I see Romney and McCain as opposite sides of the same coin--phony conservatives, but both much better than Hillary who is unabashedly far-left. That would be insane if Ann Coulter actually campaigns for her. It would be funny if the situation weren't so dire. Huckabee is the only one left in the race that is anywhere close to being a conservative. No matter what happens now, the next president will be worse than Bush.
How can you say this? What makes Juan McPhony "better" than Hitlery? How do you figure that she is worse?
--Hanoi John wants our troops to continue to die like dogs in Iraq, Hitlery wants to send them all home now and let al-Qaeda win
--Hanoi John says our soldiers are all torturers
--Hanoi John helped the North Vietnamese while in prison and he then supported John Kerry when he was calling our troops "baby-killers" and marching for the Vietcong
--Hanoi John supports unlimited abortion, just like Hitlery
--Hanoi John and Hitlery both want legalization and the erasure of our borders
--Hanoi John and Hitlery are both Israel-haters, but John has a phony rep for being "pro-Israel", and thus Israel is much more likely to be bullied by him
--Hanoi John and Hitlery both oppose energy independence and are "global warming" freaks
--Hanoi John and Hitlery both would force states to accept fag marriages
--Hanoi John and Hitlery both want to ban guns
--Hanoi John and Hitlery are both anti-Serb, but McCain is worse on this issue
There you have it--ask Chaim. On all issues they are equally abhorrent, but on some of them John McAmnesty is worse.
In general, Hanoi John is worse because people will all fall in lockstep behind his plans, whereas half of the public and Congress will always hate and fight against Hillary.