Something else.
Let’s separate the following facts:
- Mohammed, who was an Arab, invented Islam by claiming he saw G-d in his dream.
- Nobody believed him, so he decided to force them to.
- Arabs were the first Muslims.
- Arab Muslims then went and occupied a great chunk of the world and converted 95% of the population into Islam.
- Here is the most interesting point. Azerbaijanis at the time were either Christians or Zoroastrians (worshippers of fire). According to various historic sources, nowhere else Arab Muslims found a greater resistance to the Muslim invasion as in Azerbaijan. Arabs sent most of their armies to put out the revolts in that land. And that’s why Azerbaijanis call themselves “Muslims by sword”, that is converted by force.
And thus…
There are no moderate Muslims, but there people whose ancestors were forced into Islam and who by their national culture resistant to both Arab culture and Islam.
And thus I suggest that we separate Arab Muslims, who were the original Muslims and original conquerors of the world from those nations who were their victims.
And if Arabs are destroyed, their victims will claim freedom.
You think Iran will reject Islam once Arabs are destroyed?
Iranians are Persians who were forcibly converted to Pisslam around 650s BY ARABS.
The rats left but the Iranians still keep the religion of their invaders.
DO YOU THINK THEY WILL EVER REJECT ISLAM?
Once a nation becomes Islamic they will ALWAYS stay Islamic.
The Azzy will never reject Islam and their archenemy is a nation
that was the first to make Christianity the official state religion.
Whoever thinks there can be peace between MODERATE muslims
and people of some other faith must have his head examined.
The moderate Albanian will never reject Islam and give Kosovo
to Serbia where it belongs. The muslim turd will never give Cyprus to Greece.
ETC ETC ETC
Now, I know there are Islamic and non-Islamic countries that are 'friends'
but that's just politics and is a matter of time before the
muslims turn against the non-muslim.