You are conflating multiple viewpoints in your attempt to defend the "Torah Codes" and in doing so you are arguing against a straw man in some cases (as is often the case when you argue with me - or with "me," actually - so it seems. I think this happens often because you are reacting viscerally in a global sense to what I say rather than considering PRECISELY what thing I have actually said and limiting it only to what I said and not 10 other things I did not say. I guess because you are defensive or emotional about the way you believe certain things, and this causes you to overreact to what you perceive as a challenge to these beliefs, you then ascribe to me beliefs that are not mine. It does get annoying. But I digress).
I do not disagree that certain textual methods can uncover sod level understandings of the parsha. Similarly, I do not disagree that certain ideas and profound wisdom are sometimes only hinted at by the Torah, which requires a deep investigative method by our greatest scholars to uncover. But I DO DISAGREE when you claim that the Torah predicts every single world event and contains every form of human knowledge. A simple proof against you is that the Tosfos and other rishonim say that we DO NOT follow the medical advice of the Talmud (not even talking Torah in that case, but Talmud, but the point is still the same - Chazal according to you should have been able to "divine" true medical knowledge and advice from the Torah text if it was really contained in there. But Torah is not a medical textbook, it does not contain that info, and therefore, when medicine advanced to a level higher than that known in the world chazal lived in, the Rabbinic scholars we rely on rightly advised that we should discard any outdated medical advice from a previous era even if it was recorded by chazal in our holy Talmud). Please think deeply about what I've said here.
