Poll

Who would be worse as POTUS?

Hillary Clinton
8 (88.9%)
Chris Christie
1 (11.1%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: February 09, 2014, 08:27:57 AM

Author Topic: Who would be worse as POTUS?  (Read 829 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ben Yehuda

  • Director Of Marketing
  • Master JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 1412
Who would be worse as POTUS?
« on: January 10, 2014, 08:27:57 AM »
Not a great choice- I know.

Offline angryChineseKahanist

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 10545
  • ☭=卐=☮
Re: Who would be worse as POTUS?
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2014, 08:31:23 AM »
A what?

If you mean president, then Hillary would be worst.
A pseudo communist or a fat opportunist?
U+262d=U+5350=U+9774

Offline GreenLightToGo

  • Full JTFer
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Re: Who would be worse as POTUS?
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2014, 09:11:18 AM »
I voted for Clinton as the worst of the two, but Christie is still bad.

Fox desperately wants Christie to run in 2016. They continue to promote him as a "potential 2016 presidential candidate" even though Christie consistently denies having any interest in that.

Fox hates Ted Cruz among other conservatives so much that they'll continue to promote a candidate for 2016 with no intention of running.

Offline NoMosqueHere

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1150
Re: Who would be worse as POTUS?
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2014, 10:14:28 AM »
I don't think H will run; she looks old and very tired to me.  And, for democrats the problem may be: once you have black, you never go back.  That old black magic got them in its spell....watch out for cory booker or the black governor of massachusetts.

Offline Daniel

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1966
Re: Who would be worse as POTUS?
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2014, 03:06:55 PM »
Hillary is pro-union while Christie is staunchly anti-union. So I would think that most of you would prefer Christie.