C'mon. Your points are all correct, but even Rabbi Kahane was mad at the Israeli press for doing that. Don't make questions with obvious implications as their title, just say what you mean, or it's like the leftists do, they take a clear position with their questions, but since it's a question, it lets them back down and say they really meant nothing, just asking journalist questions. The halachic term I believe would be that the Netanyahu has a share in the murder of Jews, not sole responsibility, so if you say it outright, Netanyahu's government is responsible for murdering Jews, you need a * after and then an explanation, so better the halachic term.
I don't know about others here, but because of my history, you try in any way to manipulate my emotions to better see your point of view, everything you say becomes your own testimony in my trial of you, and I can only see ways you might be trying to decieve me. This makes concentration rather difficult with that title up there, and I know others here compliment you for way you present, which always would make for moving speeches in a social movement, but I have to spend alot of effort to not hyperanalyze every word and breath for attempts to decieve me when your tone of voice tries to impart how I should feel about the facts, I'll decide how i feel. This is not meant as an insult, and there are American conservatives news hosts that do the thing where everything is saturated with anger, so like you clearly have a market for that, but if I didn't already know stuff about you, I would turn off the videos within seconds, and in the hypothetical where i sit there for the whole thing, little to no information would get through. This isn't a demand to talk all loving, or not to raise your voice (or even actually a demand with expectations) but I have rationally convinced rich socialists of the virtue of Kahanist thought by simply presenting, without any trace of emotion, what you say. In my opinion, anger is the path to doing nothing, and if you use tones and language to make people very angry at what's happening, 9/10 they will not want to be angry, and have to deny everything to remain happy, or will simply selective-amnesia it away. Also, already right-wing politics scares away half of all girls if you start on it but in my small study of girls that listen to your videos, all agreed with you 100% before they heard you talk, none ever wanted to hear another video again, and expressed worry that I might be influenced to be crazy (in harsher terms) if they knew me well, and said I'm crazy if they didn't, based on only the video, and in most cases, the likelyhood that they retained information was slim to none.
So basically, why is someone just hearing a video who thinks I'm brilliant one second for saying what you say and crazy the next after hearing you? I stated it already, allow me to put it in brutally honest terms; You sound like an angry guy who wants violence, not an intellectual who wants improvement. Emotional reasoning is always offensive when you hear it, but digest it. When a kid's mother says "you're going to be broke on the street with no wife and you'll die alone and no one will love you" after he gets 75% on a test, she didn't actually mean any of those things, and assuredly didn't consider the information in what she said for a moment, she is trying to transmit the information that getting low marks is bad, and is trying to give her child a sense of worry about failing. This type of reasoning is pathetically easy to manipulate (and is generally harmful to men who do not understand it). Someone who employs this type of reasoning can still be swayed by the information in what you say, and that's why i don't say you shouldn't add emotion to your tone of voice or do the thing where you say something and repeat the exact same thing in a more urgent and forceful tone even though like I've done everything up to punching people in the face for doing that to me in real life, because it will convince people that are incapable of logical reasoning that you're right. However, if you do that, and if you must put emotion in your tone of voice for whatever purpose you believe it accomplishes, make it an encouraging tone, and you can go from like woe to encouraging instead of mad to stressed and mad in your tone.
It is interesting to note that one who screams "we should kill them all" angrily seems less crazy than one who does so calmly. This is because of what suits the occasion. If you are presenting facts angrily, it transmits the message that you aren't saying that for people to learn and decide how to act based on that information, you want them to do something that they aren't doing at the moment, and so instantaneously all the emotional people feel agressed, and all the logical ones incapable of separating your personality from the facts will have different oppositional reactions based on their personality, ranging from lazyness to saying you're a nazi, which literally every leftists i show one of your videos starts by saying. You have a great mission, but you make it so damn hard to support you, Chaim. G-d willing JTF will succeed in its mission.
Topic: Is the Netanyahu government responsible for the murder of Jews? (2 videos) (Read 1383 times)