quote someone else: 'Normal' democratic societies do not attack peaceful protestors, if these people were in fact behaving peacefully. Anyway, I think we agree on at least one point cited above.
It's unfortunate that some people on this forum go into a maddened state when someone expresses the radical idea that no one who isn't trying to harm them has the right to not be beaten on the street. And Chaim, if you felt that this was the way gays should be treated in Israel, you should have said that in the video. I'm tired of being jumped on by people on this forum who dont actually read what a person writes, jumping 30 steps into things that they dont/haven't/wouldn't even think. Somehow my comment that people should not be beaten to a bloody pulp gets turned into the idea that supporting the kind of nonsense that Serbian posted above.
If this was a protest, then it would be against straightness, and would require a far more violent response than that of our Serbian friend. As for people getting beaten to a bloody pulp, I think terrorists should until they give up the facts. Now that we've established a use for beating, we go to the spirit of the law which is inflicting a punishment that causes less damage than the offense. Here they have the homos in floaties dancing too, and it is not a protest either; it is a demonstration. An advertising venue, a celebration of their sin, an opportunity for empowerment vs. the normal majority and a glorification of their detrimental (to under-exaggerate) lifestyle.
If your son, mhmhmh jr., were to enter into a gay lifestyle after being dazzled by all the pretty colors of these shameful men, would then it be worth it to knock 'em all out? How about your neighbor's son? Freedom of expression (civilian) is a fundamental right, so granted they can go out alone and sing of how much they deserve hellfire from the rooftops (but not mine). Would they allow a kahanist parade? A bunch of Jews and sane people marching in a group demanding Jewish law and Arab expulsion? Those Serbian police would be arming the protestors to that.
Freedom of speech is not free; use it or loose it. Gays have used it in their vomitus voices without ceasing, and as a result have gained power, and seek to grow it. This is not freedom of speech. This is the government and population allowing streets to be blocked and homos to control a seemingly small, but of utmost importance to them, part of our lives.
Yes, homos can dress up like the princess Diana and I won't attack. To have them elevated on floats above me, controlling streets that belong to a majority that strongly disapproves of them, and allow them to not only have a chance to dress disgustingly, but do so in front of the impressionable and lonely (traits that are consequences of not the size of the city within itself, but the social isolation that comes with tolerating everyone and showing true kinship to none), or kids.
This isn't a trait humans are born with, so if you have to get into why anyone shouldn't defend their right to a civil society where abominable things are not shown to my kids, so them and their friend don't never have kids, and get a disease and lead sinful lives also. with however they ultimately die being not the worse part. I'm calling for a crackhead and pedophile parade down your street.
Obviously they can change, but you don't get over an addiction (which comes from a particular place) by saying how its OK that you did that, just now remember how you don't have too, and its gonna be such a good life/ good to leave your current life/ bla bla bla. You say, I HAVE A PROBLEM, bad, bad problem, I'M BETTER THAN THIS.
If you can say yes to muslims in Israel, you can say yes to every action they take in Israel (because either way g-d already said what he'd do to you) they take, so if you can accept homosexuals selling and spreading their thing, which on a scale of 1 to meteors is really that bad, I'm not moving next to you.
Topic: "Gays" are going nuts over our new video on homosexual "marriage" (Read 26305 times)