Greetings Chaim. I've watched some videos by Richard Dawkins recently. One of the points he makes to promote atheism is that religious ideas seem to be based upon where you grew up rather than what beliefs are more reasonable.
He uses as an analogy that it would be very silly if different scientists had different theories about a topic in science, such as how the dinosaurs died out, and didn't base their opinions on the evidence but only on where they lived (for example, if every scientist in North America believed it was due to a meteor, every scientist in Europe believed it was because of mammals eating the eggs, etc.). Basically he says religions are like this (If you grow up in India, you're a Hindu, in Saudi Arabia, you're a Muslim, in Israel, Jewish, etc.) and says that's silly in the same way.
How would you answer this?