Tag,
Exposing a cut, at that point a wound, to the human mouth is a risk-- period. The human mouth is like the dirtiest thing going! Do you know most of us become carriers of Herpes simplex I, not from sex, not from deep kissing, but from the most casual, innocent and loving contact, usually between adult relatives and the young children they adore. In addition, the mouth is LOADED, I mean LOADED with bacteria. A newborn has very little immune system. I believe that this practice serves a purpose, as everyone is saying, but the method through which we could go about it needs to be different because everyone has a bacteria laden mouth.
That said, I'm disappointed to hear so many members compare this to pedophilia. Rabbis who perform this b'peh, however misguided, and I definitely think performing this procedure as it was 2000 years ago is just not taking advantage of everything that Gd has enabled us to learn about the world and medicine, are not 'getting off' on performing this act that they think, as is, is a mitzvah.
I can see how people see this perception as anti-Semitism. In order to see this as pedophilia, you have to imagine that the mohel enjoys it, that not only does he like kissing the penises of newborn males, but that he likes imbibing blood--to whatever degree! It's as if other member's have forgotten that this is a rite only being performed on boys that are being circumcised, not on all boys!
No baby wants to grow up with a missing limb (G-D forbid) but people still drive. All necessary precautions must and are taken, but one cannot take a case that is less then 1% of 1 % and perhaps only a possibility and blow it out of proportion making it seem thagt every other Jewish male child is having these problems. I am sure that some of the Jewish males on this thread had this done as well and they might not even be away. Almost for sure if they are of Sefardic background. Many (not all) Askenasic as well.