Necrophilia O.K. according to Islamic scholars,have sex with your dead wife

[mord]

http://sheikyermami.com/2011/05/12/fartwa-necrophilia-halal/

[Rubystars]

Wow that's gross

[mord]

Wow that's gross

Nothing surprises about Islam

[The One and Only Mo]

Nothing surprises about Islam

ditto

[Zelhar]

If we are to maintain our good credibility, we shouldn't propagated every accusation about yet another Islamic perversion unless we have sound evidence.

[mord]

If we are to maintain our good credibility, we shouldn't propagated every accusation about yet another Islamic perversion unless we have sound evidence.

http://www.moroccoboard.com/viewpoint/124/5239

[Zelhar]

http://www.moroccoboard.com/viewpoint/124/5239

I remember a previous post here about an Imam in Egypt who had suggested women to breast feed their male colleagues so that they wouldn't have to wear hijab in their work environment. But it was just one crazy Imam and his fatwa was dismissed by higher authorities.

[Christian Zionist]

Wow that's gross

Very true.

To enlighten the people who are ignorant about "Sati" Pratha in India, this custom was a result of Muslim oppression and brutality. The Hindu women of India, in order to save their honor, used to jump into the fire after their husbands were brutally murdered by Muslim invaders. The question that arises from this is why did they jump into the fire and kill themselves? Why didn't they just poison themselves? The reason for this is that the lecherous necrophiliac muslim invaders did not even leave the dead bodies alone. Yes, they had sex even with the dead bodies! How disappointing it must have been for them to find nothing, but ashes.

http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate/women.html

[muman613]

The enemies of Israel always have deviant sexual practices and JTF must expose this.

How very true. The Torah relates that the ways of the ancient Egyptians included the most vile sexual perversions...


http://vbm-torah.org/archive/sichot/vayikra/30-65kedoshim.htm
.
.
.
In the following verse, we read: "You shall perform My judgments and observe My statutes." The term "judgments" (mishpatim) refers to those commandments whose reasons are clear, those which "had they not been uttered [by God], they would be worthy of being enacted [by man]" (Rashi, ibid). "Statutes" (chukkim), on the other hand, are commandments whose reasons are unknown to us - those which, from our point of view, appear arbitrary; there is nothing inherently negative about the prohibited activity itself.

We may explain verse 3 in a similar way. Commenting on this verse, Rashi writes: "This tells us that the customs of the Egyptians and of the Canaanites were the most depraved of all the nations." Hence, the customs of Egypt and Canaan are prohibited because of their inherent perversion, because of the depravity of the acts themselves. Indeed, the chapter does go on to describe acts of immorality which are abominations in and of themselves. But when the Torah speaks of "their statutes," it refers to ordinary actions that are not in themselves negative - just as, from our point of view, there is no moral imperative inherent to such laws as "kil'ayim" (the prohibition of mixing species) or the purification procedure involving the red heifer. Why, then, are these gentile customs forbidden?
.
.
.

[syyuge]

Muslamics must be the gross products of all kinds of deviant practices.