Author Topic: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?  (Read 12487 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #50 on: September 25, 2009, 09:31:26 AM »
........................................................ :o :o :o

Meaning?

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #51 on: September 27, 2009, 11:51:02 AM »
........................................................ :o :o :o

Meaning?

It was explained, what more is there to say on this topic.

Offline Maccabi

  • Pro JTFer
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #52 on: October 04, 2009, 06:48:04 PM »
Moses killed the Egyptian with a 'lion strike', a hebrew fighting arts palm strike which caved in the Egyptians skull (I think it may have even sent his brains flying out of his head but I'm not sure)

Some rabbis these days try to explain stuff like 'yeah...David spilled blood of his enemies, but only metaphorically speaking' blah blah blah...it was all metaphorical, you've got to understand the blood, it was metaphorical....'

The fighting system of the ancient Israelites is very deadly...

I think it would probably be better if rabbis knew and explained these types of things and maybe encourage this type of training by Jews...





Ummm... Where are your sources for this? There are many sources which explain how Moshe killed the Egyptian... All of them indicate that he used the ineffable name... I have never seen a single source which says what you said... Please provide sources for your claim or else it will be just your opinion...

ps: We are talking about Moses and not David here... David obviously went to war against his enemies and killed them... Moses absolutely used the ineffable name {according to Midrash which is authentic Torah source for Jews}.

ps: this explanation is not from Rabbis of 'today' it is over 2000 years old...

http://www.njop.org/html/EMOR5764-2004.html

See Rashis explanation {Rashi is one of the most trusted Tanakh commentators} at

http://www.chabad.org/parshah/torahreading.asp?AID=15559&p=3&showrashi=true




Did Moses even know the innefable name at this point in time?

Moses killing the guy before he fled Egypt, and before the episode with the burning bush. 

At the burning bush, he asks G-d 'what is your name' (or what are you called by) so as far as I know, the innefable name was unknown to Moses before the time.

Maybe I'm overlooking something...I can find other sources if need be and can try to look up where I heard it the first time.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #53 on: October 04, 2009, 06:57:04 PM »
What you say is only your interpretation, you have not quoted any sources.

The fact is that from birth Moshe had a special connection to Hashem, as I have quoted in other threads on this forum, when Moshe was born he had a special light. He was asking Hashem what the name he should use in order for the Jewish people to accept him as their leader. Hashem had told the name to the patriarchs and one of the only ways for them to accept him was to utter this particular four-letter name {which we do not pronounce}. The Yud-Kay-Vav-Key name is only one of the many names which Hashem is known by. I will not enumerate all the names...

I have heard the explanation to your question and it is because Moshe wanted to know the name which the people would accept as a sign that he was the leader of the Jewish people, the promised redeemer.

You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #54 on: October 04, 2009, 07:00:48 PM »
I am correct in my assesment, according to Rashi:

http://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/9864/showrashi/true

Quote

12. And He said, "For I will be with you, and this is the sign for you that it was I Who sent you. When you take the people out of Egypt, you will worship G-d on this mountain."

13. And Moses said to G-d, "Behold I come to the children of Israel, and I say to them, 'The G-d of your fathers has sent me to you,' and they say to me, 'What is His name?' what shall I say to them?"

14. G-d said to Moses, "Ehyeh asher ehyeh (I will be what I will be)," and He said, "So shall you say to the children of Israel, 'Ehyeh (I will be) has sent me to you.'

15. And God said further to Moses, "So shall you say to the children of Israel, 'The Lord God of your forefathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.' This is My name forever, and this is how I should be mentioned in every generation.
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #55 on: October 04, 2009, 09:22:20 PM »
What you say is only your interpretation, you have not quoted any sources.

I thought he made a good point, Muman.   It WAS before the burning bush incident, and that's basically citing the Chumash.   You seem a little bit hostile about this?   

Yes Rashi did write that (and countless others agree with him, I'm pretty sure), but MackaB raises a good kashiya, no?   Perhaps it will lead us to a deeper understanding of what was meant.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #56 on: October 04, 2009, 10:59:21 PM »
What you say is only your interpretation, you have not quoted any sources.

I thought he made a good point, Muman.   It WAS before the burning bush incident, and that's basically citing the Chumash.   You seem a little bit hostile about this?   

Yes Rashi did write that (and countless others agree with him, I'm pretty sure), but MackaB raises a good kashiya, no?   Perhaps it will lead us to a deeper understanding of what was meant.

KWRBT,

Haven't you heard the interpretation I am explaining, that the reason Moshe asked the name was to know what to tell the people of Israel, not because he didn't know Hashem. Obviously he had ruach hakodesh before the incident at the burning bush.

The simple interpretation of the verse he brings indicates that Moshe was asking "Behold I come to the children of Israel, and I say to them, 'The G-d of your fathers has sent me to you,' and they say to me, 'What is His name?' what shall I say to them?"

I am not hostile to this opinion but I just have not ever heard it. I have heard much in Talmud about Moshes special relationship, from when he was a baby, and his sister Miriams nevuah {prophecy}.

You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #57 on: October 05, 2009, 08:36:08 AM »
What you say is only your interpretation, you have not quoted any sources.

I thought he made a good point, Muman.   It WAS before the burning bush incident, and that's basically citing the Chumash.   You seem a little bit hostile about this?   

Yes Rashi did write that (and countless others agree with him, I'm pretty sure), but MackaB raises a good kashiya, no?   Perhaps it will lead us to a deeper understanding of what was meant.

KWRBT,

Haven't you heard the interpretation I am explaining, that the reason Moshe asked the name was to know what to tell the people of Israel, not because he didn't know Hashem. Obviously he had ruach hakodesh before the incident at the burning bush.

The simple interpretation of the verse he brings indicates that Moshe was asking "Behold I come to the children of Israel, and I say to them, 'The G-d of your fathers has sent me to you,' and they say to me, 'What is His name?' what shall I say to them?"

I am not hostile to this opinion but I just have not ever heard it. I have heard much in Talmud about Moshes special relationship, from when he was a baby, and his sister Miriams nevuah {prophecy}.


Yes but he was asking for the name.   Even if he knew Hashem prior to that point, he may not have known His "name" but I guess that's the answer.

Offline Maccabi

  • Pro JTFer
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #58 on: October 05, 2009, 11:22:34 AM »
also, what did the two other hebrews witness him doing?

did the see him utter something under his breath as he walked away, and then the dude just fell over or something?

also the thing about wanting to know the name of G-d so the Israelites would accept him is not mutually exclusive from wanting to know because he did not already know.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: Jewish by the mothers line but not the fathers? Why?
« Reply #59 on: October 05, 2009, 03:50:20 PM »
also, what did the two other hebrews witness him doing?

did the see him utter something under his breath as he walked away, and then the dude just fell over or something?

also the thing about wanting to know the name of G-d so the Israelites would accept him is not mutually exclusive from wanting to know because he did not already know.

MakaB,

Can you bring a single Sage who found the meaning you are saying. There is much to back up what I am saying... All the stories about Moses as a baby and his prophetic abilities precede the event at the burning bush.

The whole story about the two hebrews who witnessed this is very well known... I have quoted this before, maybe even in this thread, that these were Dasan and Aviram, the two who ended up caught up in Korachs wicked plan. They witnessed him burying the dead egyptian in the dirt.

Quote
http://www.torah.org/learning/perceptions/5761/korach.html
SEUDAH SHLISHI:

Moshe called for Dasan and Aviram, sons of Eliav, but they told him, "We will not come to you. Does it mean nothing that you have brought out of the land flowing with milk and honey, to kill us in the desert, just to make yourself prince over us?" (Bamidbar 16:12-13)

Does chutzpah know no bounds? Not when it came to Dasan and Aviram, who went back a long way with Moshe Rabbeinu.

In fact, remember this:

After some time, when Moshe was grown, he went out to his brothers and saw their burdens. He saw an Egyptian beating a Jew, one of his brothers. He looked both ways, and when he saw that no one was around, he killed the Egyptian, and buried him in the sand. The next day when he went out, he saw two Jews fighting with each an-other, and said to the evil one, "Why do you hit your fellow?" He answered, "Who made you a noble, an officer, or a judge over us? Do you in-tend to kill me as you killed the Egyptian?" (Shemos 2:11-14)

The 'evil one' was none other than Dasan, who was trying to hit his brother-in-law, Aviram (Devarim Rabbah 2:12), with whom he had been quarreling. And yet, it was just yesterday that the young Moshe had saved Dasan's life, who had been in the process of being beaten to death by the Egyptian taskmaster Moshe had killed in Dasan's defense. That's gratitude for you!

And what had Dasan and Aviram been arguing about? Dasan's wife, and Aviram's sister, Shlomis bas Divri (mentioned later in Vayikra 24:11)-- whom had been defiled by the Egyptian who had been trying to kill Dasan the day before, and whom Moshe had killed instead. Dasan, knowing the facts, wanted to divorce his wife, while Aviram, knowing that she had not been violated willingly, insisted that they remain married.

Moshe had walked in just as Dasan was about to express his will in physical terms, and this time, saved Aviram from blows.

What was their response to Moshe's interference? BOTH of them turned on Moshe together, and even reported to Paroah that he had killed the Egyptian (Yalkut Shimoni 1:167), forcing him to flee Egypt. Nice guys, this Dasan and Aviram, no?

Then of course there was the episode of the manna. Moshe Rabbeinu had taught the Jewish nation what G-d had told him:

Moshe said, "Eat [the remainder] today, because today is G-d's [day]; today you will not find it in the field. Six days you will collect it, but on the seventh day, which is the Sabbath, there will be none." However, some of the people tried on the sev-enth day to collect some, but found none. (Shemos 16:25)

So what did Dasan and Aviram do? In advance of Shabbos, they even went out and spread some manna over the ground to make sure those lacking faith could find some the next day, and make Moshe look like a liar! That's why G-d sent the birds in to eat it all up, leaving the manna in THEIR mouths and the egg on Dasan's and Aviram's faces.

However, before we shake our heads in disgust at Dasan and Aviram, we should recall the warning of the Talmud:

Had the Torah not been given to Israel, no nation or people could stand before them, and this is like what Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish said: Three are brazen: Israel amongst the nations, a dog amongst wild animals, and, a rooster amongst the birds ... (Beitzah 25b)

What a group to be numbered amongst! However, Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish wasn't simply heaping a burning insult onto his own people, but offering a warning to the Jews of history: Without Torah, there is a Dasan and Aviram in just about all of us. This week's parshah completes the warning, reminding us of the final fate of two of the greatest of instigators the Jewish people have ever produced.

More Info:
http://www.ou.org/torah/frankel/5760/shemot60.htm

I am not going to continue arguing about this... I guess everyone is entitled to interpret things as they wish but I am one who studies what the sages and the Rabbis of the generations have said about the Torah... I believe their abilities, and the abilities of my forefathers, are greater than my own and I shape my interpretation based on the scripture and teachings of the Jewish sages.

PS: Moshe was powerful because of his power of speech... This is one reason that Bilaam, the evil prophet of the other nations was a gifted speaker... They believed that Moses power came from his ability to speak. There is much written about this too...

http://www.613.org/smiles/sources/pdf/151-%20TazriaMetzora%20The%20Power%20of%20%20Speech.pdf
http://www.aish.com/tp/b/app/48944531.html
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/137089/jewish/Pei-Communication.htm
« Last Edit: October 05, 2009, 04:04:14 PM by muman613 »
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14