JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on December 10, 2007, 04:51:59 PM

Title: Raul Marrio
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on December 10, 2007, 04:51:59 PM
Everyone,

There has been a lot of name-calling and speculation lately regarding Raul Marrio. I think a lot of it has been uncalled-for, not to mention simply inaccurate. I don't know him well, and do not share many of his views, but out of the fact that I was criticized and banned once for some intemperate comments, I like giving people the benefit of the doubt unless they are clearly acting like trolls.

1: Raul's race: Some people have called him a "greaser" and things to that effect. In his case, that is simply not true. He is not a mestizo (person of mixed Indian and Spanish ancestry). He, like most Argentines, is completely white. In fact, he has said before that he is 100% Italian, as many Argentines are. Argetine immigrants have come from all over Europe, but especially Spain, Italy, and the British Isles, and the vast majority have not mixed with indigenous peoples or blacks. Argentina is predominantly a white nation and historically, many of them have even held white-nationalistic views and do not like being lumped with other Hispanics.

It would be more accurate to call Raul a "self-hating white" than a "greaser" or wetback.

2: Aztlanism: Some people have also referred to him as an Aztlanist owing to his belief that the Americas "belong to" the indigenous Indians. This is not exactly what Aztlanism is. Aztlanism is specifically the nationalistic Mexican belief that the American Southwest belongs, rightfully, to Mexico and should be reconquered. Passive Aztlanism would be the belief that illegal immigrants have the right to be here and have whatever they want. I haven't seen Raul espouse that, and if he does, I would certainly oppose it very much, but I just wanted to clarify what Aztlanism is.

3: Views on Jews: It has also been said that Raul is secretly an anti-Semite and "any day now" will turn on at least Ashkenazi Jews. This, in my view, is completely unsubstantiated and pure speculation. I have seen no evidence that Raul hates Ashkenazi Jews. The vast majority of Argentina's long-persecuted Jewish population is Ashkenazi, primarily from the Soviet/Russian republics. All of the Jews he has been exposed to are Ashkenazi. Thus, I think it's rather wild to just declare that "well, he's gonna turn into a Nazi someday!" simply because he has some strange and unconventional views in other areas.

I am not defending Raul because he is Hispanic. I simply believe that we should not go around beating up members with different reasoning methodologies than our own if they do support our cause. Deciding to despise the entire West because the West stands against Israel is definitely unique for our forum, but it does not make somebody a troll or troublemaker.

Chaimfan.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 10, 2007, 05:19:20 PM
Quote
I simply believe that we should not go around beating up members with different reasoning methodologies than our own if they do support our cause. Deciding to despise the entire West because the West stands against Israel is definitely unique for our forum, but it does not make somebody a troll or troublemaker.

I agree C.F.

We are here all united to support Israel in its struggle for survival and I think Mexico should reclaim all of the USA back aswell as Florida and New York as compensation .
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 10, 2007, 06:51:00 PM
I'm glad Mills agrees with my views  :)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Husar on December 10, 2007, 07:03:22 PM
I also agree with you. I guess I was a little wrong about the Aztlan movement. But I did see one of them on a corner once with a sign saying "Whites Go Back To Europe" and saying that even Northern US Native Americans are their "brothers" in their fight and that the whole Americas was theirs. Which is hypocrisy because they are Mestizo and have some white in them. I guess the guy yelling this and with the sign was probably from a different movements. Have you heard of Mecha?
I know that there is a movement that wants all Whites to leave the American continent, I just don't remember what it was. Thanks for the clarification CF, you Rock!  O0

Whatever the "aztlan movement" may or may not be,
it is definitely a bunch of haters towards Israel and serbia.

"aztlanists" side along
muSSlimongers and NAZICROATS.

I put a spell on them.

 :)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 10, 2007, 07:18:57 PM
Quote
I simply believe that we should not go around beating up members with different reasoning methodologies than our own if they do support our cause. Deciding to despise the entire West because the West stands against Israel is definitely unique for our forum, but it does not make somebody a troll or troublemaker.

I agree C.F.

 I think Mexico should reclaim all of the USA back aswell as Florida and New York as compensation .

What!!!?? :o :o :o
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 10, 2007, 08:31:21 PM
1- I am Italian and can even vote in Italian elections, since all mt mother's family came here from different parts of Italy. And I am an Italian citizen. My father has mostly Basque blood, but also a mix of Danish, Spanish, Argentinian....However I chose the Italian citizenship since I was brought up with my mother. It's my father's surname that a Conservative Rav said it is of Leviite origin.
Anyway, I don't understand why Goyshe genealogy is so important to some people here!!!! Mt mother was a Gentile, so I'm a Gentile. Why do you care about my Gentile Genealogy. Hallacha is the same for ALL Gentiles!!!!!

2- I am not interested in Atzlanism. I only heard about it here. I only reject colonialism, whether Hispanic or Anglosaxon. So why would I suuport Maxico or the USA in their disputes??? Neither of them are real Amerindians!!!!

3- Regarding Jews, I sincerely don't know what on Earth made some people here think I may dislike Ashkenazim!!!! It's a very serious charge!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Eliezer Ben Avraham on December 10, 2007, 09:16:18 PM
where are all of these threads?
I had no clue about the criticism of catholics, I hadn't heard about this, I'm just out of the loop
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on December 11, 2007, 12:51:11 AM
Guys, for the last time, I don't agree with Raul! (Besides that I think that there was a lot of cruelty at times to American Indians, especially under President Andrew Jackson).

But I don't think that an "all of the Western hemisphere belongs to the Indians" philosophy" should get him banned or constantly insulted either.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 11, 2007, 03:18:12 AM
Quote
I assume you're being sarcastic, right? 

lol.....yes and no. Instinctivley I think Mexico should take back the South West of the USA (yes you will all hate me but read this first !!!) but after living in Mexico and knowing what most of the Mexicans are like on second though it would not be such a good idea. Mexico is a great country but corruption and dishonesty are too deeply rooted within its society  :(

 

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 11, 2007, 04:38:06 AM
Quote
I assume you're being sarcastic, right? 

lol.....yes and no. Instinctivley I think Mexico should take back the South West of the USA (yes you will all hate me but read this first !!!) but after living in Mexico and knowing what most of the Mexicans are like on second though it would not be such a good idea. Mexico is a great country but corruption and dishonesty are too deeply rooted within its society  :(

 


yup, we hate you!!!!!!! :::D :::D
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 11, 2007, 05:06:06 AM
Quote
I simply believe that we should not go around beating up members with different reasoning methodologies than our own if they do support our cause. Deciding to despise the entire West because the West stands against Israel is definitely unique for our forum, but it does not make somebody a troll or troublemaker.

I agree C.F.

We are here all united to support Israel in its struggle for survival and I think Mexico should reclaim all of the USA back aswell as Florida and New York as compensation .

I think also Europe should be given to the Muslims, as compensation for the loss of Al Andaluz.
Russia belongs to the MONGOLS! O0
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 11, 2007, 05:14:15 AM
Quote
I simply believe that we should not go around beating up members with different reasoning methodologies than our own if they do support our cause. Deciding to despise the entire West because the West stands against Israel is definitely unique for our forum, but it does not make somebody a troll or troublemaker.

I agree C.F.

We are here all united to support Israel in its struggle for survival and I think Mexico should reclaim all of the USA back aswell as Florida and New York as compensation .

I think also Europe should be given to the Muslims, as compensation for the loss of Al Andaluz.
Russia belongs to the MONGOLS! O0
yes, and Israel to the arabs >:(
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 11, 2007, 05:34:31 AM
Yeah, and I think it is fair to demand that 200million white race people are put to death in order to get even with the victims of colonialism!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 11, 2007, 07:20:29 AM
You left out the fact that he supports the 'black hebrews' squatting in Israel. These animals are Jew-haters who believe real Jews to be illegitimate. His support for them is no doubt based on his consistant love for apes and savages and his hatred of europeans/westerners. I'm predicting he WILL turn against the ashkenazim because he'll see them as europeans.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 11, 2007, 12:22:18 PM
Yes in referance to my previous post, another reason why I no longer support the Chicano movements for independence is because they align themselves with other “struggling” peoples such as “the PLO/Hamas Arab Muslim Nazis.”

My heart and loyalty are reserved for Israel only.

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 11, 2007, 12:30:45 PM
"As a trotskyist my hearth lies with the poor , the suppressed and the victims of capitalism." 8;)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 11, 2007, 04:43:08 PM
Sure, now that we Americans made the southwest great, built schools and libraries, made a nice the mexicans want it "back"? How convenient of them. I bet if it were a dump, they would look the other way.

Those animals are turning it into a dump. Mexicans are as bad as arabs. Everywhere they live becomes a third world stink hole.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 11, 2007, 06:59:18 PM
You left out the fact that he supports the 'black hebrews' squatting in Israel. These animals are Jew-haters who believe real Jews to be illegitimate. His support for them is no doubt based on his consistant love for apes and savages and his hatred of europeans/westerners. I'm predicting he WILL turn against the ashkenazim because he'll see them as europeans.

1- I have already said that I only suppport those Black Hebrews of Dimona, even though I believe they are mistaken about their Hebrew origin. They believe that their similarities with Hebrew come from Israel and I believe it comes from Noah. However, since they have chosen a form of Judaism, and also keep the Noahide Laws, I think they can stay as Guerim, and maybe they would be able to convert if there were a recognised Sanhedrin.

2- Regarding Ashekenazim, at last you have said what is the base of your accusation against me!!! So I will reply.
I don't hate Europeans, I only dislike colonialism, but I respect and defend Europeans right to Europe.
Secondly, even if I hated Europeans, as you  falsely claim claim, Ashkenazim are not Europeans, but Israelites who lived as exilees in Central Europe. In case I hated Europeans, then I should hate myself ( really European ancetry), not Jewish exilees.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on December 11, 2007, 07:38:48 PM
Not only that, yesterday night in the news there were 2 rapes, guess who the culprits were? I'll give you a hint, they weren't white!

Yeah, in one instance a girl was sideswiped by a towtruck (probably driven by a wetback too) and was forced to pull over on the 5 in San Clemente at 2:30 a.m. to call for help. A medium-complected man in his late 20's pulled over, pretended to ask for help, and then brazenly pushed himself into her car and raped her right on the seat.

The victim reported that the perp spoke broken English. The Los Angeles Lies printed the suspect sketch but did not give any description of his race.

It is true that the majority of Mexicans are as evil as blacks. Mexicans by and large are the most evil and savage of the major Hispanic nationalities. Puerto Ricans are not so bad, and I think most Cubans aren't bad at all.

The vast majority of Mexicans, even if they aren't self-identified Aztlanists, would sympathize with Aztlanism if push came to shove. (And I am talking American Mexicans too.)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on December 11, 2007, 07:41:14 PM
So what do you think of the black and Muslims who are colonizing Europe through immigration and huge birth rates?

I think he's nuts. But I still disagree with banning people if they sincerely hold a belief (that does not involve outright Nazism) that is wildly against ours.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 11, 2007, 08:22:23 PM
I don't hate Europeans, I only dislike colonialism, but I respect and defend Europeans right to Europe.
Secondly, even if I hated Europeans, as you  falsely claim claim, Ashkenazim are not Europeans, but Israelites who lived as exilees in Central Europe. In case I hated Europeans, then I should hate myself ( really European ancetry), not Jewish exilees.


So what do you think of the black and Muslims who are colonizing Europe through immigration and huge birth rates?



In fact I support inmigration control in Europe. And not only for people from outside Europe. I am against EU policy. I claim Italy for Italians, Britain for British, and so on.....Inmigration, whether from within or outisde Europe is destroying national States.
I have EU right to passport, but why would I settle in ANY European country except Italy?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: CorrieDeservedIt on December 11, 2007, 08:26:07 PM
Puerto ricans aren't as bad?

They all act black with that annoying accent of theirs and their nuh-uhs. In New york you'lll see that.

Same with the mexis and their gangs. I say everyone with a gang flag on their head has the right to be killed.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: CorrieDeservedIt on December 11, 2007, 08:26:49 PM
And i thought the term "greaser" was used for white teens in the 50's.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 11, 2007, 08:40:22 PM
I don't hate Europeans, I only dislike colonialism, but I respect and defend Europeans right to Europe.
Secondly, even if I hated Europeans, as you  falsely claim claim, Ashkenazim are not Europeans, but Israelites who lived as exilees in Central Europe. In case I hated Europeans, then I should hate myself ( really European ancetry), not Jewish exilees.


So what do you think of the black and Muslims who are colonizing Europe through immigration and huge birth rates?



In fact I support inmigration control in Europe. And not only for people from outside Europe. I am against EU policy. I claim Italy for Italians, Britain for British, and so on.....Inmigration, whether from within or outisde Europe is destroying national States.
I have EU right to passport, but why would I settle in ANY European country except Italy?


So what do you think about whites in Australia?



Whites or anyother who settled in native places must respect the natives rights and their lands. Not all Australia was inhabitted when whites arrived... but I claim the same solution I claim for Argentina, especial native representation in Parliament, or independent States for natives.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 11, 2007, 10:05:49 PM
I don't hate Europeans, I only dislike colonialism, but I respect and defend Europeans right to Europe.
Secondly, even if I hated Europeans, as you  falsely claim claim, Ashkenazim are not Europeans, but Israelites who lived as exilees in Central Europe. In case I hated Europeans, then I should hate myself ( really European ancetry), not Jewish exilees.


So what do you think of the black and Muslims who are colonizing Europe through immigration and huge birth rates?



In fact I support inmigration control in Europe. And not only for people from outside Europe. I am against EU policy. I claim Italy for Italians, Britain for British, and so on.....Inmigration, whether from within or outisde Europe is destroying national States.
I have EU right to passport, but why would I settle in ANY European country except Italy?


So what do you think about whites in Australia?



Whites or anyother who settled in native places must respect the natives rights and their lands. Not all Australia was inhabitted when whites arrived... but I claim the same solution I claim for Argentina, especial native representation in Parliament, or independent States for natives.

Abo's never owned land, they were nomads that wondered the place. They travelled and never made settlements, never once grew food, they were strictly hunter gathers. It was inhabitted, it was  terra nullius .
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 11, 2007, 10:11:28 PM
I don't hate Europeans, I only dislike colonialism, but I respect and defend Europeans right to Europe.
Secondly, even if I hated Europeans, as you  falsely claim claim, Ashkenazim are not Europeans, but Israelites who lived as exilees in Central Europe. In case I hated Europeans, then I should hate myself ( really European ancetry), not Jewish exilees.


So what do you think of the black and Muslims who are colonizing Europe through immigration and huge birth rates?



In fact I support inmigration control in Europe. And not only for people from outside Europe. I am against EU policy. I claim Italy for Italians, Britain for British, and so on.....Inmigration, whether from within or outisde Europe is destroying national States.
I have EU right to passport, but why would I settle in ANY European country except Italy?


So what do you think about whites in Australia?



Whites or anyother who settled in native places must respect the natives rights and their lands. Not all Australia was inhabitted when whites arrived... but I claim the same solution I claim for Argentina, especial native representation in Parliament, or independent States for natives.


Was all of Argentina inhabited when whites arrived?



It's difficult to say about Argntina, some tribes were nomads, so it's difficult to say which was the exact territory of each tribe. However I am ashamed of what Spaniards and Argentinians did here. Patagonia was free until 1889, and forcibly conquered by president Roca. Until 1994 our Constitution still had clauses against Indians, promoting to convert them to Catholicism, and indirectly implying they were not fully Argentinians
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 12, 2007, 02:13:37 AM
I don't hate Europeans, I only dislike colonialism, but I respect and defend Europeans right to Europe.
Secondly, even if I hated Europeans, as you  falsely claim claim, Ashkenazim are not Europeans, but Israelites who lived as exilees in Central Europe. In case I hated Europeans, then I should hate myself ( really European ancetry), not Jewish exilees.


So what do you think of the black and Muslims who are colonizing Europe through immigration and huge birth rates?



In fact I support inmigration control in Europe. And not only for people from outside Europe. I am against EU policy. I claim Italy for Italians, Britain for British, and so on.....Inmigration, whether from within or outisde Europe is destroying national States.
I have EU right to passport, but why would I settle in ANY European country except Italy?


So what do you think about whites in Australia?



Whites or anyother who settled in native places must respect the natives rights and their lands. Not all Australia was inhabitted when whites arrived... but I claim the same solution I claim for Argentina, especial native representation in Parliament, or independent States for natives.

Shows what an idiot he is.

The present day aborigines are NOT the original inhabitants. There was another different racial/ethnic group here first (like the Tasmanian aborigines). This current bunch of aborigines displaced them. So their claim to the land has no more merit than the whites.

I'm getting damn sick of imbeciles claiming that white Americans, South Africans and Australians are thieves who have no right to their countries.

Why does merely being in a country first (but not putting a single brick on top of another) give somebody a greater claim than those who build and develope the land?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 12, 2007, 02:22:45 AM
I don't hate Europeans, I only dislike colonialism, but I respect and defend Europeans right to Europe.
Secondly, even if I hated Europeans, as you  falsely claim claim, Ashkenazim are not Europeans, but Israelites who lived as exilees in Central Europe. In case I hated Europeans, then I should hate myself ( really European ancetry), not Jewish exilees.


So what do you think of the black and Muslims who are colonizing Europe through immigration and huge birth rates?



In fact I support inmigration control in Europe. And not only for people from outside Europe. I am against EU policy. I claim Italy for Italians, Britain for British, and so on.....Inmigration, whether from within or outisde Europe is destroying national States.
I have EU right to passport, but why would I settle in ANY European country except Italy?


So what do you think about whites in Australia?



Whites or anyother who settled in native places must respect the natives rights and their lands. Not all Australia was inhabitted when whites arrived... but I claim the same solution I claim for Argentina, especial native representation in Parliament, or independent States for natives.

Shows what an idiot he is.

The present day aborigines are NOT the original inhabitants. There was another different racial/ethnic group here first (like the Tasmanian aborigines). This current bunch of aborigines displaced them. So their claim to the land has no more merit than the whites.

I'm getting damn sick of imbeciles claiming that white Americans, South Africans and Australians are thieves who have no right to their countries.

Why does merely being in a country first (but not putting a single brick on top of another) give somebody a greater claim than those who build and develope the land?


Were the original Aborigines also Australoids?



Probably. But what does it matter? They were a different nation with a different language/customs/identity. Italians have no right to invade France even though they're both caucasion.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 12, 2007, 02:54:23 AM
Quote
Mexicans are as bad as arabs

Thats the STUPIDEST remark I have ever heard in JTF. Mexicans are nothing like the arabs.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 12, 2007, 03:08:05 AM
Quote
Mexicans are as bad as arabs

Thats the STUPIDEST remark I have ever heard in JTF. Mexicans are nothing like the arabs.

How can you compare evil with evil!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 03:18:02 AM


Do all of the present Aborigines have the same native language? Maybe it's like there are many differnet American Indian nations who were mostly nomads.



No they can't talk to each other, a tribe is a family unit of may 6-8 people thats it, the wondered around for a year meeting once to have a sex session and not interbreed, and moved off again. They have no culture, no nothing. Thats why they were studied because the nearest thing to cavemen that are still alive.

Those dot paintings where a 20 century invention, they did no art, but they just choose to pretend,  and sell it of to naive Americans for millions of dollars, the worse con in the world.

No Australian buys that crap.  ::)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 12, 2007, 03:26:54 AM
yeah ! I want to see some blue-eyed natives!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 03:29:23 AM


Infidel, is it true that some Aborigines have blue and green eyes or was that just an affirmative action LIE by my professor who said "they are one on the most beautiful people on earth" I just don't think that's true but I want to find out from someone who actually knows about it!
Thanks!  ;)

Some did have blue and green eyes because of the Dutch and the Sealers before the British came, slept with some of the women when they were passing.

Britian did not discovered Australia the Dutch did. Thats why it was first called New Holland.

It was custom of the abo women to sleep with who they liked, many traded sex for rum and other goodies.

Thats why they welcomed the British, because they thought the Brits will be like the Dutch.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 03:42:33 AM
That was then 200 years ago mills this is now........ :-\

(http://www.micrrh.jcu.edu.au/Our-Staff/staff-images/kristin-mcbain.jpg)

Yes she is an abo

(http://www.businessfacilities.com/blog/uploaded_images/aborigines_5-700849.jpg)

They are abo's.

Welcome to multi culturalism  8;)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 03:43:52 AM
Abo genes carry the brown eye markers.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 12, 2007, 03:45:40 AM
Drugs-abusers! Look at their eyes!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 03:55:53 AM
Thats right because they are very distance from the blood lines in Africa, they have not changed in thousands of years. They are modern day cavemen. Some with a hint of european blood.

If you get time this book Fatal Shores http://www.middlemiss.org/lit/australian/fatalshore.html

Is an eye opener to the real Australia, before we went all PC.

There DNA is unmatched to any other race in the world. They have mixed blood now, but still they can trace family lines way back to first settlement.


Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 04:10:49 AM
No worries, this link shows you prints from the rare books collection http://www.lib.monash.edu.au/exhibitions/aborigines/xabor.html

As you can see the hair is different in some because they used mud in their hair when hunting.

I can understand many getting confused. They are interesting people.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 12, 2007, 04:35:07 AM
1- Being first in a country and really living in it gives right. Anyone has the right to be primitive and that does not entitle others to steal from them. The same applies to individuals. What if I decide not to have electricity, no TV, not to read and write...... are others entitled to rob me or enslave me for that??????

2- That discussion whether Abos are aesthetically nice or ugly is really sickening. Especially from people who claim to love Hashem. If you are disgusted at Abo's phisical look, them pray aloud and say "Hashem, what an ugly people hast thou made"!!!!!!!!!! That's blasphemy!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 04:54:47 AM
Too bad Raul, you don't live here or know what goes on. I suggest you keep on saving your piece of the world, and allow us to save ours.

We don't have to love everyone, thats the whole problem with leftie do gooders, that are destroying cultures.

Why is it sickening to have an opinion. Just because you don't agree with it.

I find anyone thats not white unattractive, thats my opinion, you don't need to share it.

God gave us the ability of free will, and most of this forum chooses to use it.

And my freewill is to keep culture, and civilized people in our southern lands.







Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 12, 2007, 05:09:20 AM
Too bad Raul, you don't live here or know what goes on. I suggest you keep on saving your piece of the world, and allow us to save ours.

We don't have to love everyone, thats the whole problem with leftie do gooders, that are destroying cultures.

Why is it sickening to have an opinion. Just because you don't agree with it.

I find anyone thats not white unattractive, thats my opinion, you don't need to share it.

G-d gave us the ability of free will, and most of this forum chooses to use it.

And my freewill is to keep culture, and civilized people in our southern lands.









1- You are supposed to love (or at least not hate) people, except if they are wicked.
2- Defending the civilised people does not mean to hate and destroy those who are or have chosen to be primitive. If Abos are cave men, respect them.
3- If you find only whites attractive, that's ok. Just only marry a white. But don't offend others. Remember that I am a Goy and can marry any Goyah, what if I married an Abo girl? Would you insult her? And also remember that ANY goy can convert to Judaism, so if an Abo converted he/she would be a Jew. Would you insult him just because you don't like his look?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 06:34:25 AM
[

1- You are supposed to love (or at least not hate) people, except if they are wicked.
2- Defending the civilised people does not mean to hate and destroy those who are or have chosen to be primitive. If Abos are cave men, respect them.
3- If you find only whites attractive, that's ok. Just only marry a white. But don't offend others. Remember that I am a Goy and can marry any Goyah, what if I married an Abo girl? Would you insult her? And also remember that ANY goy can convert to Judaism, so if an Abo converted he/she would be a Jew. Would you insult him just because you don't like his look?

1 I will do what I like
2 I will respect whom I chose
3 I will insult who I feel like
4 I don't care who you marry, you can marry a camel, it doesn't effect me.

Why because you are not here, and not apart of the problem virus killing off the southern lands.

If you were a part of the problem here, we have one very quick and clean solution.

Have I made myself clear enough for you.

Just incase I haven't in a nutshell, don't pi$$ on our legs and tell us its raining  ::)



Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 12, 2007, 02:10:31 PM
Quote
How can you compare evil with evil!!
Saying that all Mexicans are evil is the same as saying that all Americans are stupid - wrongly generalizing everyone.

I have Mexican family and  and they are the most honest and hard working people I know. You cannot generalize the Mexican people like that as you can with the muslim/nazi arabs. The illegals and the chicanos are quite different from your average Mexican found happily living in Mexico.

Evil ?? Hey....Mexico has been a faithful ally of the USA in times of war providing all kinds of assistance: read this

http://www.mexconnect.com/mex_/travel/slenchek/slmexicoww2.html (http://www.mexconnect.com/mex_/travel/slenchek/slmexicoww2.html)

Don't forget Mexcio opened its doors to the Jews fleeing the holocaust in WW2 and aslo how about the Mexican Schindler ???
http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=15806 (http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=15806)

You cannot compare a Mexican to a killer Muslim/Nazi



 

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 12, 2007, 02:18:24 PM
Quote
How can you compare evil with evil!!
Saying that all Mexicans are evil is the same as saying that all Americans are stupid - wrongly generalizing everyone.

I have Mexican family and  and they are the most honest and hard working people I know. You cannot generalize the Mexican people like that as you can with the muslim/nazi arabs. The illegals and the chicanos are quite different from your average Mexican found happily living in Mexico.

Evil ?? Hey....Mexico has been a faithful ally of the USA in times of war providing all kinds of assistance: read this

http://www.mexconnect.com/mex_/travel/slenchek/slmexicoww2.html (http://www.mexconnect.com/mex_/travel/slenchek/slmexicoww2.html)

Don't forget Mexcio opened its doors to the Jews fleeing the holocaust in WW2 and aslo how about the Mexican Schindler ???
http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=15806 (http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=15806)

You cannot compare a Mexican to a killer Muslim/Nazi



 



Mexico races the arab countries to pass anti-Israel resolutions in the UN. It is an evil, envious, slothful nation. Just look at how those pigs live!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 12, 2007, 02:26:17 PM
On aboriginal rights:

Abbos are 2% of Australia's population but aboriginal tribal land constitutes 5% of Australia's land mass. They earn $millions in mining and tourism royalties. They get welfare and social security payments that are UNAVAILABLE to white Australians.

Australia's military was NEVER segregated. Aborigines have served in it since before WW1 with NO discrimination.

Yes there are bums and alcoholics, but that has NOTHING to do with white neglect and EVERYTHING to do with individual, personal choice.

Raul,

I suggest you worry about your pathetic, third world, banana dictatorship and let us worry about our properly run first world country.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 12, 2007, 02:27:52 PM
I hope they never get their obama
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on December 12, 2007, 04:18:34 PM
Quote
How can you compare evil with evil!!
Saying that all Mexicans are evil is the same as saying that all Americans are stupid - wrongly generalizing everyone.

I have Mexican family and  and they are the most honest and hard working people I know. You cannot generalize the Mexican people like that as you can with the muslim/nazi arabs. The illegals and the chicanos are quite different from your average Mexican found happily living in Mexico.

Evil ?? Hey....Mexico has been a faithful ally of the USA in times of war providing all kinds of assistance: read this

http://www.mexconnect.com/mex_/travel/slenchek/slmexicoww2.html (http://www.mexconnect.com/mex_/travel/slenchek/slmexicoww2.html)

Don't forget Mexcio opened its doors to the Jews fleeing the holocaust in WW2 and aslo how about the Mexican Schindler ???
http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=15806 (http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=15806)

You cannot compare a Mexican to a killer Muslim/Nazi
Merkava, you really cannot believe any of this, can you? Even IF your own family works and is law-abiding, the majority of Mexicans and Mexican Americans are not. Mexicans by and large support the Arabs and believe that they have the right to the Southwestern states of the U.S., if not the entire U.S., because the "Yankee imperialists" took it from them. The Mexican crime rate is higher than that of just about all other Latino nationalities, and there are numerous incidents of anti-white Aztlanist terrorism within the past ten years.

At least 80% of Mexicans need to go back to their scummy tortilla factories back home.


 


[/quote]
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 12, 2007, 05:01:10 PM
[

1- You are supposed to love (or at least not hate) people, except if they are wicked.
2- Defending the civilised people does not mean to hate and destroy those who are or have chosen to be primitive. If Abos are cave men, respect them.
3- If you find only whites attractive, that's ok. Just only marry a white. But don't offend others. Remember that I am a Goy and can marry any Goyah, what if I married an Abo girl? Would you insult her? And also remember that ANY goy can convert to Judaism, so if an Abo converted he/she would be a Jew. Would you insult him just because you don't like his look?

1 I will do what I like
2 I will respect whom I chose
3 I will insult who I feel like
4 I don't care who you marry, you can marry a camel, it doesn't effect me.

Why because you are not here, and not apart of the problem virus killing off the southern lands.

If you were a part of the problem here, we have one very quick and clean solution.

Have I made myself clear enough for you.

Just incase I haven't in a nutshell, don't pi$$ on our legs and tell us its raining  ::)





Well, remember that my family is Catholic and tried to reaise me as a Catholic, but I had chosen paganism instead. During my childhood and teen years I only loved the Sun and Mother Nature, and had no values regarding how to deal with humans. Then I trurned to Chassidic Ashkenazim, (the same Jews Newman has accused me of hating) and Chassidim taught me values. Even though I decided not to convert and may differ on some points of Torah interpretation with them, I have the values they have taught me. And Chassidim taught me to LOVE not to hate and insult people. To love Hashem and His Creation, to thank Him for everything. To believe that every human being has a soul given by Hashem and must be respected (except those who freely chose evil). Never to hate anyone or anything just for phisical look.
You can do whatever you like, but remember that your ideas are not Jewish neither they come from Torah.

To Newman, just let Abos alone with their 5% of the land. They have the same soul you and me have. A Goyshe soul!!!! No goy is better than other!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 12, 2007, 05:12:57 PM


To Newman, just let Abos alone with their 5% of the land. They have the same soul you and me have. A Goyshe soul!!!! No goy is better than other!!!
We ARE letting them alone, Dummy! AND we give them welfare, legal services and education that whites don't get.

NOBODY in this country is lifting a finger against our aboriginal Australian countrymen.

I'm making the point that you can't criticise us and DEMAND sovereign lands for them when we've already given them as much........and more!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 12, 2007, 05:17:16 PM
Then, ot's ok. but that mrmber who said he/she can hate whoever he/she likes must know that that ideas are not Jewish!!!! Free wil was given by Hashem to chose love, not hate.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 06:20:29 PM
[

1- You are supposed to love (or at least not hate) people, except if they are wicked.
2- Defending the civilised people does not mean to hate and destroy those who are or have chosen to be primitive. If Abos are cave men, respect them.
3- If you find only whites attractive, that's ok. Just only marry a white. But don't offend others. Remember that I am a Goy and can marry any Goyah, what if I married an Abo girl? Would you insult her? And also remember that ANY goy can convert to Judaism, so if an Abo converted he/she would be a Jew. Would you insult him just because you don't like his look?

1 I will do what I like
2 I will respect whom I chose
3 I will insult who I feel like
4 I don't care who you marry, you can marry a camel, it doesn't effect me.

Why because you are not here, and not apart of the problem virus killing off the southern lands.

If you were a part of the problem here, we have one very quick and clean solution.

Have I made myself clear enough for you.

Just incase I haven't in a nutshell, don't pi$$ on our legs and tell us its raining  ::)





Well, remember that my family is Catholic and tried to reaise me as a Catholic, but I had chosen paganism instead. During my childhood and teen years I only loved the Sun and Mother Nature, and had no values regarding how to deal with humans. Then I trurned to Chassidic Ashkenazim, (the same Jews Newman has accused me of hating) and Chassidim taught me values. Even though I decided not to convert and may differ on some points of Torah interpretation with them, I have the values they have taught me. And Chassidim taught me to LOVE not to hate and insult people. To love Hashem and His Creation, to thank Him for everything. To believe that every human being has a soul given by Hashem and must be respected (except those who freely chose evil). Never to hate anyone or anything just for phisical look.
You can do whatever you like, but remember that your ideas are not Jewish neither they come from Torah.

To Newman, just let Abos alone with their 5% of the land. They have the same soul you and me have. A Goyshe soul!!!! No goy is better than other!!!


Yeah yeah love everyone thats why we have terrorists. Grow up.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 06:21:50 PM
Then, ot's ok. but that mrmber who said he/she can hate whoever he/she likes must know that that ideas are not Jewish!!!! Free wil was given by Hashem to chose love, not hate.

Thats you opinion and you are entitled to it.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: JTFFan on December 12, 2007, 06:22:03 PM
[

1- You are supposed to love (or at least not hate) people, except if they are wicked.
2- Defending the civilised people does not mean to hate and destroy those who are or have chosen to be primitive. If Abos are cave men, respect them.
3- If you find only whites attractive, that's ok. Just only marry a white. But don't offend others. Remember that I am a Goy and can marry any Goyah, what if I married an Abo girl? Would you insult her? And also remember that ANY goy can convert to Judaism, so if an Abo converted he/she would be a Jew. Would you insult him just because you don't like his look?

1 I will do what I like
2 I will respect whom I chose
3 I will insult who I feel like
4 I don't care who you marry, you can marry a camel, it doesn't effect me.

Why because you are not here, and not apart of the problem virus killing off the southern lands.

If you were a part of the problem here, we have one very quick and clean solution.

Have I made myself clear enough for you.

Just incase I haven't in a nutshell, don't pi$$ on our legs and tell us its raining  ::)





Well, remember that my family is Catholic and tried to reaise me as a Catholic, but I had chosen paganism instead. During my childhood and teen years I only loved the Sun and Mother Nature, and had no values regarding how to deal with humans. Then I trurned to Chassidic Ashkenazim, (the same Jews Newman has accused me of hating) and Chassidim taught me values. Even though I decided not to convert and may differ on some points of Torah interpretation with them, I have the values they have taught me. And Chassidim taught me to LOVE not to hate and insult people. To love Hashem and His Creation, to thank Him for everything. To believe that every human being has a soul given by Hashem and must be respected (except those who freely chose evil). Never to hate anyone or anything just for phisical look.
You can do whatever you like, but remember that your ideas are not Jewish neither they come from Torah.

To Newman, just let Abos alone with their 5% of the land. They have the same soul you and me have. A Goyshe soul!!!! No goy is better than other!!!


Yeah yeah love everyone thats why we have terrorists. Grow up.

lol ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 12, 2007, 06:46:21 PM
Quote
Yeah yeah love everyone thats why we have terrorists. Grow up.


Terrorism has nothig to do with Abo's physical look. Come on! Where have you heard about an Australoid joining al-Qaida???? That's silly!!!!!!!
You just hate them because their brown skin and strange face. Do as you wish!!! I only tell you that yours is not Hashem's path. So if you are Jewish, you'd rather make it clear that you are noy fully observant!!!!! You have no rght to portray Judaism as hate, while Ravs teach love. Just see an orthodox Rav and ask him advise to overcome your bad feelings towards different looking humans!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 12, 2007, 06:53:12 PM
Quote
Yeah yeah love everyone thats why we have terrorists. Grow up.


Terrorism has nothig to do with Abo's physical look. Come on! Where have you heard about an Australoid joining al-Qaida???? That's silly!!!!!!!
You just hate them because their brown skin and strange face. Do as you wish!!! I only tell you that yours is not Hashem's path. So if you are Jewish, you'd rather make it clear that you are noy fully observant!!!!! You have no rght to portray Judaism as hate, while Ravs teach love. Just see an orthodox Rav and ask him advise to overcome your bad feelings towards different looking humans!!!!!!!!

In 1987 a delegation of aboriginal 'leaders' travelled to Libya to meet with Col Ghadafi. They were offered money and training (which they accepted).
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 06:54:29 PM
Quote
Yeah yeah love everyone thats why we have terrorists. Grow up.


Terrorism has nothig to do with Abo's physical look. Come on! Where have you heard about an Australoid joining al-Qaida???? That's silly!!!!!!!
You just hate them because their brown skin and strange face. Do as you wish!!! I only tell you that yours is not Hashem's path. So if you are Jewish, you'd rather make it clear that you are noy fully observant!!!!! You have no rght to portray Judaism as hate, while Ravs teach love. Just see an orthodox Rav and ask him advise to overcome your bad feelings towards different looking humans!!!!!!!!
Yeah yeah don't get all Nancy over things Raul.

Your peace loving kissing everyones rear end, allows the terrorist to take advantage of your good will, naive  as it is.

Terrorist and bad people don't play by your rules, they use that as an advantage.

So now I am not a Jew, quick go tell all the nazi's that  :::D





Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 12, 2007, 07:00:57 PM
Quote
Yeah yeah love everyone thats why we have terrorists. Grow up.


Terrorism has nothig to do with Abo's physical look. Come on! Where have you heard about an Australoid joining al-Qaida???? That's silly!!!!!!!
You just hate them because their brown skin and strange face. Do as you wish!!! I only tell you that yours is not Hashem's path. So if you are Jewish, you'd rather make it clear that you are noy fully observant!!!!! You have no rght to portray Judaism as hate, while Ravs teach love. Just see an orthodox Rav and ask him advise to overcome your bad feelings towards different looking humans!!!!!!!!

In 1987 a delegation of aboriginal 'leaders' travelled to Libya to meet with Col Ghadafi. They were offered money and training (which they accepted).

Aboriginal of what country? They shouldn't be allowed to travel, but imprisoned!!!! But I have heard of many Westerners who also travelled to Iraq to help Hussein. What about about the millions of dollars Europe gives to Palis, Most of that money is used to "conpensate" suicide bombers' families for killing "racist Zionist" school boys in buses in Israel.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 07:04:37 PM
They shouldn't be allowed to travel, but imprisoned!!!!

WHOA what happened to  love everyone  :::D

Imprison people because the travel  :::D :::D :::D

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 12, 2007, 07:08:50 PM
They shouldn't be allowed to travel, but imprisoned!!!!

WHOA what happened to  love everyone  :::D

Imprison people because the travel  :::D :::D :::D



You just don't want to understand what I say. I claim ALL people must be loved regardless of race or ethnicity. But ANY individual who travels to help terrorism must be inetrcepted by any country and jailed, if not executed.....
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 07:54:34 PM
They shouldn't be allowed to travel, but imprisoned!!!!

WHOA what happened to  love everyone  :::D

Imprison people because the travel  :::D :::D :::D



You just don't want to understand what I say. I claim ALL people must be loved regardless of race or ethnicity. But ANY individual who travels to help terrorism must be inetrcepted by any country and jailed, if not executed.....

Yes Raul you only choose to love some people  ::)

My point totally proven  8;)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 12, 2007, 08:04:19 PM
They shouldn't be allowed to travel, but imprisoned!!!!

WHOA what happened to  love everyone  :::D

Imprison people because the travel  :::D :::D :::D



You just don't want to understand what I say. I claim ALL people must be loved regardless of race or ethnicity. But ANY individual who travels to help terrorism must be inetrcepted by any country and jailed, if not executed.....

Yes Raul you only choose to love some people  ::)

My point totally proven  8;)

Exactly, only those who are righteous, respect Israel and love Nature and value human life. I hate terrorists and those who support them.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 12, 2007, 11:30:01 PM
Quote
So now I am not a Jew, quick go tell all the nazi's that 


Infidel, if your mother is Jewish or you have converted by the Orthodox, you are Jewish no matter what you think. But if you hate and insult people for their physical look, then it renders you a non-fully Torah observant. At least not the observance Chassidim have taught me. And as far as I know, the sages in Talmud also condemn hating with no reason, and above all hating what Hashem made. Do you sincerely believe Torah condones hating people just for finding them not attractive to your liking? If so, please seek the help of a Rav now!!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 12, 2007, 11:32:30 PM
Quote
So now I am not a Jew, quick go tell all the nazi's that 


Infidel, if your mother is Jewish or you have converted by the Orthodox, you are Jewish no matter what you think. But if you hate and insult people for their physical look, then it renders you a non-fully Torah observant. At least not the observance Chassidim have taught me. And as far as I know, the sages in Talmud also condemn hating with no reason, and above all hating what Hashem made. Do you sincerely believe Torah condones hating people just for finding them not attractive to your liking? If so, please seek the help of a Rav now!!!!!

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 12, 2007, 11:45:11 PM
Quote
So now I am not a Jew, quick go tell all the nazi's that 


Infidel, if your mother is Jewish or you have converted by the Orthodox, you are Jewish no matter what you think. But if you hate and insult people for their physical look, then it renders you a non-fully Torah observant. At least not the observance Chassidim have taught me. And as far as I know, the sages in Talmud also condemn hating with no reason, and above all hating what Hashem made. Do you sincerely believe Torah condones hating people just for finding them not attractive to your liking? If so, please seek the help of a Rav now!!!!!

Sarcasm is a strange concept to you I take it  ::)

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 13, 2007, 03:14:27 AM
Quote
Merkava, you really cannot believe any of this, can you? Even IF your own family works and is law-abiding, the majority of Mexicans and Mexican Americans are not. Mexicans by and large support the Arabs and believe that they have the right to the Southwestern states of the U.S., if not the entire U.S., because the "Yankee imperialists" took it from them. The Mexican crime rate is higher than that of just about all other Latino nationalities, and there are numerous incidents of anti-white Aztlanist terrorism within the past ten years.

At least 80% of Mexicans need to go back to their scummy tortilla factories back home.

The only time that Mexico has voted against Israel was in the 1970's when they had Echeverria as president. Echeverria was by large one of the worst presidents in Mexican history (corruption and lead Mexico into one of its worst economic depressions). When you say that Mexicans support Arabs you are referring to Mexican Americans and Atzlanists. Most Mexicans don't even care about what is going on in the middle east. Mexico has too many problems of its own to worry about the Middle East.

Well the "Yankee imperialists" did take the South West by force didn't they ? Ever heard of the Mexican-American war ?

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Hail Columbia on December 13, 2007, 11:15:38 AM
Well the "Yankee imperialists" did take the South West by force didn't they ? Ever heard of the Mexican-American war ?

Well, we're not giving it back any time soon.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 13, 2007, 11:58:51 AM
Quote
Merkava, you really cannot believe any of this, can you? Even IF your own family works and is law-abiding, the majority of Mexicans and Mexican Americans are not. Mexicans by and large support the Arabs and believe that they have the right to the Southwestern states of the U.S., if not the entire U.S., because the "Yankee imperialists" took it from them. The Mexican crime rate is higher than that of just about all other Latino nationalities, and there are numerous incidents of anti-white Aztlanist terrorism within the past ten years.

At least 80% of Mexicans need to go back to their scummy tortilla factories back home.

The only time that Mexico has voted against Israel was in the 1970's when they had Echeverria as president. Echeverria was by large one of the worst presidents in Mexican history (corruption and lead Mexico into one of its worst economic depressions). When you say that Mexicans support Arabs you are referring to Mexican Americans and Atzlanists. Most Mexicans don't even care about what is going on in the middle east. Mexico has too many problems of its own to worry about the Middle East.

Well the "Yankee imperialists" did take the South West by force didn't they ? Ever heard of the Mexican-American war ?




Merkava , what is happening man?
You suddenly sound like a lefty?
I hope it is just temporarily,
Sincerely yours,

Amb
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 13, 2007, 01:50:12 PM
Quote
Merkava , what is happening man?
You suddenly sound like a lefty?
I hope it is just temporarily,
Sincerely yours,

Amb

lol.......noooooooo. Sorry for coming across as that. Its just that some things must be kept into perspective. Its wrong to accuse all Mexicans of being anti-semites. There is alot more Anti-Semetism in the USA than there is in Mexico yet no one says that "Amercians are Anti-Semitic" do they? Yes alot of the anti-semetism stems from American Muslim, Shwartzas, KKK hill billies etc but they are still American aren't they?

Mexico did vote once against Israel in the UN during the 1970's under the dictator Echeverria (eventhough people still refer to him as president) but the USA has back stabbed Israel and Jews many more times :

Allen Dulles (supporting Nazi coroprations)
USA and its allies conspired to block the creation of the State of Israel in 1948 for fear its presence would threaten the flow of Arab oil to the West
The USA pretended to support Israel during the Six-Day War and passed Israeli military secrets to their Arab foes.
The White House buying guns from a PLO terrorist ??
How about the Yom Kippur fiasco in 73 ??

By all means this is not an attack on the USA but when it comes to Anti Semetism and Anti Zionism the USA leads the race. Do you get my point ?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: JTFFan on December 13, 2007, 01:58:19 PM
Quote
Merkava , what is happening man?
You suddenly sound like a lefty?
I hope it is just temporarily,
Sincerely yours,

Amb

lol.......noooooooo. Sorry for coming across as that. Its just that some things must be kept into perspective. Its wrong to accuse all Mexicans of being anti-semites. There is alot more Anti-Semetism in the USA than there is in Mexico yet no one says that "Amercians are Anti-Semitic" do they? Yes alot of the anti-semetism stems from American Muslim, Shwartzas, KKK hill billies etc but they are still American aren't they?

Mexico did vote once against Israel in the UN during the 1970's under the dictator Echeverria (eventhough people still refer to him as president) but the USA has back stabbed Israel and Jews many more times :

Allen Dulles (supporting Nazi coroprations)
USA and its allies conspired to block the creation of the State of Israel in 1948 for fear its presence would threaten the flow of Arab oil to the West
The USA pretended to support Israel during the Six-Day War and passed Israeli military secrets to their Arab foes.
The White House buying guns from a PLO terrorist ??
How about the Yom Kippur fiasco in 73 ??

By all means this is not an attack on the USA but when it comes to Anti Semetism and Anti Zionism the USA leads the race. Do you get my point ?



Agreed, and no worries about the whole leftist thing. ;)

we know your not a lefty and don't come off as one. ;) :)

America has stabbed Israel in the back way too many times. >:(
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 13, 2007, 02:21:28 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 13, 2007, 03:48:06 PM
Merk, do you think it is good to have Mexicans joining the movement
 , if they oppose their turd world culture?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 03:52:39 PM
Mexico votes against Israel every chance it gets. Tovia Singer has done shows on it.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 13, 2007, 04:10:02 PM
Quote
Mexico votes against Israel every chance it gets. Tovia Singer has done shows on it.
You gotta give us specifics with credible links. I know Mexico voted against Israel in the UN back in the 1970's under Echeverria. When was the last vote and what was the issue on ?

Quote
Merk, do you think it is good to have Mexicans joining the movement
 , if they oppose their turd world culture?
Only a small minority. I think only Mexican Jews who consider Israel more important than Mexico would cointribute (and there aren't that many). Mexians in general don't feel the threat of Islam or care about the Middle East so JTF would be irrelevant. Mexico's biggest war is within its borders - the drug cartels and corruption.   
 
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 13, 2007, 04:14:11 PM
Quote
So now I am not a Jew, quick go tell all the nazi's that 


Infidel, if your mother is Jewish or you have converted by the Orthodox, you are Jewish no matter what you think. But if you hate and insult people for their physical look, then it renders you a non-fully Torah observant. At least not the observance Chassidim have taught me. And as far as I know, the sages in Talmud also condemn hating with no reason, and above all hating what Hashem made. Do you sincerely believe Torah condones hating people just for finding them not attractive to your liking? If so, please seek the help of a Rav now!!!!!

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Jews that lived in Judea in the 5th century B.C. weren't white. And what "sin of kush" are you talking about ?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 04:20:37 PM
Quote
Mexico votes against Israel every chance it gets. Tovia Singer has done shows on it.
You gotta give us specifics with credible links. I know Mexico voted against Israel in the UN back in the 1970's under Echeverria. When was the last vote and what was the issue on ?


 

Read it & weep:

http://www.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.2264593/k.14EE/AntiIsrael_Resolutions_at_61st_GA.htm

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 13, 2007, 04:22:53 PM
Quote
Mexico votes against Israel every chance it gets. Tovia Singer has done shows on it.
You gotta give us specifics with credible links. I know Mexico voted against Israel in the UN back in the 1970's under Echeverria. When was the last vote and what was the issue on ?


 

Read it & weep:

http://www.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.2264593/k.14EE/AntiIsrael_Resolutions_at_61st_GA.htm


Very usefull website, thanks.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: JTFFan on December 13, 2007, 04:27:53 PM
Quote
Mexico votes against Israel every chance it gets. Tovia Singer has done shows on it.
You gotta give us specifics with credible links. I know Mexico voted against Israel in the UN back in the 1970's under Echeverria. When was the last vote and what was the issue on ?


 

Read it & weep:

http://www.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.2264593/k.14EE/AntiIsrael_Resolutions_at_61st_GA.htm


Very usefull website, thanks.

thanks for the site. ;)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 04:29:23 PM
Jews in Eretz Israel were Semites and of course white. The only non-white Jews may be those who converted. Some Semites may have had a slightly darker skin than Jephetites, but belong to the white race. Anyway Jews are not defined by race but ethnicity!

There's no sin of Kush, the sin was Ham's ( voluntarily seeeing Hoah's nakedness when Noah drank wine without knowing its effects and unwittingly laying without clothes in his tent). The sin passed to Cannaan and his descendant including Kush, but it has nothing to do with skin colour. And there is no evidence that Australian Abo's have any link to Kushites. Kush was traditionally associated with Ethiopia.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 04:32:47 PM
Yes.

Blacks are called 'kushies' in Israel.

Ham's descendents turned black because of Ham's sin. Black is the colour of sin.

How do you know abbos don't come from Ham? We all descend from Noah's sons.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 04:38:47 PM
Yes.

Blacks are called 'kushies' in Israel.

Ham's descendents turned black because of Ham's sin. Black is the colour of sin.

How do you know abbos don't come from Ham? We all descend from Noah's sons.

Canaanites were the more affected but the sin of Ham, however they were white. Nowhere in the Torah says the sin is by skin colour!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 13, 2007, 04:44:16 PM
I agree ....great website. Sad to see Israel has few friends

Quote
Read it & weep:
Do you really want to weep ? How about all of the treason and sabotage from the USA towards little heroic Israel ? the site you kindly shared with us alone is enough evidence:

Vote on Question of P@lestine (A/61/L.34):

USA voted against. But look at their actions - Camp David and now Annapolis with the hope of creating a Palestinan/Nazi State. And its not the 1st time something like this happens. Atleast the UK openly votes for the "rights" of these pigs.... Heck ! If you really want to weep do some research into your history:

In 1967, while outwardly supporting Israel in its Six Day War against the united Arab armies, both the USA and the UK shared Israeli defense plans with Arab oil producers. This is why the Israelis knocked out the American surveillance ship the USS Liberty, though at the time all sides agreed it was an accident.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 04:47:20 PM
I agree ....great website. Sad to see Israel has few friends

Quote
Read it & weep:
Do you really want to weep ? How about all of the treason and sabotage from the USA towards little heroic Israel ? the site you kindly shared with us alone is enough evidence:

Vote on Question of P@lestine (A/61/L.34):

USA voted against. But look at their actions - Camp David and now Annapolis with the hope of creating a Palestinan/Nazi State. And its not the 1st time something like this happens. Atleast the UK openly votes for the "rights" of these pigs.... Heck ! If you really want to weep do some research into your history:

In 1967, while outwardly supporting Israel in its Six Day War against the united Arab armies, both the USA and the UK shared Israeli defense plans with Arab oil producers. This is why the Israelis knocked out the American surveillance ship the USS Liberty, though at the time all sides agreed it was an accident.


True. But mexico is 50 times worse than the USA.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 04:48:18 PM
Yes.

Blacks are called 'kushies' in Israel.

Ham's descendents turned black because of Ham's sin. Black is the colour of sin.

How do you know abbos don't come from Ham? We all descend from Noah's sons.

Canaanites were the more affected but the sin of Ham, however they were white. Nowhere in the Torah says the sin is by skin colour!
The story is from the Midrash if I'm not mistaken.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 04:52:38 PM
Nearly all countries voted against Israel, Argentina has voted all anti-israeli resolutions, except for one Abstention. What a Shame!!!!!!!
Palau and Nauru, with a majority of Australoid Natives have voted in favour of Israel.
Europe better no to speak!!! Shamefull!!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 13, 2007, 04:54:42 PM
Quote
True. But mexico is 50 times worse than the USA.
In what way exactly ? You gotta give us more detail on your opinions.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 13, 2007, 04:55:28 PM
Quote
Jews in Eretz Israel were Semites and of course white. The only non-white Jews may be those who converted. Some Semites may have had a slightly darker skin than Jephetites, but belong to the white race. Anyway Jews are not defined by race but ethnicity!
Jews in EY weren't white as the European white, they were darker. Not all Semites are white.

Quote
Blacks are called 'kushies' in Israel.
It's not common because of the leftist PC. We call tham "Blacks".

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 04:57:18 PM
Nearly all countries voted against Israel, Argentina has voted all anti-israeli resolutions, except for one Abstention. What a Shame!!!!!!!
Palau and Nauru, with a majority of Australoid Natives have voted in favour of Israel.
Europe better no to speak!!! Shamefull!!!!!

Check Australia's record for the last 60 years. The only anti-Israel votes are very recent and only at the behest of the USA. We're 100 times better than the nazi europeans and latin americans on that score!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 04:59:59 PM
Quote
Jews in Eretz Israel were Semites and of course white. The only non-white Jews may be those who converted. Some Semites may have had a slightly darker skin than Jephetites, but belong to the white race. Anyway Jews are not defined by race but ethnicity!
Jews in EY weren't white as the European white, they were darker. Not all Semites are white.

Quote
Blacks are called 'kushies' in Israel.
It's not common because of the leftist PC. We call tham "Blacks".



But they WERE/are 'whites'. There are lots of whites in the world from scandanavia to the med'. Some are darker than others but they are all still defined as whites. A northern european is a type of white, NOT the ultimate definition of one.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 05:12:36 PM
Yes, there are no Australian votes against Israel. The problem is Argentina, they have voted even in favour of Palis "refugees". BTW, Argentina has still wtitten in the Constitution that the Falkland are Argentinian. I remember in my teens when I followed all UN resolitions about Flaklanders, and nearly all UN assembly voted against the Falklands  :'(.
The big problem is that they speak on behalf of all citizens!!!! That's why I founded Let-be-land, but that's not enough yet.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 05:16:13 PM
Quote
True. But mexico is 50 times worse than the USA.
In what way exactly ? You gotta give us more detail on your opinions.
Use your brains!!!

Go through the UN voting records on the link I just posted and COUNT the number of times meck-sicko has voted against Israel versus the number of times the USA has!
It's bloody obvious!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 13, 2007, 05:17:16 PM
Quote
There are lots of whites in the world from scandanavia to the med'
A. I was talking about the B.C.E and not about the C.E. .
B. Where did you heard that Whites are coming here from Scandinavia ?

Quote
Some are darker than others but they are all still defined as whites
Yes, but I was thinking you meant the northern Europeans' skin colour.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 05:20:25 PM
Quote
There are lots of whites in the world from scandanavia to the med'
A. I was talking about the B.C.E and not about the C.E. .
B. Where did you heard that Whites are coming here from Scandinavia ?

Quote
Some are darker than others but they are all still defined as whites
Yes, but I was thinking you meant the northern Europeans' skin colour.

I NEVER said whites came to Israel from scandanavia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Read the post again:
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 13, 2007, 05:32:08 PM
Quote
There are lots of whites in the world from scandanavia to the med'
A. I was talking about the B.C.E and not about the C.E. .
B. Where did you heard that Whites are coming here from Scandinavia ?

Quote
Some are darker than others but they are all still defined as whites
Yes, but I was thinking you meant the northern Europeans' skin colour.

I NEVER said whites came to Israel from scandanavia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Read the post again:
Oh,  :D I am going to have some sleep.
Good night..
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 05:43:16 PM
Yes, there are no Australian votes against Israel. The problem is Argentina, they have voted even in favour of Palis "refugees". BTW, Argentina has still wtitten in the Constitution that the Falkland are Argentinian. I remember in my teens when I followed all UN resolitions about Flaklanders, and nearly all UN assembly voted against the Falklands  :'(.
The big problem is that they speak on behalf of all citizens!!!! That's why I founded Let-be-land, but that's not enough yet.

In fact Let-be-land allows each citizen to have his PERSONAL position on each international issue separately, except on Israel, in which we are all bound to recognise ALL Ertez Israel for the Israelites.
Regarding other issues, everyone is free ro choose his own view.

Here's is my PERSONAL statement of recognition to the Falklanders' right to self determination sent to the local Govt in Stanley:

From: Claudette Anderson
Sent: 02 April 2007 16:03
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Peace and Health to the People of the Falkland Islands


Dear Raul
 
I write on behalf of the Government and People of the Falkland Islands and thank you for your kind words and message of peace and hope.
 
Kind Regards
Claudette Anderson MBE



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Government House [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 02 April 2007 09:06
To: Claudette Anderson
Subject: Fw: Peace and Health to the People of the Falkland Islands


 
----- Original Message -----
From: raul mario lavin
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Peace and Health to the People of the Falkland Islands


To the Authorities and People of the Falkland Islands,
Dear Neighbours,
I want to send a massage of peace and hope, wishing you the best. On the 25th aniversary of the war, I hope the relations between Argentina and the Islands would turn to understanding on the basis of self detrmination for Kelpers, having they the final decision about their future.
I think the future of the Falkland Islands concerns especially their inhabitants, and that's its your wish that must be done.
I do not hold that the Islands are on the Argentinian Sea, in fact they are on the Patagonian Sea, which was a free Amerindian territory in 1833.
I hope all political claims, based mostly on national pride, would vanish to give place to real peace and love.
Happy Easter
Sincerely
Raul Lavin
Buenos Aires Province
Argentina
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 05:46:39 PM
Raul...............

We deal in reallity here.

Will you please shove your make-believe, cyber state where the monkey shoves his nuts.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 05:55:34 PM
What do you mean, Newman? I know you dislike me. But regarding Argentina's speaking on behalf of us all without out permission, what do you think I should do? Just go personally to Israel and the Flaklands and sign a document before their authorities recognising their rights? Or visiting the Embassies and sign it before an official? Will they receive me?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 06:03:19 PM
What do you mean, Newman? I know you dislike me. But regarding Argentina's speaking on behalf we all without out permission, what do you think I should do? Just go personally to Israel and the Flaklands and sign a document before their authorities recognising their rights? Or visiting the Embassies and sign it before an official? Will they receive me?

Have a revolution like all the other latin americans do every 5 minutes. Anyone can create a make-believe state but it means NOTHING.

Maybe I'll start one. "Bloke-Land".

Constitution of Bloke-Land(part 1):

* Any male who eats quishe, orders drinks with umbrellas or plastic monkies in them, uses moisturiser, spends more than $15 on a hair cut, sees lavish Brodway musicals or drives a Renault is to be killed.

To be continued.............
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 13, 2007, 06:11:12 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 06:13:08 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 07:03:22 PM
What do you mean, Newman? I know you dislike me. But regarding Argentina's speaking on behalf we all without out permission, what do you think I should do? Just go personally to Israel and the Flaklands and sign a document before their authorities recognising their rights? Or visiting the Embassies and sign it before an official? Will they receive me?

Have a revolution like all the other latin americans do every 5 minutes. Anyone can create a make-believe state but it means NOTHING.

Maybe I'll start one. "Bloke-Land".

Constitution of Bloke-Land(part 1):

* Any male who eats quishe, orders drinks with umbrellas or plastic monkies in them, uses moisturiser, spends more than $15 on a hair cut, sees lavish Brodway musicals or drives a Renault is to be killed.

To be continued.............

You are very mistaken, it's a long time there's no revolution in Latin America. And when there were revolutions, the military men did it. You know I cannot make a revolution, you're just making fun of me becuase you hate me. No matter to you if I am the only one in this town who say the Flaklands are British. If another Argentinian came here, said the Falklands are Argentine, but supported white supremacy in the world, you'd love him more than me!!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 13, 2007, 07:46:51 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very beginning.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.

I have got friends that have fought in that conflict, of course they are British  O0 And the remarked how well the Argentines were poor sods, as much as they were.

Its old men in government positions fighting each other and using young men to kill each other off.

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 13, 2007, 08:41:46 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.
:::D :::D :::D No reply from our argentine friend :::D
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 08:55:24 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.
:::D :::D :::D No reply from our argentine friend :::D

No replies to those who just make fun of me. Whatever I say, they will hate me for being pro-Natives. And I consider Falklander natives, but most here defend them for being white, not for being the first who settled.
British soldiers are in fact 7 times stronger than Argentinians due to better equipment and military instruction, not for bieng Anglos.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: JTFFan on December 13, 2007, 09:00:18 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.
:::D :::D :::D No reply from our argentine friend :::D

 :::D :::D :::D
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 09:01:10 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.
:::D :::D :::D No reply from our argentine friend :::D

No replies to those who just make fun of me. Whatever I say, they will hate me for being pro-Natives. And I consider Falklander natives, but most here defend them for being white, not for being the first who settled.
British soldiers are in fact 7 times stronger than Argentinians due to better equipment and military instruction, not for bieng Anglos.

BULL!

British rifles in the Falklands were semi-auto only (SLRs). Argie rifles were full-auto (FALs). Argies had fixed wing Mirage fighters operating from shore bases while britain only had Harriers operating from light carriers. Mirages should make minced meat of harriers.

If the Argentines had been worth a damn they'd have made dog-meat out of Britain..........................But they ain't worth a damn!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 09:13:53 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.
:::D :::D :::D No reply from our argentine friend :::D

No replies to those who just make fun of me. Whatever I say, they will hate me for being pro-Natives. And I consider Falklander natives, but most here defend them for being white, not for being the first who settled.
British soldiers are in fact 7 times stronger than Argentinians due to better equipment and military instruction, not for bieng Anglos.

BULL!

British rifles in the Falklands were semi-auto only (SLRs). Argie rifles were full-auto (FALs). Argies had fixed wing Mirage fighters operating from shore bases while britain only had Harriers operating from light carriers. Mirages should make minced meat of harriers.

If the Argentines had been worth a damn they'd have made dog-meat out of Britain..........................But they ain't worth a damn!

It was the dictatorship who made the war and the invasion. However todays' politicians still keep that clause in the Constitution saying the Falkland are Argentine. I have already said I disagree with it, but you'll insult me nevertheless. Not for what Argentina did to the Falklanders, but just because I'm pro-native and dilslike the West.
So have it clear. I will never love the West, unless they respect Eretz Yisrael for Israelites, and stop considering Goyshe polygamy as barbaric!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: JTFFan on December 13, 2007, 09:26:42 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.
:::D :::D :::D No reply from our argentine friend :::D

No replies to those who just make fun of me. Whatever I say, they will hate me for being pro-Natives. And I consider Falklander natives, but most here defend them for being white, not for being the first who settled.
British soldiers are in fact 7 times stronger than Argentinians due to better equipment and military instruction, not for bieng Anglos.

BULL!

British rifles in the Falklands were semi-auto only (SLRs). Argie rifles were full-auto (FALs). Argies had fixed wing Mirage fighters operating from shore bases while britain only had Harriers operating from light carriers. Mirages should make minced meat of harriers.

If the Argentines had been worth a damn they'd have made dog-meat out of Britain..........................But they ain't worth a damn!

It was the dictatorship who made the war and the invasion. However todays' politicians still keep that clause in the Constitution saying the Falkland are Argentine. I have already said I disagree with it, but you'll insult me nevertheless. Not for what Argentina did to the Falklanders, but just because I'm pro-native and dilslike the West.
So have it clear. I will never love the West, unless they respect Eretz Yisrael for Israelites, and stop considering Goyshe polygamy as barbaric!!!!!!!!!!

Raul, Are the American Indians of the U.S. the true natives?  ;D

Didn't you say America belonged to the Indians in one of your posts?

No hard feelings, but I'll have to definitely disagree. ;D
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 09:58:05 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.
:::D :::D :::D No reply from our argentine friend :::D

No replies to those who just make fun of me. Whatever I say, they will hate me for being pro-Natives. And I consider Falklander natives, but most here defend them for being white, not for being the first who settled.
British soldiers are in fact 7 times stronger than Argentinians due to better equipment and military instruction, not for bieng Anglos.

BULL!

British rifles in the Falklands were semi-auto only (SLRs). Argie rifles were full-auto (FALs). Argies had fixed wing Mirage fighters operating from shore bases while britain only had Harriers operating from light carriers. Mirages should make minced meat of harriers.

If the Argentines had been worth a damn they'd have made dog-meat out of Britain..........................But they ain't worth a damn!

It was the dictatorship who made the war and the invasion. However todays' politicians still keep that clause in the Constitution saying the Falkland are Argentine. I have already said I disagree with it, but you'll insult me nevertheless. Not for what Argentina did to the Falklanders, but just because I'm pro-native and dilslike the West.
So have it clear. I will never love the West, unless they respect Eretz Yisrael for Israelites, and stop considering Goyshe polygamy as barbaric!!!!!!!!!!

Raul, Are the American Indians of the U.S. the true natives?  ;D

Didn't you say America belonged to the Indians in one of your posts?

No hard feelings, but I'll have to definitely disagree. ;D

I said American Indians are true natives, in fact. By America, I mean the continent, not just USA. However any European who settled in a non-inhabbited area is also a first come, and can be considered a Native. Indians had no concept of State, but tribes instead. They cannot claim the whole continent just by inabitting a part of it. Neither can nomads claim all the lands they intended to visit. If not, nomads could claim the world, since in case of having the means, nomads would have wandered throught the world. For example, Roma (gypsies) have visited nearly all countries, but they cannot claim planet Earth for them.
However Amerindian inhabitted areas must be respected, and nomads tribes must have a minimum space to wander!!!!!
I reject Aztanism as another form of Colnialism, since they support Aztec Empire which had also colonised other Natives.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 13, 2007, 09:59:25 PM
The Falkland Islands has taken to many lives, and one conflict that was doomed in the very begining.



It was doomed because 10 Argentines don't amount to 1 anglo-saxon.
:::D :::D :::D No reply from our argentine friend :::D

No replies to those who just make fun of me. Whatever I say, they will hate me for being pro-Natives. And I consider Falklander natives, but most here defend them for being white, not for being the first who settled.
British soldiers are in fact 7 times stronger than Argentinians due to better equipment and military instruction, not for bieng Anglos.

Rubbish!!!
They weren't even able to overthrow a few garrison soldiers! There were nearly no British soldiers on the islands...and then Argentines attacked it with surprise...and thousands of miles away in the uk, the british needed to organize and ship in response. Whereas the argentines, only a few hundreds miles from the falklands, were unable to take the island, despite having all military requirements of air and land (such as artilerry etc), and were unable to defeat a handfull of brits. It took the brits days to reach the falklands, giving the argentines a LOT of time...

"military instraction"-who's fault is that? I thought amerindians are equal to brits?-and now youre confirming that Whites are superior in brain.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 13, 2007, 10:02:56 PM
oh and if you want to equate better tech and so on, what about the macedonians and greeks? How 300 whites defeated an army of a million?-you see, there is no value in what you say regarding this
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 13, 2007, 10:06:19 PM
once again we see your attitude towards the west. In fact, why the hell have an italian citizenship, if you hate the west?!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 10:10:10 PM
Quote
"military instraction"-who's fault is that?

It's was not a fault, but rather a blessing that the dictators Army was badly equipped, otherwise they'd keep in power here, and would have done a disaster in the Falklands. Dictators were crminals who made the war to retain power and sent our youth to die in a silly war.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 10:16:44 PM
Quote
"military instraction"-who's fault is that?

It's was not a fault, but rather a blessing that the dictators Army was badly equipped, otherwise they'd keep in power here, and would have done a disaster in the Falklands. Dictators were crminals who made the war to retain power and sent our youth to die in a silly war.

They were not badly equipped.

The banana dictatorship did not have the miliary spending constraints of democratic Britain. Argie small arms, night vision and missiles were better than Britain's.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 10:20:24 PM
once again we see your attitude towards the west. In fact, why the hell have an italian citizenship, if you hate the west?!

Just the same way many people here have American citizenship but disagree with the self-hating Govts.
I disagree with Western culture and aslo with non-Western who have assimilated. Now even in the East polygamy is rejected. And it was Islam which limited polygamy for Arabs by adopting the only 4 wives rule which the Talmud keeps ONLY for Jews, not for Goyim!!!!!!! And today there isn't even a nation who keeps Levirate, however many Ravs says it applies to Goyim also!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 13, 2007, 10:25:07 PM
Were the people of The Falklands Amerindian natives? I heard from my Colonial Latin America teacher that it is now only Brits because The British kicked everyone else out.



No, the Falklanders are European British, but there were no Amerindians in the Falkland, so British settlers are the first come and have the same right as if they were natives.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 13, 2007, 10:58:11 PM
but just because I'm pro-native and dilslike the West.
So have it clear. I will never love the West,

Well the WEST hates you.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 11:06:52 PM
but just because I'm pro-native and dilslike the West.
So have it clear. I will never love the West,

Well the WEST hates you.

He's a 'black arm band' self-hater!

"Oh BOO HOO HOO........We stole from the poor primitives :'(. Let's give ourselves 30 lashes!!"
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 13, 2007, 11:10:28 PM
but just because I'm pro-native and dilslike the West.
So have it clear. I will never love the West,

Well the WEST hates you.

He's a 'black arm band' self-hater!

"Oh BOO HOO HOO........We stole from the poor primitives :'(. Let's give ourselves 30 lashes!!"

You snooze you lose  :::D
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on December 13, 2007, 11:12:36 PM
Newman, I am not taking sides, but for the record, Britain won the Malvinas war because of American-supplied Sidewinder missiles, which were more advanced than anything in the AAF.

Otherwise, Argentina was roughly equipped the same as South Africa at the same time period.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on December 13, 2007, 11:16:53 PM

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Seriously, do you believe this?

You really think that people turn dark because one of their group sinned?

Do you actually tell people this?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on December 13, 2007, 11:18:40 PM

True. But mexico is 50 times worse than the USA.
Amen
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 13, 2007, 11:26:00 PM

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Seriously, do you believe this?

You really think that people turn dark because one of their group sinned?

Do you actually tell people this?

According to Midrash, the descendants of Ham turned black because of his sins.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 13, 2007, 11:38:58 PM
but just because I'm pro-native and dilslike the West.
So have it clear. I will never love the West,

Well the WEST hates you.
Here Here! O0
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Muck DeFuslims on December 13, 2007, 11:51:38 PM
I'm thinking people who go around proclaiming 'I hate the West' should live somewhere else. Perhaps the East, or maybe Mars, or some other location wouldn't offend their delicate sensibilities and they'd be happier there.

Alas, I have a feeling the 'I hate the West' contingent isn't leaving anytime soon.

Well, while they're still in the West, they should stop using and enjoying the benefits of Western culture, inventions and technology.

If you hate the West, stop using Western invented airplanes, cars, televisions, light bulbs, radios, air conditioners, telephones, hospitals and medicines. This will allow you to get more in touch with your 'native' roots.

As a matter of fact, quit using the Western invented computer and Internet to deliver your 'I hate the West' message. You could use tin cans and a string instead. Oh wait, tin cans are a Western invention. Nevermind. Well, there's always smoke signals.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 13, 2007, 11:56:34 PM
I'm thinking people who go around proclaiming 'I hate the West' should live somewhere else. Perhaps the East, or maybe Mars, or some other location wouldn't offend their delicate sensibilities and they'd be happier there.

Alas, I have a feeling the 'I hate the West' contingent isn't leaving anytime soon.

Well, while they're still in the West, they should stop using and enjoying the benefits of Western culture, inventions and technology.

If you hate the West, stop using Western invented airplanes, cars, televisions, light bulbs, radios, air conditioners, telephones, hospitals and medicines. This will allow you to get more in touch with your 'native' roots.

As a matter of fact, quit using the Western invented computer and Internet to deliver your 'I hate the West' message. You could use tin cans and a string instead. Oh wait, tin cans are a Western invention. Nevermind. Well, there's always smoke signals.
Yes!!! Exactly my point with the italian citizenship! I guess whe won't be hearing from raul again
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 14, 2007, 12:00:32 AM
Raul, you're a self-hating westerner. Admit it.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 14, 2007, 12:01:42 AM

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Seriously, do you believe this?

You really think that people turn dark because one of their group sinned?

Do you actually tell people this?

According to Midrash, the descendants of Ham turned black because of his sins.
Provide a source.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 12:17:31 AM
I'm thinking people who go around proclaiming 'I hate the West' should live somewhere else. Perhaps the East, or maybe Mars, or some other location wouldn't offend their delicate sensibilities and they'd be happier there.

Alas, I have a feeling the 'I hate the West' contingent isn't leaving anytime soon.

Well, while they're still in the West, they should stop using and enjoying the benefits of Western culture, inventions and technology.

If you hate the West, stop using Western invented airplanes, cars, televisions, light bulbs, radios, air conditioners, telephones, hospitals and medicines. This will allow you to get more in touch with your 'native' roots.

As a matter of fact, quit using the Western invented computer and Internet to deliver your 'I hate the West' message. You could use tin cans and a string instead. Oh wait, tin cans are a Western invention. Nevermind. Well, there's always smoke signals.
Yes!!! Exactly my point with the italian citizenship! I guess whe won't be hearing from raul again

Most inventions you mentioned are Jewish, not Western. Anyway the Alphabet is Israelite. Without it the West would have done nothing! And please don't add to what I say, I said dislike NOT HATE.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 12:21:00 AM

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Seriously, do you believe this?

You really think that people turn dark because one of their group sinned?

Do you actually tell people this?

According to Midrash, the descendants of Ham turned black because of his sins.
Provide a source.

http://jewishurbanlegends.blogspot.com/2004/07/noahs-son-was-cursed-with-black-skin.html
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Lubab on December 14, 2007, 12:21:29 AM
Then, ot's ok. but that mrmber who said he/she can hate whoever he/she likes must know that that ideas are not Jewish!!!! Free wil was given by Hashem to chose love, not hate.

Hashem asks us to hate evil and love good. Not just to choose love all the time. See Psalms 97:10.




Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 12:24:41 AM
Then, ot's ok. but that mrmber who said he/she can hate whoever he/she likes must know that that ideas are not Jewish!!!! Free wil was given by Hashem to chose love, not hate.

Hashem asks us to hate evil and love good. Not just to choose love all the time. See Psalms 97:10.






Torah allows to hate te enemies, I was just rebuking her for hating Australian Abos, just because she dislikes their look
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 12:26:56 AM
I'm thinking people who go around proclaiming 'I hate the West' should live somewhere else. Perhaps the East, or maybe Mars, or some other location wouldn't offend their delicate sensibilities and they'd be happier there.

Alas, I have a feeling the 'I hate the West' contingent isn't leaving anytime soon.

Well, while they're still in the West, they should stop using and enjoying the benefits of Western culture, inventions and technology.

If you hate the West, stop using Western invented airplanes, cars, televisions, light bulbs, radios, air conditioners, telephones, hospitals and medicines. This will allow you to get more in touch with your 'native' roots.

As a matter of fact, quit using the Western invented computer and Internet to deliver your 'I hate the West' message. You could use tin cans and a string instead. Oh wait, tin cans are a Western invention. Nevermind. Well, there's always smoke signals.
Yes!!! Exactly my point with the italian citizenship! I guess whe won't be hearing from raul again

Most inventions you mentioned are Jewish, not Western. Anyway the Alphabet is Israelite. Without it the West would have done nothing! And please don't add to what I say, I said dislike NOT HATE.

Wrong again.

A huge amount (disproportionate to the Jews small numbers) were Jewish, but most (more than 50%) western inventions are western.

Most Jewish inventions were products of Jews educated in enlightened western countries.

So stop using western innovations and live in the jungle like an indian.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 14, 2007, 12:30:34 AM
Then, ot's ok. but that mrmber who said he/she can hate whoever he/she likes must know that that ideas are not Jewish!!!! Free wil was given by Hashem to chose love, not hate.

Hashem asks us to hate evil and love good. Not just to choose love all the time. See Psalms 97:10.






Torah allows to hate te enemies, I was just rebuking her for hating Australian Abos, just because she dislikes their look

Well I dislike Germans too..... me bad  :::D
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 14, 2007, 12:31:36 AM
I'm thinking people who go around proclaiming 'I hate the West' should live somewhere else. Perhaps the East, or maybe Mars, or some other location wouldn't offend their delicate sensibilities and they'd be happier there.

Alas, I have a feeling the 'I hate the West' contingent isn't leaving anytime soon.

Well, while they're still in the West, they should stop using and enjoying the benefits of Western culture, inventions and technology.

If you hate the West, stop using Western invented airplanes, cars, televisions, light bulbs, radios, air conditioners, telephones, hospitals and medicines. This will allow you to get more in touch with your 'native' roots.

As a matter of fact, quit using the Western invented computer and Internet to deliver your 'I hate the West' message. You could use tin cans and a string instead. Oh wait, tin cans are a Western invention. Nevermind. Well, there's always smoke signals.
Yes!!! Exactly my point with the italian citizenship! I guess whe won't be hearing from raul again

Most inventions you mentioned are Jewish, not Western. Anyway the Alphabet is Israelite. Without it the West would have done nothing! And please don't add to what I say, I said dislike NOT HATE.
Industrial revolution didn't take place by Jews alone that decided to invent something.
Anyway, you're 'disliking' Jews and Gentiles that contributed to Western Civilisation, and you're 'disliking' the Jews/Gentiles that are willing to defend Western Civilisation.
You like to defend Natives, and the Jews of 3000 BC, but you obviously 'dislike' your own Western & Italian  roots , which is a sin !!
You are against JTF! You do not subscribe the motto 'Save Israel, save America, and save the Western World'.

I welcome you to your native country Europe , and to leave Argentina.

But your self-hate is of no use to our struggle against Islam , or third-worldisation of the Western Civilised World.

I urge you to become a self-loving man.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 14, 2007, 12:35:48 AM

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Seriously, do you believe this?

You really think that people turn dark because one of their group sinned?

Do you actually tell people this?

According to Midrash, the descendants of Ham turned black because of his sins.
Provide a source.

http://jewishurbanlegends.blogspot.com/2004/07/noahs-son-was-cursed-with-black-skin.html
Those are legends. Anyway, in the Tanach itself (and not a legend) it says someone punished by changing his skin to white.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 12:38:54 AM

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Seriously, do you believe this?

You really think that people turn dark because one of their group sinned?

Do you actually tell people this?

According to Midrash, the descendants of Ham turned black because of his sins.
Provide a source.

http://jewishurbanlegends.blogspot.com/2004/07/noahs-son-was-cursed-with-black-skin.html
Those are legends. Anyway, in the Tanach itself (and not a legend) it says someone punished by changing his skin to white.

Midrash is legends. I never said otherwise. But it's still the only explaination as to why some people are black with big lips when we all have the same ancestors.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 14, 2007, 12:41:40 AM
Yes, but you don't see Jews going around saying they hate the West now do you, Raul!

I don't think JTF is the place for you, as Ambiorix said
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 14, 2007, 12:45:14 AM

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Seriously, do you believe this?

You really think that people turn dark because one of their group sinned?

Do you actually tell people this?

According to Midrash, the descendants of Ham turned black because of his sins.
Provide a source.

http://jewishurbanlegends.blogspot.com/2004/07/noahs-son-was-cursed-with-black-skin.html
Those are legends. Anyway, in the Tanach itself (and not a legend) it says someone punished by changing his skin to white.

Midrash is legends. I never said otherwise. But it's still the only explaination as to why some people are black with big lips when we all have the same ancestors.
You can't take legend as an expelnation. By the way, the blacks in africa, at least those I saw, don't have that big lips as those that live in America have.  ???
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 12:46:58 AM

G_d made them white.

They turned black because of the sin of kush.
Seriously, do you believe this?

You really think that people turn dark because one of their group sinned?

Do you actually tell people this?

According to Midrash, the descendants of Ham turned black because of his sins.
Provide a source.

http://jewishurbanlegends.blogspot.com/2004/07/noahs-son-was-cursed-with-black-skin.html
Those are legends. Anyway, in the Tanach itself (and not a legend) it says someone punished by changing his skin to white.

Midrash is legends. I never said otherwise. But it's still the only explaination as to why some people are black with big lips when we all have the same ancestors.
You can't take legend as an expelnation. By the way, the blacks in africa, at least those I saw, don't have that big lips as those that live in America have.  ???

We've just had a flood of african immigrants come here. They've got lips like inner tubes.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 01:06:11 AM
Quote
Industrial revolution didn't take place by Jews alone that decided to invent something.
Anyway, you're 'disliking' Jews and Gentiles that contributed to Western Civilisation, and you're 'disliking' the Jews/Gentiles that are willing to defend Western Civilisation.
You like to defend Natives, and the Jews of 3000 B.C.E., but you obviously 'dislike' your own Western & Italian  roots , which is a sin !!
You are against JTF! You do not subscribe the motto 'Save Israel, save America, and save the Western World'.

I welcome you to your native country Europe , and to leave Argentina.

But your self-hate is of no use to our struggle against Islam , or third-worldisation of the Western Civilised World.

I urge you to become a self-loving man.


First of all I don't hate my roots and I don't hate Western White race. Remember that I defend the Falklanders and call them natives/ firstcome, and they are white. It's Western and modern lifestyle that I dislike. Just because it claims to erase national identities. I claim each ethnicity must have its own identity, not just a globalized meaningless Western label.
I defend native's rights but it doesn't mean that I share all native's values and cultures. I just claim respect for them.
Regarding Jews, they were not Western in 3000 BCE and they are not Western now. They cling to their Eternal Torah.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 01:27:51 AM
Newman, I am not taking sides, but for the record, Britain won the Malvinas war because of American-supplied Sidewinder missiles, which were more advanced than anything in the AAF.

Otherwise, Argentina was roughly equipped the same as South Africa at the same time period.

How curious. Some people here hate me for living in Argentina. However you, C.F.,have just written "Malvinas" instead of Falkland and nobody has rebuked you. It seems that the Falkland war is just used to bash me, they don't really care about Islanders!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 01:44:17 AM
Newman, I am not taking sides, but for the record, Britain won the Malvinas war because of American-supplied Sidewinder missiles, which were more advanced than anything in the AAF.

Otherwise, Argentina was roughly equipped the same as South Africa at the same time period.

LOL!

Close range air-air missiles don't win an air-land-sea war.

Wars are won by SUPERIOR soldiers, sailors and airmen.

Like the 500 Brits of 2Para who engaged then captured 1000 dug in argies at Goose Green.

BTW,

It's the 'Falklands', not 'Malvinas'.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 14, 2007, 01:52:00 AM
Quote
Industrial revolution didn't take place by Jews alone that decided to invent something.
Anyway, you're 'disliking' Jews and Gentiles that contributed to Western Civilisation, and you're 'disliking' the Jews/Gentiles that are willing to defend Western Civilisation.
You like to defend Natives, and the Jews of 3000 B.C.E., but you obviously 'dislike' your own Western & Italian  roots , which is a sin !!
You are against JTF! You do not subscribe the motto 'Save Israel, save America, and save the Western World'.

I welcome you to your native country Europe , and to leave Argentina.

But your self-hate is of no use to our struggle against Islam , or third-worldisation of the Western Civilised World.

I urge you to become a self-loving man.


First of all I don't hate my roots and I don't hate Western White race.
You haven't told us anything in favour of your 'roots' , even if you mean what you say now, the message is perceive as anti -Italian/European/Western.  I do believe you mean it , but frankly you this is the first post i see where you try to  defend your roots. You should be doing that !! But instead you always mention the 'rights' of the natives. i find that concept utterly insane.
No European nation/ethnic group that inhabits its country today, was native inhabitant of it.
In that respect, you should not only condemn the White Man's colonisation of the Americas, Africa, Australia, but also all territory the Bask people lost, t Gaellic, the Franks, etc, etc.
Fact of the matter is , that you try to prove a point, untill the point becomes absurd.
In the Bible , there has been fighting between nations as well. Why don't apply your logic to them?


Remember that I defend the Falklanders and call them natives/ firstcome, and they are white.
Defending the Falklands are British. OK. What else of Western Civilisation do you defend?
It's Western and modern lifestyle that I dislike.
Me too. What about Western lifestyle before 1900?
Do you reject that as well?
Do you reject Baroque Cathedrals? Italian Expresso? Italian Wine? Italian Language? Italian / Roman History? Do you reject Antonio Vivaldi? Do you reject virigin 1st class olive oil? limoncello? Do you reject Michelangelo? Guglielmo Marconi ?
Oriana Fallaci? Alessandro Manzoni?Sandro Botticelli? Leonardo da Vinci? Filippo Brunelleschi? Maurizio Pollini? Vincenzo Bellini?

No?

than stand up and defend it !

Just because it claims to erase national identities.
Agreed. But I don't defend 'national identities of nations that ceased to exist.
The 'national identity' and Nation of Italy didn't exist before 1900. Instead you had about 37 sub-entities.

I claim each ethnicity must have its own identity, not just a globalized meaningless Western label.

PROTECTING THE IDENTITY OF YOUR OWN ETHNICITY COMES FIRST!!

Agreed. You could however make some posts about all the things you say now, and give a change to your idiot anti-western comments. You certainly have a problem in missing your Italian roots. That's obvious , reading what you posted.

You don't attack the "third-worldisation of europe in your posts untill now. You only defend the 'natives' , the victims of colonisation, the people who lost their identity and so on.

Please come back to Europe, and help us, to fight for the conservation of our identity.


I defend native's rights but it doesn't mean that I share all native's values and cultures. I just claim respect for them.
you should be doing more meaningful things than that. DEFEND YOUR OWN CULTURE!!!

Regarding Jews, they were not Western in 3000 BCE and they are not Western now. They cling to their Eternal Torah.

IF YOU'RE NOT A JEW, THAN DEFEND YOUR OWN COUNTRY!! YOU ARE PART OF A WESTERN NATION AND YOU ARE SUBVERSIVE.
YOU DO NOT WANT TO SAVE OUR CULTURE/NATIONS/CIVILISATION.
YOU ARE AGAINST YOUR OWN ROOTS IN NOT TAKING THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO BACK TO ITALY.
IT IS PAINFUL FOR ME TO SEE YOU ARE LOOSING YOUR LIFE IN THAT COUNTRY, YOU CLAIM WAS DESTROYED BY EUROPEANS.
WELL, IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT COME BACK.

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: JTFFan on December 14, 2007, 01:57:12 AM
Quote
Industrial revolution didn't take place by Jews alone that decided to invent something.
Anyway, you're 'disliking' Jews and Gentiles that contributed to Western Civilisation, and you're 'disliking' the Jews/Gentiles that are willing to defend Western Civilisation.
You like to defend Natives, and the Jews of 3000 B.C.E., but you obviously 'dislike' your own Western & Italian  roots , which is a sin !!
You are against JTF! You do not subscribe the motto 'Save Israel, save America, and save the Western World'.

I welcome you to your native country Europe , and to leave Argentina.

But your self-hate is of no use to our struggle against Islam , or third-worldisation of the Western Civilised World.

I urge you to become a self-loving man.


First of all I don't hate my roots and I don't hate Western White race.
You haven't told us anything in favour of your 'roots' , even if you mean what you say now, the message is perceive as anti -Italian/European/Western.  I do believe you mean it , but frankly you this is the first post i see where you try to  defend your roots. You should be doing that !! But instead you always mention the 'rights' of the natives. i find that concept utterly insane.
No European nation/ethnic group that inhabits its country today, was native inhabitant of it.
In that respect, you should not only condemn the White Man's colonisation of the Americas, Africa, Australia, but also all territory the Bask people lost, t Gaellic, the Franks, etc, etc.
Fact of the matter is , that you try to prove a point, untill the point becomes absurd.
In the Bible , there has been fighting between nations as well. Why don't apply your logic to them?


Remember that I defend the Falklanders and call them natives/ firstcome, and they are white.
Defending the Falklands are British. OK. What else of Western Civilisation do you defend?
It's Western and modern lifestyle that I dislike.
Me too. What about Western lifestyle before 1900?
Do you reject that as well?
Do you reject Baroque Cathedrals? Italian Expresso? Italian Wine? Italian Language? Italian / Roman History? Do you reject Antonio Vivaldi? Do you reject virigin 1st class olive oil? limoncello? Do you reject Michelangelo? Guglielmo Marconi ?
Oriana Fallaci? Alessandro Manzoni?Sandro Botticelli? Leonardo da Vinci? Filippo Brunelleschi? Maurizio Pollini? Vincenzo Bellini?

No?

than stand up and defend it !

Just because it claims to erase national identities.
Agreed. But I don't defend 'national identities of nations that ceased to exist.
The 'national identity' and Nation of Italy didn't exist before 1900. Instead you had about 37 sub-entities.

I claim each ethnicity must have its own identity, not just a globalized meaningless Western label.

PROTECTING THE IDENTITY OF YOUR OWN ETHNICITY COMES FIRST!!

Agreed. You could however make some posts about all the things you say now, and give a change to your idiot anti-western comments. You certainly have a problem in missing your Italian roots. That's obvious , reading what you posted.

You don't attack the "third-worldisation of europe in your posts untill now. You only defend the 'natives' , the victims of colonisation, the people who lost their identity and so on.

Please come back to Europe, and help us, to fight for the conservation of our identity.


I defend native's rights but it doesn't mean that I share all native's values and cultures. I just claim respect for them.
you should be doing more meaningful things than that. DEFEND YOUR OWN CULTURE!!!

Regarding Jews, they were not Western in 3000 BCE and they are not Western now. They cling to their Eternal Torah.

IF YOU'RE NOT A JEW, THAN DEFEND YOUR OWN COUNTRY!! YOU ARE PART OF A WESTERN NATION AND YOU ARE SUBVERSIVE.
YOU DO NOT WANT TO SAVE OUR CULTURE/NATIONS/CIVILISATION.
YOU ARE AGAINST YOUR OWN ROOTS IN NOT TAKING THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO BACK TO ITALY.
IT IS PAINFUL FOR ME TO SEE YOU ARE LOOSING YOUR LIFE IN THAT COUNTRY, YOU CLAIM WAS DESTROYED BY EUROPEANS.
WELL, IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT COME BACK.


Well said, Ambiorix.  O0 The ethnicity and culture shouldn't be lost to nazi muSSlim arabs in Europe and in belgium etc.  O0

You have to try to awaken your country with JTF's message!  O0
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 02:12:55 AM
Ambiorix, in fact my family came form different parts of Italy, not exactly Venezzia. But I'd like to go to Venice if I had the money to travel. But it's difficult to explain the reasons here, especially since English is not my native language. When I aimed to convert to Judaism, my dream was to pray the Havdalah ( end of Shabat prayer) in Venice one Saturday evening, before going to Israel. Now, that I have decided not to convert, I'd just simply stay there. (If I had the money)
Regarding the Basque country, I claim it must be independent. That's another reason for me to be bitter about Spain and France who anexxed it.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 14, 2007, 02:16:26 AM
Ambiorix, in fact my family came form different parts of Italy, not exactly Venezzia. But I'd like to go to Venice if I had the money to travel. But it's difficult to explain the reasons here, especially since English is not my native language. When I aimed to convert to Judaism, my dream was to pray the Havdalah ( end of Shabat prayer) in Venice one Saturday evening, before going to Israel. Now, that I have decided not to convert, I'd just simply stay there. (If I had the money)
Regarding the Basque country, I claim it must be independent. That's another reason for me to be bitter about Spain and France who anexxed it.

Do you have relatives or friends willing to help you returning to Italy?

BTW the Romans also colonised, you can't undo that .
That even makes the fact that we have a more or less unified Europe.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 02:32:15 AM
Ambiorix, in fact my family came form different parts of Italy, not exactly Venezzia. But I'd like to go to Venice if I had the money to travel. But it's difficult to explain the reasons here, especially since English is not my native language. When I aimed to convert to Judaism, my dream was to pray the Havdalah ( end of Shabat prayer) in Venice one Saturday evening, before going to Israel. Now, that I have decided not to convert, I'd just simply stay there. (If I had the money)
Regarding the Basque country, I claim it must be independent. That's another reason for me to be bitter about Spain and France who anexxed it.

Do you have relatives or friends willing to help you returning to Italy?

BTW the Romans also colonised, you can't undo that .
That even makes the fact that we have a more or less unified Europe.

In fact I agree with Margareth Thatcher's opinion that Europe would be stronger if each country preserved its identity, instead of a unified EU. I never agreed to Euro.
Regarding returning to Italy, I have enough money to travel but not to make a living there. My relatives are even poorer than me and.... friends????.....nobody would help a pro-Jewish activist here. I must be glad if people here at least don't destroy my front door or stone me in the street!!!!! It's happened many times!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 14, 2007, 03:29:34 AM
Quote
Use your brains!!!

Go through the UN voting records on the link I just posted and COUNT the number of times meck-sicko has voted against Israel versus the number of times the USA has!
It's bloody obvious!!!!!!!

Heck... Just look at the incident of the Jew that was beaten up for wishing the other guy a Happy Hannukkah in the New York subway. If  this had taken place in the Mexican Subway it would look something like this.
Christian: "Merry Xmas"
Jew: "Happy Hannukkah"
Then the Christian would have said either:
         "Gracias patron!" (thankyou chief!) 
         "Que es Hannukkah?" (What is Hannukkah)
         "Este es un asalto" (This is a robbery. Give me all of your money)

Newman, Newman, Newman. You gotta cut down on the barrels of Fosters that you are drinking.  What is worse?

1) A country with a low record of anti-semetism voting against Israel (just like the other 200 nations)
2) A country that "openly supports" little heroic Israel and yet has bent itself backwards trying to destroy it?

COUNT the numbers of times that the USA has harmed Israel: Allen Dulles, 6 Day War, Yom Kippur, Camp David, Annapolis.

UN wise Australia is a great friend of Israel....but anti-semetism is on the rise


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29841 (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29841)


   
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 14, 2007, 03:39:26 AM
I don't hate you for living in Argentina! In fact, Argentina and Chilli are my most favourite South American countries!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 04:06:11 AM
Quote
Use your brains!!!

Go through the UN voting records on the link I just posted and COUNT the number of times meck-sicko has voted against Israel versus the number of times the USA has!
It's bloody obvious!!!!!!!

Heck... Just look at the incident of the Jew that was beaten up for wishing the other guy a Happy Hannukkah in the New York subway. If  this had taken place in the Mexican Subway it would look something like this.
Christian: "Merry Xmas"
Jew: "Happy Hannukkah"
Then the Christian would have said either:
         "Gracias patron!" (thankyou chief!) 
         "Que es Hannukkah?" (What is Hannukkah)
         "Este es un asalto" (This is a robbery. Give me all of your money)

Newman, Newman, Newman. You gotta cut down on the barrels of Fosters that you are drinking.  What is worse?

1) A country with a low record of anti-semetism voting against Israel (just like the other 200 nations)
2) A country that "openly supports" little heroic Israel and yet has bent itself backwards trying to destroy it?

COUNT the numbers of times that the USA has harmed Israel: Allen Dulles, 6 Day War, Yom Kippur, Camp David, Annapolis.

UN wise Australia is a great friend of Israel....but anti-semetism is on the rise


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29841 (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29841)


   


"On the rise" is relative. From a VERY low base.

And mexico is still 50 times as anti-semitic as the USA. You're in denial to think otherwise. Trying to find any latino who is NOT an anti-semite is like looking for a needle in a haystack. This forum is the ONLY place I've 'seen' any.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 04:08:07 AM
I must be glad if people here at least don't destroy my front door or stone me in the street!!!!! It's happened many times!!!!

Raul,

Has it occured to you that they're not stoning you for being pro-Jewish but because you're the village idiot?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 14, 2007, 04:27:25 AM


In fact I agree with Margareth Thatcher's opinion that Europe would be stronger if each country preserved its identity, instead of a unified EU. I never agreed to Euro.
well, I think the EU superstate is bad for Europe as well.
Regarding returning to Italy, I have enough money to travel but not to make a living there. My relatives are even poorer than me and.... friends????.....nobody would help a pro-Jewish activist here. I must be glad if people here at least don't destroy my front door or stone me in the street!!!!! It's happened many times!!!!

Do you have diplomas that could enable you to find a job in Italy?




Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 14, 2007, 04:28:45 AM
Maybe not I am think the whole village are idiots. If you going to break a persons door down that is step one.

Step two fire bomb it.

Step three toast marshmellows over the flames while slipping hot coco.  8;)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Muck DeFuslims on December 14, 2007, 04:55:58 AM
Newman, I am not taking sides, but for the record, Britain won the Malvinas war because of American-supplied Sidewinder missiles, which were more advanced than anything in the AAF.

Otherwise, Argentina was roughly equipped the same as South Africa at the same time period.

LOL!

Close range air-air missiles don't win an air-land-sea war.

Wars are won by SUPERIOR soldiers, sailors and airmen.

Like the 500 Brits of 2Para who engaged then captured 1000 dug in argies at Goose Green.

BTW,

It's the 'Falklands', not 'Malvinas'.

Man, this thread is making me feel old.

Unlike alot of posters on this forum, I can actually remember the Malvinas Falklands war.

I'm glad you mentioned Goose Green, Newman. Due to my advancing age and senility I couldn't remember the name of that place.

However, I do remember reading an article detailing the manpower and situational aspects of the battle for Goose Green before it occurred and remarking to my father that the Brits are going to have a hard time taking the place. Vastly outnumbered, and facing a well dug in opponent, thousands of miles from home---Goose Green appeared to me to be a very tough nut to crack.

My dad just gave me a wry smile and told me 'The Brits will go through them like a hot knife through butter'. I wasn't convinced. A few days later, I had to admit my old man was right.

Goose Green really was a testament to the fighting ability and determination of those Brits.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 05:02:08 AM
Newman, I am not taking sides, but for the record, Britain won the Malvinas war because of American-supplied Sidewinder missiles, which were more advanced than anything in the AAF.

Otherwise, Argentina was roughly equipped the same as South Africa at the same time period.

LOL!

Close range air-air missiles don't win an air-land-sea war.

Wars are won by SUPERIOR soldiers, sailors and airmen.

Like the 500 Brits of 2Para who engaged then captured 1000 dug in argies at Goose Green.

BTW,

It's the 'Falklands', not 'Malvinas'.

Man, this thread is making me feel old.

Unlike alot of posters on this forum, I can actually remember the Malvinas Falklands war.

I'm glad you mentioned Goose Green, Newman. Due to my advancing age and senility I couldn't remember the name of that place.

However, I do remember reading an article detailing the manpower and situational aspects of the battle for Goose Green before it occurred and remarking to my father that the Brits are going to have a hard time taking the place. Vastly outnumbered, and facing a well dug in opponent, thousands of miles from home---Goose Green appeared to me to be a very tough nut to crack.

My dad just gave me a wry smile and told me 'The Brits will go through them like a hot knife through butter'. I wasn't convinced. A few days later, I had to admit my old man was right.

Goose Green really was a testament to the fighting ability and determination of those Brits.

Of coarse that was a generation ago.

Todays generation of Brits would have undergone sensitivity training and apologised to the 'nice argentines' for their anglo-saxon racist history, handed the falklands over along with a years supply of pork pies!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 05:10:33 AM
I must be glad if people here at least don't destroy my front door or stone me in the street!!!!! It's happened many times!!!!

Raul,

Has it occured to you that they're not stoning you for being pro-Jewish but because you're the village idiot?

No need of so many posts, I already know you hate me so much as the people of this town!!!! They hate me for defending the Jews, but also for being completely different to most people. For my strange way of speaking, and for many things..... and you are just like them. But Hashem made the world for everyone!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 14, 2007, 05:16:21 AM
look, we don't hate you, we just strongly oppose your views O0
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 05:19:07 AM
look, we don't hate you, we just strongly oppose your views O0

The message was for Newman. He seems to hate me at the very most.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 05:23:06 AM
look, we don't hate you, we just strongly oppose your views O0

The message was for Newman. He seems to hate me at the very most.

"I don't hate him. I pity the fool!"
(http://aycu06.webshots.com/image/36805/2005430150794233643_rs.jpg) (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2005430150794233643)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 14, 2007, 06:44:34 AM
Of coarse that was a generation ago.

Todays generation of Brits would have undergone sensitivity training and apologised to the 'nice argentines' for their anglo-saxon racist history, handed the falklands over along with a years supply of pork pies!

And todays generation has more history to learn.  ::)

Brits have been spoon feed this multicultural rubbish, with the introduction of more Blacks in the media, they have been raised on the TV diet and MTV baby sitter, the kids of today see it completely natural to side with any coloured race.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 07:18:26 AM
Of coarse that was a generation ago.

Todays generation of Brits would have undergone sensitivity training and apologised to the 'nice argentines' for their anglo-saxon racist history, handed the falklands over along with a years supply of pork pies!

And todays generation has more history to learn.  ::)

Brits have been spoon feed this multicultural rubbish, with the introduction of more Blacks in the media, they have been raised on the TV diet and MTV baby sitter, the kids of today see it completely natural to side with any coloured race.

What's wrong with befriending people of different races? The only problem may be marrying, because both races mix and lose their identity ( and some may want to preserve it).
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 14, 2007, 07:20:28 AM
Of coarse that was a generation ago.

Todays generation of Brits would have undergone sensitivity training and apologised to the 'nice argentines' for their anglo-saxon racist history, handed the falklands over along with a years supply of pork pies!

And todays generation has more history to learn.  ::)

Brits have been spoon feed this multicultural rubbish, with the introduction of more Blacks in the media, they have been raised on the TV diet and MTV baby sitter, the kids of today see it completely natural to side with any coloured race.

What's wrong with befriending people of different races? The only problem may be marrying, because both races mix and lose their identity ( and some may want to preserve it).

I didn't befriend I said SIDE, when you go against your own race.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 07:24:42 AM
Of coarse that was a generation ago.

Todays generation of Brits would have undergone sensitivity training and apologised to the 'nice argentines' for their anglo-saxon racist history, handed the falklands over along with a years supply of pork pies!

And todays generation has more history to learn.  ::)

Brits have been spoon feed this multicultural rubbish, with the introduction of more Blacks in the media, they have been raised on the TV diet and MTV baby sitter, the kids of today see it completely natural to side with any coloured race.

What's wrong with befriending people of different races? The only problem may be marrying, because both races mix and lose their identity ( and some may want to preserve it).

I didn't befriend I said SIDE, when you go against your own race.

What do you expect from an idiot who hates the west that's provided EVERYTHING advanced or civilised but loves every primitive and cannibal who do nothing but chop each other up?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 14, 2007, 07:32:13 AM
 I expect nothing, so I am never disappointed  :::D
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 07:39:25 AM
Quote
What do you expect from an idiot who hates the west that's provided EVERYTHING advanced or civilised but loves every primitive and cannibal who do nothing but chop each other up?

Aren't the 231 gates primitive sounds? But however the beggining of language and Creation!!!!!! Wasn't Edenics primitive?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 07:53:40 AM
Quote
What do you expect from an idiot who hates the west that's provided EVERYTHING advanced or civilised but loves every primitive and cannibal who do nothing but chop each other up?

Aren't the 231 gates primitive sounds? But however the beggining of language and Creation!!!!!! Wasn't Edenics primitive?
So you support people of 6,000 years ago who are long dead?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 08:04:29 AM
Quote
What do you expect from an idiot who hates the west that's provided EVERYTHING advanced or civilised but loves every primitive and cannibal who do nothing but chop each other up?

Aren't the 231 gates primitive sounds? But however the beggining of language and Creation!!!!!! Wasn't Edenics primitive?
So you support people of 6,000 years ago who are long dead?

I just say not to hate the primitive. In the same way you hate anything old, the anti-Semites hate Jews for believing in the 3319 (3685 according to Samaritan records) years old Torah.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 08:16:34 AM
Quote
What do you expect from an idiot who hates the west that's provided EVERYTHING advanced or civilised but loves every primitive and cannibal who do nothing but chop each other up?

Aren't the 231 gates primitive sounds? But however the beggining of language and Creation!!!!!! Wasn't Edenics primitive?
So you support people of 6,000 years ago who are long dead?

I just say not to hate the primitive. In the same way you hate anything old, the anti-Semites hate Jews for believing in the 3319 (3685 according to Samaritan records) years old Torah.

I WILL hate primitives when they engage in evil. You are just predisposed to hating westerners and loving primitives without sound reasons which is completely stupid.

How can you believe in saving Israel and NOT saving the west?

If the west is lost to iSSlam, all it's nukes will be aimed at Israel. You're either a fool or you don't really care about Israel.

You can't separate them. Israel is western country (democratic, civilised, market economy, Judaic-christian religion). If the west goes down it will be much darker for Israel.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Boeregeneraal on December 14, 2007, 08:22:37 AM
Quote
What do you expect from an idiot who hates the west that's provided EVERYTHING advanced or civilised but loves every primitive and cannibal who do nothing but chop each other up?

Aren't the 231 gates primitive sounds? But however the beggining of language and Creation!!!!!! Wasn't Edenics primitive?
So you support people of 6,000 years ago who are long dead?

I just say not to hate the primitive. In the same way you hate anything old, the anti-Semites hate Jews for believing in the 3319 (3685 according to Samaritan records) years old Torah.

I WILL hate primitives when they engage in evil. You are just predisposed to hating westerners and loving primitives without sound reasons which is completely stupid.

How can you believe in saving Israel and NOT saving the west?

If the west is lost to iSSlam, all it's nukes will be aimed at Israel. You're either a fool or you don't really care about Israel.

You can't separate them. Israel is western country (democratic, civilised, market economy, Judaic-christian religion). If the west goes down it will be much darker for Israel.

Newman is VERY right. If the west is destroyed, Israel is destroyed! simple as 123
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 14, 2007, 08:35:20 AM
Israel is:
Democratic: unfortunately Arabs and non believing Jews can vote.
Western: Secular goverment cares about what the west says, and hesitates to wipe out Palis once and for all.
Free Market: Contrary to Torah which orders lands cannot be sold, but only rented for 49 years.
Civilised: Yes, noone gets lashes for eating non-Kosher, the west would say Jews are barbaric if a Sanhedrin reinstated lashes......
Judeo-Christian religion: Wrong! Israel is Jewish religious, (except for the fact that the secular Govt. has adopted the Christian precept of not resisting the enemies)



Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 14, 2007, 11:26:39 AM
Quote
"On the rise" is relative. From a VERY low base.

And mexico is still 50 times as anti-semitic as the USA. You're in denial to think otherwise. Trying to find any latino who is NOT an anti-semite is like looking for a needle in a haystack. This forum is the ONLY place I've 'seen' any.

You still don't answer my question. I rest my case .....you cannot debate with Newman.

Mexico just like any other country suffers from anti-semetism. But it pales in comparison to the anti-semetism the that Jews experience in the USA, the West and other Hispanic countries:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/vjw/Mexico.html (http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/vjw/Mexico.html)

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 14, 2007, 11:40:31 AM
Israel is:
Democratic: unfortunately Arabs and non believing Jews can vote.
Western: Secular goverment cares about what the west says, and hesitates to wipe out Palis once and for all.
Free Market: Contrary to Torah which orders lands cannot be sold, but only rented for 49 years.
Civilised: Yes, noone gets lashes for eating non-Kosher, the west would say Jews are barbaric if a Sanhedrin reinstated lashes......
Judeo-Christian religion: Wrong! Israel is Jewish religious, (except for the fact that the secular Govt. has adopted the Christian precept of not resisting the enemies)




Israel is not seculer, there is no seperation between Judaism and state. Plus, the animel "seculer Jews" in Israel is very very rare, most of the "Seculer" Jews are actually tradional Jews +-. And, there is no reason non believer Jews wouldn't be allowed to vote, most revesionist Zionism founders were seculer, litterrly, without the non-Believer Jews there was no Zionism.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Muck DeFuslims on December 14, 2007, 12:18:41 PM
Raul, I realize English isn't your first language, but please learn how to spell the words Semite and anti-Semitism.

If you can't spell it correctly, your comments about it lose credibility.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dexter on December 14, 2007, 01:00:24 PM
Raul, I realize English isn't your first language, but please learn how to spell the words Semite and anti-Semitism.

If you can't spell it correctly, your comments about it lose credibility.
As long as you understand the points he tries to pass, there is no reason his comments will lose credibility.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 02:54:58 PM
Quote
"On the rise" is relative. From a VERY low base.

And mexico is still 50 times as anti-semitic as the USA. You're in denial to think otherwise. Trying to find any latino who is NOT an anti-semite is like looking for a needle in a haystack. This forum is the ONLY place I've 'seen' any.

You still don't answer my question. I rest my case .....you cannot debate with Newman.

Mexico just like any other country suffers from anti-semetism. But it pales in comparison to the anti-semetism the that Jews experience in the USA, the West and other Hispanic countries:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/vjw/Mexico.html (http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/vjw/Mexico.html)



What garbage!

News have never had it so good as in the USA/ Canada or Austalia. Why do say few live in that latino sh*thole by comparrison?

And comparing the number of anti-semitic incidents (an unemployed teenager yelling 'kyke' counts as one) is nothing as compared with government policy.

Mexico IS an anti-semitic country.

LOOK AT THE VOTING RECORD SINCE 1947.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 14, 2007, 03:22:50 PM
Quote
What garbage!
Whoa ! Mr.Newman....aren't we a little sensitive today ?  ^-^

Quote
Why do say few live in that latino sh*thole by comparrison?
This is not the question is it ?

Quote
And comparing the number of anti-semitic incidents (an unemployed teenager yelling 'kyke' counts as one) is nothing as compared with government policy.
This shows that you read only what YOU want to read. Did you not see my earlier posts about the USA treasoning little heroic Israel ? I think jeopardizing and at times activley working to bring to an end Israel's existance is far worse than a UN vote. By the way ....were you aware that there were over 450 Anti-Semetic incidents in Australia in 2004 alone?

http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2004/s1258570.htm (http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2004/s1258570.htm)
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 03:28:56 PM
Quote
What garbage!
Whoa ! Mr.Newman....aren't we a little sensitive today ?  ^-^

Quote
Why do say few live in that latino sh*thole by comparrison?
This is not the question is it ?

Quote
And comparing the number of anti-semitic incidents (an unemployed teenager yelling 'kyke' counts as one) is nothing as compared with government policy.
This shows that you read only what YOU want to read. Did you not see my earlier posts about the USA treasoning little heroic Israel ? I think jeopardizing and at times activley working to bring to an end Israel's existance is far worse than a UN vote. By the way ....were you aware that there were over 450 Anti-Semetic incidents in Australia in 2004 alone?

http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2004/s1258570.htm (http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2004/s1258570.htm)

Yes.

But compare that number (and the type/severity of incidents) to Russia, Poland and other countries AS WELL AS their governments voting record. Keep in mind that record keeping of such things in third world countries like Mexico is not accurate or corrupt.

BTW,

Every anti-Israel motion in the UN is an attempt to destroy/weaken Israel. So mexico with it's shockingly anti-semitic voting record is still 50 times worse than the USA.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 14, 2007, 03:52:58 PM
Quote
Yes.

But compare that number (and the type/severity of incidents) to Russia, Poland and other countries AS WELL AS their governments voting record. Keep in mind that record keeping of such things in third world countries like Mexico is not accurate or corrupt.

BTW,

Every anti-Israel motion in the UN is an attempt to destroy/weaken Israel. So mexico with it's shockingly anti-semitic voting record is still 50 times worse than the USA.

50 times worse than the USA?  Again I ask the question that you refuse to answer directly. What is worse ?

1) A country with a low record of anti-semetism voting against Israel (just like the other 200 nations)
2) A country that "openly supports" little heroic Israel and yet has bent itself backwards trying to destroy it?

COUNT the numbers of times that the USA has harmed Israel: Allen Dulles, 6 Day War, Yom Kippur War, Camp David, Annapolis.

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: newman on December 14, 2007, 03:59:39 PM
Quote
Yes.

But compare that number (and the type/severity of incidents) to Russia, Poland and other countries AS WELL AS their governments voting record. Keep in mind that record keeping of such things in third world countries like Mexico is not accurate or corrupt.

BTW,

Every anti-Israel motion in the UN is an attempt to destroy/weaken Israel. So mexico with it's shockingly anti-semitic voting record is still 50 times worse than the USA.

50 times worse than the USA?  Again I ask the question that you refuse to answer directly. What is worse ?

1) A country with a low record of anti-semetism voting against Israel (just like the other 200 nations)
2) A country that "openly supports" little heroic Israel and yet has bent itself backwards trying to destroy it?

COUNT the numbers of times that the USA has harmed Israel: Allen Dulles, 6 Day War, Yom Kippur War, Camp David, Annapolis.



1/ "Just like other countries" (not ALL countries, BTW) doesn't make it OK.

2/ I didn't say the USA was perfect. But keep in mind the overall record of the USA is still 50 times better than third world mexico. The  USA would NOT be considered a righteous country otherwise.

It's interesting that after being proved wrong about your original (incorrect) statements about meck-sicko's voting record you now grasp at straws by trying to make other nations seem as bad.

You're like a german trying to defend nazis by saying "but look at Britain denying entry to EY". :::D
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Kiwi on December 15, 2007, 06:52:56 PM
Quote
What garbage!
Whoa ! Mr.Newman....aren't we a little sensitive today ?  ^-^

Quote
Why do say few live in that latino sh*thole by comparrison?
This is not the question is it ?

Quote
And comparing the number of anti-semitic incidents (an unemployed teenager yelling 'kyke' counts as one) is nothing as compared with government policy.
This shows that you read only what YOU want to read. Did you not see my earlier posts about the USA treasoning little heroic Israel ? I think jeopardizing and at times activley working to bring to an end Israel's existance is far worse than a UN vote. By the way ....were you aware that there were over 450 Anti-Semetic incidents in Australia in 2004 alone?

http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2004/s1258570.htm (http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2004/s1258570.htm)

Yes its true not good, but out of the thousands of crimes every day its very low.
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Raulmarrio2000 on December 16, 2007, 04:50:25 AM
Raul, I realize English isn't your first language, but please learn how to spell the words Semite and anti-Semitism.

If you can't spell it correctly, your comments about it lose credibility.

Where have I written those words uncorrectly?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ambiorix on December 16, 2007, 04:56:09 AM
Raul, I realize English isn't your first language, but please learn how to spell the words Semite and anti-Semitism.

If you can't spell it correctly, your comments about it lose credibility.

Where have I written those words uncorrectly?
should be in
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Ultra Requete on December 16, 2007, 07:13:06 AM
Raul is self hating Italian, and very confused one on the top of this but this is his problem not mine. ::)
And he didn't anything to be banned - just ignore the poor sod. Merkava has right to support the Mexican nationalism over the American one and he do have right that US is more harmful to Israel than Mexico ;) but it's strange he lives between those darn Anglos in UK. ::) 
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Dan on December 16, 2007, 09:16:05 AM
Raul is self hating Italian, and very confused one on the top of this but this is his problem not mine. ::)
And he didn't anything to be banned - just ignore the poor sod. Merkava has right to support the Mexican nationalism over the American one and he do have right that US is more harmful to Israel than Mexico ;) but it's strange he lives between those darn Anglos in UK. ::) 

What? he lives in the UK?
Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 16, 2007, 02:07:00 PM
Quote
1/ "Just like other countries" (not ALL countries, BTW) doesn't make it OK.
Newman, the blows to the head that you have received from boxing with Kangaroos in the dessert have severly crippled your verbal reasoing skills to the point that you misinterpret everything I say on the forum  ..did Merkava ever say that voting against heroic Israel is ok ??

Quote
2/ I didn't say the USA was perfect. But keep in mind the overall record of the USA is still 50 times better than third world mexico. The  USA would NOT be considered a righteous country otherwise.
I agree - the overal voting record of the USA is 50 times better than Mexico. But those votes are meaningless when you see their actions

Quote
It's interesting that after being proved wrong about your original (incorrect) statements about meck-sicko's voting record you now grasp at straws by trying to make other nations seem as bad.
Yes...I was wrong on that one and I thankyou for the info  :) But I am not grasping at straws the way you grasp a barrel of Fosters while watching Queer Eye for the Straight Guy. I am putting it into context. Actions speak louder than words.

Title: Re: Raul Marrio
Post by: Merkava on December 16, 2007, 02:13:14 PM
Quote
Raul is self hating Italian, and very confused one on the top of this but this is his problem not mine. Roll Eyes
And he didn't anything to be banned - just ignore the poor sod. Merkava has right to support the Mexican nationalism over the American one and he do have right that US is more harmful to Israel than Mexico Wink but it's strange he lives between those darn Anglos in UK. Roll Eyes

1)I haven't followed Raul's posts closely so I can't comment.

2) I am glad you see my point. I support Mexico to an extent and yes I do live in th UK ! Its a great place. But we have to get rid of these Muslim/Nazi scumbags  >:(