We have a dilemma. We need to appeal to a broader base, in order to build a mass movement. On the other hand, what do movements do when they try to broaden their appeal? They compromise. The original format appealed to people who are most forward-thinking, unconventional, irreverent, iconoclastic, most immune to being brain-washed. This is the most radical element. Every revolutionary movement needs one. These would make up the backbone of the movement, its most dedicated core - but they need to be fired up from time to time by Chaim's speeches. Yet there is a lot of the untapped potential out there - people of this kind who have not yet discovered JTF. Also, the minds of some of the more conventional audience are capable of being gradually radicalized.
I was thinking - perhaps a "pre-Chaim" would do. You get a milder version of Chaim, who could be Chaim himself or another person, and later, when you get acclimated, you get admittance to the "holiest of holies," where you get access to real Chaim. But how to actually implement it, I have no idea.
Poll
Topic: Should JTF go back to the old ways? (Read 33151 times)