If Romney had won, how would the USA be today: better, worse or no different?

[Yerusha]

History has shown that there is very little difference between a Republican presidency and a Democratic presidency.

Apart that USA would today be at war with North Korea and Syria, if Romney had won after 6 months in the White House, would the USA and Israel be notably different in any way from today?

Better?

Or worse?

Or nor real difference?

[Dr. Dan]

Does it matter?  What if Moses was a woman would it have made a difference? 

[TruthSpreader]

Not really. He'd be another George W Bush.

[Rubystars]

I don't know if it would be better, but at least he'd actually be president.

[Joe Gutfeld]

As long as Obama is not the president, it will be better.  Unless it is Hillary "What difference does it make" Cllinton.

[NoMosqueHere]

Better.  We'd be rid of the muslim jew hater in the white house.  Silly question.

[drlmg]

Better.  We'd be rid of the muslim jew hater in the white house.  Silly question.

so true!

[drlmg]

Not really. He'd be another George W Bush.

Are you implying that George Bush and his administration was as bad as oBumma?

[Rubystars]

Are you implying that George Bush and his administration was as bad as oBumma?

George Bush contributed to the destruction of Gush Katif, vastly expanded the size of government, stepped all over civil liberties, and got us involved in unnecessary foreign entanglements. He wasn't a good president.

[syyuge]

George Bush attacked Afghanistan which was highly justified due to the retaliation of the 911. Then the natural consequential step of him was to obliterate their roots a pakistan and he was ready for it. However the pakistani leadership kissed the feet of saudi kingdom to stop the Bush. So saudi kingdom misguided Bush in to attacking at Iraq instead of pakistan and rest is the history of reversal of the fates. So the only mistake of Bush was that he did not invade pakistan.

[Confederate Kahanist]

George Bush contributed to the destruction of Gush Katif, vastly expanded the size of government, stepped all over civil liberties, and got us involved in unnecessary foreign entanglements. He wasn't a good president.

George wetback Bush also wanted to give amnesty to the 30 million illegals in this country as well.

[TruthSpreader]

Are you implying that George Bush and his administration was as bad as oBumma?

No. I'm just saying he wouldn't be any different from GW.

And no nobody is as bad as Obama. Not even Bush.

[Joe Gutfeld]

I'd rather have 100 George Bushes before one Obama

[Rubystars]

George Bush attacked Afghanistan which was highly justified due to the retaliation of the 911.

Personally I think it had more to do with the poppy fields there and securing control of them.

If you didn't notice Al Qaeda still exists.

Then the natural consequential step of him was to obliterate their roots a pakistan and he was ready for it. However the pakistani leadership kissed the feet of saudi kingdom to stop the Bush. So saudi kingdom misguided Bush in to attacking at Iraq instead of pakistan and rest is the history of reversal of the fates. So the only mistake of Bush was that he did not invade pakistan.

So Bush is a bad president for trusting the Saudis who had a lot to do with the hijackers coming here in the first place.

[Rubystars]

This article's a little outdated but I think it gives a good idea of why Afghanistan was targeted:

"Opium production in Afghanistan has been on the rise since U.S. occupation started in 2001. Based on UNODC data, there has been more opium poppy cultivation in each of the past four growing seasons (2004–2007) than in any one year during Taliban rule."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_production_in_Afghanistan

[Joe Gutfeld]

I knew that when I saw Romney back off on bashing Obama on the health care and Begazzi that he would lose to that Muslim.

[Nachus]

                                                                                                                                              

 
 Mitt Romney would have been better for Israel and the USA on most levels than Obama, simple as that!

[City Yossi]

la misma mierda

[Sparky]

Romney's goal was to save America, Obama's goal is to destroy it.  I think the USA would have been vastly better had Romney won.

[Chaim Ben Pesach]

בס''ד

If Romney had won:

1. Iran's nuclear program would have been destroyed by now. Romney made it clear for many years that his number one foreign policy goal was to eliminate Iran's nuclear threat by whatever means are necessary. Either the U.S. or Israel would have gotten the job done and the world would be a much safer place.

2. Thousands of additional Jews would be living in Judea, Samaria, eastern Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. Without Obama's constant pressure on Israel to freeze or slow Jewish building, the Israeli government would not as aggressively be blocking Jews from living in the liberated lands.

3. Steps would be taken to reverse and repeal the socialist nightmare known as Obamacare. This was Romney's number one domestic campaign promise.

4. Romney claimed to be against amnesty for illegal aliens or what the traitor media calls "a path to citizenship". Would Romney have kept his word on this issue? If he did, then there would be no amnesty because the bill cannot pass without presidential support.

5. America would be on the path to energy independence. Romney promised to aggressively pursue all forms of energy development. America could set an example for Western countries that would strip the Muslim Nazis of trillions of petrodollars. Drastically fewer petrodollars would mean millions of fewer Muslim babies, less Muslim development of weapons of mass destruction and fewer Muslim takeovers of major Western corporations.

6. We would be able to enjoy a long and bloody battle for the 2016 Democrat presidential nomination between Hillary Clinton and former president Barack Hussein Obama. Yes, Obama the supreme egomaniac would certainly have tried to make a comeback in 2016 and he would have been able to do so if he had been defeated for re-election. Clinton has to run in 2016 if she ever wants to be president because she will be too old in 2020. So this would have been a great civil war in the Democrat party.

These are just some of the differences. Would Romney have been a great president? No. Would Romney have been much better than Obama? Yes.

[Debbie Shafer]

Very True Chaim:  We would be better off financially, national security, illegal immigration, and Romney would not persecute Israel.   Yes, the nation would be 10,000 times better off with Romney! He has a business head on his shoulders....thats one thing he really excells at, he wouldn't be spending us into oblivion, and giving the Muslim brotherhood weapons to use on Israel.

[Yerusha]

Obama has been ordered to send Kerry to pressure Israel to again cease settlements & give up land
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4383771,00.html

Like all Mormons whose dearest wish is to bring the Jews back to oso ha'ish, Romney seemed to be a genuine Salt Lake City Israelophile.



But if US presidents really are puppets who are compelled to obey orders from "above/NWO masters", what would Romney be doing now with Israel: also pressuring her to give up land?

Or could he have got away with doing next to nothing with Israel, neither for nor against, as Reagan did for 8 years?

[Dr. Dan]

If Romney were president, it would be better than what we have today.

[shvartzawilliams]

בס''ד

If Romney had won:

1. Iran's nuclear program would have been destroyed by now. Romney made it clear for many years that his number one foreign policy goal was to eliminate Iran's nuclear threat by whatever means are necessary. Either the U.S. or Israel would have gotten the job done and the world would be a much safer place.

2. Thousands of additional Jews would be living in Judea, Samaria, eastern Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. Without Obama's constant pressure on Israel to freeze or slow Jewish building, the Israeli government would not as aggressively be blocking Jews from living in the liberated lands.

3. Steps would be taken to reverse and repeal the socialist nightmare known as Obamacare. This was Romney's number one domestic campaign promise.

4. Romney claimed to be against amnesty for illegal aliens or what the traitor media calls "a path to citizenship". Would Romney have kept his word on this issue? If he did, then there would be no amnesty because the bill cannot pass without presidential support.

5. America would be on the path to energy independence. Romney promised to aggressively pursue all forms of energy development. America could set an example for Western countries that would strip the Muslim Nazis of trillions of petrodollars. Drastically fewer petrodollars would mean millions of fewer Muslim babies, less Muslim development of weapons of mass destruction and fewer Muslim takeovers of major Western corporations.

6. We would be able to enjoy a long and bloody battle for the 2016 Democrat presidential nomination between Hillary Clinton and former president Barack Hussein Obama. Yes, Obama the supreme egomaniac would certainly have tried to make a comeback in 2016 and he would have been able to do so if he had been defeated for re-election. Clinton has to run in 2016 if she ever wants to be president because she will be too old in 2020. So this would have been a great civil war in the Democrat party.

These are just some of the differences. Would Romney have been a great president? No. Would Romney have been much better than Obama? Yes.

yes, romney said he would repeal obamacare, but he is the one who instituted obamacare in his own state when he was governor.  actions speak louder than words.  thank G-d obama was elected instead of that socialist piece of garbage romney

[Mishmaat]

yes, romney said he would repeal obamacare, but he is the one who instituted obamacare in his own state when he was governor.  actions speak louder than words.  thank G-d obama was elected instead of that socialist piece of garbage romney

What a Hillul Hashem! To thank G-d for a Muslim ruling over America is an obscenity beyond words. Obama is doing everything in his power to undermine America. He's also anti-Israel and therefore a proponent of a new Holocaust. But then again so are you. The two of you have common ground!

You're the epitome of a traitorous coward and a sniveling little worm. I hope that you drop dead soon!