Recent Posts

1

General Discussion / Re: Question About Judaism View on Hinti g

« Last post by Hrvatski Noahid on Today at 06:34:07 AM »

Hunting an animal is permitted only when it is necessary for human benefit, e.g., to eat the meat of the animal or use its hide or fur. Hunting merely for the sake of sport is not permitted because of the pain caused to the animal. This applies even to beasts of prey when they are in their natural habitat, where they do not pose a threat to humans. However, one is allowed to pursue and kill wild animals when they approach an inhabited area, if there is a practical danger that they will cause physical harm to humans, or financial harm through destruction of livestock or physical property.

2

General Discussion / Re: Question About Judaism View on Hinti g

« Last post by Zelhar on Today at 04:45:15 AM »

Kosher slaughter is only used for the purpose of meat consumption.

So as far as I understand there is no prohibition against culling wild herds, extinguishing invasive species etc. pest control etc. The only caveat I think, is that such meat is not kosher.

3

General Discussion / Re: Kamala Harris is half white and half black.

« Last post by Zelhar on Today at 04:37:23 AM »

Indians are mostly a mixture of north indien ancestal population and south indian ancestral population. The former is part of the caucasoid  population and the latter is probably a race or whatever you want to call it on its own.

India is a country. There are only four human races. India is very diverse. The majority are Caucasian. Some are Orientals. Look at where the Bnei Menashe come from. The State of Manipur looks almost as if it's not even in India. It's part of a region of India that looks as if it is a peninsula surrounded by a Burmese and Chinese sea. See the far East of the image below. The "untouchables" are Australoid. They are completely brown (as dark as the darkest blacks).

4

Torah and Jewish Idea / Re: The Divine Code Daily Dose

« Last post by Hrvatski Noahid on Today at 03:44:57 AM »

The general rule is that it is obligatory for a Gentile to learn the seven commandments that he is commanded to do, and he should learn them very well, to know what is permitted and prohibited for him. He is permitted to learn them even in a way of "delving into them," meaning deeply learning to understand the reasons and the details within the Noahide Code (the Divine Code by Rabbi Moshe Weiner, Ask Noah International, 2018, p 74).

5

General Discussion / Re: Russia starts already to vaccinate citizens Putins daughtger vaccinanetd

« Last post by Kahane-Was-Right BT on Today at 03:39:44 AM »

They have called the vaccine SPUTNIK like the Satellite and they taking in orders. They say, that they have received already 1 Billion! orders from foreign countries.

If it is not really tested, like you said, and they distribute it on this scale it can be very dangerous. 

Absolutely.  This could be a huge public health nightmare if this isn't safe and they distribute it this widely. 
Aside from just regular side effects which may happen from any product, there is an additional risk with vaccines that if they don't induce the precise necessary immune response that is needed to protect against infection by this virus, and they instead produce what will result in "antibody dependent enhancement," then rather than preventing people from being infected and/or making that infection much milder, it could cause a person who is exposed to the virus to have a more severe infection and worse disease than they otherwise would have had from the same infection.
This happened with the dengue vaccine and was a big problem.   We have to hope this won't happen with coronavirus vaccines, but only clinical testing will tell us for sure.

6

General Discussion / Re: Russia starts already to vaccinate citizens Putins daughtger vaccinanetd

« Last post by Ulli on Today at 02:14:44 AM »

They have called the vaccine SPUTNIK like the Satellite and they taking in orders. They say, that they have received already 1 Billion! orders from foreign countries.

If it is not really tested, like you said, and they distribute it on this scale it can be very dangerous. 

7

General Discussion / Re: Kamala Harris is half white and half black.

« Last post by Binyamin Yisrael on August 11, 2020, 11:39:24 PM »

Harris does not look black at all. She is lighter than many whites. She looks likes like she has black facial features. Most biracial people that are half white and half black usually look more black. She looks more white. Prince Harry's wife is the same. But Harris is evil. She looks vicious in many pictures (such as when she visited the headquarters of Al Sharpton).

I used to think she was better than Obama. I thought she's just a Leftist but doesn't make everything about race. I guess she's just the same or worse.

8

General Discussion / Re: Kamala Harris is half white and half black.

« Last post by Binyamin Yisrael on August 11, 2020, 11:33:22 PM »

"Indian is not a race"

huh?

India is a country. There are only four human races. India is very diverse. The majority are Caucasian. Some are Orientals. Look at where the Bnei Menashe come from. The State of Manipur looks almost as if it's not even in India. It's part of a region of India that looks as if it is a peninsula surrounded by a Burmese and Chinese sea. See the far East of the image below. The "untouchables" are Australoid. They are completely brown (as dark as the darkest blacks).

9

General Discussion / Re: Kamala Harris is half white and half black.

« Last post by Kahane-Was-Right BT on August 11, 2020, 10:03:29 PM »

"Indian is not a race"

huh?

10

General Discussion / Kamala Harris is half white and half black.

« Last post by Binyamin Yisrael on August 11, 2020, 09:46:52 PM »

Of course she would rather identify as black since it's more politically correct. Her mother is white. Indian is not a race.

She claims to be a "woman of color". She's half "of color". Her mother is not "of color", even if she was a non-white Indian. "Colored" in the US means black. Orientals and other non-black races are not "of color". I think in South Africa, there were "coloreds" which referred to Indians.

There are only four races: Caucasian, Negro, Oriental, and Australoid. Only one of them is "of color" although Australoids are very dark but are not Negros. If you want to use colors, then it would be white, black, yellow, and brown. These also correspond to the four corners of the Old World. Europe, half of Asia, and North Africa are white. Sub-Saharan Africa is black. Eastern Asia and parts of the Pacific are Oriental. The natives of Australia, some parts of India (the very dark Indians). and many Indian Ocean peoples (including Madagascar) are Australoid. Oriental later spread to the New World and became the natives of the New World but the American Indians are not a distinct race, even though sometimes they are given the color red a if it's a fifth race.

Hispanic is not a race and is a made up identity. AOC is not "of color". She may be mixed between white and native but she is not black. She's most likely a Mestizo, meaning half white and half Oriental (native).

Also, black should not be capitalized if it's not the beginning of a sentence. I've noticed articles that say "Black" rather than "black" while in the same sentence not capitalizing white. If they want to be capitalized, they should say Negro or "African-American".