Save Western Civilization > Save America
"Affirmative Action" Used For Women
adam613:
The 1964 Civil rights law affected women too. So a fact is a fact. Otherwise, JTF also engages in Political Correctness when it comes to women. There are affirmative programs for women and to pretend otherwise is wrong. If it makes it harder for me to get married by saying the truth fine. Somebody has to be the bad cop. The reality is some of the younger men will find out soon enough that some women unless you are a complete doormat will have no interest in you and some even if you are a doormat they won't marry you. IN the Orthodox world in America a large percentage of men and women in their 20's and 30's are single.
Scriabin:
So why isn't there a section for 'Feminism'?
JTF is POLITICALLY CORRECT when it comes to women.
wonderfulgoy:
--- Quote from: Scriabin on December 22, 2006, 10:59:50 AM ---So why isn't there a section for 'Feminism'?
JTF is POLITICALLY CORRECT when it comes to women.
--- End quote ---
To lump women into the same group as evil blacks and Muslims I agree would be disgraceful. Women SHOULD be seen as having angel-like potential; women are Sacred in G-d's own eyes, white women are the strongest proof of G-d's creation. Anyone who implies that the white woman has evolved from primitive life forms is desecrating G-d and the entire universe and should be put to death.
That being said, the modern woman is certainly fallen.
It is the fallen nature of the woman which should be lamented, not her achieving more in society per se. If woman used her new power properly, for G-dly and cooperative purposes, rather than trying to out-do her men, feminism would be a gift rather than a curse.
Scriabin:
--- Quote from: Get thee hence Satan on December 22, 2006, 11:13:27 AM ---
--- Quote from: Scriabin on December 22, 2006, 10:59:50 AM ---So why isn't there a section for 'Feminism'?
JTF is POLITICALLY CORRECT when it comes to women.
--- End quote ---
To lump women into the same group as evil blacks and Muslims I agree would be disgraceful. Women SHOULD be seen as having angel-like potential; women are Sacred in G-d's own eyes, white women are the strongest proof of G-d's creation. Anyone who implies that the white woman has evolved from primitive life forms is desecrating G-d and the entire universe and should be put to death.
That being said, the modern woman is certainly fallen.
It is the fallen nature of the woman which should be lamented, not her achieving more in society per se. If woman used her new power properly, for G-dly and cooperative purposes, rather than trying to out-do her men, feminism would be a gift rather than a curse.
--- End quote ---
I agree.
adam613:
>It is the fallen nature of the woman which should be lamented, not her achieving more in society per se. If woman used her new power properly, for G-dly and cooperative purposes, rather than trying to out-do her men, feminism would be a gift rather than a curse.
Well a women actually being a real women is not feminism. The term feminism implies female superiority. Imagine men going around all day saying they were masculinists or getting a few wacked out women to support them. How would the average women feel about it? In genesis
1:27 it says "So g-d created created man in his image in the image of g-d he created them male and female he created them. Both male and females are equally important and I am disturbed when the men aren't giving the credit they deserve. Abraham had to fight nimrod and was thrown into a furnace and g-d performed a miracle and saved him. Sarah didn't have this done to her. Yes, she saved her son Issac from Ismael by telling Abraham that Ismael could not live with Issac and kicking Hagar and Ismael out and deserves much credit for this. They both made contributions that are different but both were equally important. Without both the Jewish people would not be here today.
Lastly, since JTF has said that Jews could be protected by nonjews why is it the JTF somehow thinks that men can't protect women. THere is no evidence that women were mistreated and abused and that this kind of behavior was ever tolerated in the United States and this was at a time when only men that owned property could vote or if their husband was dead the wife could vote. Feminism at it's core no matter how you slice it is suggesting that men in general would beat and abuse women without empowering women and showing favortism towards them and I completely disagree with that. Many communities and judges from what I read thankfully did not tolerate men who "legitimately" abused their wives.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version