JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Dexter on September 04, 2007, 12:14:37 PM
-
Turkey is the "best" (of the worst) Muslim ally, they are not arabs, and most of tham are non-religious, and the state is non-religious either .
What do you think about Turkey ?
-
"The Hellenic (Greek) Genocide was the systematic torture, massacre and ethnic cleansing of several million Hellenes (Greeks) perpetrated by the Turks in Asia Minor, Constantinople (now called Istanbul by the Turks), Eastern Thrace, Imvros, Tenedos, Macedonia, Cappadocia and Pontos.
Most of the victims were massacred between 1895 and 1955. The present estimate is that some 2,000,000 Greek children, men and women of all ages were killed during that period.
The Hellenic Genocide is commemorated on May 19 and September 14."
Read the rest here:
http://www.greece.org/cyprus/HellenicGenocide.htm (http://www.greece.org/cyprus/HellenicGenocide.htm)
-
Ummmm...what's your point ?
It's a bit irrelevant in my opinion .
-
I think Turkey is a Muslim nation. Period. That means that sooner or later, it will be bad for the Jews.
I know a Turkish, Jewish woman there, and I care for her deeply. Her whole family seems to see no danger in living among millions of Muslims...because they too make the argument that Turkey is mostly a secular state.
I keep telling her she and her family needs to make Aliyah...but....
However, the Islamic forces have been getting stronger as evidenced by their latest elections.
Hopefully the secular military would not allow Islam to become a force that would control them.
-
Ummmm...what's your point ?
It's a bit irrelevant in my opinion .
Oh, I thought my point was obvious. Okay then. My point is, as a Greek, I am familiar with the history of Turkish atrocities and I could care less about whether they are religious Muslims or secular Muslims. Their actions during the 20th century were perpetrated after their supposed secular revolution.
-
Turks are very vicious moslems equal if not more so then arabs eventually they will align with their Islamic brethren and turn on the west
-
I also heard that Turkey was the best of the muslims and the state is secular. But you can't trust any arab though.
-
Turkey is the "best" (of the worst) Muslim ally, they are not arabs, and most of tham are non-religious, and the state is non-religious either .
What do you think about Turkey ?
They are responsible for the genocide of millions of Christians, Turkey is a Nazi state. Look at what Turks do when they enter Europe and Australia.. they are just as troublesome as the Arabs. It has nothing to do with them not being Arab, that is irrelevant. The Arab Christians that escape from Muslim nations and come to America are very loyal to America, as are the Persian Christians. I don't care if they are blond/blue eyed Albanian/Bosnian Muslims or Oriental Indonesian Muslims - they're Muslims.
-
Sure, but I mean TODAY'S turkey ....
-
Sure, but I mean TODAY'S turkey ....
Ahh, like TODAY'S Germany?
-
Sure, but I mean TODAY'S turkey ....
Ahh, like TODAY'S Germany?
YES ;D
Quote :
"Turkey is the "best" (of the worst) Muslim ally"
;)
-
Dexter.. the way you as a Jew view Germany, is the way I as a Christian view Turkey. I don't care if it's "modern" or "secular" now. Does that make more sense?
-
Turkey is not "Arab," they are a separate Turkish ethnic group. Just as Persians are not Arab.
I agree they are "more secular," but they still have corruption. They deny that they murdered Armenians during WWI.
I can also say that Romania and Turkey had conflicts in the past, with Turks trying to invade Europe. However, this is not relevant modernly.
-
Sure, but I mean TODAY'S turkey ....
Ahh, like TODAY'S Germany?
YES ;D
Quote :
"Turkey is the "best" (of the worst) Muslim ally"
;)
TODAY'S TURKEY:
The closure of the Halki Theological Seminary is a violation of human rights and religious freedom. It is a move meant by the Turkish authorities to finish off the Greek Orthodox population that is supposed to be protected by the Treaty of Lausanne. Earlier in the century, the Ottomans engaged in a genocidal policy of extermination against its Greek population.
By 1923, only 100,000 Greeks remained in Turkey whereas well over one and a half million had existed in Turkey previously. Over the last several years, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has been bombed four times, at least 2 Greek Orthodox cemetaries have been desecrated, and several individuals of Greek descent have been murdered. Human rights abuses against the Greek community continue.
The closure of the Patriarchal Seminary of Halki is state sponsored discrimination. The stature of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, holy to millions of Orthodox Christians, is worthy of attention as are its still suffering faithful in Turkey. In January 1998, a caretaker of a Greek Church was brutally murdered. In the fall of 1999, a six year old Greek boy on the Island of Imbros was burned to death following an arson attack.
To date, there has been no improvement in the status of Turkey's Ethnic Greek population nor has there been any attempt by the government in Ankara to stabilize this community's status by lifting its present blockade against the Patriarchate of Constantinople which represents the centuries long persecution and survival of the Hellenic population under Turkish rule.
Also, the Turkish government still denies the genocides that it committed in the last century.
-
Almost as bad as arabs.
A bunch of filthy, stinking, unwashed sodomites.
-
I think Turkey is a muslim country, and they want the same thing as all muslims, a caliphate, the destruction of Israel and the Jews, the destruction of western civilization as we know it.
-
In 2005 , Mein Kampf was a huge hit in Turkey. I do not trust them.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/turkey/story/0,,1447209,00.html (http://www.guardian.co.uk/turkey/story/0,,1447209,00.html)
-
You liked Turkey when you went there, didn't you Dexter. :)
Turkey is a beautiful country in terms of architecture and scenery, as for the people they are divided, there are those who are surprisingly modern and very secular and those who um....aren't. ;D
The government and military are corrupt and recently Abdullah Gul-who was a previous islamist politician- who just got elected will probably turn things completely around. Either that or the military will take over if they get annoyed.
-
You liked Turkey when you went there, didn't you Dexter. :)
Turkey is a beautiful country in terms of architecture and scenery, as for the people they are divided, there are those who are surprisingly modern and very secular and those who um....aren't. ;D
The government and military are corrupt and recently Abdullah Gul-who was a previous islamist politician- who just got elected will probably turn things completely around. Either that or the military will take over if they get annoyed.
nah.....it was nice...not that much ...
-
I don't know too much about Turkey but I think I agree with him when he says that it's one of the best Muslim countries (only because it has the least percentage of Muslims though)
-
You liked Turkey when you went there, didn't you Dexter. :)
Turkey is a beautiful country in terms of architecture and scenery, as for the people they are divided, there are those who are surprisingly modern and very secular and those who um....aren't. ;D
The government and military are corrupt and recently Abdullah Gul-who was a previous islamist politician- who just got elected will probably turn things completely around. Either that or the military will take over if they get annoyed.
I don't want to sound like a total Greek snob but most of the beautiful and important architecture in Turkey was not built by the Turks.
-
well, Turkey is APPEARING to be 'moderate"
HOWEVER, Turkey can and WILL become a VERY dangerous country to Israel and the West, particularly Europe.
Turkey has a good military (supplied by the americans), imagine those weaponry being used against Israel.
And like someone else said, you can't trust a muslim, and that applies to whether he is arab, persian or even turk for that matter.
Look at Iran, they are persian muslims, and yet, they are the biggest threats to Israel, the same can and will go to Turkey. In respect to that, Turkey is VERY close to Israel, much closer than Iran, meaning that Turkey will become possibly more dangerous to Israel than Iran.
Also, Turkey is the bridge beinbg used for the invasion of Europe, just ask the Serbian members.
Anyway, that's just my thoughts
-
Sure, but I mean TODAY'S turkey ....
Ahh, like TODAY'S Germany?
YES ;D
Quote :
"Turkey is the "best" (of the worst) Muslim ally"
;)
I understand your point Dexter, but my point is
"A .22 is the "best" (of the worst) bullet to get shot by."
"Cyanide is the "best" (of the worst) poison to ingest."
Both those statements may be true, but I prefer NOT to be shot or poisoned at all.
As for the Turks not being Arabs, that may be correct but, as was posted above, neither are the Iranians. In fact, the Albanians are European and we see how wonderful Islam has been for them.
-
You liked Turkey when you went there, didn't you Dexter. :)
Turkey is a beautiful country in terms of architecture and scenery, as for the people they are divided, there are those who are surprisingly modern and very secular and those who um....aren't. ;D
The government and military are corrupt and recently Abdullah Gul-who was a previous islamist politician- who just got elected will probably turn things completely around. Either that or the military will take over if they get annoyed.
I don't want to sound like a total Greek snob but most of the beautiful and important architecture in Turkey was not built by the Turks.
you are NOT being snobbish at ALL. And you are completely correct-and it is the TRUTH. I mean, look at the Hagia Sofia, today it is a mosque, but originally was a temple/church of the christians. the christians built it, NOT the turks, and so you are completely correct Alexander
Take for instance South Africa, it's damn beautiful (architecture), but it was NOT the blacks that built it.
-
Turkeys anti semitism unmasked good article http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=AA081200-710B-40AC-8D74-60D6C44DB285
Turkish Jew-Hate
By Andrew G. Bostom
The American Thinker | 9/5/2007
On August 28, 2007, the same day that Abdullah Gul became Turkey's President -- replacing his secular predecessor, and further consolidating the ruling Islamic AK (Adalet ve Kalkinma) Party's (AKP) hold on power -- MEMRI published excerpts from a chilling interview given by former Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan. The interview originally aired July 1, 2007, as part of Erbakan's campaign efforts in support of Islamic fundamentalist political causes before the general elections of July 22, 2007, and the AKP's resounding popular electoral victory over its closest "secularist" rival parties.
Erbakan, founder of the fundamentalist Islamic Milli Gorus (National Vision; originated 1969) movement, mentored current AKP leaders President Gul, and Prime Minister Erdogan, both of whom were previously active members of Erbakan's assorted fundamentalist political parties, serving in mayoral, ministerial, and parliamentary posts. During Erbakan's pre-election campaign stops before throngs of tens of thousands of supporters throughout Anatolia (including cities such as Trabzon, Elazig, and Konya), as well as cosmopolitan Ankara and Istanbul, he reiterated the same virulently Antisemitic statements captured in the July 1 interview, and other interviews.
These interviews and more expansive speeches were rife with allusions to Zionists/Jews (deliberately conflated), as "bacteria," and "disease," conspiring to dominate the contemporary Islamic world ("from Morocco to Indonesia,"), as they had attempted unsuccessfully during the 11th and 12th centuries when Jews purportedly "organized" the Crusades, only to be stopped by the Turk's/Erbakan's Seljuk "forefathers." Ultimately, Erbakan claimed, modern Jews/Zionists wished to establish "a world order where money and manpower are dependent on [them]."
For over thirty years, Necmettin Erbakan a former chairman of the fundamentalist National Salvation Party, and its numerous offshoots, have represented the most significant examples of Turkish Muslim political organizations exploiting systematized anti-Jewish, anti-Zionist bigotry. Erbakan's ascension to Deputy Prime Minister in January, 1974, was marked by Pan-Islamic overtures, along with increasingly strident verbal violence against Jews, Zionism, and the State of Israel emanating from the National Salvation Party's organs, especially its daily Milli Gazete (The National Newspaper), published in Istanbul since January 12, 1973.
The modern fundamentalist Islamic movement Erbakan founded has continued to produce the most extreme strain of antisemitism extant in Turkey, and traditional Islamic motifs, i.e., frequent quotations from the Koran and Hadith, remain central to this hatred, nurtured by early Islam's basic animus towards Judaism. Milli Gazete published articles in February and April of 2005, for example, which were toxic amalgams of ahistorical drivel, and virulently antisemitic and anti-dhimmi Koranic motifs, including these protoypical comments based upon Koran 2:61/ 3:112:
In fact no amount of pages or lines would be sufficient to explain the Qur'anic chapters and our Lord Prophet's [Muhammad's] words that tell us of the betrayals of the Jews... The prophets sent to them, such as Zachariah and Isaiah, were murdered by the Jews...
The April 2005 edition of the monthly Aylik, produced by a Turkish jihadist organization which claimed responsibility for the November 15, 2003 dual synagogue bombings in Istanbul, contained 18 pages of antisemitic material. An article written by Cumali Dalkilic entitled, "Why Antisemitism?", combined traditional Koranic antisemitic motifs with Nazi antisemitism, and Holocaust denial. Another article's title repeats the commonplace, if very pejorative Turkish Muslim characterization of Jews, "Tschifit," which translates as "filthy Jews" (a pejorative term for Jews whose usage was recorded by the European travelers Carsten Niebuhr in 1794, and Abdolonyme Ubicini in 1856, based upon their visits to Ottoman Turkey), i.e., "The Tschifits [The Filthy Jews] Castle."
Bat Ye'or published a remarkably foresighted 1973 analysis (first translated into English here) of the Islamic Antisemitism resurgent in her native Egypt, and being packaged for dissemination throughout the Muslim world. The primary, core Antisemitic motifs were Islamic, derived from Islam's foundational texts, on to which European, especially Nazi elements were grafted.
The pejorative characteristics of Jews as they are described in Muslim religious texts are applied to modern Jews. Anti-Judaism and anti-Zionism are equivalent-due to the inferior status of Jews in Islam, and because divine will dooms Jews to wandering and misery, the Jewish state appears to Muslims as an unbearable affront and a sin against Allah. Therefore it must be destroyed by Jihad. Here the Pan-Arab and anti-Western theses that consider Israel as an advanced instrument of the West in the Islamic world, come to reinforce religious anti-Judaism. The religious and political fuse in a purely Islamic context onto which are grafted foreign elements. If, on the doctrinal level, Nazi influence is secondary to the Islamic base, the technique with which the Antisemitic material has been reworked, and the political purposes being pursued, present striking similarities with Hitler's Germany. [emphasis added]
That anti-Jewish opinions have been widely spread in Arab nationalist circles since the 1930s is not in doubt. But their confirmation at [Al] Azhar [University] by the most important authorities of Islam enabled them to be definitively imposed, with the cachet of infallible authenticity, upon illiterate masses that were strongly attached to religious traditions. [emphasis added]
Erbakan's recent statements are vivid evidence of the fulminant Antisemitism his popular movement has imbued, including amongst Turkey's current ruling elites, who never criticize such pronouncements by their mentor. This bigoted discourse resonates among the masses, illustrating graphically the same phenomenon described so presciently 34 years ago by Bat Ye'or in Egypt: sequentially grafting on to a learned foundation of Antisemitic motifs from Islam's core texts, modern secular Western European elements, especially those associated with Nazism. Current Prime Minister Erdogan, in 1974, while serving as president of the Istanbul Youth Group of his mentor Erbakan's National Salvation Party, wrote, directed, and played the leading role in a theatrical play entitled Maskomya, staged throughout Turkey during the 1970s. Mas-Kom-Ya was a compound acronym for "Masons-Communists-Yahudi [Jews]", and the play focused on the evil, conspiratorial nature of these three entities whose common denominator was Judaism.
And recently, when the wildly popular, most expensive film ever made in Turkey Valley of the Wolves (released February, 2006) included a "cinematic motif" which featured an American Jewish doctor dismembering Iraqis supposedly murdered by American soldiers in order to harvest their organs for Jewish markets, Prime Minister Erdogan not only failed to condemn the film, he justified its production and popularity.
Rifat Bali, a Turkish historian, and Jew, made a passionate indictment of Turkey's tacit acceptance of Antisemitism, published soon after the November 15, 2003 Istanbul synagogue bombings. The singularly courageous Bali, decried first and foremost, Prime Minister Recep Tayip Erdogan's and his AKP government's abject failure to publicly denounce both the Antisemitic discourse of the fundamentalist Islamic movement from which Erdogan emerged, and which he claimed later to have abandoned, and those (like Erdogan's mentor Necmettin Erbakan, for example) insistent on perpetuating such public discourse. With bitter disbelief, Bali further noted the near unanimously shared, albeit counterfactual view, of a respected Turkish columnist, published (in Milliyet November 17, 2003) within two days of the bombings, who maintained that, "...there has never been Antisemitism in Turkey in its racist or religious sense."
The opportunity for honest discussion was squandered by every domain of Turkish society, not only politicians, but also media and intellectual elites. Moreover, a profoundly depressing example of collective Jewish dhimmitude was on ignominious display: the Chief Rabbi, as well as the secular leaders in his entourage representing the voice of Turkey's Jewish community, even the Israeli government, as Bali observes,
...all seemed determined to ignore...[rather than] to confront face to face the Antisemitism which is incorporated in the political Islamic movement...[i.e., which currently governs Turkey].
Bali further admonished the Erdogan regime to live up to its professed support of equality for Jews within Turkish society:
Turkey's Jews are not dhimmis in need of the tolerance and the protection of the Muslim majority. They are citizens of the Republic of Turkey.[emphasis added]
Amidst this atmosphere of chronic, openly espoused Antisemitism in Turkey-punctuated by the violent synagogue attacks of November, 2003, and met with craven silence by both political leaders in Israel, and major Jewish advocacy groups in the United States-a related subplot which concerns recognition of the Armenian genocide has been unfolding since March, 2007.
According to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (4/23/07, "Turks want genocide commission"), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the American Jewish Committee, and B'nai B'rith were all lobbying against the Armenian genocide recognition legislation in the Congress (HR 106) and the Senate (SR 106), at least "passively", by presenting of letters of opposition from the beset dhimmi Jewish community of Turkey; ADL and JINSA reportedly complemented these letters with their own statements opposing the resolutions. When the ADL later sponsored a campaign to combat bigotry and celebrate diversity ("No Place for Hate") it sparked bitter resentment in Watertown, MA-a small town whose 8,000 Armenian-Americans comprise nearly 25% of the population -- ultimately forcing the organization and ADL leader Abraham Foxman to recognize this established historical event. But even the most recent statements by ADL and AJC-both of whom publicly recognized the Armenian Genocide only under duress-actively oppose (ADL), or fail to support (AJC), the resolutions.
These groups maintain that passage of HR/SR 106 jeopardizes both the safety of Turkey's small Jewish minority (which is glaringly inconsistent with their simultaneous hagiography of Turkey's treatment of Jews, past and present), and what they profess to be the ongoing congenial and strategic relationship between Turkey and Israel. The predictable Turkish response to ADL's about face has been apoplectic denial -- of the Armenian genocide; of threats to the vestigial Turkish Jewish community as a consequence of potential American Jewish support for HR/SR 106 (let alone any acknowledgement of Turkey's chronic, virulent Antisemitism) -- replete with verbal chastisement of Israeli leaders and American Jewish organizations, ADL especially.
This unhinged "diplomatic" response by Turkey occurred, ironically, despite the fact that the US Congressional resolutions are based wholly on copious, often repellently detailed World War I era documentation, most notably, the diaries of Henry Morgenthau, the U.S. ambassador to Turkey from 1913 to 1916, and his immediate successor Abraham Elkus, an extended report by American consul Leslie Davis in Harput, Turkey, from 1915 to 1917, and the entire recently published United States Official Records on the Armenian Genocide, 1915-1917.
Such official Turkish governmental outrage and bullying is itself outrageous. Equally reprehensible is the behavior of Israeli political leaders, major American Jewish advocacy organizations, and the overtly dhimmi leadership of the vestigial Turkish Jewish community. This unholy alliance of "Jewish leadership" never condemns in public the poisonously Antisemitic discourse, or even violent acts committed in Turkey against Turkish Jews, yet, perversely is quick to apply pressure-notwithstanding the ahistorical and amoral connotations of these actions-to block recognition of the Armenian genocide, even within the United States.
Perhaps ceasing this disgraceful and delusional behavior starts by putting an end to the hagiography of Jewish life under Ottoman rule -- including Jews living within Istanbul's ghettoes, and Ottoman Palestine -- and using precise terms that describe this half-millennium of history, appropriately and accurately: jihad, surgun (forced population transfer), and chronic dhimmitude. There was nothing "humanitarian" whatsoever in the Ottomans accepting a relatively modest number of Jewish refugees from the Inquisition -- far greater numbers were accepted in other parts of Europe itself. Indeed the vacuum created for these skilled Jewish refugees whom the Ottomans re-settled in their burgeoning Empire was created by the Ottoman jihad conquest of Byzantine and Venetian territories and their Jewish populations, i.e., Jews who were subjected to the Ottoman jihad, including massacre, pillage, enslavement, forced conversion, and surgun deportation.
Also one cannot get lost in comforting happy talk and ignore the chronic, grinding Antisemitism, and vestiges of dhimmitude to which the Jews in Turkey have been subjected throughout the history of modern Republican Turkey-including the large, government organized Thracian pogroms of 1934, and the blatantly discriminatory, deliberately pauperizing varlik vergisi taxation scheme and subsequent deportations of Jewish business leaders to "Turkish Siberia," during World War II (WWII). This ongoing discrimination contributed to the rapid exodus of 40% of Turkey's Jews after WWII to Israel within 2 years of its creation, followed by the steady, continuous attrition of the Turkish Jewish population -- their departure accelerating again after the notorious Istanbul pogrom against Greeks, Armenians, and Jews in 1955-so that only 17,000 of Turkey's 77, 000 post-WWII Jews remain.
Joseph Hacker's seminal research highlights the 1523 book of the Talmudist Eliyah Kapsali (Seder Eliyah Zuta, composed in Crete), and its embellishment by the 17th century Egyptian chronicler Rabbi Yosef Sambari (in Sambari's Divrei Yosef)-rather crudely redacted narratives which became the version accepted by modern historiography of the history of the Jews in the Ottoman Empire:
...the sürgün [forced population transfer] phenomenon and all its attendant [discriminatory] features features was not considered at all. If the sürgün was mentioned at all in the writings of the [Jewish] scholars of the Empire, it was held to be an insignificant, indecisive episode in the history of the Jews. The relations between Jews and Ottomans were thus felt to be both idyllic and monotonous from their very inception, no distinction being made either between kinds of Jewish populations or between one period and another throughout the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries.
Kapsali conceals all criticism and tries to cover up and obliterate inconvenient facts...This is also apparently the reason for his utterly ignoring the Romaniot [Byzantine] Jews and their fate at the time of the conquest of Constantinople, and of the suffering of the others exiled there after the conquest.
The 16th century dhimmi Jewish leadership's deliberate misrepresentation of the actual plight of Ottoman Jewry was described by Hacker with obvious contempt. Tragically, and in our modern era, inexcusably, this pathological behavior persists five centuries later among contemporary Jewish leadership elites, who appear incapable of identifying, let alone adequately defending against, the resurgence of jihadist Islam in Turkey. Gifted writer Diana West's evocative language depicts the ultimate outcome if this self-destructive dhimmitude is not reversed: "in denial there is defeat."
But a liberating victory can still be achieved if the leadership of the Turkish Jewish community, Israel, and American Jewish advocacy groups simply muster the intellectual courage to overcome their own craven denial. Collectively galvanized, they could confront Erdogan's AKP government over the ugly living legacy of anti-dhimmi and Antisemitic discrimination against Turkey's Jews, and demand immediate efforts at amelioration of their plight: marginalization and legal punishment of Turkish politicians and public intellectuals whose discourse incites Jew-hatred, and potentially, anti-Jewish violence; the implementation of concrete reforms, ensuring in practice equal rights, opportunities, and public safety for Jews. And if all these measures were not implemented rapidly, with tangible evidence of success, Turkey's Jews would be allowed unfettered, mass emigration without any economic penalties.
Such bold, forthright action -- joint "anti-dhimmitude" -- would put an end to the ongoing phenomenon of a vestigial de facto dhimmi Jewish community of Turkey (via its dhimmi leadership) holding Israel, and American Jews hostage to the whims of an oppressive Turkish government, in the throes of a transformative fundamentalist Islamic revival.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew G. Bostom, MD, MS is an Associate Professor of Medicine at Brown University Medical School, and regular contributor to Frontpage Magazine. He is the author of "The Legacy of Jihad."
-
it would make a good ask jtf question what chaim thinks of Kemal Attaturk, the Otthoman Empire, and Turkey when it first became a secular state.
-
I asked Chaim on Ask JTF within the last month or two about Turkey and Kurdistan and whether he thinks the Kurds should get independence from Iraq; Turkey is against an independent Kurdish state so I also asked if it's better for the Kurds to get what they want or for Turkey to get what they want.
I just searched for the question using the search feature...
From July 29's Ask JTF:
What do you think of the Kurds trying to gain an independent state of their own? A segment about Kurdistan were previously shown on CBS's "60 Minutes" months ago, showing them living in peace and controlling the security of their territory. They want to separate themselves from the chaos and not be part of Iraq. They seem to appreciate their liberation that's been given to them as result of the war. What do you think of this?
Is Turkey a secular country? Why is there a conflict between Turkey and the Kurds? I think Turkey is against the Kurds having their own state.
In a conflict between Turkey and the Kurds--where Turkey wants to prevent the Kurds from separating from Iraq and having their own state-- should one side be seen as a more favorable outcome over the other--whether the Turks get their way and there's no Kurdistan state or the Kurds get their way and they're able to separate from Iraq and have a Kurdistan state?
It took too long to download so I didn't see the response to the question. But maybe you should check out Chaim's response to that question to see what he thinks of the Kurds and Turkey.
-
Dexter.. the way you as a Jew view Germany, is the way I as a Christian view Turkey. I don't care if it's "modern" or "secular" now. Does that make more sense?
Vito, Dexter also thinks "modern" Germany is OK. He thinks we can't blame today's Germans for the holocaust, even though today's Germans do NOT regret that their grandparents murdered 6 million Jews, and today's Germans would love to see a holocaust against 5 million Israeli Jews. That's why today's Germans are anti-Israel and pro-Arab.
So if Dexter feels this way about Germany, it's no surprise that he feels the same way about Turkey.
Chaim has spoken about Muslim Nazi Turkey many times on his television program. Chaim has pointed out that Turkey perpetrated holocausts against millions of innocent Armenians, Greeks and Serbs. And Turkey persecuted and oppressed the Jews in the Land of Israel when the Turks occupied the Holy Land before World War I. The Turkish Nazis did everything possible to prevent the creation of a Jewish state when the Zionist movement began trying to get Jews to return to Israel from the 1880s to 1917. In 1917, the British removed the Turks from the Holy Land.
The Turks are a cruel, evil and vicious people whose crimes against the Armenians, Greeks and Serbs are similar to the crimes committed by the Germans against the Jews.
America and Israel consider Muslim Nazi Turkey to be an "ally". This is completely insane. The Turkish media is violently anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Israel and anti-Semitic.
-
Vito, Dexter also thinks "modern" Germany is OK. He thinks we can't blame today's Germans for the holocaust, even though today's Germans do NOT regret that their grandparents murdered 6 million Jews, and today's Germans would love to see a holocaust against 5 million Israeli Jews. That's why today's Germans are anti-Israel and pro-Arab.
So because the German GOVERMENT is anti-Israeli does it mean that the German are anti-Israel ? no, because you can say that Israelis are anti-Israelis bye electing Olmert for the head of the Israeli goverment .
Did you know that the men that try to blow Hitler up to peices are today's Germany national herose ?
Did you know that even though Germany is anti-Israel as all European states are, Germany is the best european ally for israel ?
How do you know that they don't regret that their grandparents murdered 6 million jews and 4 milion other people ? did someone made a poll about it ?
Chaim has spoken about Muslim Nazi Turkey many times on his television program. Chaim has pointed out that Turkey perpetrated holocausts against millions of innocent Armenians, Greeks and Serbs. And Turkey persecuted and oppressed the Jews in the Land of Israel when the Turks occupied the Holy Land before World War I. The Turkish Nazis did everything possible to prevent the creation of a Jewish state when the Zionist movement began trying to get Jews to return to Israel from the 1880s to 1917. In 1917, the British removed the Turks from the Holy Land.
It's the Ottoman Empire, I'm talking about Turky from AtaTurk days (1923)..
-
I agree with Dexter on Germany.
Hitler did NOT come to power via popularity. NO! Hitler only had about 20% (might be wrong on the specific percentage, but the amount of popularity for hitler was VERY low) of the vote.
Hitler cunningly hijacked fuhrer stauts. Id advise that all read up about this fact.
The moral is, MOST Germans did NOT support hitler!
-
Chaim has spoken about Muslim Nazi Turkey many times on his television program. Chaim has pointed out that Turkey perpetrated holocausts against millions of innocent Armenians, Greeks and Serbs. And Turkey persecuted and oppressed the Jews in the Land of Israel when the Turks occupied the Holy Land before World War I. The Turkish Nazis did everything possible to prevent the creation of a Jewish state when the Zionist movement began trying to get Jews to return to Israel from the 1880s to 1917. In 1917, the British removed the Turks from the Holy Land.
It's the Ottoman Empire, I'm talking about Turky from AtaTurk days (1923)..
I can post paragraphs and paragraphs of information but I'll try to keep it short. This is all post-1923.
In the beginning of the 20th century there were 300,000 Greeks residing in Constantinople.
In May 1941, large numbers of young men ranging in age from 18-38. were conscripted into the Turkish army from the Greek and Armenian communities The Turkish intention was to exterminate these young men through the well-known method of "forced-labour battalions".
On 11 Noverriber 1942, the Turkish government passed a law regarding taxation of property of non-muslims, known as the VA RLIK VE RGISI. Through this !aw non-muslim citiizens had to submit, without the right to appeal, to the discretion and arbitrary judgment of the tax clerks.
As a result (of the use) of these harsh and inhuman measures, by 1955 only 25,000 people were left, rather than the 450,000 that should have been their number given a normal rate of growth in 35 years.
Attacks in Constantinople:
The attack by the angry mobs began at 5:50 PM on the 6th of September 1955 and ended at 02:00 AM on the 7th of September 1955.
§ the Theological School of Halki, the Marasleios School, The Monestary of Valoukli, the Zappeio School for Girls and many other sites, suffered great damage.
§ of the 83 Greek Orthodox churches in the <<Polis>> 59 were burned and most others suffered serious damage to the icons and ancient paintings of great value.
§ the tombs of Patriarchs were destroyed, Christian cemeteries and ossuaries were defiled ;
§ 3,000 homes were looted and destroyed ;
§ 4348 Greek stores were looted and destroyed ;
§ 200 Greek women were raped ;
§ hundreds of Greeks were ill-treated or tortured, such as the old Bishop of Derkon Iakovos; the metropolitan of Ilioupolis Yennadios, whose beard was cut off and who was then dragged through the streets so that he would die shortly thereafter from ill-treatment; and Bishop Pamphilou Yennadios that was thrown into the burned ruins of Valoukli;
§ 15 Greeks were murdered and among them a 90 year old monk at the Valoukli Monastery, Chrys. Mantas, who was burned alive. Many others in the monastery were seriously wounded.
In 1964 12,000 Greeks who were protected by the Treaty of Lausanne were deported from the city by the Turkish government. They took with them three times their number in relatives and friends. Therefore, in the years 1964 to 1966, about 48,000 Greeks were forced to abandon their ancestral homes.
As of 2005, only 2,000 Greeks still remain in Constantinople.
In July 1974 a coup was staged in Cyprus by the US controlled Greek military junta, then in power, for the overthrow of President Makarios and Turkey used this pretext to launch an invasion with a fully fledged army against defenseless Cyprus. The invasion was carried out in two stages in which the Turkish troops eventually occupied 40% of the island's territory, and has been called by the Turks themselves-without shame-Attila operation.
Ankara tried to justify the invasion as a peace operation aimed at establishing the constitutional order disturbed by the coup, but even after the restoration of such order and the return of President Makarios to the island in December 1974, the Turkish troops remained to back up the plans of Turkey to colonize Cyprus as a first step to annexation. Two hundred thousand Greek Cypriots, 40% of the total Greek Cypriot population, were forced to leave their homes in the occupied area and were turned into refugees. The few thousands of Greek Cypriots who remained in their homes after the completion of the invasion were gradually forced through intimidation methods to leave their homes and move to the south.
-
NSDAP was greatest party in German Reichstag in 1933; and Geman anti nazi resitance was a few thouands men in nation of eighty milions; many of them like Staufenberg and others joined only when they realised war was lost; We can say anything but without III Reich the WWII with 55 milons of dead woud not happen; so we can blame them on germns too; lastlly the germans never voluntary repented for their vrimes; they were forcibly ashamed by alies post WWII; now they resent USA for this; Did heard of this plot
to blow up US base in Ramstein? Once a nazim always a nazim, now islamonazim for a change.
-
Yes and 2 where real traitors real Germans who converted to Islam
-
NSDAP was greatest party in German Reichstag in 1933; and Geman anti nazi resitance was a few thouands men in nation of eighty milions; many of them like Staufenberg and others joined only when they realised war was lost; We can say anything but without III Reich the WWII with 55 milons of dead woud not happen; so we can blame them on germns too; lastlly the germans never voluntary repented for their vrimes; they were forcibly ashamed by alies post WWII; now they resent USA for this; Did heard of this plot
to blow up US base in Ramstein? Once a nazim always a nazim, now islamonazim for a change.
And the Kahanists in Israel are also a few thouands men in nation of 6 milions...so ??
Hitler got only 44% of the votes in 1933 .
HiWarp - Now I understand your point.....
-
I THINK IT MIGHT HAVE EVEN BEEN LESS THAN 44%
kEEP IN MIND ALSO, MANY GERMANS WERE INTIMIDATED INTO VOTING FOR THE NAZI'S
-
I THINK IT MIGHT HAVE EVEN BEEN LESS THAN 44%
kEEP IN MIND ALSO, MANY GERMANS WERE INTIMIDATED INTO VOTING FOR THE NAZI'S
Maybe i'm not so sure..
anyway, they voted hitler only or mainly because the economic issue .
-
that's right dex
-
They voted for hitler y'shmo because they hated Jews, plain and simple. The Germans are the descendants of Haman, they are the physical descendants of Amalek. There is a midrash explaining how Haman would spawn a nation called germamia of edom.
Hardly any were ashamed of their deeds, many fled to arab countries because they knew that their beliefs would be extremely well received by the arabs and wanted to foster the racial anti-semitism of nazism into the existing islamic based hatred of Jews.
Germany today is not a threat, not enough time has passed for them to start up their Jew killing, they'll just let the arabs do that themselves right now. Lucky for us, the arabs are primitive beasts unlike germans who have always been modern and industrious.
-
Germany is under the Top Five most Economically strong countries in the world. Now, why would G-D bless Germany so greatly, if it was evil? I just don't get it
-
I don't think there is such a thing as a country of muslims that is an ally.
-
They voted for hitler y'shmo because they hated Jews, plain and simple. The Germans are the descendants of Haman, they are the physical descendants of Amalek. There is a midrash explaining how Haman would spawn a nation called germamia of edom.
Hardly any were ashamed of their deeds, many fled to arab countries because they knew that their beliefs would be extremely well received by the arabs and wanted to foster the racial anti-semitism of nazism into the existing islamic based hatred of Jews.
Germany today is not a threat, not enough time has passed for them to start up their Jew killing, they'll just let the arabs do that themselves right now. Lucky for us, the arabs are primitive beasts unlike germans who have always been modern and industrious.
on what do you base your words, that Germans are of the seed of Amalek?
-
Germany is under the Top Five most Economically strong countries in the world. Now, why would G-D bless Germany so greatly, if it was evil? I just don't get it
I would have to disagree with you on that Boere.. between Germany's socialist system and the Euro, the German economy has been falling apart, same with France and Holland.
-
Germany is under the Top Five most Economically strong countries in the world. Now, why would G-D bless Germany so greatly, if it was evil? I just don't get it
I would have to disagree with you on that Boere.. between Germany's socialist system and the Euro, the German economy has been falling apart, same with France and Holland.
You mean befor Hitler became PM of Germany or after ?
-
Germany is under the Top Five most Economically strong countries in the world. Now, why would G-D bless Germany so greatly, if it was evil? I just don't get it
I don't think that has anything to do with G-d at all.
-
Germany is under the Top Five most Economically strong countries in the world. Now, why would G-D bless Germany so greatly, if it was evil? I just don't get it
I don't think that has anything to do with G-d at all.
Everything has to do with God ...
Unless you are Deist of Atheist .
-
Put it this way. I don't believe G-d loves Germany more than it does any other country. Their economical success has more to do global economics than it does it's attributes as a holy nation.
-
Put it this way. I don't believe G-d loves Germany more than it does any other country. Their economical success has more to do global economics than it does it's attributes as a holy nation.
Why do you think God loves tham if they have great economic ?
If the babylonian won the Jews, that means that God love tham ?
Of course not .
-
It's my belief that the global economy is a design of man.
I believe that G-d loves all nations. I believe the Jewish people are G-d's chosen people assigned with the task of redeeming the entire world as a "light" among the nations. But every now and then, throughout history, some among the other nations will adopt contrary beliefs, will rise up to reject this idea and take it out on the Jewish people. Conversely, it's been well documented in the writings of the prophets that there have been among the jews throughout history who have rejected the task that G-d had chosen for them, and as a result the people as a whole have suffered.