Romney the only one that can beat obama

[Confederate Kahanist]

how about dropping out of this forum?

No

He keeps me laughing 

[cjd]

how about dropping out of this forum?

Why should he?

[jbeige]

 

He's a dime a double dozen. Its all shits an giggles outside this forum, I've been there.

[jbeige]

No

He keeps me laughing 

Thank you, you keep me laughing too. 

[jbeige]

Santorum says he doesn't care about unemployment.
Give me the Mormon.

[jbeige]

Aw gay.

I have reported you to the administrators, we will see how they handle this.

[jbeige]

Here is what Santorum said:
“I don’t care what the unemployment rate’s going to be,” he said in Moline. “It doesn’t matter. My campaign doesn’t hinge on unemployment rates and growth rates. There’s something more foundational that’s going on here.”

Santorum appeared to shrug off the importance of the economy.

[jbeige]

And he's right, blind one. Economic issues are always completely dependant on moral ones. That's why Ronnie Putz would have destroyed the economy. Take abortion for instance; a moral issue, with no direct co-relation to economic matters. If, however, you were to have 50 million more Americans alive today, there would be enormously less illegal immagration, far, far less need for outsourcing and no need to ship manufacturing overseas. No economic plan comes close the the finacial benefit conferred by taking the righteous stance on this moral issue. Porn as well; less sexual perversion, such as homosexuality, which reduces the population, less lust, encouring marriages and lasting relationships based on inter-personal relations over carnal desires, and less folks having diffrent partners every day, which discourages marriage and love in general, making a society that is less willing to work together, and more prone to depression and suicide, as well as sexually transmitted disease. Teaching Torah or the bible in schools ( though not your book of moron) is another one. All the liberal verbal diharea on improving your wealth does not compare to a society founded on these, where students become intelligent, kind, courteous, and willing to stand up for what they believe in, as well as work hard to achieve it, which improves the economy in ways that would take me countless essays to just introduce, and books to fully describe.

I believe I don't need to make more points for now to make this clearer, but from what I gather, you're telling me you could care less about the morality of your leader, so long as he says he'll improve the economy? Why don't we have a candidate that plans to accept billions to the Saudis and teach their "point of view" or a candidate that promises to take all the money from Jewish citizens to pay back the debt?

"Mormon morality" should forever be known to hold a place next to "Islamic scholar".

Naive one, First I have to stop laughing.
First of all how if you have more people is it going to cut outsourcing?  How is 50 million more people going to stop illegal immigrants?
You are doing obaaamy math. 
More people means LESS jobs.  Outsourcing is NOT because there are not enough people to fill jobs and if there were 50 million more people it would stop illegal immigration just blew my mind.
 

[jbeige]

And he's right, blind one. Economic issues are always completely dependant on moral ones. That's why Ronnie Putz would have destroyed the economy. Take abortion for instance; a moral issue, with no direct co-relation to economic matters. If, however, you were to have 50 million more Americans alive today, there would be enormously less illegal immagration, far, far less need for outsourcing and no need to ship manufacturing overseas. No economic plan comes close the the finacial benefit conferred by taking the righteous stance on this moral issue. Porn as well; less sexual perversion, such as homosexuality, which reduces the population, less lust, encouring marriages and lasting relationships based on inter-personal relations over carnal desires, and less folks having diffrent partners every day, which discourages marriage and love in general, making a society that is less willing to work together, and more prone to depression and suicide, as well as sexually transmitted disease. Teaching Torah or the bible in schools ( though not your book of moron) is another one. All the liberal verbal diharea on improving your wealth does not compare to a society founded on these, where students become intelligent, kind, courteous, and willing to stand up for what they believe in, as well as work hard to achieve it, which improves the economy in ways that would take me countless essays to just introduce, and books to fully describe.

I believe I don't need to make more points for now to make this clearer, but from what I gather, you're telling me you could care less about the morality of your leader, so long as he says he'll improve the economy? Why don't we have a candidate that plans to accept billions to the Saudis and teach their "point of view" or a candidate that promises to take all the money from Jewish citizens to pay back the debt?

"Mormon morality" should forever be known to hold a place next to "Islamic scholar".

This entire post does not make any sense, someone please help me with this one.

[jbeige]

Romney wins another one 

With 99% of precincts reporting, Romney led former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum by a 47%-to-35% margin. Texas Rep. Ron Paul was running third at 9%, while former House Speaker Newt Gingrich had 8%.

With the victory, Romney was poised to win at least 41 of the 54 delegates up for grabs in the state, giving him a total of 562, Santorum is second with 249, Gingrich third with 137 and Paul last with 69.

[jbeige]

You laugh alot, dontch'a? I once heard of this special treat called ritalin, which might be of some benefit for you.
1. More people means lower wages means more competiveness means less interest in lower wages abroad + transportation costs.
2. More people means less interest in and acceptance of illegal immigrants, which are employed because current American workers are far too costly for baby sitter/ walmart jobs. The mehicans can come here for vacation all they please, but unless they're needed, they'll go where they'll get work, like Canada.
3. You are doing obaaamy math., More people means LESS jobs.: you were repededly dropped as a child, and your mother stopped breast feeding far too early. Define Obama math, and how, all other economic matters remaining unnafected by the population, how more people would reduce the number of available jobs, in any sector. Start with service, perhaps I'd like to try this laughter you're too fond of.

I add mormon scholar to the previously mentionned list, and well as the tooth fairy.

LOL
It doesn't take much to response to this.
So you want the American people to work for lower wages?  That is the obaaamy plan and where we are at right now.
You want everyone in America working for minimum wage?
This is not Canada.

You're plan would make America a third world country.

[jbeige]

And beaten.

Just for laugs calender; logic from a moron: abortion keeps America a first world country.

The only reason higher wages are currently enjoy is the country's ability to sustain its debt. Without that, serious changes would have had to be made in order to avoid utter depression.

With more industry, due to all those eager for work, there'd be more jobs, and therefore more wealth would be spread out amongst more people so while there'd be an increased but proportional number of people that earn lower wages, there would certainly be a higher proportion of middle and upper-middle class (specialized factory workers and small business owners) that is currently, and well much less ultra poor, due to the stronger job market, and exponentially so if low-wage illegal immigrants are removed from the picture.

You don't seem to understand there are more then enough American people to fill jobs, we do not need more people.
Abortion has NOTHING to do with the economy, that is a moral issue.

[jbeige]

And beaten.

Just for laugs calender; logic from a moron: abortion keeps America a first world country.

The only reason higher wages are currently enjoy is the country's ability to sustain its debt. Without that, serious changes would have had to be made in order to avoid utter depression.

With more industry, due to all those eager for work, there'd be more jobs, and therefore more wealth would be spread out amongst more people so while there'd be an increased but proportional number of people that earn lower wages, there would certainly be a higher proportion of middle and upper-middle class (specialized factory workers and small business owners) that is currently, and well much less ultra poor, due to the stronger job market, and exponentially so if low-wage illegal immigrants are removed from the picture.

Your plan sounds like the obammmy plan.
America needs less people, not more, we need less people so there is a shortage and will get more people working, having 50 million more is not going to make higher paying jobs.
Your post is complete non-sense and goes around and around. 
I will not answer any more of this non-sense.
Someone from Canada really does not know the American way of life so with that, thank for your input.

[cjd]

Define the obama plan.
Daily logic from a moron part two: America desperately needs less people to resolve all its problems, and therefore serial killers are hereby named as public servants.

If there were 5 people in America, all of them working, would that be better than now?

If there are more jobs, there will be more higher paying jobs. With industies that involve trade, such as manufacturing, higher paying jobs increase overall in relation to local industry.
And I lived in the States, and know people there well. I hope I didn't belittle your complete understanding of the American way of life, and how to resolve all its problems. You should run for president actually, and run on the platform of kicking out 50% of all citizens and illegal immigrants, for the good of the country.

And don't insult me and my opinions in cases where you can't formulate an acceptable respone, it makes me think of you as worthless, a liar and a waste of time, and I'll get more annoyed and less informative. Critism is lovely, but do remain civil.

The "respone" was acceptable you just don't have the capacity to understand it   You should really take your own advise about criticism  

[jbeige]

You read these posts, and I'm the stupid one? Hope I didn't interupt moron fake prayer time.
Ok, typo. Lets analyze the so-called acceptable response you defend.
Your plan sounds like the obammmy plan. -Obama is exaclty for reducing the population and shipping out jobs, with lower wages a bonus in his war against the middle class. I know well of Obama's many plans, I just want to hear the moron perspective.
America needs less people, not more, we need less people so there is a shortage and will get more people working, having 50 million more is not going to make higher paying jobs. Responds to the first part of my post, and was adequetely refuted in my previous post; I still have a storehouse of ammuntion in case of rebuttal.
Your post is complete non-sense and goes around and around. 
I will not answer any more of this non-sense. General break-down after I use insults to stress my point, [which I generally have no problem with if included with sufficient logic to undermine my position] that more Americans, not illegal immigrants, is good for America. Cheap shot to cover up his tracks, slightly more honorable than his typical cowering away from a reponse, but eaiser to see.
Someone from Canada really does not know the American way of life so with that, thank for your input. He thinks he knows me, and what I know. Then shows sarcastic arrogance, which is likely the pinnacle of his mental achievements.

Ok, typoII
Anyone that thinks having more people will create more jobs is an idiot, there are NOT enough jobs now to go around, so lets just add more people and make it impossible.
I think understanding what the unemployment rate is will help, when there are not enough jobs and a lot of people looking for work that's called unemployment.
It's so stupid to try to tie the abortion issue to the economy.
I don't know why I am responding to someone from of all places, Canada, you are not an American so your views on the economy are lacking any real knowledge.   
You think people aren't noticing your little name calling at the beginning of your posts but people are and it's not cute or funny, your insults show how ignorant you are and that when you don't make sense and get trapped with non sense you resort to name calling.

[jbeige]

It's not an insult, its a proposed name change for the entire church, that, in light of their beliefs, is more suiting then mormoon, meaning ghoul in latin, (a creature that digs up and devours corpses, much like your dead people conversions") because it incorporates the fundamental spirit, beleifs and practices of the church.

Saying "if tommorow, and nothing in the past had changed, 50 million people were added to America, there would be more unemployment at first [but the same number of jobs, except for slight increases to low-paying/hard-labor jobs" is correct.

If however, when negotiating contracts to ship companies overseas earlier, there was ample workers availble to negotiate a mutually benefical contract for American workers and their employers, the companies would not have been shipped overseas, and the wealth of America and its people would have increased.

Not only do I study the developments in the American economy daily, as I intend to, and know people that do business in the states as well as trade from Canada to the states, I hear of the economic woes of my friends living there, and certainly know more about the American economy than the average American citizen. I studied Economics in post-secondary studies so if it wasn't clear before, don't say you know what I know; When you assume, it makes an a** out of u and me.

I guess you opted for the ritalin. It's a good sign now that you don't laugh incessently, but try to avoid the depression, or you will lead a rather dull life, and could snap.

That's how you make a comeback, which sounds better than an insult, and serves to lighten a situation rather than belittle.

I didn't even read your non sense.  All I can do is 

[jbeige]

Never mix ritalin and alcohol, you could die!

Another one I didn't read. 

[jbeige]

I warned you. After blurry vision comes faintess and heart failure.

bah bah bah bah 

[jbeige]

In a straight two-way matchup, GOP primary voters prefer Romney to Santorum by 49-44 percent.

Primary voters who are age 65 and over, wealthier, or have a college degree are more likely to back Romney. Groups more likely to support Santorum include white evangelical and born-again Christians, very conservative voters and those who are part of the Tea Party movement.

Meanwhile, a 58-percent majority of primary voters would rather nominate a candidate who is more likely to beat President Obama, even if the candidate is not a true conservative. Less than a third -- 31 percent -- would pick the true conservative who might be less electable.

[jbeige]

This is amazing, I can't get over how low Santorum is.
Santorum is a piece of filth, he's so low I hope him and his family suffer pain.

Santorum: Might As Well Have Obama Over Romney


Presidential candidate Rick Santorum on Thursday said Republicans should give President Barack Obama another term if Santorum isn't the GOP nominee and for a second day compared rival Mitt Romney to an Etch A Sketch toy.

Santorum reiterated an argument he has made before: The former Massachusetts governor is not conservative enough to offer voters a clear choice in the fall election and that only he can provide that contrast.

"You win by giving people a choice," Santorum said during a campaign stop in Texas. "You win by giving people the opportunity to see a different vision for our country, not someone who's just going to be a little different than the person in there."

Santorum added: "If they're going to be a little different, we might as well stay with what we have instead of taking a risk of what may be the Etch A Sketch candidate for the future."

Santorum was referencing Romney adviser Eric Fehrnstrom's comment Wednesday that "everything changes" for the fall campaign. "It's almost like an Etch A Sketch," he said on CNN. "You can kind of shake it up and we start all over again."

The remark reignited criticism of Romney as the type of politician who will say or do anything to win.

Romney, who made no public appearances Thursday, issued a statement expressing disappointment "that Rick Santorum would rather have Barack Obama as president than a Republican."

"This election is more important than any one person. It is about the future of America," he said. "Any of the Republicans running would be better than President Obama and his record of failure."

Rival Newt Gingrich tweeted: "Rick Santorum is dead wrong. Any GOP nominee will be better than Obama."

[jbeige]

What a sore loser Scumtorum is, he's losing so he doesn't want any other republican to win.
I have to say I am very happy that Gingrich said any republican is better then obaaamy.
It's time for the people to wake up and dump that piece of sh*t scumtorum.
Obaamy wants to destroy America and Israel, he wants to let Iran have nukes and scumtorum says obaamy is better then Romney?  I see what kind of friend of Israel Scumtorum is.

[jbeige]

It's amazing, Scumtorum said we should just vote for obaaaamy if Romney gets the nomination and the people on here are still willing to follow him, he's like that goat.
Keep following him.

[Lisa]

Locust Killing Zealot, you're still a  new member here.  So I really don't think it's a good idea to go around calling other members, like Jbeige stupid and gay.  You don't have to agree with all his posts, and he doesn't have to agree with yours.  He has every right to be in favor of Romney.  Heck, we'll support him if he becomes the Republican nominee.  Also, Jbeige hasn't broken any rules here.  Therefore you have no business telling him to leave the forum.  The only time people "leave" here is if they're too busy, if they disagree with us, or if they get banned for being disruptive and obnoxious.

   

[jbeige]

Gingrich is starting to see the light that it's over, he started to lay off his staff and is cutting down on campaigning, Scumtorum should do the same.

[Israel Chai]

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gEnJZVocts_NGNnKj9-PUb0Q8DbA?docId=64a7f57bad8a4c14a675edcd8eb64214