I haven's said I agreed with him or disagreed with him. I've showed that it's not a choice Israel can make.
Ok, and I am asserting that by making that statement you are definitely contradicting what Chaim constantly preaches about what Israel should do and what it could do. That's fine too, you don't have to agree or think the same way as Chaim. But to me it is obvious that you are clearly wrong about this! Israel if it had any guts, could do all the things Chaim talks about and Rabbi Kahane talked about.
It's like me choosing to shoot somebody. Of course I COULD shoot somebody, but doing that will lead to punishment. Similarly, Israel CAN do whatever it wants, but it will be punished. Whether or not the punishment is severe is up for discussion, but they don't want to deal with the universal backlash. Since when did I say anything about Chaim?
There is backlash no matter what they do. No matter how politically correct they try to be. Haven't you learned that by now?
Some of us are sick and tired of these excuses and really do not care about backlash and do not care about what the world wants. Especially considering they send the backlash at us even when we do something completely parve, they manage to twist it and portray it negatively. Ok, so that's the best they got?
Some of us are ready to deal head on with backlash, come as it may, as long as we take care of the Arabs. What's more important here?
And some people, like me, are skeptical that there would really be such a backlash. I am skeptical that this is a manufactured premise designed to keep good Jews apathetic and shrug their shoulders and throw their hands up in the air and say "well, what can we do, we have no choice, what will america say." The oslo agenda gets carried out as long as there are enough Jews who are complacent like that and in utter dread and fear of this supposed "backlash" and the built-up persona given to the idea of Israel getting punished - a "conventional wisdom" built up by far leftists and media elites. One of those "conventional wisdoms" which in my mind is neither conventional nor wise.
There are many countries in the world, many of them behave according to their own interests, not what the UN wants or what the US wants or what one particular other country wants. They do not get beheaded or nuked. Most times they get cold relations at worst. Only very severe DIRECT AFFRONTS (ie an attack on america, or north korea saying it will nuke america) create actual military hostility. Most of the time, America will express how they don't like a policy and put pressure to try to get it according to their wishes. If that doesn't work, oh well.
They are not going to send troops into Israel to make Israel treat Arabs gentler . It is not worth the time and effort of these other countries. LOL at the idea of them caring about Arabs. They certainly do not.
You didn't say something about Chaim, but when I contradicted some of your points, another poster here (brennan fan) defended you by saying that you said the same thing as Chaim, or that you are agreeing with Chaim on the points you made. So I simply tried to assert that is not true. Obviously, you don't have to agree with Chaim or with anyone. My main point is not that you differ from Chaim's views, but that your view is mistaken!