Author Topic: Arabs and Iranians who dream that they are Aryan Whites lol funny thread  (Read 6138 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline BabylonianJew

  • Senior JTFer
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
  • Berber/Shepardic Jew
http://www.whitearyan.info/board/showthread.php?t=282

WhiteArabs, Whitemorrocans, whiteiranians lol. The Arab dream of them being Nazis, it seem that hitler has left his legacy of Arab Nazism and the now Arabs belive themselves to be an Indo-European peoples, especially those of Palestine,Lebanon,Syria they claim they have no single drop of "Semitic" blood, but they have blood from Crusaders,Vikings,Persians, and Armenieans. Its also interesting Iraqi Arabs and Arabians take pride their Semitic ancestory and even claim Jewish hertiage as prestiage, but that Levanities are now claming their Europeans lol.

Yes, the Phoenician element is very small. At least 50% descent mostly from Persians, Armenians, Greeks, Romans, and crusaders, with not a single drop od "semitic" blood.

Offline Masha

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1205
You might think it funny, but there exists an opinion that Jews are aryan themselves. They came from Ur originally. They were Sumerian, meaning aryan. They later came to live among semitic peoples and adopted their language. That is not unusual. This happens throughout history all the time, when a group has one ethnicity, but adopts the language of another ethnicity among whom they live. Of course, given their long history, Jews might have mixed with semites to some extent. But still, they are very distinct in looks from Arabs in Saudi Arabia, where semitic people come from. And not just looks - mentality and customs as well. Just my 2 cents.

Offline Dissenter

  • Full JTFer
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
You might think it funny, but there exists an opinion that Jews are aryan themselves. They came from Ur originally. They were Sumerian, meaning aryan. They later came to live among semitic peoples and adopted their language.

You're completely wrong about the Sumerians, Masha, and you really should do your research before bothering us with historical fol-de-rol.

Nobody knows yet precisely who the Sumerians were or where they came from.

The Sumerian language has no ties to the Indo-European (Aryan) ones. In fact, nobody can point to any language, living or dead, to which Sumerian is related.

If you base your claim that the Sumerians were Aryan on the theory that they came from India, then you should know that even if the Sumerians did have an Indian origin, they must have left India for Mesopotamia thousands of years before the Aryans ever descended into India from the north. (Sumerian civilization in Mesopotamia began around 3500 BCE, whereas the Aryans entered India around 1500 BCE.)

The Aryans destroyed or conquered the old Indian lands from which the Sumerians theoretically migrated to Mesopotamia. In other words, the Aryans and Sumerians were not in any way related.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2007, 05:00:50 AM by Dissenter »

Offline Masha

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1205
There was a discussion about this on an Israeli forum that I read occasionally about a year ago. This is a very right-wing, patriotic forum, by the way, so people there would not say anything anti-Jewish or offensive to the Jews.

You seem to be offended by this suggestion, however, judging from your wording. I wonder, why? What is offensive or sacriligeous about Jews not being semitic (if indeed they are not - I'm not a historian and can't evaluate this claim). It doesn't say in the Torah that they are semitic people. I personally was happy to learn about this hypothesis, because I don't want the Jews to have anything to do with Arabs. Jewish faces are very different from those of Arabs of Saudi Arabia. And the important thing is that their mentality is completely different. It's hard for me to believe that you would have two closely related nations, where one of them is peaceful and intelligent and the other is bloody, irrational murderers. Usually related tribes also have related mental characteristics.

The Torah doesn't say either that Ishmael started the arab nation, only that it was a great nation. Wasn't it Mohammed who first said this? Are arabs a great nation? Only numerically.

Offline kahaneloyalist

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1959
Jews are descended from Shem, which is where the name Semite comes from, hence we are semites, Arabs are from Ham hence they are not semites.
"For it is through the mercy of fools that all Justice is lost"
Ramban

Offline Masha

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1205
Jews are descended from Shem, which is where the name Semite comes from, hence we are semites, Arabs are from Ham hence they are not semites.

Well, I won't argue. The important thing is that Jews and arabs are not "cousins."

Offline BabylonianJew

  • Senior JTFer
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
  • Berber/Shepardic Jew
Jews are descended from Shem, which is where the name Semite comes from, hence we are semites, Arabs are from Ham hence they are not semites.

Arabs are decenants of Ishamel, so they are Semitic, i think

Offline mord

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25853
This is saddest bunch of wn. i have ever seen that guy the arab moslem takes steroidsLOL HE LOoKS VERY WEAK HE SAYS HE IS 190 CN ABOUT 6'1" NOT VERY TALL AND THE GUY HORVATH LOOKS LIKE A HUNGARIAN CLOWN :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
« Last Edit: June 01, 2007, 04:04:16 PM by mord »
Thy destroyers and they that make thee waste shall go forth of thee.  Isaiah 49:17

 
Shot at 2010-01-03

Offline Dissenter

  • Full JTFer
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
There was a discussion about this on an Israeli forum that I read occasionally about a year ago. This is a very right-wing, patriotic forum, by the way, so people there would not say anything anti-Jewish or offensive to the Jews.

You seem to be offended by this suggestion, however, judging from your wording. I wonder, why?

Masha, if you're talking to me - you should always specify to whom you're responding, if you're not quoting the person - I wasn't offended by the suggestion, and I didn't mean to sound like I was. JTF isn't a racist or racialist organization and we couldn't care less - most of us couldn't, anyway - about the origins of species.

I'm pointing out that by reading something on a web site and then regurgitating it for our delectation, without bothing to do some rudimentary research of your own, you're wasting both our time and yours.

There is plenty of legitimate information about the Sumerians all over the internet. Look into it before you make statements which only decrease your credibility, and before you come to us asking for lessons.

Every professor in college will tell you that before you come to him or her for advice, you should always do as much homework as possible on your own.

Anyway, welcome to the forum.

Offline Dissenter

  • Full JTFer
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
This is saddest bunch of wn. i have ever seen that guy the arab moslem takes steroidsLOL HE LOoKS VERY WEAK HE SAYS HE IS 190 CN ABOUT 6'1" NOT VERY TALL AND THE GUY HORVATH LOOKS LIKE A HUNGARIAN CLOWN :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

I like the 17-year-old kid who says he's going to take out his shotgun if the new guy isn't white. ;D

Offline Dissenter

  • Full JTFer
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
You might think it funny, but there exists an opinion that Jews are aryan themselves. They came from Ur originally. They were Sumerian, meaning aryan. They later came to live among semitic peoples and adopted their language.

As long as we're on the topic, Masha, let me say that just because Abraham lived in Ur doesn't mean that he was a Sumerian.

The first Semitic conquerors of Mesopotamia, Sargon and Hammurabi and others, arrived from the north around 2500 BCE, nearly a thousand years before Abraham lived in Ur. Abraham's father was likely either a part of that conquest, a Semite who took up residence in Ur, or a descendant of such Semites.

Interestingly, Ur in the Bible is called "Ur of the Chaldeans". The Chaldeans were a Semitic people from whom the Aramaic language originated. So at some time or another, in the days of Abraham or before or after, Ur was indeed brought under Semitic rule.

Offline Masha

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1205
I'm pointing out that by reading something on a web site and then regurgitating it for our delectation, without bothing to do some rudimentary research of your own, you're wasting both our time and yours.

There is plenty of legitimate information about the Sumerians all over the internet. Look into it before you make statements which only decrease your credibility, and before you come to us asking for lessons.

Every professor in college will tell you that before you come to him or her for advice, you should always do as much homework as possible on your own.

Dissenter, thank you for welcoming me. I'm glad to have found this forum. And it's gladdening that there is a lot of traffic here. It looks like more and more people are beginning to wake up.

As for your comment. This is a forum, not a peer-reviewed academic journal. I am very familiar with the academic standards of debate through personal experience. But my understanding of forums is that this is an informal place of discussion. If I am going to do serious research every time before I post, I'd rather save the time to do my own work-related research. If you find my comment misinformed, it's enough to correct me.

Offline Dissenter

  • Full JTFer
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
I'm pointing out that by reading something on a web site and then regurgitating it for our delectation, without bothing to do some rudimentary research of your own, you're wasting both our time and yours.

There is plenty of legitimate information about the Sumerians all over the internet. Look into it before you make statements which only decrease your credibility, and before you come to us asking for lessons.

Every professor in college will tell you that before you come to him or her for advice, you should always do as much homework as possible on your own.

Dissenter, thank you for welcoming me. I'm glad to have found this forum. And it's gladdening that there is a lot of traffic here. It looks like more and more people are beginning to wake up.

As for your comment. This is a forum, not a peer-reviewed academic journal. I am very familiar with the academic standards of debate through personal experience. But my understanding of forums is that this is an informal place of discussion. If I am going to do serious research every time before I post, I'd rather save the time to do my own work-related research. If you find my comment misinformed, it's enough to correct me.

Well said.

And as you see, I couldn't help speaking at length about the Sumerians, despite my admonishment to you. It's just that there's so much junk on the internet, and so little time, that I sometimes get frustrated.

Again, I didn't mean to sound harsh. Like you, I don't have much time, and I can't spend it like Balzac, rolling around on the floor searching for the mot juste.

By the way, I just looked up the spelling of that famous phrase, to make sure of the "e". ;D

Offline Masha

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1205
Interestingly, Ur in the Bible is called "Ur of the Chaldeans". The Chaldeans were a Semitic people from whom the Aramaic language originated. So at some time or another, in the days of Abraham or before or after, Ur was indeed brought under Semitic rule.

It's true. But the hypothesis that these people discussed (I'm writing from memory) was that Abraham came from the priestly Sumerian family, and the priestly class intermarried and did not mix with the semites. Another thing that was said was that the Sumerian origin of the Jews would be able to explain their genetic similarities to the Kurdish people, about whom it has also been speculated recently that they might have the Sumerian origins. So that the Sumerian ancestors would be the link between Jews and Kurds.

Quote
In 2001, a team of scientists discovered that three Jewish communities of Ashkenazi, Sephardic and Kurdish Jews surprisingly shared more haplotypes and chromosomes with Muslim Kurds than with either Palestinians or Bedouins.

(from Wikipedia - they should have the link to the actual article).

You are right, the sumerian language isn't aryan. I was sloppy. I meant a certain type of looks, which I associate with Persians, Europeans, Kurds, but not with Arabs. I think that Jews look more like Persians than like Arabs, in general. Iranians would always address my father in Farsi, assuming that he was Persian.

Offline Dissenter

  • Full JTFer
  • ***
  • Posts: 205
But the hypothesis that these people discussed (I'm writing from memory) was that Abraham came from the priestly Sumerian family, and the priestly class intermarried and did not mix with the semites.

It's a possibility, but only rank speculation. Abraham's father was more likely a simple artisan, as implied by the Bible story.

And don't forget Deuteronomy 26:5: "My ancestor was a wandering Aramaean. He went to Egypt with a small number of men and lived there as an immigrant, but it was there that he became a great, powerful and populous nation."

The Aramaeans, from whom came the Chaldeans - as in Ur of the Chaldeans - were a Semitic people.

Another thing that was said was that the Sumerian origin of the Jews would be able to explain their genetic similarities to the Kurdish people, about whom it has also been speculated recently that they might have the Sumerian origins. So that the Sumerian ancestors would be the link between Jews and Kurds.

Practically every people of the Middle East has been named as a possible ancestor of the Sumerians. But since the Sumerians had an ancient deity of the ocean (whose temple was extant in Babylon even in Persian times), it's hard to see how the Kurds fit in. Being Indo-Europeans, they came from the north, not the south.

In 2001, a team of scientists discovered that three Jewish communities of Ashkenazi, Sephardic and Kurdish Jews surprisingly shared more haplotypes and chromosomes with Muslim Kurds than with either PLO/Hamas Arab Muslim Nazis or Bedouins.

Since the original Semites are thought to have descended from the north, it's not "surprising" that some of them intermingled with the Kurds, who live in approximately the same region. (Also, the likely northern Semitic origin of the Jews has long been recognized. The development of Hebrew has been plausibly traced through Syrian and Phoenician.) But as I say, the Sumerians lived nowhere near there.

All of this raises questions about the history of Abraham's forebears in southern Mesopotamia. Were they northern Semites who never mingled with the southern ones, namely the Arabs? Or is there truth, symbolic or otherwise, in the Bible story recounting the split of the Jews and Arabs in Abraham's day?

I do not have the answers at this time.... ;D

You are right, the sumerian language isn't aryan. I was sloppy. I meant a certain type of looks, which I associate with Persians, Europeans, Kurds, but not with Arabs. I think that Jews look more like Persians than like Arabs, in general. Iranians would always address my father in Farsi, assuming that he was Persian.

Looks can be deceiving! But all of this DNA research is fascinating, and it's answering a lot of questions which earlier historians thought insoluble.

By the way, if you really want a discussion on this subject, engage Yacov, one of our administrators.

You'll get all you want - and more. ;D

Offline BabylonianJew

  • Senior JTFer
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
  • Berber/Shepardic Jew
Jews: A Race? A Historically-Inbred Ethnic Group? A Religion? Or All Three?


Are Jews a race? Yes...and no. Yes, they are people related by DNA or genes. But most anthropologists do not classify Jews as a race, or a subrace, since a) Ashkenazim Jews, i.e. most, Jews are a racial hybrid, and b) calling Jews anything other than a religion has been taboo since WWII. Further, that question "are Jews a race?" depends on the/your scientific definition of the word "race" [subspecies]. The term "ethnic group" is probably more accurate in describing the Jew, although "race" can also be used.

[A word needs to be said about the field of Anthropology and Jews. An anthropologist informed us that when he studied anthropology in the 1950s, Jews were not referred to as anything other than a religion, and he said that that feature is still true today. We call this non-mention of Jews as an ethnic group by the anthropology field dishonest and politically-motivated].

Someone on the web mentioned that [paraphrasing] "Jews function as a race, so they are a race, regardless of what modern science calls them." Indeed. Jews are more cohesive and unified than any other ethnic group, so that is a great description of the Jews. Thanks, somebody.

Furthermore, the word "White" means White European. In other words, a White person's ancestors originally came from a White European country, such as England, Germany, France, etc. Some Jews may appear to be White. In other words, they may have light-colored skin and light-colored hair. That does not make them White, however. Only genetics makes a person White. The Jews are not genetically White. [One of the reasons that the Jews have been so successful in the Western countries is that they sometimes appear to be White].

White gentiles should hopefully be able to recognize Jewish people based upon their physical appearance, but granted, this is not always possible. However, Jews often have features that identify them as being Jewish by race. The majority of Jews do share common physical features -- especially in their faces and/or craniums [skulls].

Brief History of the Jews

Jews originally came from the tribe of Judah/Judahites back in old Canaan or Palestine. The Judah tribe was banished from the other Israelite tribes in about 950 BC. In 70 AD, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem, and did so again in 134 AD, compelling Jews as a people to scatter in the wind. Some of those Jews made their way to Europe, others stayed closer to their original homeland.

There are two main types of Jews. Most Jews in America and Europe are Ashkenazim, aka "Eastern European" or "Russian" Jews.


Typical Jewish appearance: large nose
that curves downward, weak chin, sloped
forehead, 'pinched' facial appearance


Typical Jewish appearance, including large
ears that protrude away from the head and a
heavy, 'fleshy-looking' face. Some people in
the White Nationalist movement have called this
traditional Jewish facial appearance "rodent-like,"
although some Whites may find that description
tasteless


Above: typical Jewish nose, curving downward at
the tip

 




































Ashkenazim Jews are a hybrid race by long interbreeding, their major ethnicities being Arab + Armenid [Armenid is also sometimes called Hittite or Subarian]. According to Oxford University's Dr. John R. Baker, "the evidence from blood-groups bears on the theory that the Ashkenazim have both Armenids and Orientalids ["Orientalids" is Dr. Baker's word for Arabs] for ancestors." -- from Baker's book Race, [see below], page 242, hardcover.







Compare White skull above to Armenid/Jewish skull -- White skull has longer rear portion, whereas Armenid/Jew skull looks as if the back of the head were "sawed-off."



The other, comparatively rarer type of Jew is the Sephardim, also known as "Mediterranean," or "Spanish," or "Portuguese," or "North African" Jews. These Jews lived mostly near the Mediterranean Sea. Sephardim Jews also lived in Iraq (Babylon), Syria, Greece, Turkey, and in the Americas, especially South America. Furthermore, Sephardic Jews lived in Palestine long before the European Zionist movement. Only about 10% of all Jews worldwide are Sephardim; the rest are Ashkenazim. Sephardim are more closely related to Arabs, while Ashkenazim are more related to Armenids/Hittites/Assyrians.

According to Dr. Baker, "when it is said that a person has a Jewish appearance, the speaker usually has persons of Ashkenazic stock in mind. The members of this group are the typical Jews of Russia, Poland, and England, and they constitute the great majority, perhaps 90%, of all the people in the world to whom the name of Jews is applied." -- from Race, page 238, hardcover.

In 1492, Jews were expelled from Spain. Portugal expelled her Jews five years later. Some Spanish and Portuguese Jews converted to Christianity, and these Jews were referred to as "Marranos" by Jews who had left Spain/Portugal but kept their faith. Later, as the new converts began to gain power and social status, these "New Christians" become suspect by the "Old Christians" in Spanish society as being insincere converts. They were then called Crypto Jews, or Anusim -- Jews who still practiced Judaism in secret.

It is the opinion of many gentiles that there are many Crypto or Marrano -- also called "converso" -- Jews in positions of power all over the West, but that few gentiles know of these hidden Jews' real ethnic heritage.

Despite their geographical dispersion, however, all Jews are genetically similar to a remarkable degree, given their diaspora and the chance, seldom taken, to mix blood with surrounding populations.

[Also of note is that a U.N.-sponsored body listed "Jewish" as being only a religion in 1951 -- no doubt for political purposes, since WWII had just ended a few years previously. John Baker shows that Jews are indeed an ethnic group related by race, although he says that they are not a subrace since some people of Armenid descent are not Jewish].

The question "who is a Jew?" has a simple answer: anyone whose birth mother was Jewish by race -- i.e., not a convert to Judaism; or, cleverly, the few people who convert to Judaism. Under Israel's Law of Return [1], a gentile who converts to Judaism can immigrate to Israel. However, conversion to Judaism is rare and difficult by design, and such converts are not considered to be "true Jews." It is the opinion of many that Jews "allow" converts so as to make Jews appear, to outsiders, to be "not a race, only a religion." Such a feature also allows Jews to deflect the charge that Israel is "a race-based state."


[1] quote from Israel's amended Law of Return: "Definition 4B. For the purposes of this Law, "Jew" means a person who was born of a Jewish mother or has become converted to Judaism and who is not a member of another religion." -- Law of Return (Amendment No. 2) 5730-1970*; Addition of sections 4A and 4B apparently occurred in 1970.

------------------------------------------

Facial/Cranial Features of Ashkenazim Jews
[Note that not all Jews have the physical features listed below]

A) Ashkenazim Jews have a long, large nose -- one that differs from Italian-type noses by the fact that it often curves downward at the tip; the nose often has a noticeable "hump" on the top portion of it, if viewed in profile; the nose often resembles the number "6," if viewed with the grooves of the "wings" of the nose, in profile [2]. Further, some gentiles have commented that Jews often have a facial appearance that seems "pinched," as if God had taken their faces between his thumb and fingers and then squeezed.

B) The forehead and temples of the skull recede quickly. In other words, the forehead and temples begin to slope or curve almost immediately, whereas in Whites those areas are more "wall-like" and vertical. Studies of Jewish skull shapes show that most Jews are either a) not Semitic; or b) only partly Semitic. Instead, they are Armenid/Hittite in their skull shapes [3]. This means that the term "anti-Semitism" does not really apply to Jews [also 3]. Further, many Ashkenazim Jews have short heads, as compared to Europeans.

C) The ears of Ashkenazim Jews are usually larger than a gentile's, especially the upper ear, and the ears often stick out, away from the head; this, combined with their large noses, often gives Jews a "rat-like" or "rodent-like" appearance. This "rodent-like" appearance is more noticeable when they smile.

D) Mouth opening/lips often larger than normal.

E) The eyes are sometimes slightly Asian in appearance, i.e. slightly more "squinted" than a European's. This is more noticeable when they smile, squeezing their eyes shut even more than a gentile's. Eyelids, especially the lower ones, are more puffed-out and "fleshy" than a European's.

F) Jews usually have a "weak chin" that does not jut out.

G) Jews usually have legs and arms that are, proportionately speaking, rather short.

H) Their head hair is usually curlier, and darker, than a gentiles; further, Jews often cannot grow heavy beards; their beards are often scraggly and frizzy instead.

[1] source: book Race, by Dr. John R. Baker, Oxford University Press/FHU; 1974/1981; pages 232ff, hardcover. This book is considered by many to be the most detailed book ever written about the various human races. It includes many photos and diagrams.

[2] "Luschan holds that the hook-nose is by no means characteristic of the Semites, and contends that the number of arched noses that are found among the Jews is due to ancient intermixture with the Hittites in Asia Minor. He shows that other races also, as the Armenian, for instance, who have a good portion of Hittite blood in their veins, have hook-noses" (Jewish Encyclopedia IX [1905], 338). Also: "The relation of the breadth of the nose to its length, known as the 'nasal index,' has been considered one of the best means of distinguishing the various races of mankind." (Jew. Enc. IX [1905], 339). And, "The nose is generally the characteristic feature of the Jews, who have, on the average, the longest (77 ram) and narrowest (34 mm)" (Jew. Enc. I [1901], 619).

[3] "The most important problem suggested by a study of craniometrical results concerning Jews is the relation of the type head of the modern Jews to that of the ancient Hebrews and to the modern Semitic skulls. The pure Semitic skull is dolichocephalic [long-headed], as may be seen from a study of the heads of modern Arabs, Abyssinians, Syrians .... The only way the type of the head may change is by intermixture with other races. If the ancient Hebrews were of the same stock as the modern non-Jewish Semites, and if the modern Jews are their descendants, then a pure dolichocephalic type of head would be expected among the Jews. As has been seen, all results of craniometry prove that the Jews are brachycephalic [broad-headed], and that the dolichocephalic form is only found among them in less than two percent of the cases" (Jewish Encyclopedia IV [1902], 335). Also, "Some anthropologists are inclined to associate the racial origins of the Jews, not with the Semites, whose language they adopted, but with the Armenians and Hittites of Mesopotamia, whose broad skulls and cuffed noses they appear to have inherited" (Jew. Enc. X [1903], 264). Dr. John Baker's modern book Race also calls Jews brachycephalic instead of dolichocephalic.

-------------------------------------------------

See Here for a list of diseases that strike Jews regularly.

See Here the hazards of Jewish inbreeding.

--------------------------------------------------

Some Common Psychological Characteristics of Jews

While humans vary in their personalities and behavior, Jews often display distinctive behavior patterns. Listed below are their more well-known behaviors:

Jews often have a superiority complex, believing that they are superior to gentiles.

Jews are known to complain about life's daily hardships more than gentiles.

Jews are known to be more paranoid than gentiles, often believing that gentiles are "out to get them simply because they are Jewish."

Disloyalty towards non-Jewish persons and governments is a frequent feature among Jews.

Jews are often obsessed with scatological [fecal] subjects, e.g., human fecal- and urine-based humor. Further, Jews do not value "moral" behavior as Whites do, since their ancestors and relatives did not embrace the Christian socioreligious concept of "moral vs. immoral" behavior.

Jews, due to their unique history, have an uncanny ability to manage money and financial resources. Indeed, Jews seem obsessed with money and finance, and further, Judaism is a very materialistic religion that obsesses over valuable commodities.

Jews see themselves as physically unattractive; indeed, Jewish women often reduce the size of their noses via plastic surgery.

Jews seem to have an inborn dislike of anything culturally "European" or "White," be it art, literature, music, film, etc., and further, Jews seem to delight in criticizing such White cultural features.

Jews have a predisposition to thinking and acting in human "group" terms, i.e. "which social/political action is best for Jews?" This is an opposing feature as compared to Western gentiles, who have been trained to think as "individuals."

Jews seem to have an inability to believe that Jews might engage in any wrongdoing. Any gentile accusing any Jew of criminal or unethical behavior is automatically wrong in the eyes of Jews. Jews can never be guilty of anything, according to most Jews.

 

 

Offline BabylonianJew

  • Senior JTFer
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
  • Berber/Shepardic Jew
The article is from Nazi source but its good for analysis of the Jewish phenotypes and types. Some of it is based ofcourse.

Offline mord

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25853
o.k. I HAVE NORMAL HIGH BROAD FOREHEAD NON SLOPING, LONG LEGS AND ARMS.REGULAR SIZE EARS,ANDNON HOOK NOSE PLUS I'M VERY TALL.tHE ONLY PART IS DARK HAIR.oH IAND I FORGOT STRONG JAW ;D
Thy destroyers and they that make thee waste shall go forth of thee.  Isaiah 49:17

 
Shot at 2010-01-03

Offline BabylonianJew

  • Senior JTFer
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
  • Berber/Shepardic Jew
WhiteLebenese pride hahahaha, he looks "Jewish" probably Ashkenazic


Offline Shechinah

  • Junior JTFer
  • **
  • Posts: 85


Typical Jewish appearance: large nose
that curves downward, weak chin, sloped
forehead, 'pinched' facial appearance


Above: typical Jewish nose, curving downward at
the tip

 





Can you provide us with the original pictures?

sat_chit_anand

  • Guest
The characteristics which make some European Jews 'look' Jewish are typical of the Armenoid sub-racial group.

Armenoids are part of the white European family of sub-races, and you can find lots and lots of non-migrational Armenoids in Armenia/thereabouts.

The Irano-Afghan sub-racial grouping is also Europid.

Two examples of 'pure' Armenoids:




Armenoid + East-Baltid:



He 'looks' Jewish doesn't he? Typical Ashkenazim.

Babylonian Jew, I am not sure where all of this is leading.  ???

...

« Last Edit: June 09, 2007, 03:56:30 AM by sat_chit_anand »

Offline Masha

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1205
The characteristics which make some European Jews 'look' Jewish are typical of the Armenoid sub-racial group.

Armenoids are part of the white European family of sub-races, and you can find lots and lots of non-migrational Armenoids in Armenia/thereabouts.

The Irano-Afghan sub-racial grouping is also Europid.

Two examples of 'pure' Armenoids:





Armenoid + East-Baltid:



He 'looks' Jewish doesn't he? Typical Ashkenazim.

Babylonian Jew, I am not sure where all of this is leading.  ???

...



The two first photographs don't look "typically" Jewish. They could be Jewish, but they could be other things as well. There is such a thing as a Jewish type. Or rather there are several different typically Jewish types. I am very good at recognizing Ashkenazi Jewish types. I should have worked for Hitler - ha-ha! (Sorry, bad joke). But like most people who are all mixed today, in each population there is a certain percent of typical faces, a certain percent of physical types that could be shared with neighboring peoples, and a certain percent of people who are untypical. I would not make a bet on identifying one specific person as belonging to specific nationality, but if I had a group of 100 representatives in front of me then guessing where they are from would be a trivial matter, and I would stake my money on it. (This concerns not all nationalities inhabiting the earth, but only those with whose type I am familiar).