The Worldwide Crisis of Islam > The Truth About Islam
A Topic that went badly wrong (formerly called a reminder of the forum rules)
newman:
--- Quote from: ftf on July 10, 2007, 05:01:24 PM ---I'm not in any way opposed to insulting islam, but in keeping with the forum rules, when it comes to a specific person I think we should be attacking the beliefs not the person, many posts by newman and Muck de Fuslims were definately aimed at the person, calling him specifically a cammel humper for instance.
Why couldn't they alternatively say "Why does your religion authorise sex with animals?" That would be in keeping with the rules, and would stop it from being personal.
--- End quote ---
If a hammas leader was on the forum with Chaim, Do you think Chaim would be so whimpy?
I agree with Ze'ev we need a final ruling here. This organisation is not a ladies tea party. The forum rules were never meant to apply to nazis.
ftf:
Look, if there was a Hamas leader here, it would be quite appropriate to accuse him of being party to mass murder, but we are not talking about a hamas leader, we are talking about a fringe member of the muslim community, a recent convert who has not yet commmited any crimes in the name of Islam as far as we know.
Muck DeFuslims:
--- Quote from: ftf on July 10, 2007, 05:01:24 PM ---I'm not in any way opposed to insulting islam, but in keeping with the forum rules, when it comes to a specific person I think we should be attacking the beliefs not the person, many posts by newman and Muck de Fuslims were definately aimed at the person, calling him specifically a cammel humper for instance.
Why couldn't they alternatively say "Why does your religion authorise sex with animals?" That would be in keeping with the rules, and would stop it from being personal.
--- End quote ---
I'm getting more than a little tired or your lies and distortion of the truth.
I never accused the Moozie of being a camel humper.
And even if newman did, he did so facetiously, he obviously has no way to know who or what Abdu is humping, as he doesn't know him personally.
He's putting the Moozie down with dark humor. I already explained this to you in another thread.
Calling the Moo a camel humper is NOT civil, IS disrespectful, IS insulting, IS demeaning, but is NOT obscene.
NOT being civil, NOT being courteous, and choosing TO insult Muslims is NOT against JTF rules.
Newman or myself COULD have said "Why does your religion authorise sex with animals?" but I guess we're just not as erudite, articulate, intelligent or polite as you are.
Please try using better criteria and judgement before deleting posts in the future, as this nonsense is getting tiresome and disrupting the board.
You know,ftf, I keep trying to let things with you rest. But you insist on mentioning me in your posts or inserting comments about my posts in threads that have died.
Give it a rest.
One other thing, if you're going to vigorously 'inforce' the rules, I think you should learn how to correctly spell 'enforce. Poor spelling and semi-literate moderators reflect badly on JTF.
newman:
--- Quote from: Muck DeFuslims on July 10, 2007, 10:40:25 PM ---
--- Quote from: ftf on July 10, 2007, 05:01:24 PM ---I'm not in any way opposed to insulting islam, but in keeping with the forum rules, when it comes to a specific person I think we should be attacking the beliefs not the person, many posts by newman and Muck de Fuslims were definately aimed at the person, calling him specifically a cammel humper for instance.
Why couldn't they alternatively say "Why does your religion authorise sex with animals?" That would be in keeping with the rules, and would stop it from being personal.
--- End quote ---
I'm getting more than a little tired or your lies and distortion of the truth.
I never accused the Moozie of being a camel humper.
And even if newman did, he did so facetiously, he obviously has no way to know who or what Abdu is humping, as he doesn't know him personally.
He's putting the Moozie down with dark humor. I already explained this to you in another thread.
Calling the Moo a camel humper is NOT civil, IS disrespectful, IS insulting, IS demeaning, but is NOT obscene.
NOT being civil, NOT being courteous, and choosing TO insult Muslims is NOT against JTF rules.
Newman or myself COULD have said "Why does your religion authorise sex with animals?" but I guess we're just not as erudite, articulate, intelligent or polite as you are.
Please try using better criteria and judgement before deleting posts in the future, as this nonsense is getting tiresome and disrupting the board.
You know,ftf, I keep trying to let things with you rest. But you insist on mentioning me in your posts or inserting comments about my posts in threads that have died.
Give it a rest.
One other thing, if you're going to vigorously 'inforce' the rules, I think you should learn how to correctly spell 'enforce. Poor spelling and semi-literate moderators reflect badly on JTF.
--- End quote ---
Hey Muck,
How do you type the noise you make when you blow a rasberry?
I think I'll need to learn.
newman:
--- Quote from: Yacov Menashe Ben Rachamim on July 10, 2007, 11:05:59 PM ---As Chief Administrator, I rule that the rules don't apply when dealing with Muslims. Chaim says with our enemies, anything goes.
--- End quote ---
Thanks, Yacov....Jimmy said the same later on. Someone's not listening, though.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version