JTF.ORG Forum
Israel => Save Israel => Topic started by: Dexter on May 30, 2007, 10:39:11 AM
-
Acient Israeli's bordors filled with blue, and have a black borders.
Moderen Israeli's bordors filled with blue, and have green borders.
(http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l162/chai48/DavidandSolomonKingdom1.gif)
Do you think Israel should have borders like in the acient times ?
-
Acient Israeli's bordors filled with blue, and have a black borders.
Moderen Israeli's bordors filled with blue, and have green borders.
(http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l162/chai48/DavidandSolomonKingdom1.gif)
Do you think Israel should have borders like in the acient times ?
Yes i never knew Damscus was part of ancient Israel,but it's fine with me but the moslems must leave
-
More maps:
(http://f.nau.co.il//Upload/12007/Article/Article_Paragraph_1409520.jpg)
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Davids-kingdom.jpg)
-
I posted another map in the Think Tank section:
(http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/greater_israel_files/hebrewmap.gif)
Well, I don't know which is the right map. It should go from Nile to Euphrates. I wholeheartedly support Israel within G-d's prescribed borders. I would not accept anything less - no compromise!
-
I posted another map in the Think Tank section:
(http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/greater_israel_files/hebrewmap.gif)
Well, I don't know which is the right map. It should go from Nile to Euphrates. I wholeheartedly support Israel within G-d's prescribed borders. I would not accept anything less - no compromise!
Your map is of the tribes journy.
-
(http://f.nau.co.il//Upload/12007/Article/Article_Paragraph_1409520.jpg)
Would this then be an accurate map of the land that God gave to Israel and that should belong to it rightly? It seems to go from river to river.
-
Israel is way too small.
-
I'm just happy with the Israel of 1967.
I am not happy.
-
I'm just happy with the Israel of 1967.
I'm not. I don't think we need all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates - but the borders should be returned to at least what they were during the time of David HaMelech.
-
I'm just happy with the Israel of 1967.
I'm not. I don't think we need all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates - but the borders should be returned to at least what they were during the time of David HaMelech.
G-D PROMISED US ALL OF THE LAND; WE NEED TO FORCIBLY TAKE IT ALL!
-
I'm just happy with the Israel of 1967.
I'm not. I don't think we need all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates - but the borders should be returned to at least what they were during the time of David HaMelech.
G-D PROMISED US ALL OF THE LAND; WE NEED TO FORCIBLY TAKE IT ALL!
I said I don't think we need all of the land. Obviously, if we get the chance (which we will eventually), we should take it.
-
(http://f.nau.co.il//Upload/12007/Article/Article_Paragraph_1409520.jpg)
Would this then be an accurate map of the land that G-d gave to Israel and that should belong to it rightly? It seems to go from river to river.
Thet's how it was promised in genesis.
-
I don't think it will be possible (at least in the near and even somewhat distant future) to conquer and then forcibly expel all those people. We would have to conquer most of Jordan, all of Lebanon, a big chunk of Syria, and the Sinai and then expel millions. There would be a mass exodus of tens of millions of arabs. We don't even have the ability to conquer all those places, let alone expel everyone. Israel can't even expel a million and something arabs inside the country! We should focus on kicking all the arabs out of Israel first. That will be difficult enough and would be provocative enough to invite a major confrontation with a few arab countries and the rest of the world and possibly a war. If Israel tried to conquer to expand the borders to the ancient land of Israel, the world would simply not stand by while Israel invaded all those areas and expelled their populations. Most of the middle east would declare war on us and other countries like Russia would step in as well. It would basically be like starting World War III. It would pretty much be suicide. Let's focus on expelling all the arabs inside Israel first. Then let's concentrate on resettling all of the Palestinians in arab lands.
-
I don't think it will be possible (at least in the near and even somewhat distant future) to conquer and then forcibly expel all those people. We would have to conquer most of Jordan, all of Lebanon, a big chunk of Syria, and the Sinai and then expel millions. There would be a mass exodus of tens of millions of arabs. We don't even have the ability to conquer all those places, let alone expel everyone. Israel can't even expel a million and something arabs inside the country! We should focus on kicking all the arabs out of Israel first. That will be difficult enough and would be provocative enough to invite a major confrontation with a few arab countries and the rest of the world and possibly a war. If Israel tried to conquer to expand the borders to the ancient land of Israel, the world would simply not stand by while Israel invaded all those areas and expelled their populations. Most of the middle east would declare war on us and other countries like Russia would step in as well. It would basically be like starting World War III. It would pretty much be suicide. Let's focus on expelling all the arabs inside Israel first. Then let's concentrate on resettling all of the PLO/Hamas Arab Muslim Nazis in arab lands.
I do see your point. However, I think that it is very important for strategic purposes to maintain that the ultimate goal of Zionism is Israel in its Biblical borders (just as "palistinians" keep insisting that their ultimate goal is to destroy Israel). The more ambitious is one's declared final goal, the more acceptable are one's temporary goals (such as re-occupying Gaza and the West Bank).
-
I'm just happy with the Israel of 1967.
I'm not. I don't think we need all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates - but the borders should be returned to at least what they were during the time of David HaMelech.
G-D PROMISED US ALL OF THE LAND; WE NEED TO FORCIBLY TAKE IT ALL!
I have noticed an interpretation in the Torah that the although Gd gave a nice chunk of lands for them and us, He intentionally didn't give 100% of that land right away. Why is that? Because the population of the Jewish people and Israelites was too small to occupy all that land..otherwise vicious beasts and the what not, would attack the people.
I see it as a similar situation today. Yes, in our hearts we know that the Niles to the Euphrates is what Gd promised us. However, there are not enough Jews yet to be able to occupy those lands...but in time, we know, Gd willing, with His help, that we will receive that land from Him.
-
I do see your point. However, I think that it is very important for strategic purposes to maintain that the ultimate goal of Zionism is Israel in its Biblical borders (just as "palistinians" keep insisting that their ultimate goal is to destroy Israel). The more ambitious is one's declared final goal, the more acceptable are one's temporary goals (such as re-occupying Gaza and the West Bank).
On the other hand, the more ambitious the goals of extremist Zionism are, the more of a reason surrounding arab states have to seek the destruction of Israel in order to prevent the conquering of their land. When arabs believe that Israel wants to expand beyond the 1967 borders, that unifies them in the purpose of preventing Israeli imperialism, which they see as a reality and a threat to them. I've heard arabs say many times that the destruction of Israel is justified because it wants to create a "Talmudic empire." Even for strategic purposes, the idea of an Israel based on its ancient land does not do any good. I think it's sufficient for strategic purposes to have an unwavering position that demands kicking all arabs out of Israel and out of Gaza, Judea, and Samaria.
-
On the other hand, the more ambitious the goals of extremist Zionism are, the more of a reason surrounding arab states have to seek the destruction of Israel in order to prevent the conquering of their land. When arabs believe that Israel wants to expand beyond the 1967 borders, that unifies them in the purpose of preventing Israeli imperialism, which they see as a reality and a threat to them. I've heard arabs say many times that the destruction of Israel is justified because it wants to create a "Talmudic empire." Even for strategic purposes, the idea of an Israel based on its ancient land does not do any good. I think it's sufficient for strategic purposes to have an unwavering position that demands kicking all arabs out of Israel and out of Gaza, Judea, and Samaria.
Z. Zhabotinsky, a position like yours is very rational. But my gut feeling is that when we deal with Israel, we need to be irrational. The first Zionists were told that their dream is completely irrational and unattainable. If we only imagine the possible, we will never achieve the impossible. I even had a good quote from one of the Zionist Fathers to this effect, but I don't know where it is.
Another thing is that this (being "reasonable") is the line of thought that leads to propitiation. Israel keeps playing this card of propitiating and accommodating - and look where it got it. Painting itself into a corner. Again, my got feeling is that now is the time to stake out a position that is completely "unreasonable" by the standards of Western community. They will only respect us for this. And anyway, our support is not from polititians, but from regular folks. They will be delighted if Israel takes an uncompromising, religious stance.
-
I've seen this one:
(http://www.nogw.com/images/greater_israel.gif)
on loony A-rab site about Zionist cospiracy and protocols; ::)
The funny thing is: The Israelis won't start the war; they realy want to live normal live in peace; Those stupid nazim A-rabs and mullahs belivin' in Mahdi and zionist plot paranoia will start the war; and the end will be just like after six day war... or this map.
(http://www.ismi.emory.edu/images/after1967warlg.jpg)
Thah will be the hand of G-d, We shoud only prey that post war Israeli leadership will be more brave and honest than Golda Meier and Moshe Dayan.
-
The first map is not a bad map. This should be the ultimate goal - from Nile to Euphrates.
-
I'm just happy with the Israel of 1967.
I'm not. I don't think we need all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates - but the borders should be returned to at least what they were during the time of David HaMelech.
If you are so anxious to do so why arent you going to "liberate" it? because face it, most of you people are cyber net warriors, you allways use the terms "will,should,could,would", you expect other people to do so for you, the moderate majority, you also expect them to die for you, just so your fake belief in a divine redemption will arrive, but then again the main reason the english section is 100 times more active than the hebrew one, is because most of the wannabes are not only not Israelis and dont understand hebrew, but they see it as some sort of a video game all the way from the US of A, this applies to the Kach fundies and christian "zionists".
-
I'd rather be a Christian zionist or Kach fundie cyber warrior than a useless, moronic peace now [censored].
What's your vision, cornhole ?
Singing kumbaya with the moooozies ?
Take your politically correct 'moderation' and shove it up your ass.
-
we shouldnt base our borders on religion at the cost of lives, most of the supporters of such expansion are those who sit safely at home while others do the dying in their name (מדבר עליכם, ישיבה'ניקים)
we should strive for a stable, safe, united and secular country above all else, upholding western values that set us apart from the muslim majority.
-
we shouldnt base our borders on religion at the cost of lives, most of the supporters of such expansion are those who sit safely at home while others do the dying in their name (מדבר עליכם, ישיבה'ניקים)
we should strive for a stable, safe, united and secular country above all else, upholding western values that set us apart from the muslim majority.
We've got another plant from 'surrender now'.
A 'secular country' defeats the whole purpose of a Jewish State, nitwit!
-
we shouldnt base our borders on religion at the cost of lives, most of the supporters of such expansion are those who sit safely at home while others do the dying in their name (מדבר עליכם, ישיבה'ניקים)
we should strive for a stable, safe, united and secular country above all else, upholding western values that set us apart from the muslim majority.
We've got another plant from 'surrender now'.
A 'secular country' defeats the whole purpose of a Jewish State, nitwit!
i was under the assumption that i live in a secular country, interesting.
a jewish state upholds jewish tradition, but does not force it (at least most of it), its a secular country and i like it that way, a jewish state exists to harbor jews, not to form some kind of giant mitzvah factory.
and just because i have slightly different views doesnt mean im a peace now scumbag.
-
I'd rather be a Christian zionist or Kach fundie cyber warrior than a useless, moronic peace now [censored].
What's your vision, cornhole ?
Singing kumbaya with the moooozies ?
Take your politically correct 'moderation' and shove it up your ass.
A cornhole? well that's a new one, i expected the good old Nazi title or lefty, atleast there's a bit creativity, my vision is a state in defendable borders, not a fantasy dream about expansion in a sea of 300 million arabs, what do you want to do all the way to Iraq, kill every arab in the way? we'll follow you... lead the way.
Politically correct? i dont think me and SSN are politically correct in any sense, i mean if you had a clue about Israeli internal state of mind you would know the settlers are the sacred cow, and in the U.S, well any guy with an average level of I.Q knows the role of envengalicals in the same corrupted DC, right?
-
we shouldnt base our borders on religion at the cost of lives, most of the supporters of such expansion are those who sit safely at home while others do the dying in their name (מדבר עליכם, ישיבה'ניקים)
we should strive for a stable, safe, united and secular country above all else, upholding western values that set us apart from the muslim majority.
We've got another plant from 'surrender now'.
A 'secular country' defeats the whole purpose of a Jewish State, nitwit!
Sorry to dissapoint you, but Peace Now to me is as much of a renegade organization as Kach, dont worry i dont discriminate when it comes to politics.
-
we should strive for a stable, safe, united and secular country above all else...
Here's the problem, idiots.
Your ideas, and the cornhole Taren's ideas for bringing stability, safety, and unison haven't worked.
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong ?
Do you ever feel remorse for the deaths of Jews that you cause as a result of your 'moderation' and insanely suicidal, never ending appeasement, in pursuit of an unachievable 'peace' ?
The Oslo farce sure brought stability and safety didn't it ?
The 'disengagement' sure brought about unity, safety and stability, didn't it ?
And you have the unmitigated gall to come here and say we want people to die for our vision ?
The truth is thousands of Jews have died and countless others have been maimed due to your lack of vision.
But you idiots never give up.
You're proven wrong, time and time again.
Jews suffer and die because of your gutless appeasement policies that only embolden an implacable enemy.
You make me want to puke.
Both of you clowns talk about safety and defendable borders.
Tell me what that means to you.
I suppose establishing a Paleostinkian state in Judea, Samaria and Aza will bring you defendable borders ? How about the Golan ?
Apparently, on your planet creating defendable borders entails surrendering more land from an already tiny nation.
Your suicidal insanity would be humorous if it was just yourselves that you were getting killed.
But that's not the case.
That's why you bastards are so worthy of contempt.
-
we should strive for a stable, safe, united and secular country above all else...
Here's the problem, idiots.
Your ideas, and the cornhole Taren's ideas for bringing stability, safety, and unison haven't worked.
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong ?
Do you ever feel remorse for the deaths of Jews that you cause as a result of your 'moderation' and insanely suicidal, never ending appeasement, in pursuit of an unachievable 'peace' ?
The Oslo farce sure brought stability and safety didn't it ?
The 'disengagement' sure brought about unity, safety and stability, didn't it ?
And you have the unmitigated gall to come here and say we want people to die for our vision ?
The truth is thousands of Jews have died and countless others have been maimed due to your lack of vision.
But you idiots never give up.
You're proven wrong, time and time again.
Jews suffer and die because of your gutless appeasement policies that only embolden an implacable enemy.
You make me want to puke.
Both of you clowns talk about safety and defendable borders.
Tell me what that means to you.
I suppose establishing a Paleostinkian state in Judea, Samaria and Aza will bring you defendable borders ? How about the Golan ?
Apparently, on your planet creating defendable borders entails surrendering more land from an already tiny nation.
Your suicidal insanity would be humorous if it was just yourselves that you were getting killed.
But that's not the case.
That's why you bastards are so worthy of contempt.
Well these two "idiots" actually live in Israel, its interesting those that are the most millitant live thousands of miles away and spit "go all the way to Iraq", are you going to come and fight or let the usual suckers die for you?
"The truth is thousands of Jews have died and countless others have been maimed due to your lack of vision.", actually if you look into it, it was religious fanatics who brought disaster on the Jews, the fall of the first and secon temple and the exile, but dont tell me, those were Lefty Jews sent by satan.
You talk as if you actually give a you know what about Israeli lives, then you give me the BS that the borders should be all the way to Iraq, and the plan to achive it is, war? which will cost probably a few million Israelis, but you still believe it should be done, so i asked you again, gutless keyboard warrior, are YOU going to come and help all the way to Iraq, or keep threatening on a damn forum? muslims do that a lot, shows a hell of a lot of character.
-
Answer his points, shtetl boy.
Admit it. Your kind have been consistantly wrong over and over and over again. The current headlines [prove it.
-
Answer his points, shtetl boy.
Admit it. Your kind have been consistantly wrong over and over and over again. The current headlines [prove it.
were not leftists, but we dont believe there are only two options, appeasement or conquest and genocide.
what makes you think the only option aside of appeasement is your solution?
im actually going to fight, unlike you and you kahanist kin, which make poor soldiers. סרבנים הם לא חיילים
we need safe borders, the pullout was a strategic move, the violent reaction to it- a political move.
-
Listen cornhole, I don't have to live on the South Pole to know it's cold there and it's best to have a warm jacket.
I'll ask you again....
What is your idea of 'defendable borders' and how do you plan to obtain them ?
Let me guess....
You're gonna throw those 'religious fanatics' out of their homes to do it.
No ?
Then tell me your plan.
Put up or shut up.
-
Answer his points, shtetl boy.
Admit it. Your kind have been consistantly wrong over and over and over again. The current headlines [prove it.
were not leftists, but we dont believe there are only two options, appeasement or conquest and genocide.
what makes you think the only option aside of appeasement is your solution?
im actually going to fight, unlike you and you kahanist kin, which make poor soldiers. סרבנים הם לא חיילים
we need safe borders, the pullout was a strategic move, the violent reaction to it- a political move.
"the pullout was a strategic move"
GOOD GRIEF!!!
If that dissaster was a 'srategic move', then G_d save Israel from more of your bone-headed strategy.
-
Listen cornhole, I don't have to live on the South Pole to know it's cold there and it's best to have a warm jacket.
I'll ask you again....
What is your idea of 'defendable borders' and how do you plan to obtain them ?
Let me guess....
You're gonna throw those 'religious fanatics' out of their homes to do it.
No ?
Then tell me your plan.
Put up or shut up.
1. bigass wall, no remote settlements who suck up resources and manpower, endangering troops for religious greed/zeal.
2. more incursions and disruption of hamas, im no general (neither are you kid) but i know re- occupation is one of the proposed solutions.
and no, the settlements werent strongholds, they were a weakness to the IDF.
-
Listen cornhole, I don't have to live on the South Pole to know it's cold there and it's best to have a warm jacket.
I'll ask you again....
What is your idea of 'defendable borders' and how do you plan to obtain them ?
Let me guess....
You're gonna throw those 'religious fanatics' out of their homes to do it.
No ?
Then tell me your plan.
Put up or shut up.
Sure you do, because its much easier to sacrifice a few Israelis when it has zero affect on you all the way back in the cosy U.S.
"What is your idea of 'defendable borders' and how do you plan to obtain them ?"
Keeping the main, large concetration of settlements such as Ma'ale Adomim and the removal of all small, which requier a dozan soldiers to baby sit two families living in the middle of no where in a trailer, now whats yours, conquest all the way to Iraq? :laugh:
The Golan should remain under Israeli controll, Gush Katif is dead, it aint coming back.
"You're gonna throw those 'religious fanatics' out of their homes to do it.
No ?"
If they break the Israeli law, if they think they are in a level above other Israelis, and if they do hold the Torah as the only law and refuse to obey the rules of the state, they can form their own little fanaticalistan and see how much time its going to take for the arabs to run it over, to your question, depends on the location of those settlements.
"Put up or shut up", try me, now you havent answered my question yet, border up to the nile, share with me your glorious plan, and let me laugh.
-
we need safe borders, the pullout was a strategic move, the violent reaction to it- a political move.
The 'pullout' was sure a brilliant strategic move. Definitely created a safe border, didn't it ?
Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too. That'll create another safe border.
Oh, and the people that resist having their homes taken from them, and their communities destroyed are only making a 'political' statement. They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents, they're just playing politics.
Do you actually believe the crap you write ?
-
we need safe borders, the pullout was a strategic move, the violent reaction to it- a political move.
The 'pullout' was sure a brilliant strategic move. Definitely created a safe border, didn't it ?
Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too. That'll create another safe border.
Oh, and the people that resist having their homes taken from them, and their communities destroyed are only making a 'political' statement. They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents, they're just playing politics.
Do you actually believe the crap you write ?
if you pull your head out of your ass youll understand the uprising and refuseniks were ordered to do so by radicals with an agenda.
poor babies had their homes taken away, justifies throwing blocks at our troops!
as taren said, larger easier to guard settlements are fine in most circumstances, when we can actually safeguard it without allocating 100 men per family.
-
we need safe borders, the pullout was a strategic move, the violent reaction to it- a political move.
The 'pullout' was sure a brilliant strategic move. Definitely created a safe border, didn't it ?
Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too. That'll create another safe border.
Oh, and the people that resist having their homes taken from them, and their communities destroyed are only making a 'political' statement. They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents, they're just playing politics.
Do you actually believe the crap you write ?
if you pull your head out of your ass youll understand the uprising and refuseniks were ordered to do so by radicals with an agenda.
poor babies had their homes taken away, justifies throwing blocks at our troops!
as taren said, larger easier to guard settlements are fine in most circumstances, when we can actually safeguard it without allocating 100 men per family.
KEEP THE WHOLE OF BIBLICAL ISRAEL AND NO SETTLEMENT WOULD BE ISOLATED, YOU GREAT, BIG, PRIZE-WINNING, BLUE RIBBON SCHMUCK!!
-
If you are so anxious to do so why arent you going to "liberate" it? because face it, most of you people are cyber net warriors, you allways use the terms "will,should,could,would", you expect other people to do so for you, the moderate majority, you also expect them to die for you, just so your fake belief in a divine redemption will arrive, but then again the main reason the english section is 100 times more active than the hebrew one, is because most of the wannabes are not only not Israelis and dont understand hebrew, but they see it as some sort of a video game all the way from the US of A, this applies to the Kach fundies and christian "zionists".
Woah... what a hateful, angry little man you are.
Hang on one second... you are completely wrong.
Personal insults are NOT allowed on this forum. You have said some nasty things in here and I'm going to let you say your last word before I ban you.
You are saying some very ignorant things. It's obvious you are making a lot of assumptions. I could rip your arguments into pieces.
For example, the Hebrew forum is more active and the database is actually larger than the U.S. JTF site. I should know since I maintain it, back it up, and query against it. The list goes on... you would do well to ask questions before you jump the gun and call us all sorts of names.
-
If you are so anxious to do so why arent you going to "liberate" it? because face it, most of you people are cyber net warriors, you allways use the terms "will,should,could,would", you expect other people to do so for you, the moderate majority, you also expect them to die for you, just so your fake belief in a divine redemption will arrive, but then again the main reason the english section is 100 times more active than the hebrew one, is because most of the wannabes are not only not Israelis and dont understand hebrew, but they see it as some sort of a video game all the way from the US of A, this applies to the Kach fundies and christian "zionists".
Woah... what a hateful, angry little man you are.
Hang on one second... you are completely wrong.
Personal insults are NOT allowed on this forum. You have said some nasty things in here and I'm going to let you say your last word before I ban you.
You are saying some very ignorant things. It's obvious you are making a lot of assumptions. I could rip your arguments into pieces.
For example, the Hebrew forum is more active and the database is actually larger than the U.S. JTF site. I should know since I maintain it, back it up, and query against it. The list goes on... you would do well to ask questions before you jump the gun and call us all sorts of names.
i did not see him call anyone names, look at people who replied to him and to me. banning him only shows how scared you are of actual opposition to your beliefs.
i dont know if mr. big bad admin has a scroll button, but you can click on the sidebar and drag upwards and see some namecalling by your members, who will of course not be banned...
not that i expect anything else, just trying to show you how scared you are.
-
we need safe borders, the pullout was a strategic move, the violent reaction to it- a political move.
The 'pullout' was sure a brilliant strategic move. Definitely created a safe border, didn't it ?
Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too. That'll create another safe border.
Oh, and the people that resist having their homes taken from them, and their communities destroyed are only making a 'political' statement. They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents, they're just playing politics.
Do you actually believe the crap you write ?
As usuall you people act as if prior to the pull out every thing was a utopia, as if qassams werent fired, as if infiltrations werent commited, selective memory.
"Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too." you cant compare Gaza to the West bank, in terms of size, in terms of population centers, and in term of the power Fatah holds in the West Bank and in contrast Hamas in Gaza, and i already said and SSN that the main settlements should be kept, so why are you even using the term "pull out of the west bank"? ::)
"They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents", they should be given the money that was promised to them, those who used violence against soldiers, no, as for living in tents, well its ironic, because billions upon billions spent on a group of 10,000 people living like a chicken bone stuck in the neck of Gaza, but thats alright, talking about brilliant strategists, not one of you answered a simple question, up to Iraq, how exactly?
-
we need safe borders, the pullout was a strategic move, the violent reaction to it- a political move.
The 'pullout' was sure a brilliant strategic move. Definitely created a safe border, didn't it ?
Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too. That'll create another safe border.
Oh, and the people that resist having their homes taken from them, and their communities destroyed are only making a 'political' statement. They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents, they're just playing politics.
Do you actually believe the crap you write ?
As usuall you people act as if prior to the pull out every thing was a utopia, as if qassams werent fired, as if infiltrations werent commited, selective memory.
"Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too." you cant compare Gaza to the West bank, in terms of size, in terms of population centers, and in term of the power Fatah holds in the West Bank and in contrast Hamas in Gaza, and i already said and SSN that the main settlements should be kept, so why are you even using the term "pull out of the west bank"? ::)
"They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents", they should be given the money that was promised to them, those who used violence against soldiers, no, as for living in tents, well its ironic, because billions upon billions spent on a group of 10,000 people living like a chicken bone stuck in the neck of Gaza, but thats alright, talking about brilliant strategists, not one of you answered a simple question, up to Iraq, how exactly?
swim in the river of troop's blood into baghdad.
all in the name of alla... err... hashem.
-
The 'pullout' was sure a brilliant strategic move. Definitely created a safe border, didn't it ?
Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too. That'll create another safe border.
Oh, and the people that resist having their homes taken from them, and their communities destroyed are only making a 'political' statement. They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents, they're just playing politics.
Do you actually believe the crap you write ?
As usuall you people act as if prior to the pull out every thing was a utopia, as if qassams werent fired, as if infiltrations werent commited, selective memory.
"Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too." you cant compare Gaza to the West bank, in terms of size, in terms of population centers, and in term of the power Fatah holds in the West Bank and in contrast Hamas in Gaza, and i already said and SSN that the main settlements should be kept, so why are you even using the term "pull out of the west bank"? ::)
"They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents", they should be given the money that was promised to them, those who used violence against soldiers, no, as for living in tents, well its ironic, because billions upon billions spent on a group of 10,000 people living like a chicken bone stuck in the neck of Gaza, but thats alright, talking about brilliant strategists, not one of you answered a simple question, up to Iraq, how exactly?[/quote]
Jews should NEVER pull out of any land in Israel. EVER.
You might not like to hear this, but the evil terrorist arabs that live in Israel should be killed immediately. If they are a part of Hamas, they should be killed. Fatah? Killed. The rest of them would be given money to leave or they would forced to leave.
This would solve the problem. They don't understand peace. They only understand violence. It's like a bully who won't stop until you clock him in the nose.
You are very angry (and quite the cyber warrior yourself) but you don't have the guts to do what it takes for real long lasting peace. We do.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
-
"Keeping the main, large concetration of settlements such as Ma'ale Adomim and the removal of all small, which requier a dozan soldiers to baby sit two families living in the middle of no where in a trailer, now whats yours, conquest all the way to Iraq?"
Ah, I see now.
Ma'ale Adomim stays but the rest go.
It's impractical to protect the others so out they go.
Besides, they're barely citizens anyway.
They're really religious fanatics that exclusively follow Torah law with utter disregard for obeying the rule of the State.
And to top it off they're on Muslim land.
Beware of a military that thinks it's impractical to protect it's citizens.
One day they'll decide it's impractical to defend the nation.
I know, like Olmert, you're tired of fighting and winning.
As far as a glorious plan to conquer all the land from the Nile to the Euphrates, we both know one doesn't exist.
That's just a red herring you like to use so you can say 'you're gonna get millions of Israelis killed'.
Sure, an Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates would be wonderful.
But no one is advocating launching an expansionist war to achieve it.
On the other hand, you're for shrinking an already microscopic nation and throwing your Jewish brothers and sisters out of their homes and communities on the grounds that it will create 'defendable borders'.
So tell me again, who is for creating stability, safety and unison ?
It's surely not you.
-
The 'pullout' was sure a brilliant strategic move. Definitely created a safe border, didn't it ?
Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too. That'll create another safe border.
Oh, and the people that resist having their homes taken from them, and their communities destroyed are only making a 'political' statement. They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents, they're just playing politics.
Do you actually believe the crap you write ?
As usuall you people act as if prior to the pull out every thing was a utopia, as if qassams werent fired, as if infiltrations werent commited, selective memory.
"Hey, I have an idea. 'Pull out' of the 'West Bank' too." you cant compare Gaza to the West bank, in terms of size, in terms of population centers, and in term of the power Fatah holds in the West Bank and in contrast Hamas in Gaza, and i already said and SSN that the main settlements should be kept, so why are you even using the term "pull out of the west bank"? ::)
"They aren't brilliant strategists like you guys, and really don't mind relocating and living in tents", they should be given the money that was promised to them, those who used violence against soldiers, no, as for living in tents, well its ironic, because billions upon billions spent on a group of 10,000 people living like a chicken bone stuck in the neck of Gaza, but thats alright, talking about brilliant strategists, not one of you answered a simple question, up to Iraq, how exactly?
Jews should NEVER pull out of any land in Israel. EVER.
You might not like to hear this, but the evil terrorist arabs that live in Israel should be killed immediately. If they are a part of Hamas, they should be killed. Fatah? Killed. The rest of them would be given money to leave or they would forced to leave.
This would solve the problem. They don't understand peace. They only understand violence. It's like a bully who won't stop until you clock him in the nose.
You are very angry (and quite the cyber warrior yourself) but you don't have the guts to do what it takes for real long lasting peace. We do.
[/quote]
ok.... are you coming any time soon to kill them? or do you expect some one else to do your dirty job?
How am i a cyber net warrior if i dont pose as rambo, talking about killing, taking land, is the definition of a cyber warrior, those who only talk behind their computer screen...
But when it comes to doing it themselves.... they are too busy thousands of miles away.
And i am asking again, you people said up to Iraq, how? give me your military tactic or plan.
-
remember to include the long term tactics of holding these lands.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
-
All those settlemets that are not worth keeping in terms of strategic position in Judea and Samaria arent worth it, and if you think they do, go baby sit it yourself, then wonder how troops didnt have the time to train because they were too busy being baby sitters 24/7 in some god forsaken hill.
"Besides, they're barely citizens anyway", your words, not mine.
"And to top it off they're on Muslim land", didnt say that.
" know, like Olmert, you're tired of fighting and winning", you people dont have the guts to fight, other wise you would have done it before instead of bragging about doing so in a forum.
'So tell me again, who is for creating stability, safety and unison ?" the extreme nut cases on both of the political wings, youre no different than peace now, your goals are the same, just the tactic is different, so excuse us if we dont share the desire for Armagedon and the rapture.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
-
And i am asking again, you people said up to Iraq, how? give me your military tactic or plan.
Already answered you in an earlier post.
I'll repeat it since you're having difficulty keeping up:
As far as a glorious plan to conquer all the land from the Nile to the Euphrates, we both know one doesn't exist.
That's just a red herring you like to use so you can say 'you're gonna get millions of Israelis killed'.
Sure, an Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates would be wonderful.
But no one is advocating launching an expansionist war to achieve it.
On the other hand, you're for shrinking an already microscopic nation and throwing your Jewish brothers and sisters out of their homes and communities on the grounds that it will create 'defendable borders'.
So tell me again, who is for creating stability, safety and unison ?
It's surely not you.
-
interesting how relocating settlements and removing a minority population are the same.
-
interesting how relocating settlements and removing a minority population are the same.
See??......morally vaccuous. You couldn't tell the difference between Elliot Ness and Al Capone.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
I gave Ma'ale Adomim as an example, as for your question, both are fine with me, they act pretty much the same any ways, same coin, just different sides.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
I gave Ma'ale Adomim as an example, as for your question, both are fine with me, they act pretty much the same any ways, same coin, just different sides.
You said Ma'ale Adomim could stay and the rest would have to go.
Then you said removing the arabs would be a logistical impossibility.
That's when I asked you why removing Jews isn't an impossibility but removing arabs is an impossibility.
Now your position is removing everyone is fine with you.
But the truth is you don't have any intention of removing arabs.
All you want to do is remove Jews.
You're full of crap.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
I gave Ma'ale Adomim as an example, as for your question, both are fine with me, they act pretty much the same any ways, same coin, just different sides.
You said Ma'ale Adomim could stay and the rest would have to go.
Then you said removing the arabs would be a logistical impossibility.
That's when I asked you why removing Jews isn't an impossibility but removing arabs is an impossibility.
Now your position is removing everyone is fine with you.
But the truth is you don't have any intention of removing arabs.
All you want to do is remove Jews.
You're full of crap.
For me you are arabs, just as much the arabs are you, you are the same in my eyes, so i have no problem applying the same, is it so hard to understand?
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
I gave Ma'ale Adomim as an example, as for your question, both are fine with me, they act pretty much the same any ways, same coin, just different sides.
You said Ma'ale Adomim could stay and the rest would have to go.
Then you said removing the arabs would be a logistical impossibility.
That's when I asked you why removing Jews isn't an impossibility but removing arabs is an impossibility.
Now your position is removing everyone is fine with you.
But the truth is you don't have any intention of removing arabs.
All you want to do is remove Jews.
You're full of crap.
For me you are arabs, just as much the arabs are you, you are the same in my eyes, so i have no problem applying the same, is it so hard to understand?
You bet your ass that's hard for me to understand.
Get your eyes checked.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
There won't be a future with 'Israelis' like you in control.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
There won't be a future with 'Israelis' like you in control.
amazing comeback... you're a disgrace.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
There won't be a future with 'Israelis' like you in control.
amazing comeback... you're a disgrace.
Oh, really???
I don't betray my kind and spit on my culture like you.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
Once again genius, you're avoiding the issue.
The fact is you're advocating removing a hundred thousand Jews or more from the 'West Bank'.
Removing Jews isn't a problem. Removing arabs is an impossibility. You're a hypocrite with a double standard.
50% of Arabs are traitors ? Where'd you get that number from ? Since we're making numbers up and denying the number of Jews to be removed from the 'West Bank', I might as well make up numbers too. 99.9999% of Arabs are traitors. Heck, most of them don't accept the idea of a Jewish State (that's something you have in common with them), so I wouldn't call them 'traitors'. They're arabs being arabs.
I'd wish you good luck removing Jews, but I actually hope you have no luck.
And with Israelis like you controlling Israel's future, Israel has no future.
But don't worry, you're not going to be controlling anything again, anytime soon.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
There won't be a future with 'Israelis' like you in control.
amazing comeback... you're a disgrace.
Oh, really???
I don't betray my kind and spit on my culture like you.
ya really, and i serve my people and culture more then you ever will, scum.
your childish comments only reveal what a sick twisted immature joke you are, im proud of my people and my nation, especially since youre not a part of it.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
There won't be a future with 'Israelis' like you in control.
amazing comeback... you're a disgrace.
Oh, really???
I don't betray my kind and spit on my culture like you.
ya really, and i serve my people and culture more then you ever will, scum.
your childish comments only reveal what a sick twisted immature joke you are, im proud of my people and my nation, especially since youre not a part of it.
BS!!!
You HATE Torah, you HATE Jewish culture, you HATE Israel and you HATE yourself!
Go back to your shtetl.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
There won't be a future with 'Israelis' like you in control.
amazing comeback... you're a disgrace.
Oh, really???
I don't betray my kind and spit on my culture like you.
ya really, and i serve my people and culture more then you ever will, scum.
your childish comments only reveal what a sick twisted immature joke you are, im proud of my people and my nation, especially since youre not a part of it.
Say it loud, I'm a self hating kike and I'm proud !!
Tell the truth dirtbag, you hate Judaism and religious Jews, dontcha ?
You're proud of your people ?
You're a liar.
-
Newman, you've got this turd's number.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
Once again genius, you're avoiding the issue.
The fact is you're advocating removing a hundred thousand Jews or more from the 'West Bank'.
Removing Jews isn't a problem. Removing arabs is an impossibility. You're a hypocrite with a double standard.
50% of Arabs are traitors ? Where'd you get that number from ? Since we're making numbers up and denying the number of Jews to be removed from the 'West Bank', I might as well make up numbers too. 99.9999% of Arabs are traitors. Heck, most of them don't accept the idea of a Jewish State (that's something you have in common with them), so I wouldn't call them 'traitors'. They're arabs being arabs.
I'd wish you good luck removing Jews, but I actually hope you have no luck.
And with Israelis like you controlling Israel's future, Israel has no future.
But don't worry, you're not going to be controlling anything again, anytime soon.
i told you why moving settlers is more of a problem you imbecile. 50% of the arabs support palestinian plight and/or hezbullah, therefore they are traitors. these are actual surveys BTW, not baseless rants by deranged "rabbis".
-
Newman, you've got this turd's number.
His number's not hard to find. just look in the toilets at a Tel Aviv gay bar.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
Once again genius, you're avoiding the issue.
The fact is you're advocating removing a hundred thousand Jews or more from the 'West Bank'.
Removing Jews isn't a problem. Removing arabs is an impossibility. You're a hypocrite with a double standard.
50% of Arabs are traitors ? Where'd you get that number from ? Since we're making numbers up and denying the number of Jews to be removed from the 'West Bank', I might as well make up numbers too. 99.9999% of Arabs are traitors. Heck, most of them don't accept the idea of a Jewish State (that's something you have in common with them), so I wouldn't call them 'traitors'. They're arabs being arabs.
I'd wish you good luck removing Jews, but I actually hope you have no luck.
And with Israelis like you controlling Israel's future, Israel has no future.
But don't worry, you're not going to be controlling anything again, anytime soon.
i told you why moving settlers is more of a problem you imbecile. 50% of the arabs support PLO/Hamas Arab Muslim Nazi plight and/or hezbullah, therefore they are traitors. these are actual surveys BTW, not baseless rants by deranged "rabbis".
Get your story straight you blathering idiot.
You're saying moving 'settlers' is more of a problem now ?
You were saying moving the arabs was a logistical impossibility before, and removing 'settlers' an attainable strategic goal.
Now moving the 'settlers' is more difficult.
Make up your mind, you freaking moron.
-
Newman, you've got this turd's number.
His number's not hard to find. just look in the toilets at a Tel Aviv gay bar.
dude this is epic, these insults are so lame its just priceless...
-
Newman, you've got this turd's number.
His number's not hard to find. just look in the toilets at a Tel Aviv gay bar.
dude this is epic, these insults are so lame its just priceless...
Where'd your butt buddy Taren go ?
You two ass-clowns came in here breathing fire and looking for a fight.
Looks like Taren left you alone to be beaten like a pinata.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
Once again genius, you're avoiding the issue.
The fact is you're advocating removing a hundred thousand Jews or more from the 'West Bank'.
Removing Jews isn't a problem. Removing arabs is an impossibility. You're a hypocrite with a double standard.
50% of Arabs are traitors ? Where'd you get that number from ? Since we're making numbers up and denying the number of Jews to be removed from the 'West Bank', I might as well make up numbers too. 99.9999% of Arabs are traitors. Heck, most of them don't accept the idea of a Jewish State (that's something you have in common with them), so I wouldn't call them 'traitors'. They're arabs being arabs.
I'd wish you good luck removing Jews, but I actually hope you have no luck.
And with Israelis like you controlling Israel's future, Israel has no future.
But don't worry, you're not going to be controlling anything again, anytime soon.
i told you why moving settlers is more of a problem you imbecile. 50% of the arabs support PLO/Hamas Arab Muslim Nazi plight and/or hezbullah, therefore they are traitors. these are actual surveys BTW, not baseless rants by deranged "rabbis".
Get your story straight you blathering idiot.
You're saying moving 'settlers' is more of a problem now ?
You were saying moving the arabs was a logistical impossibility before, and removing 'settlers' an attainable strategic goal.
Now moving the 'settlers' is more difficult.
Make up your mind, you freaking moron.
HEY mistakes happen, with all this talk about arab traitors and settlers i got em all mixed up, it aint that hard to do BTW.
-
This shtetl kike can't tell the difference between an arab-nazi and religious Jew ???
Ban this SOB. I can only argue with a complete imbecile for so long.
-
jeff what about the arabs who are peaceful and even serve in the IDF?
the logistics for such an operation would be mind boggling, tell me how you and your fellow political geniuses are going to pull it off.
Jeff, I hope u don't mind me answering this buffoon.
We 'political geniuses' are astounded how the logistics for removing about a hundred thousand or more Jews from their homes and communities is an attainable 'strategic' goal, but when it comes to removing arabs it becomes a mind boggling impossibility.
We're just not as smart as you guys, so maybe you can explain the double standard to us.
Another display of ignorance and distortion of truth, there werent "hundreds of thousands of Jews" in Gaza, 10,000, if youre talking abou the West bank, we already answered twice, what more do you want smart guy?
If being "smart" means copy pasting "Mavet La Aravim", then i'll pass..
Who's being ignorant now ?
We were talking about the 'West Bank', weren't we ?
Your premise was Ma'ale Adomim gets to stay, the rest go.
Now how many Jews would you say that means removing ?
So you still haven't answered the question (although you claim to have answered it twice)---why is it that removing a hundred thousand Jews from their homes is an attainable strategic goal but removing arabs is a logistical impossibility ?
Nice try at deflecting. Now try honestly answering the question.
1. the number of people that need to be removed
2. the facts that you are starting a war inside the country, since 50% are traitorous scum
3. the seperation is not location based, but race based. how will you distinguish "good" arabs from "bad" arabs?
i feel like im insulting humanity by actually answering that "question".
You're a freaking clown !
The number of people that need to be removed isn't a problem when you're remving a hundred thousand or more Jews.
Who are you calling 'traitorous scum', you traitorous scumbag ?
Who said anything about distinguishing good arabs from bad arabs ? They're all going, good or bad.
You don't have a problem in removing every Jew from areas you're gonna surrender to the mooozies, do you ?
Maybe you should try to differentiate between the good and bad Jewish 'settlers'.
Oh, my bad, you already have, and 50% are 'traitorous scum'.
1. how many settkers were moved and how many arabs are there in israel?
2.50% of arabs are traitors, same as the bastards who fought our soldiers in the settlements
3. OK. so you want to evacuate all arabs. good luck with that!
us ISRAELIS will control our future, not you.
Once again genius, you're avoiding the issue.
The fact is you're advocating removing a hundred thousand Jews or more from the 'West Bank'.
Removing Jews isn't a problem. Removing arabs is an impossibility. You're a hypocrite with a double standard.
50% of Arabs are traitors ? Where'd you get that number from ? Since we're making numbers up and denying the number of Jews to be removed from the 'West Bank', I might as well make up numbers too. 99.9999% of Arabs are traitors. Heck, most of them don't accept the idea of a Jewish State (that's something you have in common with them), so I wouldn't call them 'traitors'. They're arabs being arabs.
I'd wish you good luck removing Jews, but I actually hope you have no luck.
And with Israelis like you controlling Israel's future, Israel has no future.
But don't worry, you're not going to be controlling anything again, anytime soon.
i told you why moving settlers is more of a problem you imbecile. 50% of the arabs support PLO/Hamas Arab Muslim Nazi plight and/or hezbullah, therefore they are traitors. these are actual surveys BTW, not baseless rants by deranged "rabbis".
Get your story straight you blathering idiot.
You're saying moving 'settlers' is more of a problem now ?
You were saying moving the arabs was a logistical impossibility before, and removing 'settlers' an attainable strategic goal.
Now moving the 'settlers' is more difficult.
Make up your mind, you freaking moron.
HEY mistakes happen, with all this talk about arab traitors and settlers i got em all mixed up, it aint that hard to do BTW.
Yeah, well try to keep up and not make mistakes.
Anyone reading this thread can tell your mixed up.
You're getting dropped like a toilet seat in this debate.
You're looking like a one legged man in an ass kicking contest.
Do yourself a favor and leave like your butt buddy Taren did.
You'll be more comfortable at a site like dailykos.
Beat it, loser
-
Yeah, well try to keep up and not make mistakes.
"Anyone reading this thread can tell your mixed up.
You're getting dropped like a toilet seat in this debate.
You're looking like a one legged man in an ass kicking contest.
Do yourself a favor and leave like your butt buddy Taren did.
You'll be more comfortable at a site like dailykos.
Beat it, loser"
AHAHAHA! you did nothing but call me gay and swear like that newman joke, this "debate" was a one sided rant from my side, and your pathetic comebacks which accomplished nothing but embolden my beliefs that you people HAVE NO BRAINS.
personal insults only show me how right i am, please continue. we both know you wont be banned.
-
Listen pecker-breath, you came in here looking for a fight.
You got one.
You came in here calling everyone cowards and tossed around a few insults.
Now you're gonna whine that you've been insulted and want people banned ?
You're a real piece of work.
Did the big bad evil Kahanists hurt your widdle feelings ?
Boo-freakin-hoo.
Get lost, punk.
-
Listen pecker-breath, you came in here looking for a fight.
You got one.
You came in here calling everyone cowards and tossed around a few insults.
Now you're gonna whine that you've been insulted and want people banned ?
You're a real piece of work.
Did the big bad evil Kahanists hurt your widdle feelings ?
Boo-freakin-hoo.
Get lost, punk.
wow not only did you add personal insults, you made yourself a complete tool!
THANK YOU! i feel really REALLY smart now next to you
-
Listen pecker-breath, you came in here looking for a fight.
You got one.
You came in here calling everyone cowards and tossed around a few insults.
Now you're gonna whine that you've been insulted and want people banned ?
You're a real piece of work.
Did the big bad evil Kahanists hurt your widdle feelings ?
Boo-freakin-hoo.
Get lost, punk.
wow not only did you add personal insults, you made yourself a complete tool!
THANK YOU! i feel really REALLY smart now next to you
You'll feel really smart when Kahanists come to power in EY and you're at the end of a rope!
-
Newman, you've got this turd's number.
His number's not hard to find. just look in the toilets at a Tel Aviv gay bar.
Now we are gays? not that i am a big fan of the gays, but if having the gay parade in Jerusalem just to [censored] you off and let other people see how fanatical you religious fundies are, i say we should do it every month.
A Tel-Aviv gay bar is a thousand times better than a ghetto like Bnei-Brak, probably cleaner.
Funny all those tough religious dudes are so out of the radar in Israel, they are too scared to actually do something, because the words "Shabak" make them shake endlessly, so all they can do is type in a forum "kill all arabs", oh how brave of you, trying to blow up a girls school, how heroic.
-
Listen pecker-breath, you came in here looking for a fight.
You got one.
You came in here calling everyone cowards and tossed around a few insults.
Now you're gonna whine that you've been insulted and want people banned ?
You're a real piece of work.
Did the big bad evil Kahanists hurt your widdle feelings ?
Boo-freakin-hoo.
Get lost, punk.
wow not only did you add personal insults, you made yourself a complete tool!
THANK YOU! i feel really REALLY smart now next to you
You'll feel really smart when Kahanists come to power in EY and you're at the end of a rope!
End of a rope? you know this is exactly what your friends in the Iranian regime did in 1979, they promised democracy, they used the none religious nut cases to get to power, and then they executed any one who didnt share their stupid belief.
You want to hang me tough guy? come, but it has been proven before that all you people are good at, is talk, youre just like Muslims, you speak like Muslims online, they are also fans of death threats, but its a known fact 99% of them are cowards, youre no different.
I bet the Shabak has its eye on this forum, even the Israeli members here were too afraid to even meet to a drink.
You will come to power just like Khane can dodge a bullet, it aint going to happen Jewish mujhadeen.
-
Listen pecker-breath, you came in here looking for a fight.
You got one.
You came in here calling everyone cowards and tossed around a few insults.
Now you're gonna whine that you've been insulted and want people banned ?
You're a real piece of work.
Did the big bad evil Kahanists hurt your widdle feelings ?
Boo-freakin-hoo.
Get lost, punk.
wow not only did you add personal insults, you made yourself a complete tool!
THANK YOU! i feel really REALLY smart now next to you
You'll feel really smart when Kahanists come to power in EY and you're at the end of a rope!
End of a rope? you know this is exactly what your friends in the Iranian regime did in 1979, they promised democracy, they used the none religious nut cases to get to power, and then they executed any one who didnt share their stupid belief.
You want to hang me tough guy? come, but it has been proven before that all you people are good at, is talk, youre just like Muslims, you speak like Muslims online, they are also fans of death threats, but its a known fact 99% of them are cowards, youre no different.
I bet the Shabak has its eye on this forum, even the Israeli members here were too afraid to even meet to a drink.
You will come to power just like Khane can dodge a bullet, it aint going to happen Jewish mujhadeen.
im not going to generalize memebrs of this forum but mr. newman and muck defuslims are no different then the iranians, fascist nazi cowards who rely on their horde mentality to make "arguments".
they are prime examples of people that degrade this movement, hayamin haamiti needs to lose these people if they want to grow and appeal to a wider audience.
-
Listen pecker-breath, you came in here looking for a fight.
You got one.
You came in here calling everyone cowards and tossed around a few insults.
Now you're gonna whine that you've been insulted and want people banned ?
You're a real piece of work.
Did the big bad evil Kahanists hurt your widdle feelings ?
Boo-freakin-hoo.
Get lost, punk.
wow not only did you add personal insults, you made yourself a complete tool!
THANK YOU! i feel really REALLY smart now next to you
You'll feel really smart when Kahanists come to power in EY and you're at the end of a rope!
End of a rope? you know this is exactly what your friends in the Iranian regime did in 1979, they promised democracy, they used the none religious nut cases to get to power, and then they executed any one who didnt share their stupid belief.
You want to hang me tough guy? come, but it has been proven before that all you people are good at, is talk, youre just like Muslims, you speak like Muslims online, they are also fans of death threats, but its a known fact 99% of them are cowards, youre no different.
I bet the Shabak has its eye on this forum, even the Israeli members here were too afraid to even meet to a drink.
You will come to power just like Khane can dodge a bullet, it aint going to happen Jewish mujhadeen.
im not going to generalize memebrs of this forum but mr. newman and muck defuslims are no different then the iranians, fascist nazi cowards who rely on their horde mentality to make "arguments".
they are prime examples of people that degrade this movement, hayamin haamiti needs to lose these people if they want to grow and appeal to a wider audience.
Let's see...we should get rid of long-time supporters like Newman, who chaim evidently likes since he has a high status in this forum, in favor of an atheist like you? that sounds logical
-
Listen pecker-breath, you came in here looking for a fight.
You got one.
You came in here calling everyone cowards and tossed around a few insults.
Now you're gonna whine that you've been insulted and want people banned ?
You're a real piece of work.
Did the big bad evil Kahanists hurt your widdle feelings ?
Boo-freakin-hoo.
Get lost, punk.
wow not only did you add personal insults, you made yourself a complete tool!
THANK YOU! i feel really REALLY smart now next to you
You'll feel really smart when Kahanists come to power in EY and you're at the end of a rope!
End of a rope? you know this is exactly what your friends in the Iranian regime did in 1979, they promised democracy, they used the none religious nut cases to get to power, and then they executed any one who didnt share their stupid belief.
You want to hang me tough guy? come, but it has been proven before that all you people are good at, is talk, youre just like Muslims, you speak like Muslims online, they are also fans of death threats, but its a known fact 99% of them are cowards, youre no different.
I bet the Shabak has its eye on this forum, even the Israeli members here were too afraid to even meet to a drink.
You will come to power just like Khane can dodge a bullet, it aint going to happen Jewish mujhadeen.
im not going to generalize memebrs of this forum but mr. newman and muck defuslims are no different then the iranians, fascist nazi cowards who rely on their horde mentality to make "arguments".
they are prime examples of people that degrade this movement, hayamin haamiti needs to lose these people if they want to grow and appeal to a wider audience.
Let's see...we should get rid of long-time supporters like Newman, who chaim evidently likes since he has a high status in this forum, in favor of an atheist like you? that sounds logical
i like how you use the word atheist as an insult.
newman is a child.
-
Listen pecker-breath, you came in here looking for a fight.
You got one.
You came in here calling everyone cowards and tossed around a few insults.
Now you're gonna whine that you've been insulted and want people banned ?
You're a real piece of work.
Did the big bad evil Kahanists hurt your widdle feelings ?
Boo-freakin-hoo.
Get lost, punk.
wow not only did you add personal insults, you made yourself a complete tool!
THANK YOU! i feel really REALLY smart now next to you
You'll feel really smart when Kahanists come to power in EY and you're at the end of a rope!
End of a rope? you know this is exactly what your friends in the Iranian regime did in 1979, they promised democracy, they used the none religious nut cases to get to power, and then they executed any one who didnt share their stupid belief.
You want to hang me tough guy? come, but it has been proven before that all you people are good at, is talk, youre just like Muslims, you speak like Muslims online, they are also fans of death threats, but its a known fact 99% of them are cowards, youre no different.
I bet the Shabak has its eye on this forum, even the Israeli members here were too afraid to even meet to a drink.
You will come to power just like Khane can dodge a bullet, it aint going to happen Jewish mujhadeen.
im not going to generalize memebrs of this forum but mr. newman and muck defuslims are no different then the iranians, fascist nazi cowards who rely on their horde mentality to make "arguments".
they are prime examples of people that degrade this movement, hayamin haamiti needs to lose these people if they want to grow and appeal to a wider audience.
Let's see...we should get rid of long-time supporters like Newman, who chaim evidently likes since he has a high status in this forum, in favor of an atheist like you? that sounds logical
i like how you use the word atheist as an insult.
newman is a child.
It is an insult for them, its a degrading word, obviously they state they have no problem with them to get members, but as soon as they turn their backs.... the knives are drawn, they probably think an atheist is a comunist / socialist / bolshevick.... they need a dictionary.
-
Listen pecker-breath, you came in here looking for a fight.
You got one.
You came in here calling everyone cowards and tossed around a few insults.
Now you're gonna whine that you've been insulted and want people banned ?
You're a real piece of work.
Did the big bad evil Kahanists hurt your widdle feelings ?
Boo-freakin-hoo.
Get lost, punk.
wow not only did you add personal insults, you made yourself a complete tool!
THANK YOU! i feel really REALLY smart now next to you
You'll feel really smart when Kahanists come to power in EY and you're at the end of a rope!
End of a rope? you know this is exactly what your friends in the Iranian regime did in 1979, they promised democracy, they used the none religious nut cases to get to power, and then they executed any one who didnt share their stupid belief.
You want to hang me tough guy? come, but it has been proven before that all you people are good at, is talk, youre just like Muslims, you speak like Muslims online, they are also fans of death threats, but its a known fact 99% of them are cowards, youre no different.
I bet the Shabak has its eye on this forum, even the Israeli members here were too afraid to even meet to a drink.
You will come to power just like Khane can dodge a bullet, it aint going to happen Jewish mujhadeen.
im not going to generalize memebrs of this forum but mr. newman and muck defuslims are no different then the iranians, fascist nazi cowards who rely on their horde mentality to make "arguments".
they are prime examples of people that degrade this movement, hayamin haamiti needs to lose these people if they want to grow and appeal to a wider audience.
Let's see...we should get rid of long-time supporters like Newman, who chaim evidently likes since he has a high status in this forum, in favor of an atheist like you? that sounds logical
i like how you use the word atheist as an insult.
newman is a child.
It is an insult for them, its a degrading word, obviously they state they have no problem with them to get members, but as soon as they turn their backs.... the knives are drawn, they probably think an atheist is a comunist / socialist / bolshevick.... they need a dictionary.
dictionaries are a bolshevick conspiracy.
-
I'm a child, huh?
Well at least this 'child' knows the fundamental difference between right and wrong.
It is obvious from the morally vaccuous rantings of you two that you and your kind do not.
If you cannot differentiate between PLO nazis and Kahanists, between Arab muslims and Jewish settlers, between the nazi-koran and Torah then obviously you can't judge between cholent and rat poison.
Go back to kindergarten.
-
Debate is fine. Name calling and threats are NOT. It is completely against the forum rules and reflects poorly on JTF.
This is a public warning. If it happens again, I'm banning someone.
Please keep your anger down. No one is going to make a point with this nonsense.
-
Now we are gays? not that i am a big fan of the gays, but if having the gay parade in Jerusalem just to [censored] you off and let other people see how fanatical you religious fundies are, i say we should do it every month.
A Tel-Aviv gay bar is a thousand times better than a ghetto like Bnei-Brak, probably cleaner.
Funny all those tough religious dudes are so out of the radar in Israel, they are too scared to actually do something, because the words "Shabak" make them shake endlessly, so all they can do is type in a forum "kill all arabs", oh how brave of you, trying to blow up a girls school, how heroic.
This just got you banned.
Taren is an evil traitor.
-
Now we are gays? not that i am a big fan of the gays, but if having the gay parade in Jerusalem just to [censored] you off and let other people see how fanatical you religious fundies are, i say we should do it every month.
A Tel-Aviv gay bar is a thousand times better than a ghetto like Bnei-Brak, probably cleaner.
Funny all those tough religious dudes are so out of the radar in Israel, they are too scared to actually do something, because the words "Shabak" make them shake endlessly, so all they can do is type in a forum "kill all arabs", oh how brave of you, trying to blow up a girls school, how heroic.
This just got you banned.
Taren is an evil traitor.
taren is more of an israeli then anyone else on this forum, brainwashed deluded kahanist tools.
-
This is not acceptable. I've had enough. I gave you so many chances.
-
SSN is banned.
I warned privately and publicly but he thinks by just "living in Israel", he must know better than anyone else... even though Rabbi Kahane lived in Israel.
-
SSN is banned.
I warned privately and publicly but he thinks by just "living in Israel", he must know better than anyone else... even though Rabbi Kahane lived in Israel.
[/quote
Thank you! I was getting tired of those two.
-
Their arguments were not only stupid but circular and unfocused. They were all over the place and confused.
-
SSN is banned.
I warned privately and publicly but he thinks by just "living in Israel", he must know better than anyone else... even though Rabbi Kahane lived in Israel.
So be it. I attempted to have a debate using logic and reason with SSN but apparently he gave up. As for Taren, I ignored him since he was apparently a twit.
-
it will be bad if you surrender historic biblical lands
-
schmuck SUCKING KIKE GO KILL YOURESELF HOW DO YOU FIT 6 MILLION JEWS IN A CAR 2 IN THE FROUNT 3 IN THE BACK AND THE REST IN THE ASH TRAY
STINKY MUSLIM COMMUNIST SATANIC MANIAC NAZI, GET OUT OF THIS FORUM
-
funny, that's the same thing he's posted on 3+ threads. I didn't think he had anything intelligent to say anyway let alone something of "diversity".... ;) Very "tolerant" people these Commie bastards...
-
Karlmarx has been banned.
-
Man im sorry I missed this thread.Like Ive been trying to say ,They call themselves communists but they are really Neo-Nazis.They some how think calling themselves communists ,will endear us to them.My Nazidar[RADAR] Is worth at least listening too.Smile :)
Man im tired ,,,,,you guys and girls have a good nite,
wayne jude
-
Man im sorry I missed this thread.Like Ive been trying to say ,They call themselves communists but they are really Neo-Nazis.They some how think calling themselves communists ,will endear us to them.My Nazidar[RADAR] Is worth at least listening too.Smile :)
Man im tired ,,,,,you guys and girls have a good nite,
wayne jude
Nazi/dar means Nazi gift on my language, dar means gift :::D ;D gifted persong to spot nazis ;D 8;)