From the article I posted:
"In a letter, the religious-rights organization urged the district to broaden its accommodations to Christians and Jews by setting aside separate classrooms for daily prayer and to permit rabbis, priests and other religious figures to lead children in worship on campuses.
A lawyer representing the district said those ideas would violate the Constitution's prohibition against government establishment of religion. "
I thought lawyers were supposed to be intelligent. This lawyer thinks it wouldn't violate the constitution for Muslims to have the right to pray in classrooms but it would violate the constitution if any other religion did so. Isn't this a clear contradiction, double-standard, hypocrisy?