Author Topic: Why didn’t Trump drop a bomb on Iran who is building nuclear weapons?  (Read 1372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Shlomo

  • Administrator
  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5212
  • SAVE ISRAEL!
Why didn’t Trump drop a bomb on Iran who is building nuclear weapons and promises a nuclear holocaust?

https://jtf.org/why-didnt-trump-drop-a-bomb-on-iran-who-is-building-nuclear-weapons-and-promises-a-nuclear-holocaust/

I'm putting the whole article here because I believe it's important.

This is going to be the most politically incorrect explanation ever told. In fact, many liberals will literally explode when they read this. Stay with me here.



Anyone who knows us here at JTF knows that we love when Muslim terrorists are liquidated. Any time Muslims kill other Muslims in the name of jihad, we believe they are “right” in their cause and both sides should prove how dedicated they are to Mohammed and should fight to the death against those other fake Muslims and wipe each other out.

We support that. Leave us infidels alone because, hey look, those other Muslims just insulted Mohammed by doing it wrong.

So why am I giving ol' RINO Trump cheeto king a hard time with that whole “he just killed a bunch of Muslims with the biggest bomb ever?” I mean it sounds good, right?

The problem here is what good is going to come from this? It's just Obama all over again. Seriously.

Guess what? Obama dropped 26,171 bombs on ISIS in 2016. That's like 26,170 more bombs than Trump dropped.

Back when Barack Hussein Obama bombed Islamic State (just like Trump did), the Spectator aptly named the article “The pretend war: why bombing ISIS won't solve the problem” claiming it would solve nothing.

And you know what? It solved absolutely nothing. This bomb will solve nothing too. You want to know why?

Because dropping a bomb in the middle of Afghanistan isn't even going to put a dent in the number of Muslims that want global jihad. The problem isn't that one little spot in Afghanistan. The problem is the death cult named Islam.

Our leaders keep talking about the “war on terror.” Please. We have a war on a tactic? We don't even know who our enemies are! How do you think we can win anything if we can't even figure out what the problem is or even who the enemy is? You can't win a war on a tactic. It's ridiculous.

Furthermore, if you are going to bomb anything... who would you pick?

These idiots in Afghanistan?



Oh here they are practicing to be ninjas:



It's a good thing they train with those suicide bomb belts on. We encourage that.

Or these Iranians trying to nuke Israel and the United States?



How about this missile they built to carry a nuclear payload that says (in Hebrew) “Israel should be wiped off the face of the earth.”



Exactly. You drop a bomb on the Muslim lunatics who are building a nuclear weapon to nuke innocent people in order to start a war so their Muslim “messiah” will return and kill all the infidels. Oh... and they want to give this technology to the other Muslim lunatic terrorists so they can nuke infidels too. Yeah, that's happening right now.

So why are we doing NOTHING about Iran? What gives?

And how is bombing a mentally handicapped and goat marrying country like Afghanistan going to solve the “ISIS” problem that actually is a MUSLIM problem?


Don't laugh. They are married.

We just wasted a bomb we could have dropped on Iran's nuclear program! We could have set them back at least 10 years.

And why hasn't Netanyahu done ANYTHING about Iran other than tell Trump (and you couldn't even make this next part up if you tried) NOT to cancel the Iranian nuclear deal with Obama! This is the leader of Israel!

Iran's nucelar bomb would make that MOAB look like a firework.

Where is reason and common sense?
"In the final analysis, for the believer there are no questions, and for the non-believer there are no answers." -Chofetz Chaim

Offline Ben Yehuda

  • Director Of Marketing
  • Master JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 1412
Great point. Can they drop one on Saudi Arabia while they're at it; it might slow down the pace of mosques being built in the USA and elsewhere.

Offline TruthSpreader

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8751
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/WeThePeopleZeb
I've been wondering this myself. Why couldn't he bomb Iran?
Dan - Stay calm and be brave in order to judge correctly and make the right decision

Offline syyuge

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7684
Iran and Medina both.
There are thunders and sparks in the skies, because Faraday invented the electricity.

Offline briann

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8038
  • Mmmm HMMMMM
the MOAB, although powerful for a conventional weapon... is puny compared to even the smallest Nuke... I really think a we need to fight nukes with nukes

While were on the subject, some other potential targets for MOAB:
1)  Mecca
2)  Pyongyang
3)  Iraq (now infested with ISIS... thanks Bush & Obama)
4)  ok, any Muslim country

Offline Yehudayaakov

  • Pro JTFer
  • *****
  • Posts: 740
Because nietaniyhu refrain him to bomb the terrorist country!!! Thanks to Iranian netaniahyu has become the longest prime minister in exercise and noone can blame him to defending his business .

Offline syyuge

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7684
Hiroshima was 15 KTn. Modern tactical nukes are =or> 1.0 KTn. MOAB is only 0.01 KTn. So MOAB is 1500 times weaker than the Hiroshima. Hence more and more tactical nukes shall be used against the concentrated muslamic terrorist targets especially during their days of festivity. Strategical nukes shall only be used judiciously against the widespread muslamic terrorist targets especially in their desert like environmentally degraded area. After all Ecology and environment are of huge global concerns to the humanity. 
There are thunders and sparks in the skies, because Faraday invented the electricity.