Mo I think even you have missed his point but its because there was a diversion.
He is trying to equate this logic (ie, hamas is a nazi organization, but it would be ok to join because there one would do xyz positive thing - for example kill PLO arabs ) to something I wrote.
I said that even though there is treasonous leadership it does not mean the IDF is itself a nazi group and courageous Jews (only those who have the beitzim to refuse evil orders) should join the army with the intention to sabotage any attempts at expulsion of Jews.
However his logic makes no sense - the logic consists of what he added at the very end that someone in hamas could be "fighting against the hamas leadership" (how so?) because I said that brave Jews like the ones I described are foiling the plans of the ruling elites and their yes-men in berets. But what it has to do with fighting hamas leadership is anybody's guess. If u disobey orders from hamas they will simply shoot you. And no one in hamas is urinating themselves over the idea of soldiers refusing orders to fight Jews, but the IDF and the media go hysterical over this possibility. Etc etc