Author Topic: Shalom  (Read 6961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dan Ben Noah

  • Senior JTFer
  • ****
  • Posts: 279
Shalom
« on: April 21, 2012, 02:57:35 PM »
Shalom
« Last Edit: June 25, 2016, 05:22:58 PM by Dan Ben Noah »
Jeremiah 16:19 O Lord, Who are my power and my strength and my refuge in the day of trouble, to You nations will come from the ends of the earth and say, "Only lies have our fathers handed down to us, emptiness in which there is nothing of any avail!

Zechariah 8:23 So said the Lord of Hosts: In those days, when ten men of all the languages of the nations shall take hold of the skirt of a Jewish man, saying, "Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you."

Offline Zelhar

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10689
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2012, 03:20:52 PM »
I think this article shows nothing but biased against science. "supernatural" is by definition something that cannot be explained scientifically. And of course God by definition is not a natural phenomenon that one can measure and explain scientifically. Genetics and evolution are not and cannot refute the existence of God but some atheists bastardize pseudo-scientific rhetoric in an attempt to make people believe they are right. However I think on the other side you have the "flat earth society" type of people that think the bible is the only valid science book, something it was never meant to be.

Offline Zelhar

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10689
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2012, 03:51:01 PM »
That's the whole point that the article is making.  They start with evolution as an assumption and working backwards from their conclusion contrive a scenario where evolution could be true even if it doesn't work the same way as the created version.  That's not science.  And calling them on it is not bias against science.
But in the case you posted they talk about something very specific and related completely to genetic science. It's not like this scientist try to prove metaphysical facts using his particular discipline. And it happens sometimes in science that scientist have tunnel vision and they don't try to look outside of their very narrow and particular field of expertise I am not sure if that's the case here or not but anyway that has little to do with the debate about evolution and atheism.

Offline Zelhar

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10689
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2012, 04:14:48 PM »
Ok, so let's take a supernatural event like Elijah being carried to heaven in a chariot of fire.  This, like creation, is something that can't be measured or explained scientifically.  But what if someone tried to prove that it was scientific processes that formed the chariot of fire and made Elijah disappear and said G-d was not involved in the event at all?  What if they started doing experiments to try to reproduce a chariot of fire that could spontaneously make people disappear?  Clearly the only reason people would do something this ridiculous is if they had an axe to grind against G-d, not because they were genuinely interested in truth.  The same thing is true of devilutionists.
Sounds like something the History Channel would do, if they hadn't already. I think this is quite silly how some people try to explain away events such as the 10 plagues as natural events.

Offline Zelhar

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10689
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2012, 04:21:22 PM »
They say that they want to find out how something "evolved" (so they assume it evolved in the first place).  And then they engineer a laboratory-produced version that is incredibly inferior to the natural one using their assumptions.  They could probably also engineer a way that water could be produced from metal if that was their goal but that doesn't mean it's a natural process.
They indeed work under the assumption of genetic evolution and that is very reasonable. It's a theory with established supporting evidence and with productive and beneficial discoveries particularly in medicine. I am not qualified to tell if the specific methodology in one particular lab experiment was flawed but generally it is a scientific fact that DNA and the process of mutation in DNA exist and play a major role in life science.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2012, 01:35:47 PM »
I think this article shows nothing but biased against science. "supernatural" is by definition something that cannot be explained scientifically. And of course G-d by definition is not a natural phenomenon that one can measure and explain scientifically. Genetics and evolution are not and cannot refute the existence of G-d but some atheists bastardize pseudo-scientific rhetoric in an attempt to make people believe they are right. However I think on the other side you have the "flat earth society" type of people that think the bible is the only valid science book, something it was never meant to be.

Yes,obviously a scientist will seek only a natural explanation - otherwise he would be doing theology, not science.  The scientist's job is to seek natural explanations to phenomena in nature, so we can understand them better (to the best of our ability anyway).  The writers of articles like this are very insecure about themselves and their beliefs because they cannot simply be confident that BEHIND the natural explanations are ultimately a supernatural source.   They feel the need to attack every natural explanation (typically using using attacks without much or basis).   Just because a scientist doesn't mention God, it does equate to an "attack" on religion or belief in God!   The overly defensive posture and indignation of the articles like this is a bit embarrassing.  Religionists should be confident of the veracity of the Torah.

It is also funny how they always arbitrarily draw the line at a certain level of complexity.  If I combine sodium hydroxide and hydrogen chloride in a test tube to produce salt (sodium chloride) why am I "allowed" by these geniuses to explain that naturally?  God is not involved with that but He is involved in toxins fitting into protein receptors?   
Clearly the answer is that God is behind all of these phenomena but we should still try to arrive at naturasl explanations for all of them (if we are able to) because that is our job to understand the workings of God in nature and to appreciate them.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2012, 01:03:15 AM »
The claim that it's a scientist's job to seek only natural explanations does not logically lead to the conclusion that there are only natural explanations for everything.  Like I said earlier, if there are scientists seeking a "natural explanation" for the chariot of fire that carried Elijah away, they are just grasping at straws.  Furthermore, even if a scientist found a "natural explanation" for the chariot of fire, the 10 plagues, etc., it doesn't mean that the natural explanation would be the right one.  To try to find a natural explanation for the chariot of fire would mean that a scientist is making an assumption that there is no G-d before even starting.  This is the same thing that the scientist in the article is doing when he assumes evolution before he even starts his experiment.

Chariots of fire do not fall under the purview of science.   Scientists investigate natural causes to natural phenomena that can be observed in nature or in the lab.    A vision from centuries ago that cannot be replicated simply cannot be studied.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2012, 01:59:37 AM »
The claim that it's a scientist's job to seek only natural explanations does not logically lead to the conclusion that there are only natural explanations for everything.  Like I said earlier, if there are scientists seeking a "natural explanation" for the chariot of fire that carried Elijah away, they are just grasping at straws.  Furthermore, even if a scientist found a "natural explanation" for the chariot of fire, the 10 plagues, etc., it doesn't mean that the natural explanation would be the right one.  To try to find a natural explanation for the chariot of fire would mean that a scientist is making an assumption that there is no G-d before even starting.  This is the same thing that the scientist in the article is doing when he assumes evolution before he even starts his experiment.

Is this 'Mister Rational' speaking?

You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2012, 05:00:27 PM »
So you believe that if someone started writing theories about how a chariot of fire could have appeared by natural means, this would appear in a peer reviewed journal of any merit? 

Sorry, but nature, cell, or science are not publishing that because its fantasy not reproducible science.
A minor journal might publish it if they can actually produce such an experience with a consistent protocol! And who cares if they can?  Does that mean to you that the original never happened?

Second question, about the plagues, do you believe that God's miracles cannot happen through natural phenomena?  Isn't that what creation is?  God's acts expressing themselves in the natural world we perceive and live in?  Or did he only create unnatural things?  (In that case, exactly what world are we living in if not the one God created?)

Did God "erase Himself" from the splitting of the sea when He dictated to Moshe who wrote it down in His own Torah that it was caused by a strong east wind blowing all night?  (See exodus 14:21)
Sorry, friend, but it is YOUR mistake when you erase God from any seemingly natural event or whenever His actions are expressed in the natural world thru natural mechanisms.  A very big mistake.  No reason to fear natural explanations of things we experience.

Offline Tag-MehirTzedek

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 5462
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2012, 05:51:31 PM »

If you're saying that G-d intervened in nature at certain points in history in order to make miracles occur using elements of nature, that I would agree with.  With respect to the east wind blowing all night--wind is a part of nature.  However, wind blowing at a certain time and place in order to allow Israel to pass through a sea on dry land, and then stopping at the time needed to destroy the Egyptian army--that is not a natural phenomenon.  That is a process that would require divine intervention to create.

 I think you both are agreeing. G-D is certainly great and master of all, including the precise time of each event happening. The miracle of the sea splitting etc. demonstrates G-D's control of all including time and being precise to the last second. According to some (perhaps Rambam as well), the whole universe and everything that happened or will happen (from our point) was already done at the exact point of creation. The great "intervention" if you will is time. What was, Is and Will be is all part of the creation of the world. And G-D does run this world according to His will of natural laws (aka nature). Even the miracles are all part of G-D's natural system to the world which He created and placed at the precise time He willed it.  These are hard concepts to grasp soo I hope one reads it carefully.
.   ד  עֹזְבֵי תוֹרָה, יְהַלְלוּ רָשָׁע;    וְשֹׁמְרֵי תוֹרָה, יִתְגָּרוּ בָם
4 They that forsake the law praise the wicked; but such as keep the law contend with them.

ה  אַנְשֵׁי-רָע, לֹא-יָבִינוּ מִשְׁפָּט;    וּמְבַקְשֵׁי יְהוָה, יָבִינוּ כֹל.   
5 Evil men understand not justice; but they that seek the LORD understand all things.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2012, 07:16:48 PM »
I think you both are agreeing. G-D is certainly great and master of all, including the precise time of each event happening. The miracle of the sea splitting etc. demonstrates G-D's control of all including time and being precise to the last second. According to some (perhaps Rambam as well), the whole universe and everything that happened or will happen (from our point) was already done at the exact point of creation. The great "intervention" if you will is time. What was, Is and Will be is all part of the creation of the world. And G-D does run this world according to His will of natural laws (aka nature). Even the miracles are all part of G-D's natural system to the world which He created and placed at the precise time He willed it.  These are hard concepts to grasp soo I hope one reads it carefully.

Yes I have heard this discussed. It is believed that water was created from the very beginning with the 'pre-programming' to split when the Jewish people reached the edge of the Sea of Reeds {Yam Suf}.



http://www.torah.org/learning/hamaayan/5758/beshalach.html

Quote

The midrash (commenting on verse 14:27) offers two reasons why the Red Sea split for Bnei Yisrael. One view says that it was in the merit of the bones of Yosef which traveled with Bnei Yisrael. The other view says that when Hashem created the sea, He imposed a condition that the water would split for the Jewish people.


http://www.shemayisrael.com/yomtov/chanukah/selections63.htm
Quote
Rabbi Shlomo Kluger, in his commentary on our prayers, Y'rios Shlomo, explains that Hashem frowns upon miracles that are contrary to nature, while He is pleased with those that are within nature. This is to be explained as follows: We can view a happening as a miracle, totally contrary to the set laws of nature, while in truth it is not a miracle at all, but rather within the confines of nature. We find in the M.R. Breishis 5:5 that Rabbi Yochonon derives from "Va'yoshov ha'yom l'eisono," - and the sea returned to its strength, that although Hashem gave water the nature to flow, He stipulated at the time of creation that the waters of the sea should split for the bnei Yisroel at the required time. Since this was originally set into the system of the creation of the world, it is not to be considered a miracle, albeit that it is a major departure from the norm. The same is true of almost all of the miracles that Hashem has wrought. The Nezer Hakodesh writes likewise on Shmos 12:41, the verse that relates that after 430 years the hosts of Hashem exited from Egypt, that every miracle that took place in the saga of the exile in Egypt and the exodus, was already in the workings, having been pre-programmed into the creation of the world. This actually takes this type of miracle out of the realm of miracles. It is this type of miracle that Hashem is not reluctant to do.
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2012, 09:23:28 PM »
I don't buy the pre-programming thing.  Notice Rabbi Shlomo Kruger, who advocates it, correctly says that if this is the case then it is not to be considered a miracle.  I would not call this position atheism, but "theism light" since it shies away from believing in miracles.  The Torah says that the parting of the waters happened when Moses stretched his staff over the sea, which is the time that G-d intervened in nature and caused the waters to part.  A lot of G-d's miracles are also dependent on free will.  In Jeremiah it tells us that G-d can change His plans on whether to fulfill prophecies of reward or punishment based on people's behavior.  And what about the times that G-d spoke to Moses?  If it was actually G-d's voice then it would be G-d intervening at that time in history and not a pre-destined audio recording.  G-d couldn't speak to the prophets if He was currently just a bystander.  Therefore it is G-d intervening, not pre-destining, in nature that causes miracles to happen.  However, I can see how those with atheistic tendencies might buy into this one because it reduces G-d to a less active role which is the next step to atheism.

It is not only Rabbi Kruger who says this. It comes from the sages...It has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with Atheism, and as you can see Rambam subscribed to this particular understanding...

As a matter of fact the Pirkie Avot {Ethics of the Fathers} a Talmudic tract, states the following:

Ten things were created at twilight of Shabbat eve. These are: the mouth of the earth [that swallowed Korach]; the mouth of [Miriam's] well; the mouth of [Balaam's] donkey; the rainbow; the manna; [Moses'] staff; the shamir; the writing, the inscription and the tablets [of the Ten Commandments]. Some say also the burial place of Moshe and the ram of our father Avraham. And some say also the spirits of destruction as well as the original tongs, for tongs are made with tongs. (Avot 5:6)



http://blog.webyeshiva.org/teachers-contributions/insights-in-pirkei-avot-the-final-moments-of-creation

What commonality unites this disparate list and why were these things formed at the very end of the six days of creation?  Many of the listed items refer to miraculous events and the previous two mishnayot in Avot catalogue miracles; thus, we may have another enumeration of divinely inspired changes in nature.  Rambam offers such an interpretation while reading the mishnah in light of his strong endorsement of the stability of the natural order.  Divine perfection entails making a world which does not require constant tinkering at later sages.  In fact, subsequent deviations from the regularity of nature were all programmed in at the time of creation.  That is the implication of G-d creating miraculous elements just before the first Sabbath.

This mishnah does not offer an exhaustive list of biblical miracles; note that the splitting of the sea does not appear.  Why focus on these specific miracles?  Rambam explains that other miracles were programmed in during earlier days of creation.  For example, the splitting of the sea was planned on the second day of creation when G-d formed the waters.  It remains unclear why certain miracles were incorporated early in the six days whereas others were left for the end of process.  That some of the listed items, such as the rainbow and Avraham’s ram, do not refer to miraculous events provides another difficulty for Rambam’s interpretation.

In Moreh Nevuchim (2:29), Rambam cites midrashic support for his interpretation.  Yalkut Shimoni (Yehoshua 21) states that G-d made a condition with the sea at the time of creation that it would split for the Jewish people at the appropriate moment.  Arguably, this conveys the idea that G-d preprogrammed all miracles into the created order.

However, Tosafot Yom Tov points out an alternative reading of the midrash.  A different midrash (Tanchuma Bereishit) says that G-d made a condition at the time of creation that the world’s survival depends upon the Jews accepting the Torah.  That second midrash refers not to miracles but to the purpose of creation. Perhaps the midrashic motif of divine conditions made during beriat olam always suggests something about the telos of creation.  If so, the midrash from Yalkut Shimoni says something abut the great significance of keriat yam suf but nothing about the nature of miracles.

Meiri offers an explanation of the mishnah in Avot in which the mishnah enumerates ideas crucial to our worldview.  Their inclusion in the six days of creation indicates their ultimate significance.  The earth opening alludes to punishment of the wicked while the well of Miriam indicates reward for the righteous.  I will not outline his explanations for the entire list here but will suffice with two intriguing aspects.  According to Meiri, the burial place of Moshe is significant precisely because we do not know where it is lest it become an object of worship.  We certainly acknowledge the greatness of our heroic leaders but we also reject any attempt to attribute divinity to them.  Meiri explains that mazikim (translated above as “the spirits of destruction”) refers to the evil inclination, itself a crucial element of the created order.  Without the energy and drive generated by the aggressive elements of the human personality, the world could not survive (see Bereishit Rabba 9:7).

Avot certainly serves as guide to Jewish ethics but it may also be a guide to Jewish philosophy.  Meiri’s reading gives this mishnah philosophical weight and theological importance.
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Tag-MehirTzedek

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 5462
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #12 on: April 30, 2012, 09:27:38 PM »
Dan- The opposite of your conclusions. Its not athiestic tendencies, actually its the opposite. It is saying that G-D's "program" in the world is perfect. The software which produced this world is perfect and doesn't need upgrades. Within the program their is included incidents which are not to the same frequency of other things made, but its all perfectly planned and made.
 Also about free choice- G-D Knows what one will choose, never-the-less we have free choice. This is a hard philosophical thing to grasp as is time, but G-D is above time.
 And about the "voice" of G-D that Moshe heard, Rambam (in Moreh) explains that it was a created entity as well.
.   ד  עֹזְבֵי תוֹרָה, יְהַלְלוּ רָשָׁע;    וְשֹׁמְרֵי תוֹרָה, יִתְגָּרוּ בָם
4 They that forsake the law praise the wicked; but such as keep the law contend with them.

ה  אַנְשֵׁי-רָע, לֹא-יָבִינוּ מִשְׁפָּט;    וּמְבַקְשֵׁי יְהוָה, יָבִינוּ כֹל.   
5 Evil men understand not justice; but they that seek the LORD understand all things.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: How Darwiniacs use assumptions to prove evolution
« Reply #13 on: April 30, 2012, 09:42:07 PM »
I didn't say it was atheism, it's "theism light".  I don't have a problem with the idea that G-d knew of miracles before they occured, I just don't like the explanation that G-d didn't intervene in history and didn't really perform miracles.  Judaism has rejected the Presbyterian doctrine of pre-destination, which deals with similar issues, so I find it ironic that some rabbis accept this.

This does not have anything to do with predestination as you suggest. It has to do with Hashems knowledge that there will be a Jewish people. We believe that the reason Hashem created the entire universe was so that the Jewish people would exist. Thus we have the belief that the Torah existed for 2000 years before creation {as the blueprint of creation}, and that the Torah really should have started with the first mitzvah {marking the first day of the month of the Jewish lunar calendar}.

http://www.beingjewish.com/basics/torahstudy.html

Quote
What is the secret of our existence? The Torah. Though, actually, it's no secret. It is our very reason for existence. More to the point, it is the reason that the world exists.

The Midrash tells us that Hashem created the Torah two thousand years before He created the universe (Midrash Beraishis Rabbah, 8). When the time came to create the universe, Hashem used the Torah as a blueprint. Just as a builder places walls where the blueprint says to put them, and doors where the blueprint says to put them, Hashem created the Torah and used that as a blueprint. (Midrash Beraishis Rabbah 1:1)

What does this mean? It means that the reason we are born with hands is because Hashem wrote in the Torah the Commandment of giving charity. We need hands to give charity, so we are born with hands.

We have parents because the Torah says "Honor your father and your mother."

The Torah commands us to pray; the Torah commands us not to gossip; the Torah commands us to eat Matzah on Passover night; the Torah commands us to teach our sons Torah: therefore, we are born with mouths.

Without this knowledge, we would have thought precisely the opposite. We would have assumed that since we have eyes, Hashem commanded us not to look at idols, and not to look at debauchery, etc. But the truth is the reverse. Hashem created the Commandments first, and then gave us the ability to obey or transgress those Commandments.

The Torah was not only the blueprint for Creation, it is also what keeps the world in existence today! The Rabbis teach us that the observance of the Covenant of Circumcision and the Covenant of the Torah keep the world in existence (Babylonian Talmud, Shabbos 137b; Pesachim 68b; Nedarim 31a).

http://www.meaningfullife.com/torah/parsha/bamidbar/bamidbar/The_First_Creation.php

Quote
The First Mitzvah
Time’s status as the “first creation” sheds light on another point raised by the commentaries on the first verse of the book of Genesis. In his commentary on this verse, Rashi quotes the Midrash:

The Torah should have begun with, “This month shall be to you the head of months...” (Exodus 12), which is the first mitzvah commanded to the people of Israel. Why does it begin ‘In the beginning of...’?

Torah means “law” and “instruction”; the function of the Torah is instruct us on the laws of life, which it does via the 613 mitzvot (divine commandments) it addresses to the people of Israel. But the first such mitzvah appears only in the 12th chapter of Exodus, where G-d commands the mitzvah of kiddush hachodesh - the “sanctification of the new month” and the setting of the Jewish calendar. Why, asks the Midrash, does the Torah devote the first of its five books, and a good part of the second, to things other than its primary purpose? While there is many a lesson to be learned from the Torah’s accounts of the creation of the universe, the history of mankind and the lives of the Patriarchs, would it not be more appropriate for the Torah to begin with G-d’s direct instructions to us?

The Midrash goes on to explain the Torah’s reason for opening with its account of the creation - a reason whose deeper significance we have explored on another occasion.[2]

 In this essay, we shall dwell on the Midrash’s reference to the mitzvah of kiddush hachodesh as “the first mitzvah to be commanded the Jewish people.” Why, indeed, was this our first mitzvah? Obviously, the setting of our calendar has a far-reaching influence on many other mitzvot—it determines when we will sound the shofar, fast and atone for our sins, conduct the Passover seder, as well as a host of other time-specific observances. But it would seem that there a number of other, no less fundamental mitzvot. In what sense is the mitzvah of setting the calendar more basic to our service of G-d than mitzvot such as Torah study, charity or prayer?
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14