Conservative New Media, one of the best Conservative channels on Zootube, has a very interesting take on Sarah Palin's decision and the California U.S. Senate Race in general. Whether one agrees with them or not, I definitely see their logic:
The idea of going for the "one who could win" is what leads to disasters like McCain winning the GOP nomination. I'm sorry to tell you that Palin and RUBIO (he came out against the Arizona immigration law) are false idols who are riding on the TEA party movement to get themselves money and power.
Each election is a separate entity. If Chuck DeVore had a realistic chance of winning the U.S. Senate Republican Nomination in California, he would probably be my choice of who to support. The reality of the situation is DeVore is a distant third in the race in California. According to the following site, his poll number was only 14 % two weeks ago. Nothing has apparently changed for the better for DeVore since then:
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2010/04/calif-poll.htmlWhile I disagree with Marco Rubio's decision to come out against the Arizona Immigration Law, I understand his point of view that the focal point of borders protection should be on the U.S. Government. Which he correctly has mentioned has failed to protect the borders.