Chaim, here is my full take on the matter:
On this matter, I agree with Ron. Huckabee might turn out to be the best we have got but I'm not convinced yet. Ron's quote on Huckabee's position on the Fakestinians is one I dug up years ago and posted liberally during the primaries here. I am not sure at all that I trust him. We could very easily have a Jimmy Carter here--someone who attacks Israel and supports the Arabs with a religious zeal. It's great that he says he supports the pioneers and that they should be allowed to construct unfettered NOW, but back before he was in the limelight, this wasn't exactly his position as Ron has reminded us.
Huckabee's record prior to running for president is one of a fanatical religious leftist. That's what we have to work with and actions speak louder than words. You said that he might be another Ronald Reagan--a semi-left-wing governor who becomes more right-wing as president--but that's not exactly something to aspire to. Ronald Reagan (ys"vz) was a Nazi pig who invaded Lebanon in order to crush the IDF, railroaded Jonathan Pollard, sucked the Soviet taqqiyah master Mikhail Gorbachev (ys"vz)'s tuchis to no end, and threw you in prison for six years in order to suck up to the Soviets. He also praised SS (yimach schmam) butchers at his Bitburg address and was very good friends with Fag Buchanus.
At this point, I'm not convinced yet that a Romney-type wouldn't be the best we can get. I would love for Duncan Hunter to run again but barring a miracle, there's no way he's getting the dozens of millions of dollars that will be needed to put on an effective primary (and his party would support Yasser Arafat before it supported him). Romney is an establishment politician, but I really don't see him going out on a fanatical crusade to help the illegals, Arabs, etc. He will probably be a centrist--better than a RINO whore like McCain, and more electable and competent than an idiot like Sarah Palin.