About Multiculturalism

[Dexter]

In our era Multiculturalism is a way to erode the foundations of any standart society and to make it to an unstable society, culturally and political. It should be an interest of every society (or a state) to aspire for a cultural homogeneousness because that's the only way to unsure cultural and political stability. Ministries of Education and pedagogical contents have to mark an collective myths that creates united ethos.

We see in our days where does Multiculturalism leads us: Bosnia, Kosovo and the riots of Africans and Muslims in Paris streets. Today in the era of globalization, we live in a continual paradox:  fragmentation of ethnic groups that disintegrate the society and threats the peacefull lives of the individual (us, in fact). Cultural homogeneousness is the best way for society to keep stable.

Democracy that doesn't recognize the value of homogeneousness society is a short-days Democracy.

There is no doubt that Pluralist society that covers diffrent mentalities and cultures is a wanted ideal. But in my opinion in this days it is an ideal only and Multicultural societies become unstable when the ideal of Pluralism becomes empty of contents. I am a bit influenced of book "The Coming Anarchy" by Robert D. Kaplan - the book gives us the ability to understand that the future is full of conflicts inside states and also stable (for now) migration states as the USA wouldn't be immune of the inside disintegration of society. The nature of Mankind leads us to conflict and conflict will happen near the "borders" of diffrent cultures in the same society/state. Therefor, Multiculturalism is the fuel that would light the conflict. We can see it today in Pluralistic states inside Europe and we will see it in the future in states like the USA where Whites, Blacks and Hispanics will struggle. The tendency for fragmentation that comes hand to hand with integration is unavoidable.

Multiculturalism is not a good thing and the aspiration always should be towards synthesis and not towards the eternal existens of thesis and antithesis. History teaches us what will happen to societies that can't solve the differences inside them, from the cultural revolution of China and to Bosnia and West-Africa.

[New Yorker]

Exactly. Read the book Death of the West. Covers this very topic very well.

[Dexter]

Exactly. Read the book Death of the West. Covers this very topic very well.

Sounds a good book to me. I'll try to get my hand on it.

[judeanoncapta]

In our era Multiculturalism is a way to erode the foundations of any standart society and to make it to an unstable society, culturally and political. It should be an interest of every society (or a state) to aspire for a cultural homogeneousness because that's the only way to unsure cultural and political stability. Ministries of Education and pedagogical contents have to mark an collective myths that creates united ethos.

We see in our days where does Multiculturalism leads us: Bosnia, Kosovo and the riots of Africans and Muslims in Paris streets. Today in the era of globalization, we live in a continual paradox:  fragmentation of ethnic groups that disintegrate the society and threats the peacefull lives of the individual (us, in fact). Cultural homogeneousness is the best way for society to keep stable.

Democracy that doesn't recognize the value of homogeneousness society is a short-days Democracy.

There is no doubt that Pluralist society that covers diffrent mentalities and cultures is a wanted ideal. But in my opinion in this days it is an ideal only and Multicultural societies become unstable when the ideal of Pluralism becomes empty of contents. I am a bit influenced of book "The Coming Anarchy" by Robert D. Kaplan - the book gives us the ability to understand that the future is full of conflicts inside states and also stable (for now) migration states as the USA wouldn't be immune of the inside disintegration of society. The nature of Mankind leads us to conflict and conflict will happen near the "borders" of diffrent cultures in the same society/state. Therefor, Multiculturalism is the fuel that would light the conflict. We can see it today in Pluralistic states like Europe and we will see it in the future in states like the USA where Whites, Blacks and Hispanics will struggle. The tendency for fragmentation that comes hand to hand with integration is unavoidable.

Multiculturalism is not a good thing and the aspiration always should be towards synthesis and not towards the eternal existens of thesis and antithesis. History teaches us what will happen to societies that can't solve the differences inside them, from the cultural revolution of China and to Bosnia and West-Africa.

This is quite impressive for a guy for whom English is a second language.

Good going, Dexter.

[DownwithIslam]

Even the way Dexter writes "I'll try to get my hands on it" shows his mastery of English. It's really incredible and the fact that he is only 14 makes it that much greater.

[Dexter]

Thanks guys.

[Ambiorix]

Even the way Dexter writes "I'll try to get my hands on it" shows his mastery of English. It's really incredible and the fact that he is only 14 makes it that much greater.

at least as great as some 41 year old!

[Dexter]

Don't take it so far, I am a fool and ignorant, I have a lot, lot, lot [...] more to learn.

[Ambiorix]

Don't take it so far, I am a fool and ignorant, I have a lot, lot, lot [...] more to learn.

Of course.
Me too.
It s a life long learning.

[Ultra Requete]

Multiculturalism is finte made by comies and musslimes to desintagrate the old societys; they're no any pluralism in countries governed by them. It's slow motion cultural Revolution.

[Husar]

Call it muFticulturaliSSlamism.

 

[Ultra Requete]

I call it multicultism. 

[Husar]

I call it multicultism. 

What about muSStafacultotalitarianism ?

 

[newman]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

[Dexter]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

It have nothing to do with white skin, it's all about culture.

[Vito]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

Exactly..

[newman]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

It have nothing to do with white skin, it's all about culture.

That's what it is taken to mean and used for in the west.

Just like religion..........the 'pure' meaning and how it is practiced are often two different things.

[Dexter]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

It have nothing to do with white skin, it's all about culture.

That's what it is taken to mean and used for in the west.

Just like religion..........the 'pure' meaning and how it is practiced are often two different things.

As long as Blacks, Chinese and other groups will act like whites in USA and won't create any sub-culture, there will be no conflics on a cultural base, probably on ethnic and racial base.

[newman]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

It have nothing to do with white skin, it's all about culture.

That's what it is taken to mean and used for in the west.

Just like religion..........the 'pure' meaning and how it is practiced are often two different things.

As long as Blacks, Chinese and other groups will act like whites in USA and won't create any sub-culture, there will be no conflics on a cultural base, probably on ethnic and racial base.

That's a contadiction, Dexter.

If asians, blacks etc act like whites and don't form those sub-cultures, it's NOT 'multicuralism'. It's mono-culturalism. Multi-race, yes but not multi-culture.

[JTFFan]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

It have nothing to do with white skin, it's all about culture.

That's what it is taken to mean and used for in the west.

Just like religion..........the 'pure' meaning and how it is practiced are often two different things.

As long as Blacks, Chinese and other groups will act like whites in USA and won't create any sub-culture, there will be no conflics on a cultural base, probably on ethnic and racial base.

That's a contadiction, Dexter.

If asians, blacks etc act like whites and don't form those sub-cultures, it's NOT 'multicuralism'. It's mono-culturalism. Multi-race, yes but not multi-culture.

yes, most likely mono-culturalism

[Dexter]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

It have nothing to do with white skin, it's all about culture.

That's what it is taken to mean and used for in the west.

Just like religion..........the 'pure' meaning and how it is practiced are often two different things.

As long as Blacks, Chinese and other groups will act like whites in USA and won't create any sub-culture, there will be no conflics on a cultural base, probably on ethnic and racial base.

That's a contadiction, Dexter.

If asians, blacks etc act like whites and don't form those sub-cultures, it's NOT 'multicuralism'. It's mono-culturalism. Multi-race, yes but not multi-culture.

Conflicts happen all the time, by diffrent factors, but they will never pass of our world.

[newman]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

It have nothing to do with white skin, it's all about culture.

That's what it is taken to mean and used for in the west.

Just like religion..........the 'pure' meaning and how it is practiced are often two different things.

As long as Blacks, Chinese and other groups will act like whites in USA and won't create any sub-culture, there will be no conflics on a cultural base, probably on ethnic and racial base.

That's a contadiction, Dexter.

If asians, blacks etc act like whites and don't form those sub-cultures, it's NOT 'multicuralism'. It's mono-culturalism. Multi-race, yes but not multi-culture.

yes, most likely mono-culturalism

multi-cultural means different cultures all living in the one country. It doesn't work. How can you have peace when one culture (arabs) demand the right to honour-kill their daughters and Jews/christians demand the prohibition of such acts. They'll never have one cohesive society and they'll NEVER get along.

G-d didn't create 70 separate nations in order for us to mix everything into a big pile of sludge.

[Ulli]

Very good Dexter,

you are right. There is no place for insane ideoligies and evil cultures from the third world in the free West. Either they become decent members of our culture, or they have to go back to their hellhole-countries.

[Ultra Requete]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

It have nothing to do with white skin, it's all about culture.

That's what it is taken to mean and used for in the west.

Just like religion..........the 'pure' meaning and how it is practiced are often two different things.

As long as Blacks, Chinese and other groups will act like whites in USA and won't create any sub-culture, there will be no conflics on a cultural base, probably on ethnic and racial base.

That's a contadiction, Dexter.

If asians, blacks etc act like whites and don't form those sub-cultures, it's NOT 'multicuralism'. It's mono-culturalism. Multi-race, yes but not multi-culture.

It's like in Switzerland, when you have German, French, Reto-Romans and Italian speakers, calvinists, lutherans and catholics but they have one swiss culture so they live in peace with each other for 500 years. The fact that each nation lives in its own valey-canton preety much apart helps too. So mono culturims and separatism aka Apartheid are OK!  

[newman]

Muliculturalism is a fraud.

It amounts to white guilt and self-hate forcing western countries to accept third worlders to pollute their nations.

It have nothing to do with white skin, it's all about culture.

That's what it is taken to mean and used for in the west.

Just like religion..........the 'pure' meaning and how it is practiced are often two different things.

As long as Blacks, Chinese and other groups will act like whites in USA and won't create any sub-culture, there will be no conflics on a cultural base, probably on ethnic and racial base.

That's a contadiction, Dexter.

If asians, blacks etc act like whites and don't form those sub-cultures, it's NOT 'multicuralism'. It's mono-culturalism. Multi-race, yes but not multi-culture.

It's like in Switzerland, when you have German, French, Reto-Romans and Italian speakers, calvinists, lutherans and catholics but they have one swiss culture so they live in peace with each other for 500 years. The fact that each nation lives in its own valey-canton preety much apart helps too. So mono culturims and separatism aka Apartheid are OK!  

Politicians in Australia brag about our multiculturalism. But:

1/ It's going sour now with arabs, other muSSlims and africans etc.

2/ It has only worked so far because their is one dominant anglo-saxon culture with a lot of minorities thrown in. If there were equal numbers of anglo-saxons, hindus, musslims, asians, african etc, there'd be civil war and anarchy!