I don't understand why some are so supportive of Duncan Hunter. He barely made his presence known during the debates. He would be a very weak leader. Plus, his views on immigration reform and terrorism aren't that strong.
At least, Tom Tancrado has devoted a great deal of his political career to fighting against amnesty. But even barely made his presence felt in the debate.
All the candidates are horrible. People like Tancredo have great principles, but they need to express them to the American people during the debates. Just posting your policies on your website isn't going to do a whole lot to secure votes.
You're wrong.
Hunter is the one who is responsible for having a border fence built at the San Diego border.
He's actually done more than Tancredo, in that regard, to fight against amnesty. In Hunter's district, he has the respect of many of the Hispanics who also oppose amnesty.
He also recognizes how the unfair trade practices with China are bad for national security as well as for the economy.
Hunter served in the army and currently has a son who is serving his 3rd tour in the marines.
So please, don't make claims about what you don't know.
I'm not sure about Tancredo's stance towards Israel, but Hunter's is very good. World Net Daily is supportive of Hunter.
Hunter might be the best candidate that there has been in more than the last 100 years. I think he'd be better than Reagan. There are many voters who feel nostalgic for Reagan. Well, they'd like Hunter.