Perhaps not doing this is more riskier then doing it because the blood can still stay in even with the tube.
What?
First off, you are citing Talmudic health practices, but the Tosfos and many authorities already say that we don't go in our day by the medical recommendations of the Talmud. All the more so today, hundreds of years after those rishonim that said that. So the whole idea about blood suctioning protecting the baby is not necessarily correct. But even if it was...
There should not be any difficulty suctioning through a tube. What is the difference? If the guy does a thorough job, then he does a thorough job. "The tube isn't good enough" is said by people who want to insist on the ages old practice so "disbelieve" any type of innovation. But many poskim have said the glass tube is good, and tons of people utilize this.
Also who said that it is putting the child at risk? You are making too many assumptions.
Well it doesn't take a medical genius or a scientific wizard to understand that the mouth is a mucous membrane, the penis itself has a mucous membrane, so both of these enable the passing of germs from one to another, and especially an OPEN WOUND is a serious risk of spreading germs. So it's not really an assumption, it's more like scientific fact.
There is a certain mohel I am aware of in Monsey who infected multiple babies and is banned from performing this procedure. It has happened that babies contracted something. In that case, I am not assuming anything, I'm assessing reality which says that although a tiny number of babies ever got anything, still - some did. And that means the possible risk (discussed above) was confirmed as an actual risk.
These are issues that are addressed with the halahic authorities and the conclusions each group makes should be respected.
You calling it "criminal" is wayy over the top
Was it "over the top" when chazal referred to as a "chassid shoteh" a man who would refuse saving a drowning woman because of shomer negiah concerns? To me, this is a similar use of that category. Someone who would endanger their child for the sake of some mysterious form of "piety" is a chassid shoteh in my view. There are certain things which cannot be respected. Endangering a child is one.
and on top of that having secular or non-Jewish government intervene is even more criminal because once you give them leeway they will bann circumcision altogether, and these are discussions in Halacha and no outside gov.
Govt shouldn't have to get involved. Jews should be smart enough to take precautions and do away with a practice that is unnecessary by Jewish law and could cause complications.
and am haartzim should have a say in this especially those who make fun of and project their own nasty perverted ideas and minds unto this subject.
Well, I don't know what this has to do with am haaratzim, unless you are referring to me as one. I never said am haaratzim should decide the matter. But if am haaratzim are on the correct side of this issue, maybe a broken clock is right twice a day.
I might be an am haaretz, but I think the points I've made are valid.