Be sure not to have any babies before or after being vaccinated

[Israel Chai]

It should be strongly noted that there is a near-0% chance of the slightest medical problem with women of childbearing age, and making them take the vaccine is now added to the greatest political, social and economic tragedy since Hitler YS"V, the commie flu lockdown.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pfizer-coronavirus-vaccine-not-safe-for-pregnant-or-breastfeeding-mums-potential-danger-for-fertility

Pfizer COVID jab warning: No breastfeeding, avoid pregnancy for 2 months, unknown fertility impacts
A safety instructions document published by the UK government states 'For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination'
Fri Dec 4, 2020 - 11:54 am EST

Featured Image
shutterstock.com
Dorothy Cummings McLean By Dorothy Cummings McLean
Follow Dorothy

    Share on Parler
    Share on Facebook
    Share on Twitter
    Share via Email
    Print this Page

WESTMINSTER, England, December 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Government produced safety instructions for a new coronavirus vaccine indicate that it should not be used by pregnant or breast-feeding mothers and children. In addition, they state that it is unknown what effect the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine will have on fertility.

The ten-page “Reg 174 Information for UK Healthcare Professionals” describes the vaccine, how it is to be stored, diluted, and administered, and the trial studies carried out to test it. To be effective, the vaccine is supposed to be administered twice.  In a section called “Fertility, pregnancy and lactation,” the guide says there is “no or limited data” on the vaccine. Therefore, it is not recommending its use for pregnant women.

“Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy,” the guide states in section 4.6.

“For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination.”

The guide also advises that women should avoid becoming pregnant for the first two months after their Covid-19 shots.

“In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose,” it says.
SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite's daily headlines
U.S. Canada World Catholic

Because it is still unknown whether or not the vaccine can be transmitted to a breast-feeding infant through his or her mother’s milk, the instructions state that “a risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded.” Therefore, the guide specifies that the vaccine “should not be used during breast-feeding.”

But alarmingly the guide has only one thing to say about the vaccine’s impact on fertility: they don’t know if it does or doesn’t.

“It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility,” it states.

The guide notes that the safety of the vaccine was tested in two clinical studies. The first study enrolled 60 people aged 16 to 55, and the second involved “approximately” 44,000 people aged 12 and older. The most common negative effects of the vaccine in people over the age of 16 have been “pain at the injection site” (a muscle), experienced by over 80%, fatigue (over 60%), headache (over 50%), sore muscles (over 30%), chills (over 30%), joint pain (over 20%), and fever (over 10%). According to the guide, these side-effects “were usually mild or moderate in intensity” and went away after a few days. 
— Article continues below Petition —
SIGN: Join petition calling for a stop to COVID vaccine testing in Europe
13,877 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 15,000!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this
petition and related issues.
Fertility fears

Earlier this week, two leading doctors wrote to the European Medicine Agency, which is responsible for the safety of vaccines, in an attempt to stop human trials of all Covid-19 vaccines, especially the Pfizer/BioNtech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 described above. Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former head of Pfizer’s respiratory research, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a health policy advisor, think that human testing is still unethical.

Among other concerns, Yeadon and Wodart warn that some of the vaccines may prevent the safe development of placentas in pregnant women, resulting in “vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”

“Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2,” the doctors wrote. 

“Syncytin-1 […] which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses,” they continued. 

“There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”

The doctors suggest that because the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol says that “women of child-bearing potential” can take part only if they are not pregnant or breastfeeding and are using contraception, it could take “a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of post-vaccination infertility could be observed.”
Pfizer can’t be sued for damages

According to the U.K.’s Independent newspaper, Pfizer, the owner of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has been given indemnity in the United Kingdom, which means that people who suffer damage from the vaccine will not be able to sue the company.

“NHS (National Health Service) staff providing the vaccine, as well as manufactures of the drug, are also protected,” the Independent reported.

The newspaper also reported that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was authorised by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency on Tuesday under Section 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations 2012.

The regulation, which was altered by the British government this autumn, currently states that the ordinary “prohibitions” in Britain’s requirements for authorization “do not apply where the sale or supply of a medicinal product is authorized by the licensing authority on a temporary basis in response to the suspected or confirmed spread of— (a) pathogenic agents; (b) toxins; (c ) chemical agents; or (d) nuclear radiation, which may cause harm to human beings.”

The Independent noted that in a press conference on Wednesday, Pfizer’s U.K. managing director refused to explain why the company needed this legal protection.

“We’re not actually disclosing any of the details around any of the aspects of that agreement and specifically around the liability clauses,” said Pfizer’s Ben Osborn.

Curiously, in October the government’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), posted a bid request stating that “For reasons of extreme urgency,” they seek “an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs).” The bid goes on to explain that “it is not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of ADRs that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine,” and that this “represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.”

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

Be sure not to be braindead.
The vaccines weren't tested in pregnant women.  They were screened out of the trials. Therefore, it's not recommended for them.  They will have to run trials to prove that it's safe in order to be able to vaccinate pregnant women with these products.

Until then, follow the very simple advice of not being pregnant at the time of vaccination and waiting 2 months afterward to become pregnant, so that it's cleared from the system by then.

Your alarmism is as misleading as ever.

[Israel Chai]

It's really clear since this COVID how much of the swamp large swaths of the medical profession are.

There are multiple indicators that this vaccine harms the placenta, how much is the question.

Just very simple advice, don't have babies near the vaccine. If you do well you can't sue so it's just "simple advice", no need to make warnings about a vaccine that you don't have any reason to care if people and their babies start dropping dead from. Wouldn't want to scare anyone from buying our product with a warning.

No woman of child rearing age has any reason to take the vaccine unless she suffers from serious respiratory issues, and in many cases with 20-40 year old women with acute bronchitis, virtually all cases were asymptomatic, and no difference among smokers. This army of corporate sleazes that brand their corporate theft as "medical"  and "science" need to be taken down with the rest of the democrats in Washington they fund.

I thank you for making it perfectly clear why all the big pharma corporations in America donate millions to leftists.

[Israel Chai]

I said it here before their pretty article, but whatever. In a sentence, old and sick, get covid, dead from covid. Old and sick, get the vaccine and die, vaccine can't possibly be to blame. You can't be a self-respecting adult and buy the lies of these commie slugs.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/01/shifting_goalposts__covid_deaths_versus_vaccine_deaths.html

[Israel Chai]

Oh and by the way, if anyone wants to know how we got rid of lice before these Nazi pharmaceutical companies made us sell poison ones that kill you or they take away our insulin deals, it's camphor (C₁₀H₁₆O) and 100% alcohol diluted with water, 1 shot kill 0 lice left. Don't go trying to mix it yourself even if I tell you how to do it or you can dry or burn yourself depending on what kind of ignoramus you are. People that know how to make medical things should do this, and Nazi pharma companies will never let that or any cure that costs nothing and works immediately. Camphor is easy to extract from a tree.

But I'm sure their vaccine and sticking tubes for inflammation where you breathe is much better than what the natural health community can come up with. We're all pushing Wim Hoff levels where you can kill pathogens with your mind before you use real medicine to heal yourself and they want you to stop having babies to save you from something that can't hurt you.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

It's really clear since this COVID how much of the swamp large swaths of the medical profession are.

There are multiple indicators that this vaccine harms the placenta, how much is the question.

No. There are NONE.   You fell victim to antivaxer propaganda.

And you still haven't bothered to read the fda briefing documents that I've linked here many times for you.
The FDA reviewed Moderna's reproductive tox study and found no risks.  That is a standard study done for any drug/vaccine to get approval.   
As a counter example, a drug called Filgotinib, invented by Galapagos and purchased by Gilead, encountered a problem in its reproductive tox studies showing a negative impact on sperm in the animal study.   Because of this FDA required further study, and eventually Gilead decided not to pursue this indication in the US because they saw this issue as a hurdle they would not be able to escape (or otherwise a mark on the drug's record which would cause people to prefer other options that are safer).   So you cannot sit there and claim "The FDA can't be trusted!"  as I'm sure you were about to reply with.  If they found an issue it would be elaborated in those documents.  Just as it is for all drugs.   FDA clearly stated there was no reproductive toxicity in Moderna's animal studies.

In Pfizer's case, the study was still ongoing at the time of the review, and Pfizer had communicated only the data available so far, but will provide FDA the full data as soon as it's done.  At that point, they will add that documentation to the record and so far have found no issues.

I thank you for making it perfectly clear why all the big pharma corporations in America donate millions to leftists.

I think you are making it clear that you cannot stick to the facts and really debate anything when your opponent has subject matter knowledge. You simply veer off into unrelated tangents and ad hominem attacks as an attempt at smoke and mirrors to make it appear you are right and your opponent is wrong because you are so badly misinformed that whenever I correct your false information that you probably got from some loser like gateway pundit or whatever fake news source, you have nothing substantive to offer in response.

[Israel Chai]

I can very much say the FDA can't be trusted for a wode range of things yes. Go I'm just leaving that amd going with and easy yes, not to be trusted. Even when they try to be trustworthy with organic food, which is a patented word they own, crop duster flies over the field next to it, organic. On the drug side I'll be here twice as many weeks as I can say on the food side. So very yes don't trust them or what they say. Define "safe" this time.