international.aish.com/seminars/worldperfect/wp03n11.htm

Infanticide:

Infanticide Iron Age depiction of a priestess sacrificing a child(the murder of newborn babies) was universally practiced by virtually every culture we know about. Why were babies killed? Typical reasons were:

    * Population control
    * Sex selection (which always meant killing newborn girls)
    * Ridding society of potentially burdensome or deformed members.

A newborn who was weak or sickly, or even with a minor birth defect such as a cleft pallet, harelip, or just a missing finger, was killed. The "baby removal squad" did not do this. It was a member of the immediate family, usually the mother or father, who disposed of the infant soon after its birth. The baby was taken outside and left to die of exposure, dropped down a well to drown, or smothered.

ROMAN BATHHOUSE IN ASHKELON

    "Remains of nearly 100 infants, killed very soon after birth, were discovered in this Roman bathhouse.  The ancient Greeks and Romans considered infanticide, especially through abandonment and exposure to the elements, the most effective form of birth control."
    Biblical Archaeology Review, July / August 1991

Gruesome evidence of this practice was recently found by archaeologists in Ashkelon, on the Mediterranean coast of Israel. Ashkelon was a center of Roman life 2,000 years ago. In 1990, archaeologists excavating the ancient bathhouses in the city found the skeletal remains of 100 newborn babies who were dumped into the sewers after birth. They were literally dropped down the toilet by their parents.

[voo-yo]

Maybe Turner's mother should decide to have a very late abortion.

[Rubystars]

Maybe Turner's mother should decide to have a very late abortion.

I think the term for that is a post-natal procedure. 

[TruthSpreader]

I would impose a zero-child policy for the Muslims.