Was Mahatma Gandhi an Anti-Semite?

[ChabadKahanist]

If not why was he opposed to Jews having an independent state in Eretz Yisrael?
Why is/were Indian Hindus entitled to an independent state but not Jews?
Sure reeks of Anti-Semitism to me.

[angryChineseKahanist]

Do lions eat wildebeest?

[ChabadKahanist]

Do lions eat wildebeest?

Exactly.
He was a bonafide Jew-hater & why the world sees this POS as a saint & a hero I will never know.

[zachor_ve_kavod]

It's exactly like with Mandela. You know, the West is racist, but not in the way people think. The West is racist because we have such a low and contemptuous opinion of racial minorities, that we don't expect anything from them. We're all just so impressed when they don't act like savages that we give them a pass in other areas. So what's the big deal if Black Americans and Native Americans are anti-Semitic? We're just so impressed when they can speak an articulate sentence. THAT is the real racism of the West. If we want better from minorities, then we have to expect it from them. And so we should not consider Ghandi and Mandela heroes. Would we have still considered them heroes if they were White Christian Americans? So I don't know the full extent to which Ghandi and Mandela were anti-Semitic, but I do know that we sweep under the rug much of what is ugly about these people, so that it doesn't taint our hero worship of them.

[Israel Chai]

It's exactly like with Mandela. You know, the West is racist, but not in the way people think. The West is racist because we have such a low and contemptuous opinion of racial minorities, that we don't expect anything from them. We're all just so impressed when they don't act like savages that we give them a pass in other areas. So what's the big deal if Black Americans and Native Americans are anti-Semitic? We're just so impressed when they can speak an articulate sentence. THAT is the real racism of the West. If we want better from minorities, then we have to expect it from them. And so we should not consider Ghandi and Mandela heroes. Would we have still considered them heroes if they were White Christian Americans? So I don't know the full extent to which Ghandi and Mandela were anti-Semitic, but I do know that we sweep under the rug much of what is ugly about these people, so that it doesn't taint our hero worship of them.

Oh Mandela we do know. 100% antisemite. Ghandi was a commie, so probably 99%, 1% being he probably loved dead Jews.

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Yes.

[Yerusha]

Using their Sepoy & Gurkha lackeys, the British knew how to deal with Indian Gandhists!

[muman613]

Using their Sepoy & Gurkha lackeys, the British knew how to deal with Indian Gandhists!

You are again showing your not-so-good qualities.... So you are suggesting the British massacre was justified? I don't think so.

The Indians deserved independence from the disgusting british... I have many Indian friends and they all don't 'love' ghandi... The entire ghandi clan was corrupt (and is corrupt to this day), but that doesn't justify condemning all Indians..

[Yerusha]

If the British hadn't come along with their bayonets to wipe out their murderous strangulation-religion, the murderous Tugee (The "Thugs") would have strangled all of India. Most countries actually benefited from the British taking them over, except for Israel: Israel & the Jew is the exception to every rule.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

Exactly.
He was a bonafide Jew-hater & why the world sees this POS as a saint & a hero I will never know.

He was also a self-hating Indian. Hindu nationalists that support Kahanist views for Israel would consider him the Hindu version of someone like Shimon Peres. Maybe Herzl would be a more accurate comparison. Mahatma Gandhi was never Prime Minister. He is credited with creating Indian nationalism like Herzl is credited with creating Zionism. Both are lies. If anything, they hijacked religious movements and tried to make them secular.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

If the British hadn't come along with their bayonets to wipe out their murderous strangulation-religion, the murderous Tugee (The "Thugs") would have strangled all of India. Most countries actually benefited from the British taking them over, except for Israel: Israel & the Jew is the exception to every rule.

I think we all agree without a doubt that Hinduism is idolatry in the most classic sense. That we can agree with Christians on. A Hindu converting to Christianity is certainly moving forward. On the other hand, Christians like George Harrison of the Beatles converting to Hinduism is certainly a step backwards.

What we share with Hindus is our political views and certain historical similarities but the culture is completely different. The historical similarities are that both peoples have a 4,000 year old religion and a similar period of being oppressed by Muzzie occupiers and later British occupiers, followed by self-hating Socialist politicians after independence.

[Rational Jew]

Was Mahatma Gandhi an Anti-Semite?

Was Mohammed an Arab?

[Lisa]

Check out what Gandhi wrote about the Jews, the Nazi and the fakestinians:

https://jtf.org/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=75127.0;last_msg=628872

But my sympathy does not blind me to the requirements of justice. The cry for the national home for the Jews does not make much appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and the tenacity with which the Jews have hankered after return to Palestine. Why should they not, like other peoples of the earth, make that country their home where they are born and where they earn their livelihood?

Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct. The mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home.

The nobler course would be to insist on a just treatment of the Jews wherever they are born and bred. The Jews born in France are French. If the Jews have no home but Palestine, will they relish the idea of being forced to leave the other parts of the world in which they are settled? Or do they want a double home where they can remain at will? This cry for the national home affords a colourable justification for the German expulsion of the Jews.

But the German persecution of the Jews seems to have no parallel in history. The tyrants of old never went so mad as Hitler seems to have gone. And he is doing it with religious zeal. For he is propounding a new religion of exclusive and militant nationalism in the name of which any inhumanity becomes an act of humanity to be rewarded here and hereafter. The crime of an obviously mad but intrepid youth is being visited upon his whole race with unbelievable ferocity. If there ever could be a justifiable war in the name of and for humanity, a war against Germany, to prevent the wanton persecution of a whole race, would be completely justified.

But I do not believe in any war. A discussion of the pros and cons of such a war is therefore outside my horizon or province.But if there can be no war against Germany, even for such a crime as is being committed against the Jews, surely there can be no alliance with Germany. How can there be alliance between a nation which claims to stand for justice and democracy and one which is the declared enemy of both? Or is England drifting towards armed dictatorship and all it means?

Germany is showing to the world how efficiently violence can be worked when it is not hampered by any hypocrisy or weakness masquerading as humanitarianism. It is also showing how hideous, terrible and terrifying it looks in its nakedness.

Can the Jews resist this organised and shameless persecution? Is there a way to preserve their self-respect, and not to feel helpless, neglected and forlorn? I submit there is. No person who has faith in a living God need feel helpless or forlorn. Jehovah of the Jews is a God more personal than the God of the Christians, the Mussalmans or the Hindus, though as a matter of fact in essence, He is common to all and one without a second and beyond description. But as the Jews attribute personality to God and believe that He rules every action of theirs, they ought not to feel helpless. If I were a Jew and were born in Germany and earned my livelihood there, I would claim Germany as my home even as the tallest gentile German may, and challenge him to shoot me or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be expelled or to submit to discriminating treatment. And for doing this, I should not wait for the fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance but would have confidence that in the end the rest are bound to follow my example. If one Jew or all the Jews were to accept the prescription here offered, he or they cannot be worse off than now. And suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy which no number of resolutions of sympathy passed in the world outside Germany can. Indeed, even if Britain, France and America were to declare hostilities against Germany, they can bring no inner joy, no inner strength. The calculated violence of Hitler may even result in a general massacre of the Jews by way of his first answer to the declaration of such hostilities. But if the Jewish mind could be prepared for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy that Jehovah had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant. For to the godfearing, death has no terror. It is a joyful sleep to be followed by a waking that would be all the more refreshing for the long sleep.

[Lisa]

Here's more:

And now a word to the Jews in Palestine. I have no doubt that they are going about it in the wrong way. The Palestine of the Biblical conception is not a geographical tract. It is in their hearts. But if they must look to the Palestine of geography as their national home, it is wrong to enter it under the shadow of the British gun. A religious act cannot be performed with the aid of the bayonet or the bomb. They can settle in Palestine only by the goodwill of the Arabs. They should seek to convert the Arab heart. The same God rules the Arab heart who rules the Jewish heart. They can offer satyagraha in front of the Arabs and offer themselves to be shot or thrown into the Dead Sea without raising a little finger against them. They will find the world opinion in their favour in their religious aspiration. There are hundreds of ways of reasoning with the Arabs, if they will only discard the help of the British bayonet. As it is, they are co-shares with the British in despoiling a people who have done no wrong to them.

I am not defending the Arab excesses. I wish they had chosen the way of non-violence in resisting what they rightly regarded as an unwarrantable encroachment upon their country. But according to the accepted canons of right and wrong, nothing can be said against the Arab resistance in the face of overwhelming odds.

Let the Jews who claim to be the chosen race prove their title by choosing the way of non-violence for vindicating their position on earth. Every country is their home including Palestine not by aggression but by loving service. A Jewish friend has sent me a book called The Jewish Contribution to Civilisation by Cecil Roth. It gives a record of what the Jews have done to enrich the world`s literature, art, music, drama, science, medicine, agriculture, etc. Given the will, the Jew can refuse to be treated as the outcaste of the West, to be despised or patronised. He can command the attention and respect of the world by being man, the chosen creation of God, instead of being man who is fast sinking to the brute and forsaken by God. They can add to their many contributions the surpassing contribution of non-violent action.

Segaon, November 20, 1938

[Aces High]

Check out what Gandhi wrote about the Jews, the Nazi and the fakestinians:

https://jtf.org/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=75127.0;last_msg=628872

But my sympathy does not blind me to the requirements of justice. The cry for the national home for the Jews does not make much appeal to me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and the tenacity with which the Jews have hankered after return to Palestine. Why should they not, like other peoples of the earth, make that country their home where they are born and where they earn their livelihood?

Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct. The mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home.

The nobler course would be to insist on a just treatment of the Jews wherever they are born and bred. The Jews born in France are French. If the Jews have no home but Palestine, will they relish the idea of being forced to leave the other parts of the world in which they are settled? Or do they want a double home where they can remain at will? This cry for the national home affords a colourable justification for the German expulsion of the Jews.

But the German persecution of the Jews seems to have no parallel in history. The tyrants of old never went so mad as Hitler seems to have gone. And he is doing it with religious zeal. For he is propounding a new religion of exclusive and militant nationalism in the name of which any inhumanity becomes an act of humanity to be rewarded here and hereafter. The crime of an obviously mad but intrepid youth is being visited upon his whole race with unbelievable ferocity. If there ever could be a justifiable war in the name of and for humanity, a war against Germany, to prevent the wanton persecution of a whole race, would be completely justified.

But I do not believe in any war. A discussion of the pros and cons of such a war is therefore outside my horizon or province.But if there can be no war against Germany, even for such a crime as is being committed against the Jews, surely there can be no alliance with Germany. How can there be alliance between a nation which claims to stand for justice and democracy and one which is the declared enemy of both? Or is England drifting towards armed dictatorship and all it means?

Germany is showing to the world how efficiently violence can be worked when it is not hampered by any hypocrisy or weakness masquerading as humanitarianism. It is also showing how hideous, terrible and terrifying it looks in its nakedness.

Can the Jews resist this organised and shameless persecution? Is there a way to preserve their self-respect, and not to feel helpless, neglected and forlorn? I submit there is. No person who has faith in a living God need feel helpless or forlorn. Jehovah of the Jews is a God more personal than the God of the Christians, the Mussalmans or the Hindus, though as a matter of fact in essence, He is common to all and one without a second and beyond description. But as the Jews attribute personality to God and believe that He rules every action of theirs, they ought not to feel helpless. If I were a Jew and were born in Germany and earned my livelihood there, I would claim Germany as my home even as the tallest gentile German may, and challenge him to shoot me or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be expelled or to submit to discriminating treatment. And for doing this, I should not wait for the fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance but would have confidence that in the end the rest are bound to follow my example. If one Jew or all the Jews were to accept the prescription here offered, he or they cannot be worse off than now. And suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy which no number of resolutions of sympathy passed in the world outside Germany can. Indeed, even if Britain, France and America were to declare hostilities against Germany, they can bring no inner joy, no inner strength. The calculated violence of Hitler may even result in a general massacre of the Jews by way of his first answer to the declaration of such hostilities. But if the Jewish mind could be prepared for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy that Jehovah had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant. For to the godfearing, death has no terror. It is a joyful sleep to be followed by a waking that would be all the more refreshing for the long sleep.

Look at the end here of what Gandhi- this piece of crap, wrote:

The calculated violence of Hitler may even result in a general massacre of the Jews by way of his first answer to the declaration of such hostilities. But if the Jewish mind could be prepared for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy that Jehovah had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant. For to the godfearing, death has no terror. It is a joyful sleep to be followed by a waking that would be all the more refreshing for the long sleep.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

In other words- he's telling Germany's Jews to accept their death at the hands of the Nazis, and that it is a joyful sleep. 

[Israel Chai]

Never read that. Yemach Shemo Vezichro to that animal.

[Rational Jew]

Notice how everyone who had a last name 'Gandhi' was an evil Jew-hating Nazi. Mahatma Gandhi ys was a friend of Hitler and against Israel. Indira Gandhi ys was a Nazi who supported Muslim Nazis and Soviet Nazis and was anti-Israel. And notice how both these Nazi cockroaches are admired by not just Indians but the whole world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indira_Gandhi#Middle_East

Gandhi remained a staunch supporter of Palestinians in the Arab-Israeli conflict and was critical of the Middle East diplomacy sponsored by the United States.[34] Israel was viewed as a religious state and thus an analogue to India's arch rival Pakistan. Indian diplomats also hoped to win Arab support in countering Pakistan in Kashmir. Nevertheless, Gandhi authorized the development of a secret channel of contact and security assistance with Israel in the late 1960s. Her lieutenant, Narasimha Rao, later became Prime Minister and approved full diplomatic ties with Israel in 1992.[40]

India's pro-Arab policy had mixed success. Establishment of close ties with the socialist and secular Baathist regimes to some extent neutralized Pakistani propaganda against India.[41] However, the Indo-Pakistani war in 1971 put the Arab and Muslim states of the Middle East in a dilemma as the war was fought by two states both friendly to the Arabs.[42] The progressive Arab regimes in Egypt, Syria, and Algeria chose to remain neutral, while the conservative pro-American Arab monarchies in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and United Arab Emirates openly supported Pakistan.[42] Egypt's stance was met with dismay by the Indians, who had come to expect close co-operation with the Baathist regimes.[41] But, the death of Nasser in 1970 and Sadat's growing friendship with Riyadh, and his mounting differences with Moscow, constrained Egypt to a policy of neutrality.[41] Gandhi's overtures to Muammar Gaddafi were rebuffed.[42] Libya agreed with the Arab monarchies in believing that Gandhi's intervention in East Pakistan was an attack against Islam.[42]

[TruthSpreader]

Yes he once said Jews should go to the gas chambers.