I hear your point but then why are you involved in a law-abiding movement ?
Where's the contradiction? we're debating the morals of illegal actions, not encourage them. But we never condemn them, and there's nothing illegal about teaching the outcomes of such actions.
We don't know that for sure. Once Rabin was dead, the Israeli establishment continued Rabin's policy of surrender and betrayal. Other puppets took over from Rabin. In 2000, Barak offered Arafat a state on a golden plate. What prevented the establishment of the "Palestinian" state in Eretz Israel is more the stupidity of Arabs, especially Arafat, than Rabin's assassination.
What Barak did
5 years after later does not matter. By this logic, we shouldn't praise the brave Jewish Maccabee heroes who fought against the Hellenist traitors and the Greeks because they didn't smash the Arabs as well. And even this example is not enough to explain the absurdity of this claim. The assasination of Rabin couldn't eliminate the entire regime, which will forever fight for Israel's elimination. But the assasination of the most powerful tyrant Israel had since Ben-Gurion saved Israel did save Israel
back then. With Rabin alive, the Oslo process would have been completed and so is the Arab's genocidal war against Israel and the Jewish people, G-d forbid.
Non-violent protests can be much more effective than an isolated assassination if they are massive. Imagine that a vast majority of the people of Israel would engage in a campaign of civil disobedience to oppose the surrender of its land in Judea and Samaria and Jerusalem. No more transportation, no more businesses running, huge strikes and demonstrations. That would bring the Establishment down to its knees. That is what we ought to try to set off, in my opinion.
This is exactly what the Israeli public was doing. When Rabin went for Oslo, the public opinion opposed, mass demonstrations were taken place constantly (and ending with broken heads for the peaceful demonstrators), and the national suicide process was taking place big time.
When we finally burried Rabin the public opinion favored Oslo - and yet the process was significantly delayed.
After the Oslo War (second Intifada) the public opinion was yet again against national suicide - but Sharon succeeded in carrying out the mass expulsion of Jews from Gush Katif and its handing over to the Hamas murderers, with the peaceful demonstrations and marches brutally oppressed.
Conclusion: in order to carry out suicidal plans, the Left needs a strong "hawkish" leader, such as Begin, Rabin, Sharon and Bibi.
http://jtf.org/israel/israel.jewish.civil.war.part.three.htmDr Dan did not condemn Yigal Amir. You are twisting his words.
This is what I understood from this:
Rabin wasn't going to Yigal Amir and kill him, that's why it's different..and because he broke the law, he had to get jail..but now he should be free.