JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: takebackourtemple on March 02, 2008, 12:18:28 AM
-
From Adam to Noah to all the people on the earth today, where have these monsters branched off? Did they evolve from actual humans or did they truly come from primates?
(http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j200/swampgift/obama.jpg)
(http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/images/photos/beyonce-knowles-al-sharpton-tmz.jpg)
(http://www.courier-journal.com/blogs/popvulture/uploaded_images/oj_simpson_narrowweb__300x472,0-781304.jpg)
(http://www.squibkick.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/magic-johnson.jpg)
(http://www.writespirit.net/inspirational_talks/political/martin_luther_king_talks/martin-luther-king2.jpg)
-
Feel free to add other apes. Just in case Erica reads this, these monsters all happen to be black, but each race has plenty of them.
-
A well known Ape SupremaciSSt ;D ;D ;D
(http://obits.eons.com/obits/tributes/malcolm_x/1526-1-photo.jpg)
Enjoy ;D
-
TBOT, three of those apes belong back in their cages, yimach shemam.
"Pastor" Jeremiah Wright:
(http://www.voicenewspaper.com/clients/voicenewspaper/12-5-2007-10-24-54-AM-3137567.jpg)
"Minister" Louis Farrakhan:
(http://tomroeser.com/blog/img/f21868/louis_farrakhan.jpg)
"Reverend" Jesse Jackson:
(http://freepages.misc.rootsweb.com/~argyll/Jesseshovelingagain_833B/0_21_jackson_jesse2.jpg)
-
(http://www.ronpaul.net/assets/images/ronpaulphoto.jpg)
(http://vwt.d2g.com:8081/duke01.jpg)
(http://newsbusters.org/static/2007/05/2007-05-28CindySheehan2.bmp)
Theres a lot more. I'll just write them here. Hugo Chavez, Billary, Dennis Kucinich, Davis Fleetwood(the [censored] from Youtube), and Keith Olberman.
-
All humans are primates.
-
All humans are primates.
Yeah if you believe Hitlers mentor, Darwin.
-
Darwin and Hitler didn't even live at the same time.
-
Darwin's ideas laid down the foundation for Nazism.
-
I think that's a stretch. Besides any science can be used for either good or evil. Even if true it also laid the foundation for all modern biology including modern medical advances.
-
Darwinism provided the foundation for eugenics, which in turn provided an underlying basis for Nazism. Darwin was an animal.
-
You can't forget these monsterSS ;D :D
(http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/pictures/20071220RonPaulDonBlack.jpg)
-
Darwinism provided the foundation for eugenics, which in turn provided an underlying basis for Nazism. Darwin was an animal.
Don't confuse "Social Darwinism" with evolution. One is a political philosophy that Darwin did not invent or have anything to do with, and the other is a scientific theory.
Evolution doesn't claim that one branch of the tree is higher or better than any other, just different, although some twigs may be more successful than others over time.
-
From Adam to Noah to all the people on the earth today, where have these monsters branched off? Did they evolve from actual humans or did they truly come from primates?
Hey, why no love for Magic Johnson?
-
Just as a sidenote, whether you like it or not, Sub-Saharan Africans Are the same species as us. That's the reason why we can interbreed.
However, they are obviously closer to Chimps than we are. (I believe the ones in Nigeria are the closest). They have remained very much unchanged for the last 200,000 years, which is why their genetics is so strong when they interbreed, and why (for example) recent races such as Amerindians and Pacific Islanders have such WEAK genetics.
BTW, whites are NOT!!! the furthest genetically from Chimps. That honor goes to South American Amerindians.
So Hitler was wrong in this issue. (As with nearly everything else) :) (May he burn in hell)
-
Darwinism in any form is rebelion against Torah and G-d; And Africans are people but cursed becouse they're decendants of Cham.
-
Darwinism provided the foundation for eugenics, which in turn provided an underlying basis for Nazism. Darwin was an animal.
I think that the foundation of nazism where the $$ that industrial barons gave hitler.
The rest that explaines his rise are the treaty of Versailles, the European hate against Jews, and the need to revenge WWI, and the pro-working class socialist policies.
Regardless of what Darwin teached, this cocktail would have had the same results anyway.
-
I think that the foundation of nazism where the $$ that industrial barons gave hitler.
The rest that explaines his rise are the treaty of Versailles, the European hate against Jews, and the need to revenge WWI, and the pro-working class socialist policies.
Regardless of what Darwin teached, this cocktail would have had the same results anyway.
Yes and No. The $$$ given to the Nazi party from the private sector was pennies compared to what was given to the mainstream non-communist parties such as the social democratic party and the conservative party. And many only started giving to the NSDAP because in late 1932, the mainstream parties had become irrelevant, and it appeared that the communists were on the verge of taking over, and although the Nazis didnt really have a coherent economic policy, at least they were anti-communist.
the main reason Hitler got elected, was economics. (People vote with their pocketbook) Under the Wiemar republic, Germany had gone through absurd inflation ( where the mark would 1/2 its value every few hours) and when the great depression came, it hit them hard, and the people just gave up on the system, and the Nazi's promoted themselves as an anti-establishment, anti-Versaille treaty party, and Hitler (like Obama) was a very capable speaker, so all that culminated into his election.
Anti-semitism and Anti-bolshevism is what got them on the map, but it was economics that put them in power.
-
White genes or other race's genes aren't "weaker" per se, but many of the "white traits" do tend to be recessive traits that require a gene from each parent to express.
Light colored eyes such as blue or green or hazel are not going to be expressed if only one parent carries the genes for them.
Light colored hair is recessive.
Someone with very little melanin breeding with someone with a LOT of melanin is going to create a "yellow" like Obama, but not someone really dark.
Black features do predominate in a white-black interracial child because white traits tend to be recessive, but not necessarily weaker.
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
I don't agree with miscegenation at all, but as a student of Biology I thought I should make these points.
-
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
This photo is exactly what i don't want to happen in Europe.
Our genes should stay largely what they are. We don't need to be fanatical, but enough is enough.
If we allow even more aliens to help the 20 million non-whites to outbreed us, and -if we are not ethnically cleansed by them-
the resulting mixed race will produce some 1/8 or 2/8 genuine white looking babies, I still think it is a Holocaust/Genocide against white people. There is a deliberate policy of destroying the white race going on now, and it started with MLK in the USA.
The blacks should have been deported back to Africa in the 50ties, after WWII, before the decolonisation.
-
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
This photo is exactly what i don't want to happen in Europe.
Our genes should stay largely what they are. We don't need to be fanatical, but enough is enough.
If we allow even more aliens to help the 20 million non-whites to outbreed us, and -if we are not ethnically cleansed by them-
the resulting mixed race will produce some 1/8 or 2/8 genuine white looking babies, I still think it is a Holocaust/Genocide against white people. There is a deliberate policy of destroying the white race going on now, and it started with MLK in the USA.
The blacks should have been deported back to Africa in the 50ties, after WWII, before the decolonisation.
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
-
Darwinism in any form is rebelion against Torah and G-d; And Africans are people but cursed becouse they're decendants of Cham.
I guess I cannot dictate to people how to respond, but I was hoping for this to be a torah(like this response) based discussion rather than a debate of evolution vs creationism. Hopefully we can discuss evolution vs creationism on another thread.
-
I think that the foundation of nazism where the $$ that industrial barons gave hitler.
The rest that explaines his rise are the treaty of Versailles, the European hate against Jews, and the need to revenge WWI, and the pro-working class socialist policies.
Regardless of what Darwin teached, this cocktail would have had the same results anyway.
Yes and No. The $$$ given to the Nazi party from the private sector was pennies compared to what was given to the mainstream non-communist parties such as the social democratic party and the conservative party. And many only started giving to the NSDAP because in late 1932, the mainstream parties had become irrelevant, and it appeared that the communists were on the verge of taking over, and although the Nazis didnt really have a coherent economic policy, at least they were anti-communist.
the main reason Hitler got elected, was economics. (People vote with their pocketbook) Under the Wiemar republic, Germany had gone through absurd inflation ( where the mark would 1/2 its value every few hours) and when the great depression came, it hit them hard, and the people just gave up on the system, and the Nazi's promoted themselves as an anti-establishment, anti-Versaille treaty party, and Hitler (like Obama) was a very capable speaker, so all that culminated into his election.
Anti-semitism and Anti-bolshevism is what got them on the map, but it was economics that put them in power.
Of course. the communist and nazi regimes came in power thanks to the starvation of the people, and their so-called solutions:
communists: "kill your elite" (monarchs, nobility, doctors, teachers, industrials, clerics,...) , to take over power and become the elite themselves.
Nazis: "kill all the non-Aryans" (Russians, Bolsheviks, Poles, Communists, socialists, homos, Jews, Gypsies)
for the sake of what? Destroying all nation-states
What is the E.U. going to do with us? Isn't it doing the same? But with the "soft totalitarian" method?
-
White genes or other race's genes aren't "weaker" per se, but many of the "white traits" do tend to be recessive traits that require a gene from each parent to express.
Light colored eyes such as blue or green or hazel are not going to be expressed if only one parent carries the genes for them.
Light colored hair is recessive.
Someone with very little melanin breeding with someone with a LOT of melanin is going to create a "yellow" like Obama, but not someone really dark.
Black features do predominate in a white-black interracial child because white traits tend to be recessive, but not necessarily weaker.
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
I don't agree with miscegenation at all, but as a student of Biology I thought I should make these points.
That twin was 1 in a million. They made a huge fuss over that in the media, because it was SO unbeleivably rare. And the parents were both Mulattos.
-
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
This photo is exactly what i don't want to happen in Europe.
Our genes should stay largely what they are. We don't need to be fanatical, but enough is enough.
If we allow even more aliens to help the 20 million non-whites to outbreed us, and -if we are not ethnically cleansed by them-
the resulting mixed race will produce some 1/8 or 2/8 genuine white looking babies, I still think it is a Holocaust/Genocide against white people. There is a deliberate policy of destroying the white race going on now, and it started with MLK in the USA.
The blacks should have been deported back to Africa in the 50ties, after WWII, before the decolonisation.
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
It is the destruction of the people of European descent.
I don't care if these babies are born in South - America e.g.
But here in Europe, non-whites must be kept out at all cost.
-
White genes or other race's genes aren't "weaker" per se, but many of the "white traits" do tend to be recessive traits that require a gene from each parent to express.
Light colored eyes such as blue or green or hazel are not going to be expressed if only one parent carries the genes for them.
Light colored hair is recessive.
Someone with very little melanin breeding with someone with a LOT of melanin is going to create a "yellow" like Obama, but not someone really dark.
Black features do predominate in a white-black interracial child because white traits tend to be recessive, but not necessarily weaker.
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
I don't agree with miscegenation at all, but as a student of Biology I thought I should make these points.
That twin was 1 in a million. They made a huge fuss over that in the media, because it was SO unbeleivably rare. And the parents were both Mulattos.
The parents are white, Ambiorix. And those twins are the cutest! :D
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
-
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
This photo is exactly what i don't want to happen in Europe.
Our genes should stay largely what they are. We don't need to be fanatical, but enough is enough.
If we allow even more aliens to help the 20 million non-whites to outbreed us, and -if we are not ethnically cleansed by them-
the resulting mixed race will produce some 1/8 or 2/8 genuine white looking babies, I still think it is a Holocaust/Genocide against white people. There is a deliberate policy of destroying the white race going on now, and it started with MLK in the USA.
The blacks should have been deported back to Africa in the 50ties, after WWII, before the decolonisation.
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
It is the destruction of the people of European descent.
I don't care if these babies are born in South - America e.g.
But here in Europe, non-whites must be kept out at all cost.
They are babies. How cruel can you be? Because the other baby wasn't born with lighter skin, she's going to destroy the world?
-
White genes or other race's genes aren't "weaker" per se, but many of the "white traits" do tend to be recessive traits that require a gene from each parent to express.
Light colored eyes such as blue or green or hazel are not going to be expressed if only one parent carries the genes for them.
Light colored hair is recessive.
Someone with very little melanin breeding with someone with a LOT of melanin is going to create a "yellow" like Obama, but not someone really dark.
Black features do predominate in a white-black interracial child because white traits tend to be recessive, but not necessarily weaker.
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
I don't agree with miscegenation at all, but as a student of Biology I thought I should make these points.
That twin was 1 in a million. They made a huge fuss over that in the media, because it was SO unbeleivably rare. And the parents were both Mulattos.
The parents are white, Ambiorix. And those twins are the cutest! :D
If the majority of the people become mixed with blacks in Europe, it is worse than all evil that ever happened to us.
I'd rather want to get the AIDS destroying us, than have these twins to become the standard.
Those parents are having mixed genes, so they cannot be whites.
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
-
White genes or other race's genes aren't "weaker" per se, but many of the "white traits" do tend to be recessive traits that require a gene from each parent to express.
Light colored eyes such as blue or green or hazel are not going to be expressed if only one parent carries the genes for them.
Light colored hair is recessive.
Someone with very little melanin breeding with someone with a LOT of melanin is going to create a "yellow" like Obama, but not someone really dark.
Black features do predominate in a white-black interracial child because white traits tend to be recessive, but not necessarily weaker.
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
I don't agree with miscegenation at all, but as a student of Biology I thought I should make these points.
That twin was 1 in a million. They made a huge fuss over that in the media, because it was SO unbeleivably rare. And the parents were both Mulattos.
The parents are white, Ambiorix. And those twins are the cutest! :D
If the majority of the people become mixed with blacks in Europe, it is worse than all evil that ever happened to us.
I'd rather want to get the AIDS destroying us, than have these twins to become the standard.
Those parents are having mixed genes, so they cannot be whites.
You'd rather have AIDS than to have two twins with a bright future in front of them to stand next to you? What year is this? 1956?
-
White genes or other race's genes aren't "weaker" per se, but many of the "white traits" do tend to be recessive traits that require a gene from each parent to express.
Light colored eyes such as blue or green or hazel are not going to be expressed if only one parent carries the genes for them.
Light colored hair is recessive.
Someone with very little melanin breeding with someone with a LOT of melanin is going to create a "yellow" like Obama, but not someone really dark.
Black features do predominate in a white-black interracial child because white traits tend to be recessive, but not necessarily weaker.
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
I don't agree with miscegenation at all, but as a student of Biology I thought I should make these points.
That twin was 1 in a million. They made a huge fuss over that in the media, because it was SO unbeleivably rare. And the parents were both Mulattos.
The parents are white, Ambiorix. And those twins are the cutest! :D
If the majority of the people become mixed with blacks in Europe, it is worse than all evil that ever happened to us.
I'd rather want to get the AIDS destroying us, than have these twins to become the standard.
Those parents are having mixed genes, so they cannot be whites.
You'd rather have AIDS than to have two twins with a bright future in front of them to stand next to you? What year is this? 1956?
it is 2008. We whites must take our future much more seriously.
If we do not, we will have ethnical conflicts all over the globe for the coming centuries.
Some with Jews.
The Jews have abandonned the Zionist policies, and now want to make peace with the arabs(under UN/USA/EU/OPEC pressure).
You see what happens now?
they should have expelled all the arabs in 48 and 67. Now the arabs will outbreed them, and drive them in the mediteranian- unless
the Jews kick the arabs out, while they have the power to do so.
I hope Israel wakes up soon.
-
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
Their parents are as black as Obama. Are you going to start referring to all mullatoes as white now?
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
They're not white. Your neice's white grandparents have more genes in common with some random white child than they do with their own "grandchild". How is that family?
That's sad.
It is sad, because I want my people to survive into the future and to thrive, and to live in peace, and to live in societies that value them and where they can have good lives. I don't want to see my people disappear due to mixing.
In many ways it's similar to the problem the Jews face. Jews worry about their people marrying out and/or assimilating with predominating Gentile cultures. They call this another form of Holocaust.
Whites are having literal genocide committed against us as well, because our genes are being wiped out and destroyed and mixed in. Once you mix eggs into a cake, you can't get the eggs back out. That's the same thing with miscegenation.
I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
That's not what I said at all and I don't think that's what anyone else said here. I believe every people should stay among their own kind and marry among their own kind and preserve their own heritage. I believe every people should have their own nations in which to live free and in security in societies that value them and promote individual success and community health.
Being black isn't bad, but destroying another people through mixing is pure evil. Radical black nationalists of the 60s talked about using mixing as a warfare strategy to destroy whites.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
It's not against the child. I want these children to have successful and happy and righteous lives.
I just don't want to be a minority because I know that means death for me and other whites. They are being used as a weapon against whites by those committing Holocaust and genocide against whites as a people. A slow death through mixing is just as sure a death as outright gunning us down, and that's happening as well at the same time.
-
I don't agree with all points made by Ruby or Ambroix, but I recognise that G-d create us different for a reason, rampant race mixing advocated (only) in west by radicall left will destroy human diversity just like nazi idea of exterminating anybody straying from being "pure aryan".
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
-
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
Their parents are as black as Obama. Are you going to start referring to all mullatoes as white now?
I thought that it was the other way around...I'm sorry. There was a little black boy born to a white couple though. I'll have to find his picture. At any rate, those little girls are beautiful.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
They're not white. Your neice's white grandparents have more genes in common with some random white child than they do with their own "grandchild". How is that family?
What's wrong with that? She's human. Living, breathing, and playing. And that family is fine, thanks. Color in skin is just pigment. You're turning it into a revolution or something.
That's sad.
It is sad, because I want my people to survive into the future and to thrive, and to live in peace, and to live in societies that value them and where they can have good lives. I don't want to see my people disappear due to mixing.
No, its sad that you basically called the little black girl "your death" when she doesn't even know you. Why would you say such a thing? By all means, love and purify your race but the babies who are born into this world with dark skin don't need your grief. They have to eventually make it in this world also.
In many ways it's similar to the problem the Jews face. Jews worry about their people marrying out and/or assimilating with predominating Gentile cultures. They call this another form of Holocaust.
And here you are comparing biracial relationships and children to death again.
Whites are having literal genocide committed against us as well, because our genes are being wiped out and destroyed and mixed in. Once you mix eggs into a cake, you can't get the eggs back out. That's the same thing with miscegenation.
So whites who decide to fall in love with and marry blacks and have kids with them are taking your culture away? Are you even reading what you're typing? People don't get married to please races anymore. They get married and have children to be happy and share their lives together. I can't see myself, even as a married woman now; doing it just to fulfill my end of the bargain "Marry a black man" to preserve the black race. If my husband wasn't black, he sure would have been my husband as a white man, an Asian man or a Hispanic man. He treats me the way I deserve to be treated...
I hope one day you find happiness, Ruby.
I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
That's not what I said at all and I don't think that's what anyone else said here. I believe every people should stay among their own kind and marry among their own kind and preserve their own heritage. I believe every people should have their own nations in which to live free and in security in societies that value them and promote individual success and community health.
Being black isn't bad, but destroying another people through mixing is pure evil. Radical black nationalists of the 60s talked about using mixing as a warfare strategy to destroy whites.
Blacks don't really have a heritage anymore. And furthermore, killing people is evil , stealing is evil, raping someone is evil. Falling for someone who loves you dispite what color you are hurts NO ONE.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
It's not against the child. I want these children to have successful and happy and righteous lives.
I just don't want to be a minority because I know that means death for me and other whites. They are being used as a weapon against whites by those committing Holocaust and genocide against whites as a people. A slow death through mixing is just as sure a death as outright gunning us down, and that's happening as well at the same time.
You're really afraid that there'll be an eminent end to white people everywhere. I'm a minority and I'm no more dead than you are. If the 17% of blacks that reside in America today took on your idea of doom and gloom, we'd all be running back to Africa to be with people our own color. We're not doing that, are we? You make up 80% of the U.S's population. Preserve your race, Ruby...I won't fault you for that. We all have a right to. But I dont' think it's up to you to say that Blacks need to go here.. whites' over here...Asians over there...It's like being in a high school cafeteria where everyone makes themselves unaccessible. I guess that's segregation for you.
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Yeah...just like Hitler. He didn't want any imperfect people in his race either. That's why he became the ultra-segregationist and did the unthinkable. I can't believe what I'm reading here.
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Yeah...just like Hitler. He didn't want any imperfect people in his race either. That's why he became the ultra-segregationist and did the unthinkable. I can't believe what I'm reading here.
Hitler was expansionist not separationist and he wanted the same as left want now; One human race the only difference he wanted it all blond and blue ayed, they want it all brown like you.
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Yeah...just like Hitler. He didn't want any imperfect people in his race either. That's why he became the ultra-segregationist and did the unthinkable. I can't believe what I'm reading here.
Hitler was expansionist not separationist and he wanted the same as left want now; One human race the only difference he wanted it all blond and blue ayed, they want it all brown like you.
Didn't hitler have brown hair BTW? The least he could do was commit suicide to "purify the white race" then.
At least he did not make children.
He should have been gassed and burned according to his own theories.
How can you call that monster? A self-hating Austrian? A would be Prussian? Jealous of the Jews? Satan?
But what I advocate has nothing to do with that.
I do not want war between white nations. I do not want war against other people.
But I don't want them to immigrate neither.
Currently , whites are being colonised by north-africans in France, Belgium, Holland, germany,..
by Pakistanis in England, by somalis in Sweden and Denmark, By other blacks in Italy and Spain,
by the Turks everywhere (also Africa)...
These colonists, get all what they want from us, taxpayers,
and in return we get criminality, the collapse of the school-system, anarchy , riots, burning cars, rape-epidemics, racist murders on whites,...
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Yeah...just like Hitler. He didn't want any imperfect people in his race either. That's why he became the ultra-segregationist and did the unthinkable. I can't believe what I'm reading here.
Its not the question of being perfect or in perfect. Its preference nothing more. Why make it into something sinister. Some folks would like to think that their descendants will look something close to themselves. Why should that be a problem. When white folks have children with black folks the result in most cases is a very light skinned person with black features. I guess if I was a black person I could live with that but as a white person it makes me sad because basically offspring like this would eventually mean the end of the line for people like me. So now Erica tell me why I should be jumping for joy over something like this.
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Yeah...just like Hitler. He didn't want any imperfect people in his race either. That's why he became the ultra-segregationist and did the unthinkable. I can't believe what I'm reading here.
Hitler was expansionist not separationist and he wanted the same as left want now; One human race the only difference he wanted it all blond and blue ayed, they want it all brown like you.
Didn't hitler have brown hair BTW? The least he could do was commit suicide to "purify the white race" then.
At least he did not make children.
He should have been gassed and burned according to his own theories.
How can you call that monster? A self-hating Austrian? A would be Prussian? Jealous of the Jews? Satan?
But what I advocate has nothing to do with that.
I do not want war between white nations. I do not want war against other people.
But I don't want them to immigrate neither.
Currently , whites are being colonised by north-africans in France, Belgium, Holland, germany,..
by Pakistanis in England, by somalis in Sweden and Denmark, By other blacks in Italy and Spain,
by the Turks everywhere (also Africa)...
These colonists, get all what they want from us, taxpayers,
and in return we get criminality, the collapse of the school-system, anarchy , riots, burning cars, rape-epidemics, racist murders on whites,...
You have point, but remember that for begoted people only whites can be like shitler, Not Osama or Mugabe. ::) ;)
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Yeah...just like Hitler. He didn't want any imperfect people in his race either. That's why he became the ultra-segregationist and did the unthinkable. I can't believe what I'm reading here.
Hitler was expansionist not separationist and he wanted the same as left want now; One human race the only difference he wanted it all blond and blue ayed, they want it all brown like you.
Didn't hitler have brown hair BTW? The least he could do was commit suicide to "purify the white race" then.
At least he did not make children.
He should have been gassed and burned according to his own theories.
How can you call that monster? A self-hating Austrian? A would be Prussian? Jealous of the Jews? Satan?
But what I advocate has nothing to do with that.
I do not want war between white nations. I do not want war against other people.
But I don't want them to immigrate neither.
Currently , whites are being colonised by north-africans in France, Belgium, Holland, germany,..
by Pakistanis in England, by somalis in Sweden and Denmark, By other blacks in Italy and Spain,
by the Turks everywhere (also Africa)...
These colonists, get all what they want from us, taxpayers,
and in return we get criminality, the collapse of the school-system, anarchy , riots, burning cars, rape-epidemics, racist murders on whites,...
You have point, but remember that for begoted people only whites can be like shitler, Not Osama or Mugabe. ::) ;)
They have a point. Blacks are perhaps not able to wage large-scale operations as we do.
But Chinese can. Japanase can. Mongoleans and Coreans can...
I'm shure Arabs can too, if we are weakened.
Osama bin laden killed far less people than hitler.
Mugabe comes closer. he is a little black hitler.
Obama is dangerous. We need to stop him before it is too late.
But I see little difference with the other candidates.
we should not only stop Obama, but stop the whole media-circus that brainwashes the USA-people.
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Absolutely Agree, Even though she is "white" skinned there will be without a doubt, hints for Negroid traits and or tendencies that might deviate towards that direction. Additionally, the traits are recessive and most likely not 'junk' genes anyways, and will show up in a different generation.
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Very well said Ambiorix O0, I also believe in segregation for people's so unique cultures, and phenotypes can be preserved. When you race mix, crime, identity crises, self-hate, etc. occurs which isn't productive for people. Just think, you could inherit a couple traits from a 10xgreat-grandfather who was black african, so by no means it's no good for Europeans to breed with muSSlims or BlacKKKs, as it takes hundreds of generations, for some instances just several generations, to breed out black traits. They always seem to dominate and manifest itself one way or another in the phenotype, whether it just be clues or hints.
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Very well said Ambiorix O0, I also believe in segregation for people's so unique cultures, and phenotypes can be preserved. When you race mix, crime, identity crises, self-hate, etc. occurs which isn't productive for people. Just think, you could inherit a couple traits from a 10xgreat-grandfather who was black african, so by no means it's no good for Europeans to breed with muSSlims or BlacKKKs, as it takes hundreds of generations, for some instances just several generations, to breed out black traits. They always seem to dominate and manifest itself one way or another in the phenotype, whether it just be clues or hints.
Well I assume you don't have any doubts about the criminality of the US-presidents since 1960 then.
This race - mixing is really forced upon us. Who are these multiculturalists in charge anyway? Ex-Soviets-agents?
Satanists?
Like if we are all nazis, if we choose not to loose our cultural & genetical heritage!
>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
I repeat: I don't hate blacks, especially not those who live in african countries.
But the majority of them are not able to adapt to our culture, so they are demanding we adapt to them.
What has become of law and order in certain no-go areas in the big cities??
THEY make the law and "order"
THEY are repressing the whites.
THEY want revenge for their "bad" situation.
and that attitude is "not racist" ;D
They are the biggest racists >:(
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Very well said Ambiorix O0, I also believe in segregation for people's so unique cultures, and phenotypes can be preserved. When you race mix, crime, identity crises, self-hate, etc. occurs which isn't productive for people. Just think, you could inherit a couple traits from a 10xgreat-grandfather who was black african, so by no means it's no good for Europeans to breed with muSSlims or BlacKKKs, as it takes hundreds of generations, for some instances just several generations, to breed out black traits. They always seem to dominate and manifest itself one way or another in the phenotype, whether it just be clues or hints.
Well I assume you don't have any doubts about the criminality of the US-presidents since 1960 then.
This race - mixing is really forced upon us. Who are these multiculturalists in charge anyway? Ex-Soviets-agents?
Satanists?
Like if we are all nazis, if we choose not to loose our cultural & genetical heritage!
>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
I repeat: I don't hate blacks, especially not those who live in african countries.
But the majority of them are not able to adapt to our culture, so they are demanding we adapt to them.
What has become of law and order in certain no-go areas in the big cities??
THEY make the law and "order"
THEY are repressing the whites.
THEY want revenge for their "bad" situation.
and that attitude is "not racist" ;D
They are the biggest racists >:(
yes, blacks should go back to africa as they are native their, and can't seem to adapt on different lands, as many of us Euro-Americans have for generations here in the U.S. The U.S. is a majority Euro-American Judeo-Christian country, with great values, some righteous other races can stay, but the rest should be deported to their country of origin as much of the crime rate would go down.
For example, we have 2nd and 3rd generation Mexican-Americans that even identify only as Mexican and still wave the mexican flag over the American! LiberalSS, will try to argue, "well they are close to their homeland and they have the right to do that", well we know many games the bolsheviKKK LiberalSS play and bolshevise this and that, yes everyone is proud of their heritage, but one's nationality should come first American!, we don't see 3rd generation Irish-Americans waving Irish flags around over the American, even if they did, they would wave the American flag at the same time as that is where they are from.
-
White genes or other race's genes aren't "weaker" per se, but many of the "white traits" do tend to be recessive traits that require a gene from each parent to express.
Light colored eyes such as blue or green or hazel are not going to be expressed if only one parent carries the genes for them.
Light colored hair is recessive.
Someone with very little melanin breeding with someone with a LOT of melanin is going to create a "yellow" like Obama, but not someone really dark.
Black features do predominate in a white-black interracial child because white traits tend to be recessive, but not necessarily weaker.
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
I don't agree with miscegenation at all, but as a student of Biology I thought I should make these points.
The only way I can explain this as possible is as follows. One woman, two eggs, two fathers. One father is white, the other is black. The woman must have had sex with both fathers within a very short timespan. The article shows only one father, however, she is only 19 and her partner is only 17, which is also out of place since guys usually go for younger ladies. I'm guessing that she probably was a prostitute and her partner paid for sex.
-
You are amazing. You're basically saying that those gorgeous little girls are your downfall? You're scared of biracial babies now? This is rich!
Even that "white" girl is not really white, and will undoubtedly be raised in an environment where she identifies more with black culture than with white culture.
How, ruby? When their parents are both white!?
When a black and a white have a child, the baby always comes out black due to the recessive nature of white traits. This destroys the white parent's genetic legacy.
Not necessarily true. I have a neice who's mom is white, my brother is black. She's got her mother's complexion and my brother's nose, face and smile. :) In fact, I know lots of blacks who were biracial and took on their white mom's/ or dad's complexion.
Whites are suffering as a demographic percentage and in total numbers. All you have to do is look at Zimbabwe/Rhodesia or the poor whites of South Africa to see what happens when others have power over whites. Every time I see an interracial child, I feel like I'm looking at an image of my own death.
That's sad. I hope that my kids don't grow up thinking like this. Because someone's hue is darker than yours they're destroyers of the world. That's just cruel.
I don't have anything against the child themselves, but I see miscegenation as a destructive, and deadly social force.
Ruby when you basically call the child "an image of your own death" that's just mean.
That is the truth ... uhm ... the real inconvenient truth... forget about al ghore's global warming. That isn't even bothering me a 0,5% of what this nonwhite-immigration-colonisation-racemixing-wave will do to our people.
I have no feelings of affection for babies that are black, and live here. (in Africa 0% problem with babies)
I despise them. I know they will reproduce , and mix with our people.
that makes me angry.
But blacks, with blacks in a african black country is of course perfectly fine.
I don't want grand-grand-grand-children with blacks.
I don't want blacks in my street.
I don't want blacks on my TV-screen.
I am 100% for racial segregation, but since that system doesn't work for a period longer than 400-500 years,
It is better never to take slaves of another race, and let them live around you.
The best thing whites in the USA can do, is to create a segrationist state for whites only, and have a big, big wall around it and a huge army to protect them.
Very well said Ambiorix O0, I also believe in segregation for people's so unique cultures, and phenotypes can be preserved. When you race mix, crime, identity crises, self-hate, etc. occurs which isn't productive for people. Just think, you could inherit a couple traits from a 10xgreat-grandfather who was black african, so by no means it's no good for Europeans to breed with muSSlims or BlacKKKs, as it takes hundreds of generations, for some instances just several generations, to breed out black traits. They always seem to dominate and manifest itself one way or another in the phenotype, whether it just be clues or hints.
Well I assume you don't have any doubts about the criminality of the US-presidents since 1960 then.
This race - mixing is really forced upon us. Who are these multiculturalists in charge anyway? Ex-Soviets-agents?
Satanists?
Like if we are all nazis, if we choose not to loose our cultural & genetical heritage!
>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
I repeat: I don't hate blacks, especially not those who live in african countries.
But the majority of them are not able to adapt to our culture, so they are demanding we adapt to them.
What has become of law and order in certain no-go areas in the big cities??
THEY make the law and "order"
THEY are repressing the whites.
THEY want revenge for their "bad" situation.
and that attitude is "not racist" ;D
They are the biggest racists >:(
yes, blacks should go back to africa as they are native their, and can't seem to adapt on different lands, as many of us Euro-Americans have for generations here in the U.S. The U.S. is a majority Euro-American Judeo-Christian country, with great values, some righteous other races can stay, but the rest should be deported to their country of origin as much of the crime rate would go down.
For example, we have 2nd and 3rd generation Mexican-Americans that even identify only as Mexican and still wave the mexican flag over the American! LiberalSS, will try to argue, "well they are close to their homeland and they have the right to do that", well we know many games the bolsheviKKK LiberalSS play and bolshevise this and that, yes everyone is proud of their heritage, but one's nationality should come first American!, we don't see 3rd generation Irish-Americans waving Irish flags around over the American, even if they did, they would wave the American flag at the same time as that is where they are from.
Mexicans will try to provoke, and provoke and provoke, untill NewMexico and Texas are theirs.
They are nationalists too, and they hate "gringos".
Let's arest all illegals, and push them out.
Anyone who then waves another Mexican flag, instead of the US flag, should be shot on sight.
-
White genes or other race's genes aren't "weaker" per se, but many of the "white traits" do tend to be recessive traits that require a gene from each parent to express.
Light colored eyes such as blue or green or hazel are not going to be expressed if only one parent carries the genes for them.
Light colored hair is recessive.
Someone with very little melanin breeding with someone with a LOT of melanin is going to create a "yellow" like Obama, but not someone really dark.
Black features do predominate in a white-black interracial child because white traits tend to be recessive, but not necessarily weaker.
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
I don't agree with miscegenation at all, but as a student of Biology I thought I should make these points.
The only way I can explain this as possible is as follows. One woman, two eggs, two fathers. One father is white, the other is black. The woman must have had sex with both fathers within a very short timespan. The article shows only one father, however, she is only 19 and her partner is only 17, which is also out of place since guys usually go for younger ladies. I'm guessing that she probably was a prostitute and her partner paid for sex.
lol, you never know, but I think it's from the same mulatto father and mulatto mother having the child, the possibilities are countless, as the "white" twin probably inherited very distant recessive recombination European traits by chance, like atavism, the 'white' child additionally may also have a new mutation, and is a bit depigmented and may have some albinism, such a thing is considerable, if this is so rare and doesn't occur too often neither. Or it could also be the milk man :::D
-
Darwin's ideas laid down the foundation for Nazism.
Since when?
-
lol, you never know, but I think it's from the same mulatto father and mulatto mother having the child, the possibilities are countless, as the "white" twin probably inherited very distant recessive recombination European traits by chance, like atavism, the 'white' child additionally may also have a new mutation, and is a bit depigmented and may have some albinism, such a thing is considerable, if this is so rare and doesn't occur too often neither. Or it could also be the milk man :::D
The mother is not an adulteress (at least in this case), so it's not fair to accuse her of it unfairly and without evidence. The white-appearing child was simply a result of genetic recombination. She is not white but only has some white attributes because her parents both carried the recessive genes.
-
lol, you never know, but I think it's from the same mulatto father and mulatto mother having the child, the possibilities are countless, as the "white" twin probably inherited very distant recessive recombination European traits by chance, like atavism, the 'white' child additionally may also have a new mutation, and is a bit depigmented and may have some albinism, such a thing is considerable, if this is so rare and doesn't occur too often neither. Or it could also be the milk man :::D
The mother is not an adulteress (at least in this case), so it's not fair to accuse her of it unfairly and without evidence. The white-appearing child was simply a result of genetic recombination. She is not white but only has some white attributes because her parents both carried the recessive genes.
The article claim both both parents to be mulatto, although they look latino like Puerto Ricans for me; so it's possible but rare.
-
The article claim both both parents to be mulatto, although they look latino like Puerto Ricans for me; so it's possible but rare.
The white parents could have been white Spaniards. They would be fully white but that could explain some "Hispanic" features on the face. Mediterranean whites look slightly different from Northern Europeans or Alpines, but they are still very much white and very much European.
-
I don't know; myself I'm not hooked to this race stuff. I'm neither rascist nor anti-rascist.
-
I don't know; myself I'm not hooked to this race stuff. I'm neither rascist nor anti-rascist.
Probably you don't live in a "multi-cultural" area.
I was like that too.
-
So you don't believe in evolution but you do believe in devolution?
-
You're really afraid that there'll be an eminent end to white people everywhere.
Yes!
In every white nation, even in those in which whites are the indigenous people, whites are in decline. Massive nonwhite immigration into Europe and other white countries is one of the biggest problems. Race mixing makes the problem worse, especially when it's as rampant a problem as it currently is.
Whites are in serious danger as our nations are taken from us and our people's numbers shrink year after year.
I'm a minority and I'm no more dead than you are. If the 17% of blacks that reside in America today took on your idea of doom and gloom, we'd all be running back to Africa to be with people our own color.
I wouldn't object to that. O0
However, one thing you don't seem to get that as a minority in a white nation, you are protected. Whites are compassionate. We care for people who aren't our own and try to make sure that all people, even minorities, are treated fairly.
Do you think the Chinese would give a crap about "minority rights" if they took over a place? Do you think the Arabs would? How do you think whites are treated in black ghettos or Mexican barrios? Whites as a group are suicidally being so altruistic and helpful to other races and forgetting to protect our own interests.
Don't even think for a moment that "AA" programs and such would exist to help whites if whites were to become the minority.
We're not doing that, are we? You make up 80% of the U.S's population. Preserve your race, Ruby...I won't fault you for that. We all have a right to. But I dont' think it's up to you to say that Blacks need to go here.. whites' over here...Asians over there...It's like being in a high school cafeteria where everyone makes themselves unaccessible. I guess that's segregation for you.
There were some bad things about segregation, such as the "separate but equal" facilities not really being of equal quality. I believe however that the problems with segregation could have been repaired to make it a more fair system, without doing away with segregation itself.
Whites were FORCED to integrate with people they were incompatible with at the point of a gun.
Nobody is going to care more about you than your own people. Everyone deserves to live among their own in their own nations with people who look like them, share their values, and form a cohesive community.
Whites don't deserve to have their cities full of criminal non-whites, or to be forced to keep fleeing from places we established. First we fled to the suburbs, now we're fleeing to the Northwest in droves, and eventually we'll have nowhere to run to. Then what do you think? Whites will either have to die or fight, and I'm more inclined to do the latter, if there are enough left to resist.
-
I don't know; myself I'm not hooked to this race stuff. I'm neither rascist nor anti-rascist.
It's very hard to overcome years of brainwashing. When you're fed the same stuff for years on end in school, on tv, in books you read, in music you listen to, etc. then it can be very hard to break out unless you have some reality checks that wake you up.
-
lol, you never know, but I think it's from the same mulatto father and mulatto mother having the child, the possibilities are countless, as the "white" twin probably inherited very distant recessive recombination European traits by chance, like atavism, the 'white' child additionally may also have a new mutation, and is a bit depigmented and may have some albinism, such a thing is considerable, if this is so rare and doesn't occur too often neither. Or it could also be the milk man :::D
The mother is not an adulteress (at least in this case), so it's not fair to accuse her of it unfairly and without evidence. The white-appearing child was simply a result of genetic recombination. She is not white but only has some white attributes because her parents both carried the recessive genes.
Yes, because they are both mulattoes, any combination is possible, or you could claim some type of atavistic traits, which are just distant recessive traits, like you mentioned.
-
The article claim both both parents to be mulatto, although they look latino like Puerto Ricans for me; so it's possible but rare.
The white parents could have been white Spaniards. They would be fully white but that could explain some "Hispanic" features on the face. Mediterranean whites look slightly different from Northern Europeans or Alpines, but they are still very much white and very much European.
who knows, what background the mulattoes are from, but the white traits recombined and that's what happened, I wonder if the 'white' twin also suffers from albinism or some depigmentation.
-
The only way I can explain this as possible is as follows. One woman, two eggs, two fathers. One father is white, the other is black. The woman must have had sex with both fathers within a very short timespan. The article shows only one father, however, she is only 19 and her partner is only 17, which is also out of place since guys usually go for younger ladies. I'm guessing that she probably was a prostitute and her partner paid for sex.
That is a possibility, but I believe genetic tests must have been done for them to bring this story up to prove the twins had the same father. Twins of two colors aren't that special in such a situation.
-
I don't know; myself I'm not hooked to this race stuff. I'm neither rascist nor anti-rascist.
It's very hard to overcome years of brainwashing. When you're fed the same stuff for years on end in school, on tv, in books you read, in music you listen to, etc. then it can be very hard to break out unless you have some reality checks that wake you up.
Im not PC "liberal" or multicultst, I'm just more in religius stuff. ;)
-
lol, you never know, but I think it's from the same mulatto father and mulatto mother having the child, the possibilities are countless, as the "white" twin probably inherited very distant recessive recombination European traits by chance, like atavism, the 'white' child additionally may also have a new mutation, and is a bit depigmented and may have some albinism, such a thing is considerable, if this is so rare and doesn't occur too often neither. Or it could also be the milk man :::D
The mother is not an adulteress (at least in this case), so it's not fair to accuse her of it unfairly and without evidence. The white-appearing child was simply a result of genetic recombination. She is not white but only has some white attributes because her parents both carried the recessive genes.
The article claim both both parents to be mulatto, although they look latino like Puerto Ricans for me; so it's possible but rare.
Yes, they look like Puerto Ricans, most Puerto Ricans are triracial mainly Subsaharan Africans, indigenous Latin American Indians and Europeans, in other words Mestizo with some black influence, so of course it's possible how the twin might turn out, the question is if we'll be able to tell as she matures, from age related changes, if she'll have Negro type influences in her phenotype.
-
lol, you never know, but I think it's from the same mulatto father and mulatto mother having the child, the possibilities are countless, as the "white" twin probably inherited very distant recessive recombination European traits by chance, like atavism, the 'white' child additionally may also have a new mutation, and is a bit depigmented and may have some albinism, such a thing is considerable, if this is so rare and doesn't occur too often neither. Or it could also be the milk man :::D
The mother is not an adulteress (at least in this case), so it's not fair to accuse her of it unfairly and without evidence. The white-appearing child was simply a result of genetic recombination. She is not white but only has some white attributes because her parents both carried the recessive genes.
The article claim both both parents to be mulatto, although they look latino like Puerto Ricans for me; so it's possible but rare.
Yes, they look like Puerto Ricans, most Puerto Ricans are triracial mainly Subsaharan Africans, indigenous Latin American Indians and Europeans mixed into one prevailing form, in other words Mestizo with some black influence, so of course it's possible how the twin might turn out, the question is if we'll be able to tell as she matures, from age related changes, if she'll have Negro type influences in her phenotype.
-
Darwin's ideas laid down the foundation for Nazism.
Keep in mind that the Muslim Nazi's took our Torah and perverted it as the Nazis did with Darwin's ideas.
-
I want to note that the girls are not newborns in that photo, so the parents must have been even younger when they had the children and even younger than that when they had sex.
-
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
This photo is exactly what i don't want to happen in Europe.
Our genes should stay largely what they are. We don't need to be fanatical, but enough is enough.
If we allow even more aliens to help the 20 million non-whites to outbreed us, and -if we are not ethnically cleansed by them-
the resulting mixed race will produce some 1/8 or 2/8 genuine white looking babies, I still think it is a Holocaust/Genocide against white people. There is a deliberate policy of destroying the white race going on now, and it started with MLK in the USA.
The blacks should have been deported back to Africa in the 50ties, after WWII, before the decolonisation.
If whites wouldn't marry blacks, it wouldn't be a problem.
Absolutely Agreed, Well said Yacov O0
-
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
This photo is exactly what i don't want to happen in Europe.
Our genes should stay largely what they are. We don't need to be fanatical, but enough is enough.
If we allow even more aliens to help the 20 million non-whites to outbreed us, and -if we are not ethnically cleansed by them-
the resulting mixed race will produce some 1/8 or 2/8 genuine white looking babies, I still think it is a Holocaust/Genocide against white people. There is a deliberate policy of destroying the white race going on now, and it started with MLK in the USA.
The blacks should have been deported back to Africa in the 50ties, after WWII, before the decolonisation.
If whites wouldn't marry blacks, it wouldn't be a problem.
Absolutely Agreed, Well said Yacov O0
If I protest against people that marry (or have just have sex wh marriage) non-whites,
they could accuse me for racism, and lock me up in jail.
-
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
This photo is exactly what i don't want to happen in Europe.
Our genes should stay largely what they are. We don't need to be fanatical, but enough is enough.
If we allow even more aliens to help the 20 million non-whites to outbreed us, and -if we are not ethnically cleansed by them-
the resulting mixed race will produce some 1/8 or 2/8 genuine white looking babies, I still think it is a Holocaust/Genocide against white people. There is a deliberate policy of destroying the white race going on now, and it started with MLK in the USA.
The blacks should have been deported back to Africa in the 50ties, after WWII, before the decolonisation.
If whites wouldn't marry blacks, it wouldn't be a problem.
That's just like saying, "If a human wouldn't marry another human, it wouldn't be a problem.'
-
The white traits can even re-emerge from mixed parents:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=377839&in_page_id=1770
(http://www.hoax-slayer.com/images/black-white-twins2.jpg)
These twins were both born to the same two parents.
This photo is exactly what i don't want to happen in Europe.
Our genes should stay largely what they are. We don't need to be fanatical, but enough is enough.
If we allow even more aliens to help the 20 million non-whites to outbreed us, and -if we are not ethnically cleansed by them-
the resulting mixed race will produce some 1/8 or 2/8 genuine white looking babies, I still think it is a Holocaust/Genocide against white people. There is a deliberate policy of destroying the white race going on now, and it started with MLK in the USA.
The blacks should have been deported back to Africa in the 50ties, after WWII, before the decolonisation.
If whites wouldn't marry blacks, it wouldn't be a problem.
Absolutely Agreed, Well said Yacov O0
If I protest against people that marry (or have just have sex wh marriage) non-whites,
they could accuse me for racism, and lock me up in jail.
I doubt that they're maried. They were called "partners" people shud be stoned for this.
-
That's just like saying, "If a human wouldn't marry another human, it wouldn't be a problem.'
I agree. Who cares who marries who!
I've dated outside my race. Frankly I could care less if others do.
My favorite singer David Bowie, a white English man, married Iman an African supermodel and they have a kid. Big deal. I always thought they made a lovely couple.
Good Mills. Make some babies with blacks. Good for you. Good for all of us.
-
That's just like saying, "If a human wouldn't marry another human, it wouldn't be a problem.'
I agree. Who cares who marries who!
I've dated outside my race. Frankly I could care less if others do.
My favorite singer David Bowie, a white English man, married Iman an African supermodel and they have a kid. Big deal. I always thought they made a lovely couple.
They are a beautiful couple and have been married for 16 years. :)
-
That's just like saying, "If a human wouldn't marry another human, it wouldn't be a problem.'
I agree. Who cares who marries who!
I've dated outside my race. Frankly I could care less if others do.
My favorite singer David Bowie, a white English man, married Iman an African supermodel and they have a kid. Big deal. I always thought they made a lovely couple.
Good Mills. Make some babies with blacks. Good for you. Good for all of us.
HA HA! Too bad for you, I am not the only person who feels this way. I am not going to obsess with white purity or in keeping my white blood "clean" or whatever. Of course, I am not attracted to black men, but I have dated men of another race.
This life passes too quickly and in the end when we die...I doubt there will be black, white, asian souls or whatever.
I am white but that does not mean I'm going to be worried with who dates who, I can care less.
I care about it, because Europe is a white men's land. Change that, and Europe's gone.
Idem dito for the USA. But if you don't care, fine with me.
-
Darwinism provided the foundation for eugenics, which in turn provided an underlying basis for Nazism. Darwin was an animal.
Don't confuse "Social Darwinism" with evolution. One is a political philosophy that Darwin did not invent or have anything to do with, and the other is a scientific theory.
Evolution doesn't claim that one branch of the tree is higher or better than any other, just different, although some twigs may be more successful than others over time.
Nothing could be further from the truth, Darwin in the Descent of Man clearly states that Whites are superior to Blacks and that the Black races would be exterminated by the White races and increase the gap between Ape and Man.
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla. (The Descent of Man (1871) p.201)
Get your facts straight.
-
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla. (The Descent of Man (1871) p.201)
He's right about the apes facing extinction, or the threat of it, but he got it backwards on which of the human races would face genocide.
I'd have to see the whole thing in context to really understand what his point was here, but I venture a guess that it was probably involving the fact that civilized peoples seemed more adaptable, more ready to take on challenges as a species, than the less culturally advanced negroes or Australian aboriginals, and that they would probably in time overpower the others in the struggle for existence.
This doesn't imply an innate superiority or inferiority, simply different qualities that may give a better or worse chance of survival.
Creationists are notorious for quote mining.
-
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla. (The Descent of Man (1871) p.201)
He's right about the apes facing extinction, or the threat of it, but he got it backwards on which of the human races would face genocide.
I'd have to see the whole thing in context to really understand what his point was here, but I venture a guess that it was probably involving the fact that civilized peoples seemed more adaptable, more ready to take on challenges as a species, than the less culturally advanced negroes or Australian aboriginals, and that they would probably in time overpower the others in the struggle for existence.
This doesn't imply an innate superiority or inferiority, simply different qualities that may give a better or worse chance of survival.
Creationists are notorious for quote mining.
It's quite clear that he is saying the negroes and aboriginals lie between whites and apes on the evolutionary scale; not to mention he uses the word exterminate in regards to those people groups, This was the same justification Hitler used to exterminate the "sub-human" Jews and other "undesirables." Perhaps he's referring to what will happen in time and not advocating it but he doesn't seem all that upset about the possibility either. Creationists are no worse for quote mining than atheists, I've wasted many hours looking up answers to atheist websites devoted to finding contradictions in the Bible who are extremely lazy about how they read passages.
-
It's quite clear that he is saying the negroes and aboriginals lie between whites and apes on the evolutionary scale; not to mention he uses the word exterminate in regards to those people groups, the man was a monster just like Hitler when he tried to exterminate the Jews which he justified with the same reasoning as Darwin.
Saying that it would almost certainly happen is not the same thing as advocating it actually happening. Obama will almost certainly win the presidency at this point. Saying that doesn't mean I want him to! Besides, I really think you need to take Darwin's life into account as a whole. He didn't believe in social injustice, and he strongly opposed slavery.
Yes, he was a Victorian, a man of his time, and held certain supremacist ideas. However, he was not so hateful as to advocate genocide in the way you accuse him of.
-
yeshuadisciple, you are a bastion of clarity. You're awesome!