That's good stuff Ariel, exactly what I was looking for. However, why has the government not answered these questions? Basically, it's just one word against the other here, and my knowledge of science is not good enough to worry about controlled demolitions or melting steel, cordite, thermite, or any other chemical reaction. The other thing that bothers me is how not even one plane was traced by a fighter jet.
To repeat, Rumstead confirmed, albeit inadvertently, that flight 93 had been shot down. This is unrelated to any conspiracy theory, but shows yet again how the US media can be manipulated such that stating the obvious becomes stating the eccentric.
Oh this is just classic. What a perfect example of how unreasonable and irrational people get about these things.
First of all, it's RUMSFELD, not Rumstead. Secondly, when he said that (to a group of soldiers, I saw the speech on youtube) it was obviously a slip of the tongue. Or else why wouldn't he have said so before or after? Why did no one else in the govt ever say such a thing. And if he was saying something completely new (since no one had said it before), why was there no shock at all and no expression whatsoever that he was saying anything new or unknown. It's quite clear that that statement was said accidentally. Do you think there's a whole army of US soldiers out there who think it is common knowledge that we shot down the plane, so all of them didn't blink when he said that? lol. Yes, it's a big govt secret yet thousands of US soldiers are in on it, and not one has come forward and not one has spoken about it. What a joke!
Now let's demonstrate how silly this is. If you or I, or any member of the press asked Donald Rumsfeld point blank: Was flight 93 shot down? Would he say yes or no? Clearly he would say no. So what are you claiming, that when he slipped up it was a "freudian slip" - that's the real truth they're 'secretly' hiding, yet he was not the slightest bit upset or disturbed that he let it slip out and nobody came out to deny it afterwards vigorously? Even tho he let slip out the big secret?
Now if I ask you, Do you really think his name was Rumstead? Would you say yes or no? And if you say no, that it was a slip of the tongue, or otherwise known as a typo, should I assume that was a freudian slip and really the big secret you've been hiding all along that Rumsfeld's name as a child was Rumstead and everyone has been hiding that? But you just sort of let it slip in a side comment when no one was paying attention, just to mess with us, as a and/or as a freudian slip. Or should I supposed that all JTF members know this secret that his name is really Rumstead? And that is why no one else thought twice about it except me? Calling an incorrect statement a "freudian slip" is silly conjecture about psychology and has nothing to do with fact or evidence.
Topic: Serious 9/11 discussion PLEASE PARTICIPATE (Read 13270 times)