Read the statement in the tweet below, and it becomes quite clear that the Obama administration has come out in favor of boycotting, divesting from and sanctioning Israel.

Obama admin opposes “conflation of Israel and ‘Israeli-controlled territories’ in #TPA bill, per @statedeptspox pic.twitter.com/zU4OWAaW46

— Matt Lee (@APDiploWriter) June 30, 2015

No, this administration is different than previous administrations. Previous administrations (with the exception of Carter) may have referred to Jewish settlement of Judea and Samaria as ‘unwise’ and may have called it ‘illegitimate.’ But only the Obama and Carter administrations have called it ‘illegal.’ (Which it’s not). And the Bush administration did support some Israeli ‘settlement’ and did issue a letter saying that it expected that some of those ‘settlements’ would be made apart of Israel as part of a final agreement with the ‘Palestinians.’ But then came the Obama administration and disavowed the letter.

More importantly, every administration until the Obama administration has said that peace between Israel and the ‘Palestinians‘ must come about as a result of a negotiated solution. Only the Obama administration – in a mad rush for a ‘Palestinian state’ that would immediately be consumed by terrorists – has attempted to impose a solution on Israel. Only the Obama administration has forced Israel to release terrorist murderers from its jail. And only the Obama administration has forced a ‘settlement freeze’ on Israel.

No, this is not the same as every other US administration.

Here’s more on the State Department statement quoted above:

The U.S. State Department on Tuesday punched a big hole in Israel-led efforts to induce the Obama administration to regard boycotts of settlements as identical to boycott of Israel proper. In doing so, it provided the Israeli government and the pro-Israel lobby with yet another painful lesson in the pitfalls of being too clever by half and biting off more than one should chew.

A special statement issued by the State Department Press Office on Tuesday afternoon made clear that while the administration “strongly opposes” any boycott, divestment or sanctions against the State of Israel, it does not extend the same protection to “Israel-controlled territories.” Rather than weakening efforts to boycott Jewish settlements in the occupied territories, as Israel supporters had planned, the State Department was actually granting them unprecedented legitimacy.

The statement came in the wake of President Obama’s signing of the Trade Promotion Authority bill, which grants him the authority he had sought to conclude the Trans-Pacific Partnership accord. But as the bill deals with free trade agreements in general, a clause was inserted in the Senate by Democratic Senator Ben Cardin and Republican Senator Rob Portman and by Representative Peter Roskam in the House of Representative that instructs American diplomats to include opposition to any boycott of Israel – or of persons from “territories controlled by Israel” – in their free trade negotiations with the European Union.

The State Department statement, however, makes clear that the bill will not change U.S. policy towards the settlements. “The U.S. government has never defended or supported Israeli settlements or activity associated with them, and, by extension, does not pursue policies or activities that would legitimize them,” it said. It went on to note: “Administrations of both parties have long recognized that settlement activity and efforts to change facts on the ground undermine the goal of a two-state solution.”

This anti-Israel administration cannot end soon enough.  ‘Most pro-Israel administration evah’ my tuches.

http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-obama-kerry-state-department-comes.html