Author Topic: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?  (Read 1551 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline artgijo

  • Junior JTFer
  • **
  • Posts: 93
What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« on: August 18, 2008, 01:18:30 PM »

Srinagar, January 4, 1990. Aftab, a local Urdu newspaper, publishes a press release issued by Hizb-ul Mujahideen, set up by the Jamaat-e-Islami in 1989 to wage jihad for Jammu and Kashmir's secession from India and accession to Pakistan, asking all Hindus to pack up and leave. Another local paper, Al Safa, repeats this expulsion order.

In the following days, there is near chaos in the Kashmir valley with Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah and his National Conference government abdicating all responsibilities of the State. Masked men run amok, waving Kalashnikovs, shooting to kill and shouting anti-India slogans.

Reports of killing of Hindus, invariably Kashmiri Pandits, begin to trickle in; there are explosions; inflammatory speeches are made from the pulpits of mosques, using public address systems meant for calling the faithful to prayers. A terrifying fear psychosis begins to take grip of Kashmiri Pandits.

Walls are plastered with posters and handbills, summarily ordering all Kashmiris to strictly follow the Islamic dress code, prohibiting the sale and consumption of alcoholic drinks and imposing a ban on video parlours and cinemas. The masked men with Kalashnikovs force people to re-set their watches and clocks to Pakistan Standard Time.

Shops, business establishments and homes of Kashmiri Pandits, the original inhabitants of the Kashmir valley with a recorded cultural and civilisational history dating back 5,000 years, are marked out. Notices are pasted on doors of Pandit houses, peremptorily asking the occupants to leave Kashmir within 24 hours or face death and worse. Some are more lucid: "Be one with us, run, or die!"

* * *

Srinagar [Images], January 19, 1990. Jagmohan arrives to take charge as governor of Jammu and Kashmir. Farooq Abdullah, whose pathetic, whimpering, snivelling government has all but ceased to exist and has gone into hiding, resigns and goes into a sulk. Curfew is imposed as a first measure to restore some semblance of law and order. But it fails to have a deterrent effect.

Throughout the day, Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front and Hizbul Mujahideen terrorists use public address systems at mosques to exhort people to defy curfew and take to the streets. Masked men, firing from their Kalashnikovs, march up and down, terrorising cowering Pandits who, by then, have locked themselves in their homes.

As evening falls, the exhortations become louder and shriller. Three taped slogans are repeatedly played the whole night from mosques: 'Kashmir mei agar rehna hai, Allah-O-Akbar kehna hai' (If you want to stay in Kashmir, you have to say Allah-O-Akbar); 'Yahan kya chalega, Nizam-e-Mustafa' (What do we want here? Rule of Shariah); 'Asi gachchi Pakistan, Batao roas te Batanev san' (We want Pakistan along with Hindu women but without their men).

In the preceding months, 300 Hindu men and women, nearly all of them Kashmiri Pandits, had been slaughtered ever since the brutal murder of Pandit Tika Lal Taploo, noted lawyer and BJP national executive member, by the JKLF in Srinagar on September 14, 1989. Soon after that, Justice N K Ganju of the Srinagar high court was shot dead. Pandit Sarwanand Premi, 80-year-old poet, and his son were kidnapped, tortured, their eyes gouged out, and hanged to death. A Kashmiri Pandit nurse working at the Soura Medical College Hospital in Srinagar was gang-raped and then beaten to death. Another woman was abducted, raped and sliced into bits and pieces at a sawmill.

In villages and towns across the Kashmir valley, terrorist hit lists have been floating about. All the names are of Kashmiri Pandits. With no government worth its name, the administration having collapsed and disappeared, the police nowhere to be seen, despondency sets in. As the night of January 19, 1990, wears itself out, despondency gives way to desperation.

And tens of thousands of Kashmiri Pandits across the valley take a painful decision: to flee their homeland to save their lives from rabid jihadis. Thus takes place a 20th century Exodus.

* * *

Srinagar, January 19, 2005. There are no Kashmiri Pandits in Srinagar, or, for that matter, anywhere else in the Kashmir valley; they don't live here anymore. You can find them in squalid refugee camps in Jammu and Delhi. As many as 300,000 Kashmiri Pandits have fled their home and hearth and been reduced to living the lives of refugees in their own country.

Two-thirds of them are camping in Jammu. The rest are in Delhi and in other Indian cities. Many of them, once prosperous and proud of their rich heritage, now live in grovelling poverty, dependent on government dole and charity. In these 15 years, an entire generation of exiled Kashmiri Pandits has grown up, without seeing the land from where their parents fled to escape the brutalities of Islamic terrorism, a land they dare not return to, although that land still remains a part of their country.

A large number of them are suffering from a variety of stress and depression related diseases. A group of doctors who surveyed the mental and physical health of the Kashmiri Pandits living in refugee camps, found high incidence of 'economic distress, stress induced diabetes, partial lunacy, hypertension and mental retardation.' Statistics reflect high death rate and low birth rate among the Kashmiri Pandit refugees.

And thereby hangs a tragic tale that has been all but wiped out from public memory.

An entire people have been uprooted from the land of their ancestors and left to fend for themselves as a weak-kneed Indian state shamelessly panders to Islamic terrorists and separatists who claim they are the final arbiters of Jammu and Kashmir's destiny. A part of India's cultural heritage has been destroyed; a chapter of India's civilisational history has been erased.

Had this tragedy occurred elsewhere in Hindu majority India, and had the victims been Muslims, we would have described it as 'ethnic cleansing' and 'genocide.' We would have made films with horror-inducing titles. We would have filed cases in the Supreme Court of India. Our media would have marshalled remarkable rage in reporting the smallest detail.

But, this tragedy has occurred in Muslim majority Kashmir valley, and the victims are all Hindus, that too Pandits. What has been lost is part of India's Hindu culture, what has been erased is integral to India's Hindu civilisation.

Therefore, the government makes bold to record that the Kashmiri Pandits have "migrated on their own" and their 'displacement (is) self-imposed;' the National Human Rights Commission, after a perfunctory inquiry, refuses to concede that what has happened is 'genocide' or 'ethnic cleansing,' though facts add up to no less than that, never mind that 300,000 lives have been destroyed.

And, our jhola-wallah brigade of secular activists rudely turn up their noses to the plight of Kashmiri Pandits: Hindu sorrow, inflicted by Islamic terror, stinks.

Today, on January 19, the 15th anniversary of the forced flight of Kashmiri Pandits, look back at India's wretched history of secular politics and consider the terrible price the nation has paid at the altar of appeasement because the Indian State has, and continues to, toe the line of least resistance.

Offline syyuge

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7684
Re: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2008, 01:56:11 PM »
Indian states of kashmir and pakistan (pak666) need to be made completely free from muzzies.  O0 O0

http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/kpsgill/2003/chapter9.htm

 
There are thunders and sparks in the skies, because Faraday invented the electricity.

Offline syyuge

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7684
Re: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2008, 02:13:33 PM »
http://www.panunkashmir.org/fundamentalism.html

QUOTE>>
In Kashmir, Islamic terrorists have been unleashing forces of death and destruction against Kashmiri Hindus (also called Pandits), a minority community, to force a change in the demographic composition in their favor by squeezing them out of their homeland of the last five thousand years. The terrorism in Kashmir has resulted in:

    * Mass exodus of hundreds of thousands of Kashmiri Pandits - about 95% of their population
    * Murder of over one thousand Kashmiri Pandits
    * Forced conversions to Islam
    * Burning and looting of thousands of houses belonging to Kashmiri Pandits

.....To further their cause the secessionists have completed a program of ethnic cleansing, expelling about 350,000 Kashmiri (Pandits) Hindus - something that has unfortunately gone largely unreported in the Western press. These Pandits are at present living as refugees in their own country.
<<UNQUOTE
There are thunders and sparks in the skies, because Faraday invented the electricity.

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18296
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
Re: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2008, 02:13:36 PM »
Is it true that when Muslims circle the kaaba they are actually worshipping Shiva without knowing it? I saw some web pages claiming this.

Offline mord

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25853
Re: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2008, 02:15:17 PM »
Islam makes trouble where ever it's practiced
Thy destroyers and they that make thee waste shall go forth of thee.  Isaiah 49:17

 
Shot at 2010-01-03

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18296
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
Re: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2008, 02:17:28 PM »
Islam makes trouble where ever it's practiced

Yes it does.

Offline syyuge

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7684
Re: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2008, 02:20:49 PM »
Is it true that when Muslims circle the kaaba they are actually worshipping Shiva without knowing it? I saw some web pages claiming this.

Yes, but they feign not knowing it. At that particular moment they also dress like Hindus. It is an ancient Mishrish Temple.
There are thunders and sparks in the skies, because Faraday invented the electricity.

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18296
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
Re: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2008, 02:24:09 PM »
Is it true that when Muslims circle the kaaba they are actually worshipping Shiva without knowing it? I saw some web pages claiming this.

Yes, but they feign not knowing it. At that particular moment they also dress like Hindus. It is an ancient Mishrish Temple.

How funny! Muslims really do steal everything from every other religion, piece it together and call it their own.

Offline syyuge

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7684
Re: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2008, 03:16:19 PM »
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200808181656.htm

QUOTE>>
   THE HINDU   
News Update Service
Monday, August 18, 2008 : 1715 Hrs

Ensure safety of migrant labourers in Kashmir valley: APMCC

Jammu (PTI): Expressing concern over the attacks on Bihari labourers and people of particular community in Kashmir valley, All Party Migrant Coordination Committee (APMCC) on Monday asked Governor N N Vohra to ensure the safety of Hindus and Sikhs in the valley.

"We ask the state governor to beef up security in and around the places where migrant labourers from Hindu and Sikh communities reside," chairman of APMCC, a conglomeration of 16 displaced Kashmiri Pandits organisations, Vinod Pandit told reporters here.

"Some miscreants can take benefit of the worsening situation in Kashmir valley by harassing minorities. Therefore CRPF forces should be deployed to guard them," he said.

Pandit said that over 2000 Bihari labourers had fled valley as well as employees belonging to minority community after being harassed.

Lambasting Hurriyat leaders Syed Ali Shah Geelani and Mirwaiz Omar Farooq for their rhetoric over safe-guarding minorities, he said, "Why are non-Kashmiri labourers were forced out of valley. It is repetition of 1990 when Kashmiri pandits were forced out."
<<UNQUOTE
There are thunders and sparks in the skies, because Faraday invented the electricity.

Offline syyuge

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7684
Re: What happend to Kashmiri Hindus?
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2008, 03:55:00 PM »
http://members.rediff.com/zuva/realkashmir.htm

QUOTE>>
DETERMINED AND DEDICATED TO FIGHT BACK PAKISTAN SPONSORED ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM IN KASHMIR,INDIA
 
Unstinted support. That is what Pakistan's Dictator/CEO/President General Pervez Musharraf promised to the US and its allies in the war against global terrorism. That was on September 13th when US Secretary of State Colin Powell made that 'You are with us or You are against us' call to Musharraf. Now let us see how much Musharraf has lived up to his promise.

In the initial days of war against terrorism, when US was pressing Taliban to hand over Osama bin Laden, Musharraf sent number of delegations to Afghanistan to impress upon Taliban to give up Osama bin Laden. Or is that what Musharraf led US to believe in?

The facts have been totally contrary to what Musharraf tells the US and its allies.

One of the Pakistani delegations to Afghanistan was led by its Islamic  clerics, who as per Musharraf, had gone to influence Mullah Omar to give up bin Laden. But the facts as published in various international media tell you a totally different story. It has come to the light now that those Islamic Clerics in fact were Taliban sympathizers and had gone their to show their support for their Taliban brothers.

Another delegation to Taliban was led by Pakistan's Intelligence Agency ISI's Ex-Chief Lt. Gen. Mahmud Ahmed. This visit too was projected by Musharraf as an attempt by Pakistan to impress the Taliban to hand over Osama bin Laden to US. But once again, the reality was different. By now it is an established fact that Lt. Gen. Ahmed was nothing but a Talibani-in-disguise. Was it a mere coincidence that Lt. Gen. Ahmed was in US on September 11? Was it a mere coincidence that Lt. Gen. Ahmed did not let Musharraf go to Kandhaar to see Mullah Omar? Was it a mere coincidence that when US bombed Mullah Omar's house, Mullah Omar escaped just half an hour before the bombing? Wasn't Lt. Gen. Ahmed the same person who was behind the wire-transfer of $100,000 from Pakistan to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta?  This was the reason that Pakistan had to fire Lt. Gen. Mahmud Ahmed under US pressure.

But does this firing of ISI Chief mean that Pervez Musharraf is being sincere in his support to US? We don't believe so. There is enough evidence in Musharraf's behavior during last six weeks that exposes his ulterior motives. Time and again, Pervez Musharraf and his administration have shown that Pakistan can not be trusted in this war against global terrorism. Why does Pakistan want the Taliban included in a future Afghan government? And why are military supplies still being sent by Pakistan to the Taliban? Why does the Pakistani leadership continue to insist on ending air strikes against the Taliban and why is it pressing for a "political solution"? What kind of a political solution can be possible with the likes of Al Qaida?

Another recent revelation has been the deep connections between Pakistan's top nuclear scientists and Al-Qaida terrorist network. So Osama was not joking when he mentioned that Pakistan's nuclear weapons are Islamic weapons and he has every right to use these weapons against all infidels.

Another recent fact published by all the major media outlets was that pro-Taliban activists have taken over an air-strip in Pakistan on Pakistan-Afghanistan border, and tens of thousands of Jehadis have gathered near the border, ready to fight along with the Taliban when US ground troops arrive. Does that give one a comfortable feeling? Does it indicate that Dictator/CEO/President Musharraf is in-charge and has everything under control?

We will not be surprised if tomorrow Osama bin Laden shows up in the house of one of Musharaf's lieutenant's in Pakistan. What would prevent somebody from assuming that Pakistan's ISI's ex-chief did not accompany Osama back to Pakistan when he returned back from his visit to Kandhaar? Has the Pentagon thought about that possibility? But knowing Pakistan's past-record and character, we strongly believe that it would not be outside the realm of possibilities.

The US might think that Musharraf is taking all the steps to clean up his administration but that is all smoke and mirror. All the steps Musharraf has taken are nothing but formalities to satisfy US and its allies. A number of experts have pointed out Pakistan's deep rooted relationships with Taliban and Al-Qaida. And it is evident that these relationships thrive today while Pakistan is called a "front-line ally" and US "experts" call for increased aid to that country.

The troublesome aspect in this double-game being played by Musharraf is that US and its allies are apparently not able to see through it. Instead the US administration and Congress is showering Pakistan with tons and tons of US  taxpayer money. Should the US taxpayer ask President Bush and Congress to explain why US is rewarding a country that has had close links to the WTC/Pentagon hijackers and continues support to the Taliban?

It is no wonder that the US is faltering in its   war on global terrorism. If the US administration is truly sincere in its war against 'Evil' then it can not be partnering with 'Evil' empires that have created and supported Taliban and Al-Qaida, and continue that support today. It can not partner with 'Evil' empires that have supported and are continuing to support terrorists in Kashmir where thousands of innocent Kashmiri Hindus were massacred and hundreds of thousands ethnically cleansed.

If the war has to be won, it has to be fought between 'Good' and 'Evil'. US can not and should not play a game of semantics in defining 'Evil'. There are no two ways about it. There is no extremist 'evil' and moderate 'evil'. Evil is Evil. The US administration, particularly Secretary of State Powell, have to see through Musharraf's double game and call a spade a spade. Like Secretary of Defense Rumsfield, Secretary Powell should stop cozying up to Pervez Musharraf. He instead needs to fully implement President Bush's plan to wipe out terrorism from the face of this earth. And in that war, he can not partner with people who play double games and we all know who they are.

Let this be a true war between 'Good' and 'Evil'. Let this be the war in which Evil is totally wiped out so that this remains the first and the last war of 21st Century.
<<UNQUOTE
There are thunders and sparks in the skies, because Faraday invented the electricity.